# Opinion

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 29, 1984 · 742 F.2d 170

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/440343

## Case

- **Full name:** Itco Corporation v. Michelin Tire Corporation, Commercial Division, and State of North Carolina, Amicus Curiae. Itco Corporation v. Michelin Tire Corporation, Commercial Division
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 29, 1984
- **Citations:** 742 F.2d 170; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19076
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/440343

## Opinion text

742 F.2d 170
ITCO CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
MICHELIN TIRE CORPORATION, COMMERCIAL DIVISION, Appellee.
and
State of North Carolina, Amicus Curiae.
ITCO CORPORATION, Appellee,
v.
MICHELIN TIRE CORPORATION, COMMERCIAL DIVISION, Appellant.
Nos. 82-2177(L), 82-2178.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Argued April 4, 1984.
Decided Aug. 29, 1984.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., District Judge.
Charles Gordon Brown, Chapel Hills, N.C. (Jordan, Brown, Price & Wall, Chapel Hill, N.C., John R. Jordan, Jr., Jordan, Brown, Price & Wall, Samuel W. Johnson, Meadows, Johnson & Spinks, Rocky Mount, N.C., John F. Dienelt, Brownstein, Zeidman & Schomer, Washington, D.C., on brief), for appellants.
J. Brantley Phillips, Jr., Natalma M. McKnew, Greenville, S.C. (Fletcher C. Mann, Leatherwood, Walker, Tood & Mann, Greenville, S.C., Jerry S. Alvis, Young, Moore, Henderson & Alvis, Raleigh, N.C., on brief), for appellee.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. of N.C., H.A. Cole, Jr., Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., John R. Corne, Associate Atty. Gen., Raleigh, N.C., on brief, as amicus curiae.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
The judgment of the district court is reversed, and this case is remanded for reasons stated in the opinion of the original panel. ITCO Corp. v. Michelin Tire Corp., Commercial Division, 722 F.2d 42 (4th Cir.1983). Judge Russell dissents for the reasons stated in his dissent to the panel opinion. 722 F.2d at 53-55 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/440343. Public record. Not legal advice.