# Matter of Brown v. Annucci

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · January 26, 2017 · 146 A.D.3d 1257

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4118747

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of Byron K. Brown, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** January 26, 2017
- **Citations:** 146 A.D.3d 1257; 44 N.Y.S.3d 922
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Garry, Egan, Devine, Clark, Mulvey
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4118747

## Opinion text

State of New York
Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Third Judicial Department
Decided and Entered: January 26, 2017 522729
________________________________

In the Matter of BYRON K.
BROWN,
Petitioner,
v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting
Commissioner of Corrections
and Community Supervision,
Respondent.
________________________________

Calendar Date: November 29, 2016

Before: Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine, Clark and Mulvey, JJ.

__________

Byron K. Brown, Auburn, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J.
Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this
Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to
review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of
violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to
challenge a tier III determination finding him guilty of
violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has
advised this Court that the determination has been
administratively reversed, all references thereto have been
expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory
$5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account.
In view of this, and given that petitioner has been granted all
the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be
-2- 522729

dismissed as moot (see Matter of Haigler v Chappius, 142 AD3d
1243, 1243 [2016]).

Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine, Clark and Mulvey, JJ.,
concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without
costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger
Clerk of the Court

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4118747. Public record. Not legal advice.