# Raul Amparo Zuniga Rodriguez and Ana Maria Ortiz Martinez, Individually and as Personal Representatives, and Heirs of the Estate of Raul Amparo Zuniga Ortiz Jr. And Juana Guadalupe Martinez, as Next Friend of Sebastian Zuniga and Wendy Zuniga,et Al. v. Conway Waak Jr. and Marlene Waak D/B/A Carmine Charolais Ranch and Carmine Charolais Ranch

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · December 31, 2018

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4355454

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** December 31, 2018
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4355454

## Opinion text

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Raul Amparo Zuniga Rodriguez and Ana Maria Ortiz Martinez,
Individually and as Personal Representatives, and Heirs of the Estate
of Raul Amparo Zuniga Ortiz Jr.; and Juana Guadalupe Martinez, as
next friend of Sebastian Zuniga and Wendy Zuniga,et al. v. Conway
Waak Jr. and Marlene Waak d/b/a Carmine Charolais Ranch and
Carmine Charolais Ranch

Appellate case number: 01-17-00755-CV

Trial court case number: 2014V-262

Trial court: 155th District Court of Fayette County

Date motion filed: September 5, 2018

Party filing motion: appellees

It is ORDERED that the motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes_________________________________
Acting for the Court

The en banc Court consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley,
Bland, Massengale, Brown, Lloyd, and Caughey.

Date: __December 31, 2018__________________

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4355454. Public record. Not legal advice.
