# Dennis Brown v. Lt. A. Banks

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 24, 2017 · 693 F. App'x 244

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4188818

## Case

- **Full name:** Dennis James BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lt. A. BANKS; Dr. Inder Jeet Singh Gujral, Independent Contractor Doctor Hired by D.O.C., Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 24, 2017
- **Citations:** 693 F. App'x 244
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Traxler, Shedd, Thacker
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4188818

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6191

DENNIS JAMES BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LT. A. BANKS; DR. INDER JEET SINGH GUJRAL, Independent Contractor
Doctor Hired by D.O.C.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:15-cv-00747-HEH-RCY)

Submitted: July 14, 2017 Decided: July 24, 2017

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis James Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Ramon Rodriguez, III,
RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Dennis James Brown appeals the district court’s orders granting summary

judgment to the Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the

pending motion and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v.

Banks, No. 3:15-cv-00747-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4188818. Public record. Not legal advice.