# Barrett Wakefield and Howard Wakefield III v. Sam Ayers and Claudia Ayers

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · November 8, 2016

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4096364

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** November 8, 2016
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4096364

## Opinion text

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Barrett Wakefield and Howard Wakefield III v. Sam Ayers and
Claudia Ayers

Appellate case number: 01-14-00648-CV

Trial court case number: 1007580-102

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County

Date motion filed: October 14, 2016

Party filing motion: Appellant Barrett Wakefield

The en banc court has unanimously voted to deny appellant’s motion for en banc
reconsideration. It is ordered that the motion is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings
Acting for the Court the En Banc Court*

Date: November 8, 2016

* En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland,
Massengale, Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4096364. Public record. Not legal advice.