# in the Guardianship of Ruby Peterson

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · December 14, 2015

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4074800

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** December 14, 2015
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4074800

## Opinion text

ACCEPTED
01-15-00567-CV
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS
HOUSTON, TEXAS
12/14/2015 12:29:57 PM
CHRISTOPHER PRINE
CLERK

No. 01-15-00567-CV
FILED IN
1st COURT OF APPEALS
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT
HOUSTON, TEXAS
HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/14/2015 12:29:57 PM
CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Clerk

MACKEY GLEN PETERSON, TONYA PETERSON, DON LESLIE
PETERSON AND LONNY PETERSON, APPELLANTS

v.

SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING, INC., D/B/A SILVERADO SENIOR
LIVING SUGAR LAND, APPELLEE

Appendix Tab 49 Part 1

P. Alan Sanders
Tx. State Bar No: 17602100
Joshua Davis
Tx. State Bar No. 24031993
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP
Weslayan Tower, Suite 1400
24 Greenway Plaza
Houston, Texas, 77046
(713) 659-6767
(713) 759-6830 – Fax
Alan.Sanders@LewisBrisbois.com
Josh.Davis@LewisBrisbois.com
TAB 49
Page # 0268 - 0353
FILED
DATA-ENTRY 12/1/2014
1211/2014 5:04:55 PM
UP
PICK UP THIS
THIS DATE
Stan Stanart
County Clerk
CD`) County
HarrisCounty
Harris

COURT
PROBATE 1
PROBATE COURT 1
NO.427,208
CAUSE
CAUSE NO. 427,208

RUBY
RUBY S.S.PETERSON,
PETERSON, Individually, §§ INPROBATE
IN COURT
PROBATE COURT NO.l
NO. 1
MACKEY
MACKEY (“MACK")
("MACK") GLENPETERSON
GLEN PETERS ON§§
PETERSON,
PETERSON, NextFriend
Individually, Next Friend §§
Attomey-in
Attorney-in
PETERSON,
PETERSON,
Fact
Fact for
DON
Attomey-in-
Next
forRUBY
RUBY
DONLESLIE
LESLIEPPETERSON

of RUBY S.PETERSON,
FactofRUBY
Fact S. PETERSON,
ETERSON
Individually, Next Friend, Attorney-in-
LONNY
LONNY §§
§§
§

PETERSON,
PETERSON, Individually
Individually Next Friend §§
andNextFriend
and
OfRUBY
Of RUBY S.SPeterson
.Peterson §
vs.
VS. § OF

CAROL
CAROL ANNE
ANNE MANLEY,
MANLEY, §
DAVID
DAVID PETERSON,
PETERSON, SILVERADO
SILVERADO §
SENIOR
SENIOR LIVING,
LIVING, INC. d/b/aSILVERADO§
INC.d/b/a SILVERADO§
SENIOR
SENIOR LIVING
LIVING —— SUGAR
SUGAR LAND
LAND §§ HARRIS
HARRIS COUNTY,
COUNTY, TEXAS
TEXAS

ATTORNEY
APPLICATION
FOR FEES TO
PURSUANT
ORDER
RULE ON 2014
NOVEMBER
ENTERED
APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO
RULE 91a ORDER ENTERED ON NOVEMBER 10, 2014
Defendant,
Defendant, Silverado SeniorLiving,Inc.
SilveradoSenior d/b/aSilverado
Living, Inc. d/b/a SeniorLivingSugarLand
Silverado Senior Living Sugar Land
thisApplication forAttorney
Attorney Pursuant
FeesPursuant to Rule91aOrder
toRule Entered On
(Silverado) files this Application for Fees 91a Order Entered On
November
November 10,2014
10, consistent
2014 consistent withthe
with Local
the Court's Local Rules andpursuant
Rulesand pursuant Texas
Ruleof
toTexas Rule
to of Civil
Civil
Procedure
9la.7.91a
Procedure 91a.7.
MOTION
91a MOTION
BACKGROUND1
BRIEF
DISMISS:
TODISMISS: BRIEF BACKGROUND
TO
Silverado filedaaRule
Rule9la Motion Dismiss September
25, Plaintiffs’
Silverado filed 91a Motion totoDismiss on
onSeptember 25, 2014.1 Plaintiffs' filed aa
FourthAmended in
6,2014and Response
October
onOctober 6, 2014 and aaResponse in Opposition3 to the pending Rule
Fourth Amended Petition2 on
Rule
tothepending
9la
motion October
27,2014. Silveradotimely its PartialWithdrawal
andReplyto
91a motion onOctober 27,
on 2014. Silverado timely filed its Partial Withdrawal and Reply to

