# Anthony Simon v. Kaytron Patric Curlin

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · November 10, 2016

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4097864

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** November 10, 2016
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4097864

## Opinion text

Opinion issued November 10, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-16-00361-CV
———————————
ANTHONY SIMON, Appellant
V.
KAYTRON PATRIC CURLIN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 312th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2015-13089

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Anthony Simon, has neither paid the required fees nor established

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1, 37.3(b); see

also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 2013),

§ 101.0411 (West Supp. 2016); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme
Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on

Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). After

being notified by this Court’s Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss for Want of

Prosecution on September 8, 2016, that this appeal was subject to dismissal for want

of prosecution for failure to pay the required fees, appellant did not timely respond.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and

for want of prosecution. See id. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Brown.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4097864. Public record. Not legal advice.