# Russell Walker v. Hoke County Board of Elections

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 31, 2017 · 694 F. App'x 143

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4191193

## Case

- **Full name:** Russell F. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOKE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; North Carolina State Board of Elections, Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 31, 2017
- **Citations:** 694 F. App'x 143
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Agee, Floyd, Hamilton, Per Curiam
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4191193

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1727

RUSSELL F. WALKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HOKE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; NORTH CAROLINA STATE
BOARD OF ELECTIONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00078-CCE-JLW)

Submitted: July 27, 2017 Decided: July 31, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Russell F. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Collins Fork, Charles Foster Marshall, III,
Craig Daniel Schauer, BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD,
Raleigh, North Carolina; James Bernier, Jr., NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Russell F. Walker appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for

failure to state a claim for relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Walker v. Hoke

Cnty. Bd. Of Elections, No. 1:17-cv-00078-CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. June 8, 2017). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4191193. Public record. Not legal advice.