On withthe and byreferenceifsetoutfullyherein.
asif set out fully herein.
On file with the Court and incorporated by reference as
1

2 Id. .
3 Id.

4849-6015-516111

Silverado Appx. 0268
No. 1-15-586-CV 3617
Plaintiffs’
Plaintiffs' Response nNovember
Response oon November6, TheMotion
6, 2014.4 The to Dismiss
Motion to Dismiss w asheard
was on November7,7,
heardon

2014 at which
2014 at which ttime
imetheCourt
the Court granted
granted Silverado’s 91a
Silverado's 91 a Motion
Motion to Dismissand
toDismiss issuedits
andissued onthe
its Orderson the
0
0
forty-fifth day of filing--November
the dateof
day followingthedate 10, 2014.A
Novemberl0,2014. llchallenged
All causesofaction
challengedcauses of action

were dismissed
were with prejudicewhich
dismissed withprejudice whichincluded:
included: ffalse
alseimprisonment, and battery,and
imprisonment, assaultand and

conspiracy.
conspiracy.
Silverado
Silverado nnow movesfor
owmoves award ofall
anaward
for an costsandreasonable
allcosts and reasonableand necessary attorneyfees
andnecessary fees

0 incurred
incurred with
with respect to thechallenged
respect to causesofaction.
the challengedcausesof action.

0 RULE 91a.7

Except in
Except actionbby
an action
in an oragainst
yor governmental
againstaa governmentalentity raapublic
entityoor
actingin
public official actingin
his her official capacity
orher
his or orunder
capacityor coloroofflaw,
undercolor law,the
thecourt
award theprevailing
court must award the prevailing
party on themotion
party on
all costsaand
the motion all costs reasonableand
ndreasonable necessaryattomey
andnecessary
feesincurred
attorney fees incurred
with
with respect to thechallenged
respectto the challengedcause
ofactioninthetrial court.TThe
cause of action in the trialcourt.
he courtmust
must
considerevidence
consider evidenceregarding
regardingcosts
indetermining award.
costs and fees in determining award.
issued
added). he firstandonlyopinion interpreting 91a.7 was issued
TEX. P. 91a.7 (emphasis added).TThe
R. Crv.P.91a.7(emphasis
TEX.R. and only opinion interpreting 91a.7was
November20,2014. Chase 2014No.02-13-00340-CV, 2014Tex.App.Lexis
November 20, 2014. Drake v.
v. Chase Bank, 2014 No. 02-13-00340-CV, 2014 Tex. App. Lexis
12572(Tex.App.— Worth Nov.20,2014,nopet. Drake involveda pro seplaintiff
Drake involvedaprose
who
plaintiff who
12572 (Tex. App. — Fort Worth Nov. 20, 2014, no pet. h.).
broughtclaimsagainst ChaseBankforirreparable harmto hiscreditandintentional infliction of
brought claims against Chase Bank for irreparable harm to his credit and intentional infliction of
emotionaldistress. Thetrial granted defendant’s 91aMotion toDismiss andawarded it
emotional distress. Id. The trial court granted defendant's 91a Motion to Dismiss and awarded it
$2,480 incostsandfees. at*1.Plaintiff amotion toreconsider which wasdenied andthe
$2,480 in costs and fees. Id. at *1. Plaintiff filed a motion to reconsider which was denied and the
awarded defendant itsfeesrelated tothatmotion
court awarded defendant its fees related to that motionas
wellintheamount of
as well in the amount of $1,545. Id.

