# Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

> United States Court of Federal Claims · October 18, 2019

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4448064

## Case

- **Court:** United States Court of Federal Claims
- **Decided:** October 18, 2019
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Nora Beth Dorsey
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4448064

## Opinion text

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 18-1015V
Filed: July 10, 2019
UNPUBLISHED

JESSICA BROWN,

Petitioner, Special Processing Unit (SPU);
v. Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
Causation-In-Fact; Influenza (Flu)
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to
HUMAN SERVICES, Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Respondent.

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
petitioner.
Amy Paula Kokot, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On July 13, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine
Act”). Petitioner alleges that her receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on September 12,
2017, caused her to suffer a left-sided shoulder injury related to vaccine administration
(“SIRVA”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the
Office of Special Masters.

1The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This
means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine
Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the
disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned
agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from
public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this
case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in
accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management
and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
On July 1, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that
petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.
Specifically, respondent states that

[T]he Division of Injury Compensation Programs (“DICP”) . . . [has]
concluded that preponderant evidence establishes that petitioner’s flu
vaccination on September 12, 2017, caused her to develop subacromial
bursitis. In addition, based on the records . . . petitioner’s injury and its
sequela persisted for more than six months after the administration of the
vaccine.

Id. at 4.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the
undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4448064. Public record. Not legal advice.