# Griffiths v. Commissioner

> United States Board of Tax Appeals · February 7, 1929 · 15 B.T.A. 252

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4489170

## Case

- **Full name:** JOHN GRIFFITHS, <emphasis typestyle="it">v.</emphasis> COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
- **Court:** United States Board of Tax Appeals
- **Decided:** February 7, 1929
- **Citations:** 15 B.T.A. 252; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2888
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Murdock
- **Judges:** Shith, Trammell, Tbussell, Fossan, Agree, Murdock
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4489170

## Opinion text

Murdock,
dissenting: I dissent from that portion of the foregoing opinion which holds that the fraud penalty should be asserted, for the reason that I think the facts indicate no more than negligence.
Shith, Tbussell, YaN FossaN, and Siefkin agree with this dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4489170. Public record. Not legal advice.