4 Id.
5 Id

168.1
4849-6015-5168.1

Silverado Appx. 0269
No. 1-15-586-CV 3618
Applyingaa de the Drake Court
of review, the
novo standard ofreview,
de novo Court foundthat"...an awardof
that "...anaward of

0 attorneys' fees
attorneys’ to theprevailing
fees to the prevailingparty on aa rule91amotion
partyon rule 91a motion to dismissiiss mandatory,not
to dismiss not
0
discretionary." Id. at *5.Notably,
Id. at thetrial
*5. Notably, the trial c ourthhad
court granted plaintiff
adgranted plaintiffindigent statusdduring
indigentstatus uringthe
the

proceedings.
proceedings. Id at *4.
Id. at the Drake Court
*4. Nevertheless, theDrake oundthat"therule
Courtffound that "the rulesays nothingaabout
saysnothing bout

exempting indigent
exempting indigentparties
parties frompayingaattorneys'
frompaying ttorneys’ fees
feestto partywho
oaaparty prevails underrule
whoprevails rule91a."IdId.
91a."

at citing ((In re
at *5 citing re Christus
Hosp.
Spohn Hosp. Kleberg, 222S.W.3d
Christus Spohn 434, 437 (Tex.2007)
222 S.W.3d434,437(Tex. 2007 )(orig.
(orig.
0 proceeding) (stating
proceeding) (stating tthat
hatcourts pplythe
courts aapply samerules
the same of constructionthat
rulesofconstruction thatgovern the interpretationof
governtheinterpretation of

0 statutes when construing
statutes when construing rules (CityofRockwell
rules ooff procedure));(City of Rockwellv. 246 S.W.3d6621,
v. Hughes,246S.W.3d 21,6625
25
(Tex. 2008) (stating
(Tex. 2008) (stating that
that ccourts
ourtscconstrue
onstrue statutesaccording
statutes accordingto theirpplain
totheir lainand commonmeaning))).
andcommon meaning))).
motion well the motion
The then affirmed the
The court then the trial
trial courts awardof
courts awardofffees
ees astto
as the9la
othe as the motionto
as wellas
91a motionas to

reconsider and
reconsider and pointed hatddefendant
out tthat
pointed out efendant incurred the
additionalfeesinconnection withitsRule91a
the additional fees in connection with its Rule 91a
challenge
challenge and
and the causes ofaction
the causes ubjectto
of action ssubject
the same. Idatat*6.
to thesame.
theDrakeCourtcited
*6. Specifically, the Drake Court cited
Rule91a.7whichmandates n "awardof
Rule 91a.7 which mandatesaan
all costsandreasonable
"award of all costs and reasonable andnecessary ttorneyfees
and necessaryaattorney fees
incurred withrespectto thechallenged
to the cause ooffaction."
Id (emphasis inoriginal). Although itisthe
incurred withrespect challenged cause action." Id. (emphasis in original). Although it is the
first
first case
interpreting awardofattorneys’ pursuantto
an award of attorneys' feespursuant
case interpretingan
Rule itisconsistent withthe
to Rule 91a, it is consistent with the
precedentofstrictconstruction regarding thisstatute.See((Wooley
precedent of strict construction regarding this statute. See ((Wooleyv.
No.l4-l3-00385-
v. Schaffer, No. 14-13-00385-
CV,2014 pp.L
Tex.App.
CV, 2014 Tex. A
EXIS8983(Tex.App.Houston [14th Aug.14,2014))(Daileyv.
LEXIS 8983 (Tex. App. Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 14, 2014)) (Dailey v.
Thorpe,No.01-13-00492-CV, 2014Tex.App.LEXIS 9630at*10(Tex.App.Houston [lstDist.]
Thorpe, No. 01-13-00492-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 9630 at *10 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.]
Aug.28,2014))(GoDaddy.com, LLC HollieToups,429
Aug. 28, 2014)) (GoDaddy.com, LLC v. Hollie Toups,
S.W.3d 752(Tex.App.—Beaumont,
429 S.W.3d 752 (Tex. App. — Beaumont,
2014,pet.denied)) (Lopez-Welchv. Farm 3:14-CV-2416-L, 2014U.S.Dist.LEXIS
2014, pet. denied)) (Lopez-Welch v. State Farm Lloyds, 3: l 4-CV-2416-L, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
154741(N.D.Tex.Oct.31,2014))(Plascencia Farm No.4:14-CV-524-A, 2014
154741 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 2014)) (Plascenciavv.. State Farm Lloyds, No. 4:14-CV-524-A, 2014
U.S.Dist.LEXIS135081(N.D.Tex.Sept.25,2014))((Oldham
Oldham v.v.Nationwide Co.ofAm.,3:14-
U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135081 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2014)) Nationwide Ins. Co. of Am., 3:14-
CV-575-B,2014U.S. LEXIS107044; 2014WL3855238(N.D.Tex.Aug.5,2014))).l

4849-6015-51
CV-575-B, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107044; 2014 WL 3855238 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 5, 2014))).

