# Sterling L. Singleton v. Patricia Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 15, 2018 · 714 F. App'x 307

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4255152

## Case

- **Full name:** Sterling L. SINGLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia BROWN, Lieutenant, Defendant-Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 15, 2018
- **Citations:** 714 F. App'x 307
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Niemeyer, King, Wynn
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4255152

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6475

STERLING L. SINGLETON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA BROWN, Lieutenant,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Beaufort. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (9:15-cv-02723-JMC)

Submitted: March 13, 2018 Decided: March 15, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sterling L. Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Michael Balthazor, Roy F. Laney, RILEY,
POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Sterling L. Singleton appeals the district court’s order accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Singleton v. Brown,

No. 9:15-cv-02723-JMC (D. S.C., Mar. 10, 2017). We deny Singleton’s motion for

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4255152. Public record. Not legal advice.