# Omar Brown v. Federal Express Corporation

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · October 24, 2019

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4449939

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 24, 2019
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Nature of suit:** Civil Rights
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4449939

## Opinion text

Case: 19-10381 Document: 00515172123 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals

No. 19-10381
Fifth Circuit

Summary Calendar FILED
October 24, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce
OMAR A. BROWN, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellant
v.

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:16-CV-1456

Before WIENER, HAYNES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff-Appellant Omar A. Brown, a former long-time employee of
Defendant-Appellee Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”), filed this
employment discrimination lawsuit grounded in his failure to be awarded a
promotion to a position for which he and other employees had applied. FedEx
filed a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of Brown’s lawsuit.
The district court referred the matter to a magistrate judge who considered the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 19-10381 Document: 00515172123 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2019

No. 19-10381
filings and evidence submitted by both parties, then prepared and filed a 22-
page Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, exhaustively considering
the factual allegations and the law applicable to Brown’s complaint. Shortly
after receipt of the magistrate judge’s filing, the district court issued an Order
granting FedEx’s Motion for Summary Judgment. On the same day, the court
issued its Final Judgment, dismissing all of Brown’s claims with prejudice.

We have now considered the record on appeal, including without
limitation the briefs of the parties and the exhaustive report and
recommendation of the magistrate judge. Like the district court before us, we
are convinced that the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant FedEx’s
Motion for Summary Judgment of Dismissal is correct in light of the alleged
facts and the applicable law. We therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal
of Brown’s claims with prejudice.

AFFIRMED.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4449939. Public record. Not legal advice.