4849.6015-5168.1

Silverado Appx. 0270
No. 1-15-586-CV 3619
WhileRule
While Rule91a.7
9la.7issilent theevidence
tothe
asto
is silent as evidence and
and procedure required prior imposition of
prior ttooimposition of

C fees,tthe
fees, hetrial court in Drake chose
courtin choseto conduct
to conduct hearing
aa hearing thanaccepting
rather than evidence
accepting evidence by
by
C
submission.
submission. 2014
2014 Tex.
Tex. App.
App. Lexis
Lexis 12572
12572 *7.Itdid
atat*7. require
notrequire
It did not Chase
Chase Bank
Bank submit
tosubmit
to itsitemized
its itemized

invoices
invoices and/or
and/or cconduct
onduct aa Lodestar lieu thereof, ititaccepted
Inlieu
Lodestar analysis. In accepted andlive
anaffidavit and
an live

testimony establishing
testimony establishing "thehours
"the devoted
hours devoted thematter,
tothe
to whoperformed
matter,who performed thework,
the work, tthe rate charged,
herate charged,

whatwork
what wasperformed,
work was andthatthefees
performed, and were reasonable and
that the fees were and necessary.
necessary. Id. The Court a
TheCourt pplied
applied
factors
theArthur
the Arthur Anderson reasonableness applied
reasonableness factors applied when contingent
whencontingent feeagreements
fee agreements atissue.
areat
are issue. Id
N
0
N
The foundthat
the trial
the did
court abuse
not related
toitsfee
itsdiscretion award.
The Drake Court found the that the trial court did not abuse its discretion related to its fee award. Id.
- SILVERADO’S APPLICATION FORATTORNEY
ATTORNEYFEES
SILVERADO'S APPLICATION FOR FEES

Consistent
Consistent withthe
with theCourt’s Local
Court's Local Rules,
Rules, Silverado
Silverado thisApplication
files this forAttorney
Application for Fees
Attorney Fees

andpresents
and presentsevidence
evidence supporting
supporting the
the reasonable and
and necessary fees incurred with
necessary feesincurred with respect
respect to the
to the

challenged ofaction
causesof
challenged causes action pursuant tothe lodestar
pursuantto TEX.R.CIV.
lodestarmethod.6 TEX. P.9la.7;Drake,
R. Qv. P. 2014
91a.7; Drake, 2014

Tex.
Tex. A
App. Lexis12572
pp.Lexis (Tex.App.
12572 (Tex. App.-FortWorth Nov.20,
- Fort Worth Nov. 20,2014, pet. h.);
nopet.
2014, no h.); Long
Long v. No.11-
v. Griffin, No. 11-

1021,2014 Tex.
1021, Tex.LEXIS 304(Tex.
LEXIS 304 April25,2014)
(Tex. April (percuriam).
25, 2014) (per curiam).

A. LODESTAR
A.LODESTAR METHOD
METHOD

A
A request forattorney fees
request for
employs
feesemploys thelodestar
the method
lodestar method whenititrelates
when relates hours worked
hoursworked for
for

eachattorney
each attomey multiplied
multiplied bytheir
by ratesffor
hourlyrates
their hourly oraa total fee.Griffin, 2014
total fee. 2014Tex. LEXIS
Tex.LEXIS 3304
04(Tex.
(Tex.

