# United States v. Elmer Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 27, 2018

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4354676

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 27, 2018
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4354676

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6993

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ELMER KERMIT BROWN, a/k/a Elmo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (2:11-cr-00035-D-1)

Submitted: December 20, 2018 Decided: December 27, 2018

Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elmer Kermit Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Elmer Kermit Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Muldrow, 844 F.3d 434, 437

(4th Cir. 2016) (reviewing district court’s decision whether to reduce sentence under

§ 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4354676. Public record. Not legal advice.