# Texas Association of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine v. Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners And Patricia Gilbert, Executive Director in Her Official Capacity > Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · November 5, 2015 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4074907 ## Case - **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) - **Decided:** November 5, 2015 - **Precedential status:** Published - **Opinion:** Opinion - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4074907 ## Opinion text ACCEPTED 03-15-00262-CV 7704799 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/5/2015 3:00:25 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/5/2015 3:00:25 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk November 3, 2015 Honorable Jeffrey D. Kyle Clerk, Third Court of Appeals 209 W. 14th St., Room 101 Austin, TX 78701 Re: No. 03-15-00262-CV; TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ACUPUNCTURE AND ORIENTAL MEDICINE, Appellant, v. TEXAS BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS AND YVETTE YARBROUGH, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Appellees. To the Honorable Members of the Third Court of Appeals of Texas: The Chiropractic Society of Texas (CST) is a state organization that represents chiropractic in the state of Texas. We are a non-profit, membership-supported organization of chiropractors, chiropractic students, and chiropractic supporters within the state of Texas. CST has a strong interest in this proceeding before the Court and concerns for the negative ramifications it portrays on the Chiropractic profession in the State of Texas. In that vein, we offer the following thoughts to the Third Court of Appeals. Our CST bylaws state the following: “ARTICLE I. DEFINITION OF STRAIGHT CHIROPRACTIC Section 1. Any person shall be regarded as practicing Chiropractic within the meaning of these By-Laws who shall employ objective or subjective means without the use of drugs, surgery, x-ray therapy or radium therapy, for the purpose of ascertaining the alignment of the vertebrae of the human spine, and practicing of adjusting the vertebrae to correct any subluxation or misalignment thereof, and charge therefore directly or indirectly, money or other compensation; or who shall hold himself out to the public as a Chiropractor or shall use either the term “Chiropractor,” “Chiropractic,” “Doctor of Chiropractic,” or any derivative of the above in connection with his name.” The above Article in our bylaws makes clear the practice of chiropractic: Adjusting the vertebrae of the spine to correct subluxation. The CST holds the position that the practice of Acupuncture is a separate and distinct art and science, using needles to treat patients, with no regard for a vertebral subluxation, thereby not qualifying under the definition of Chiropractic. It is the opinion of the CST that the practice of Chiropractic and Acupuncture are two completely distinct and separate professions. As such, the CST is not in favor of expanding the practice, and/or the scope of Chiropractic beyond the above definition. Changing the definition or scope of Chiropractic weakens our profession by creating confusion around the practice of chiropractic in Texas with our doctors and patients. Therefore, the Chiropractic Society of Texas is in support of TAAOM and we ask the court to reverse the ruling of the lower court (201st District Court) and render judgment in favor of TAAOM. We appreciate the opportunity to express our concerns and urge the Court recognize the differences between Chiropractic and Acupuncture. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Matthew M. Mix D. C. Matthew M. Mix D.C. President – Chiropractic Society of Texas 312 E. Church Street Livingston, TX 77351 512-321-9200 info@texaschiropractic.org CERTIFICATE OF AMICUS I certify on behalf of Amicus Curiae, that no persons other than Amicus Curiae or its counsel made any monetary contribution to the preparation or submission of this Amicus letter. /s/ Matthew M. Mix D.C. Matthew M. Mix D. C. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I certify on behalf of Amicus Curiae, that this Amicus letter contains 386 words according to the word count feature of the Microsoft Word software used to prepare this Amicus letter. /s/ Matthew M. Mix D.C. Matthew M. Mix D. C. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Amicus letter has been served to all attorneys of record as listed below via electronic service on November 4, 2015. Joe H. Thrash Craig T. Enoch Assistant Attorney General Enoch Kever, PLLC Administrative Law Division 600 Congress Ave., Ste. 2800 P.O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78701 Austin, Texas 78711 cenoch@enochkever.com Joe.Thrash@texasattorneygeneral.gov /s/ Matthew M. Mix D.C. Matthew M. Mix D. C. --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4074907. Public record. Not legal advice.