April
April 25, 2014)atat*6.
25, 2014) *6.Tosatisfy lodestar, evidence
To satisfy lodestar, "sufficient evidence includes,
includes, at evidence ‘of
ata minimum, evidence 'of

theservices performed,
the services performed, whoperformed
who performedthemand
them atwhat
andat hourly
what hourly ate,w
rrate, henthey
when werepperformed,
they were erformed,
andhow
and how much
much ttime
imethework
the workrrequired.'"
equired."’citing (ElA
Id. citing (El pple
Apple I, Ltd. v. Olivias,
v.Olivias, 370S.W.3d
370 S.W.3d757, 7
757, 63
763

(Tex.2012)).
(Tex. 2012)).Total
Totalnumber of
ofhours workedand
hours worked andgeneralities willnot
generalities will at*6-7.However,
notsuffice. Id. at *6-7. However,

6 OnNovember
On November 19,19,2014,Ms.CresMachicek Guardianship
2014, Ms. Cres Machicek - Guardianship Coordinator
Coordinator —- advisedcounsel
- advised counsel
regarding
regarding theCourt’s procedural
the Court's procedural requirements
requirements related o the
related tto manner
the manner inwhich
in theCourt
which the would
Court would
conduct the91a.7
conduct the evidentiary
91a,7 evidentiary proceeding.
proceeding.

4849-6015-5168.1
4849-6015-5168.1

Silverado Appx. 0271
No. 1-15-586-CV 3620
affidavit
anaffidavit
an thatgenerally
that generally describes the services performed,
describes theservices whocompleted
performed, who same and
completed same and at what
at what

hourly
hourly ratethat
rate accompanied
areaccompanied
that are by evidence
byevidence inform
toinform
to thetrial
the trial court ofthetime
of the time spent on Specific
spent on specific
0
tasks andcorresponding
tasks and correspondingdates
dates should
should constitute
constitute sufficient
sufficient evidence
evidence satisfy
tosatisfy
to thelodestar
the lodestar method.
method. Id.

at
at *7-8.

B. SEGREGATION OF FEES rs
B. IS NoT
NOT REQUIRED PURSUANTTO
TO 91a.7

While thelodestar
While the methodis
lodestar method is analogous, the
the context is distinct
context is distinctinsofar
insofaras feesegregation
as fee segregation
C)
UJ amongst prevailing
amongst prevailing claims inapplicable forthefollowing
claims iissinapplicable reasons. Rule
for the followingreasons. Rule 91a.7 requires
91a.7 requires anaward
an award
N
0 ofall
of all costs andreasonable
costsand reasonable andnecessary attorney
and attorney feesincurred
fees incurredwithrespect
with respecttothechallenged
to the challenged causes
causes

ofaction. Thematter
of action. The matterpending
pending before
before thisCourt
this Court isisnot
notone which aaverdict
oneininwhich hasbeen
verdict has been returned asto
returned as to

somecauses
some causesofaction
of which
action which would
would support
support award
anaward
an offees
of fees and otherstthat
andothers hatwould not.Compare
would not.

2014Tex.
(Griffin, 2014 Tex.LEXIS
LEXIS304
304(Tex. 25,2014))
(Tex. April 25, with(Tex.
2014)) with (Tex.R
R..Civ.
Civ. PP..91a.7).9la.7mandates
91a.7). 91a.7 mandates

recovery
recovery offees
of allchallenged
onall
fees on causes
challenged causes ofaction
of the prevailing
action ttoothe prevailing party. see also
party. Id.; see also Drake,
Drake, 2014
2014

Tex.App.
Tex. Lexis12572
App. Lexis 12572 (Tex. App.— FortWorth
(Tex.App. Nov. 2
Fort Worth Nov. 0,2014,
20, noopet.
2014, n pet. h.).

C. RESPECT DISMISSED
TOTHE
C. SILVERADO'S ATTORNEYS' FEES INCURRED WITH RESPECT TO THE DISMISSED CAUSES OF
ASSAULT
ACTION: FALSE IMPRISONMENT, ASSAULT AND
AND AND
BATTERY, AND CONSPIRACY
Silverado
Silverado learned
first learned ofthis
of litigation
this litigation July18,
onJuly
on 2014tthrough
18,2014 hrough negative publicity
negative publicity published
published

by Plaintiffs
by Plaintiffson internet. TEX. R.
theinternet.
onthe R. Civ. E. 80l(e)(2)(C)-(D).
E. 801(e)(2)(C)-(D). Whileinvestigating,
While Silverado
investigating, Silverado

discovered
discovered Plaintiffs’
Plaintiffs' Original
Original Petition
Petition onJuly
filed on 17,22014
July17, 014ininthe129th Judicial
the 129th Judicial District
District Court
Court of
of

