# Tatro v. State Of Texas

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · August 23, 1984 · 741 F.2d 82

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/440000

## Case

- **Full name:** Henri and Mary Tatro, Individually, and as Next Friend of Amber Tatro, a Minor, Cross-Appellants v. The State of Texas, State Board of Education, the Irving Independent School District, Cross-Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 23, 1984
- **Citations:** 741 F.2d 82; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19249
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/440000

## Opinion text

741 F.2d 82
19 Ed. Law Rep. 477
Henri and Mary TATRO, Individually, and as Next Friend of
Amber Tatro, A Minor, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants,
v.
The STATE OF TEXAS, et al., Defendants,
State Board of Education, Defendant-Appellant,
The Irving Independent School District, Defendant-Appellant,
Cross-Appellee.
No. 81-1454.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 23, 1984.
James W. Deatherage, Irving, Tex., for Irving Independent School Dist.
Tally F. Parker, Jr., O. Glenn Weaver, Irving, Tex., amicus curiae for Irving Independent School Dist. and Texas Ass'n of School Administrators.
Mark White, Atty. Gen., John W. Fainter, Jr., 1st Asst. Atty. Gen., Paul R. Gavia, Chief, State and County Affairs, Martha H. Allan, Richard L. Arnett, TEA, Asst. Attys. Gen., Austin, Tex., for State Bd. of Educ.
Craig T. Enoch, James Todd, Austin, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees, cross-appellants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before BROWN, GEE and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
1
As directed by the mandate of the Supreme Court, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 3371 , 82 L.Ed.2d 664 , we vacate our judgment insofar only as it affirms the trial court's award of attorneys' fees, 703 F.2d 823 , and reverse that award. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. It is so
2
ORDERED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/440000. Public record. Not legal advice.