# Khistina Caldwell Dejean v. Clenton Brown

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · February 28, 2018

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4251685

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** February 28, 2018
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4251685

## Opinion text

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-17-00949-CV
Style: Khistina Caldwell Dejean v. Clenton Brown
Date motion filed*: February 23, 2018
Type of motion: Letter-Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief
Party filing motion: Pro se appellant Khistina Caldwell Dejean
Document to be filed: Response to Jurisdictional Notice

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time:
Original due date: February 26, 2018
Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Dates: February 26, 2018
Date Requested: N/A (60 days for brief)

Ordered that motion is:
 Granted, in part
If documents are to be filed, documents due: April 2, 2018.
 Denied
 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
 Other: _____________________________________
This Court’s December 28, 2017 Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss for Want of
Jurisdiction had warned the appellant that this appeal was subject to dismissal for want
of jurisdiction unless she timely responded within sixty days to show how this Court
had jurisdiction. Thus, appellant’s extension request is construed as a motion for an
extension of time to file her response to the jurisdictional notice and is granted, in
part, for 30 days from this order. Accordingly, if appellant fails to file a response
showing how this Court has jurisdiction by April 2, 2018, this appeal may be
dismissed for want of jurisdiction without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),
(c). If appellant timely files a satisfactory response, a briefing schedule may be set.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley
 Acting for the Court

Date: March 1, 2018

November 7, 2008 Revision

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4251685. Public record. Not legal advice.