County,
Harris County, Texas whichincluded
Texaswhich included claimsaagainst
claims gainst "Silverado
"Silverado Senior
Senior Living
Living C areFacility"
Care for
Facility" for

falseimprisonment,
false imprisonment,assault battery,
andbattery,
assault and
and Plaintiffs
and conspiracy.' Plaintiffs filedan
filed Amended
anAmended Petition
Petition and
and

Demand
JuryDemand
Jury July23,2014
onJuly
on againnamed
whichagain
23, 2014 which named "Silverado
"Silverado SeniorLiving
Senior LivingC areFacility"
Care and
Facility" and

On file with theHarris
7 Onfilewith County
the Harris County District
District Clerk incorporated byreference
andincorporated
Clerkand asififset
by reference as setout fully
out fully
herein.
herein.

4849-6015-5168.1Q
4849-6015-5168A

Silverado Appx. 0272
No. 1-15-586-CV 3621
included for false imprisomnent,
included claims forfalse imprisonment, assaultandbattery, and conspiracy.8OnJuly
and battery,and On July25,2014,
25, 2014,

Plaintiffs’ Second
Plaintiffs' Second Original
Amended Original Petition was filed
Petition was filedwith
withthe sameaallegations
thesame llegations againstSilverado
against Silverado
0 although
although itremained
it remained improperly
improperly named
named aand
ndhad eenserved.9 Silverado
notbbeen
hadnot Silveradochose owaive
chosetto waivesservice
ervice
and
and enter
enter aannappearance onJuly
appearance on July28,
28,22014 in lightoof
014inlight fPlaintiffs’ requestforextraordinary
Plaintiffs'request for extraordinaryrelief
reliefinthe
in the
formof an application
form of an application ffor
ortemporary
temporary rrestraining
estraining oorder,
rder,ttemporary
emporary iinjunction
njunction aand
ndthe
theemergency
emergency
hearing
hearing related to the
related to same which
the same which Plaintiffs etforJuly28,2014.
Plaintiffs sset for July 28, 2014.
C Amidst the hundredsof
Amidstthehundreds pages of
of pages of pleadings,
pleadings,Plaintiffs
Plaintiffsclaims
claimshhave
aveatatalltimesbeen
all times been

C inflammatory andcentered on allegations
and centered on allegations thatSilverado,
that Silverado, its
its staff,physicians othersindependently
orothers
physiciansor independently
named
named — someoof
—some fwhich
whichwwere laternnonsuited
erelater onsuited wereddrugging
--were rugging Ruby
RubyPPeterson,
eterson,holding heragainst
holdingher againsther
her
will, and Plaintiffs’ visitationwithout legal Plaintiffs thechallenged
will, and refusing Plaintiffs' visitation without legal authority.t° Plaintiffs pursued the challenged

causesofactionin a mannerwhich the costoofflitigation
which drove thecost
causes of action in amanner
Silverado
up. Silveradowas
litigationup.
forcedtoincur
was forcedto incur
againstboth federaland
defending
expense defending against both aa federal and state
significant expense
lawsuit well
as wellaas
state lawsuit as
mediacampaign
in
saa media campaign in
directviolation oftheCourt’s Protective Order.Thedismissed ofaction comprised Plaintiffs
direct violation of the Court's Protective Order. The dismissed causes
causes of action comprised Plaintiffs
entire
entire case
against Silverado until October 6,2014 with theFourth Amended Petitionwhich includes
case against Silverado until October 6, 2014 with the Fourth Amended Petition which includes
subject
aa new allegationofbreachoffiduciary dutyat Paragraph 88andwillbe toanother 9la
new allegation of breach of fiduciary duty at Paragraph 88 and will be subject to another 91a
Motion toDismiss. SeeExhibit "A,"(Affidavit ofJoshK.Davis).Thechallenged causes ofaction
Motion to Dismiss. See Exhibit "A," (Affidavit of Josh K. Davis). The challenged causes of action
required multi·faceteddefense relatedtothefederal andstatelawsuits aswell stherepeated
required aa multi-faceted defense related to the federal and state lawsuits as wellaas the repeated
violations
ofCourtorders.
violations of Court orders. _

