# Belinda Puntanen, Individually, D/B/A Lar Legal Admin Resources and as Next Best Friend of Z. R. M., a Minor v. Allison Riley Grover, Homes Central Real Estate, Inc., Brian McLaurin and Denzell & Crane, Inc. D/B/A Apple Moving

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · October 25, 2018

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4324779

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** October 25, 2018
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4324779

## Opinion text

Opinion issued October 25, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-18-00845-CV
———————————
BELINDA PUNTANEN, INDIVIDUALLY, D/B/A LAR LEGAL ADMIN
RESOURCES AND AS NEXT BEST FRIEND OF Z. R. M., A MINOR,
Appellant
V.
ALLISON RILEY GROVER, HOMES CENTRAL REAL ESTATE, INC.,
BRIAN MCLAURIN AND DENZELL & CRANE, INC. D/B/A APPLE
MOVING, Appellees

On Appeal from the 113th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 2017-84676

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from an interlocutory order, signed on September

10, 2018, granting the no-evidence summary judgment motion of appellees Allison
Riley Grover and Homes Central Real Estate. Because the order at issue did not

dispose of all parties and causes of action, we dismiss this appeal.

Subject to some exceptions, appeals generally may be taken from final

judgments. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The

order here states that it is not final. In particular, it dismisses claims against two

appellees, but “[c]laims against all other Defendants remain pending,” and “[t]his is

an interlocutory order.” Nothing in our record suggests that the remainder of the case

has been severed.

Because the order appealed is interlocutory and not appealable, we dismiss

the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3, 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as

moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Caughey.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4324779. Public record. Not legal advice.