# LARRY PRICE VS. BHADO AND BHADO DEVELOPMENT, LLC(L-3854-15, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

> New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · July 11, 2017

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4185059

## Case

- **Court:** New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
- **Decided:** July 11, 2017
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4185059

## Opinion text

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court."
Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the
parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-2504-15T2
LARRY PRICE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BHADO and BHADO DEVELOPMENT, LLC
and UNION CITY ZONING BOARD OF
ADJUSTMENT,

Defendants-Respondents.
________________________________

Argued June 6, 2017 — Decided July 11, 2017

Before Judges Koblitz and Sumners.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey,
Law Division, Hudson County, Docket No. L-
3854-15.

Larry Price, appellant, argued the cause pro
se.

Gregory F. Kotchick argued the cause for
respondent Union City Zoning Board of
Adjustment (Durkin and Durkin LLP, attorneys;
Mr. Kotchick, of counsel and on the brief).

Alonso and Navarrete, LLC, attorneys for
respondent Bhado and Bhado Development, LLC,
join in the brief of respondent Union City
Zoning Board of Adjustment.

PER CURIAM
The parties to the appeal have settled the issues between

them. In accordance with their consent order of dismissal, the

appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

2 A-2504-15T2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4185059. Public record. Not legal advice.