# George Mendoza, Jr. v. State

> Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · October 17, 2019

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4447895

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
- **Decided:** October 17, 2019
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4447895

## Opinion text

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00714-CR

George Mendoza, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY
NO. 35,161, JUDGE GUILFORD L. JONES, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant George Mendoza, Jr. seeks to appeal his 2010 final judgments of

conviction for the felony offenses of indecency with a child by sexual contact and sexual assault

of a child. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 21.11(a)(1), 22.011. Mendoza’s notice of appeal filed

October 8, 2019, states that he is seeking an out-of-time appeal for an “illegal” and “void”

conviction.

However, the proper vehicle for seeking an out-of-time appeal is a writ of habeas

corpus from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Portley v. State, 89 S.W.3d 188, 189

(Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002, no pet.); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07. This Court has no

jurisdiction to grant such habeas-corpus relief from a final felony conviction. See Board of

Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483
(Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (“Jurisdiction to grant post conviction habeas corpus relief on a final

felony conviction rests exclusively with this Court.”); Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals,

802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (“We are the only court with jurisdiction in final

post-conviction felony proceedings.”); Ex parte Alexander, 685 S.W.2d 57, 60 (Tex. Crim. App.

1985) (“It is well established that only the Court of Criminal Appeals possesses the authority to

grant relief in a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding where there is a final felony

conviction.”).

Moreover, the trial court has certified that this is a plea-bargain case, that

Mendoza has no right of appeal, and that Mendoza has waived the right of appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________
Jeff Rose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Triana and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: October 17, 2019

Do Not Publish

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4447895. Public record. Not legal advice.