# Shaul Harosh v. T. Gerald Treece, Independent of the Estate of John M. O'Quinn, and Darla Lexington

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · March 16, 2017

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4153854

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** March 16, 2017
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4153854

## Opinion text

Opinion issued March 16, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-17-00064-CV
———————————
SHAUL HAROSH, Appellant
V.
T. GERALD TREECE, INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF
JOHN M. O’QUINN, DECEASED, AND DARLA LEXINGTON, Appellees

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 392,247-412

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a “Motion for Voluntary Dismissal.” See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). Further, although appellant failed to include a certificate
of conference in his motion, appellant’s motion includes a certificate of service,

more than 10 days have passed since the motion was filed, and no party has

responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4153854. Public record. Not legal advice.