# Oscar Ortiz v. State Farm Lloyds

> Texas Supreme Court · June 28, 2019

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4412787

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 28, 2019
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4412787

## Opinion text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
444444444444
NO. 17-1048
444444444444

OSCAR ORTIZ, PETITIONER,
v.

STATE FARM LLOYDS, RESPONDENT
4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444

CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT, joined by JUSTICE BROWN and JUSTICE BLACKLOCK, concurring in
part and dissenting in part.

I join Parts I, II, III-A, III-B, and III-C of the Court’s opinion. For the reasons I explain today

in dissent from the Court’s opinion in Barbara Technologies Corp. v. State Farm Lloyds,1 I dissent

from Part III-D and from the Court’s judgment insofar as it does not affirm the court of appeals’

judgment in full.

Nathan L. Hecht
Chief Justice

Opinion delivered: June 28, 2019

1
___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. 2019).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4412787. Public record. Not legal advice.