# Webb, Dempsey > Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · July 24, 2019 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4419807 ## Case - **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas - **Decided:** July 24, 2019 - **Precedential status:** Published - **Opinion:** Opinion - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4419807 ## Opinion text IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-90,029-01 EX PARTE DEMPSEY WEBB, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR22581-A IN THE 35TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BROWN COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to forty-four years’ imprisonment. The Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Webb v. State, No. 11-14-00186-CR (Tex. App. Brown June 23, 2016) (not designated for publication). Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to adequately cross-examine the victim, failed to investigate extraneous offense evidence used to identify Applicant, and erroneously advised him to reject a plea offer. 2 Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, specifically answering if he cross-examined the victim regarding her description of the attacker, investigated the extraneous offense evidence, and recommended Applicant reject the State’s plea offer. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 3 Filed: July 24, 2019 Do not publish --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4419807. Public record. Not legal advice.