8 Id
9 Id.
See Original Petition, Amended PetitionandJuryDemand, Second Amended Petition
See Plaintiffs'
and
1° Demand, Original Petition, Amended
ThirdAmended Petition andto
andContest
Petition Jury Demand, Second
Guardianship Amended
andPetition
Application,
and Jury Demand,
Amended all
PetitionThird
ofwhich areon with
Amended Petition and and/or
Contest
thisCourt the129th Judicial
to Guardianship and
Application, and Fourth
Amended Petitionbyreference
incorporated all of which areifon file with this
fully Court and/or the 129th Judicial District Court and
herein.
are as setout
are incorporated by reference as if set out fully herein.

4849-6015.5168.1

Silverado Appx. 0273
No. 1-15-586-CV 3622
This iswell-versed
in antics
related
tothis and litigation,
vexatious
This Court is well-versed in Plaintiffs antics related to this vexatious and harassing litigation,

C
but party-opponent
oneparty-opponent
but one admission
admission isworth highlighting
is highlighting to reinforce
to reinforce thattheintent andpurpose
that the intent and purpose
C
behind thefederal
behind the litigation.
federal litigation. OnAugust
On August 3,3,2014,Ms.Schwager
2014, Ms. Schwagerposts
posts aamessage
message Facebook
onFacebook
on to Mr.
to Mr.

Davisopen
Davis open to thepublic:
to the "AsI’ve
public: "As saidfrom
I've said fromday
dayone, thisis
one,this is not aboutyou,
notabout butif
you,but persistin
youpersist
if you in
violating
violating my client’s
my client's rights
rights and Ruby’s,
andRuby's, ititwillbe.
will be. IIkeep wondering
keep wondering whenthe
when thereality ofthefederal
reality of the federal

willset
casewill
case in.Nominal
setin. damages
Nominal damages pledfor
arepled
are Butthe
now.But
for now. pressisiscoming.
the press coming. IIassure
assure that.”TEX.
youthat."
you TEX.
0 R. (e)(2)(C)-(D).
CA R. Civ. E.801
E. 801(e)(2)(C)-(D). Inaddition,
In following
addition, following settlement
settlement withCarol
with Carol Anne Manleyaand
AnneManley ndDavid
David
Cd
C) Peterson,
Plaintiffs
now seek fees
torecover from
andexpenses ofRuby
theestate for
Peterson
Peterson, Plaintiffs now seek to recover fees and expenses from the estate of Ruby Peterson for
Cd
- bringing thislawsuit
bringing this wellas
lawsuit "as well asininanother case filedin
casefiled c0urt”in
in federal court" theamount
in the of
amountof
Thestrategy
$187,056.73.1 I The strategyininbringing thefederal
bringing the lawsuit
federal lawsuit appears
appears tohave
to beenintimidation
havebeen intimidation and/or
and/or

berate Silverado
berate Silverado intosettlement.
into settlement. theresult
Nevertheless, the to force
wasto
result was force S ilverado
Silverado to incur
to incur significant
fees
defending
ameritless
lawsuit
inboth
Federal Court.
andState Those andfees
costs arenow
fees defending a meritless lawsuit in both Federal and State Court. Those costs and fees are now

due.The
due.

feesincurred
totalfees
The total defending
incurred defending
against
against thechallenged causes o
the challenged causes offaction ofSunday,
asof
action as

November
November 30, 2014are
30,2014 17,183.40.
are$117,183.40. SeeExhibit
See "A,"(Affidavit of
Exhibit "A," ofJosh K.Davis)
Josh K. attached
Davis) attached hereto
hereto

andincorporated
and incorporated byreference
by reference as if set
as if setout
out fully herein.The
fullyherein. Thefeescontinue
fees continue to accrueaand
to accrue ndwillbe
will be

supplemented
supplemented at thetime
at of the hearing w
the time ofthehearing ithadditional
with additional fee and oralttestimony.
statementsandoral
fee statements estimony. Itis
It is

withinthe
within theCourt’s sound
Court's sound discretion
discretion determine
todetermine
to thelegal
the sufficiency
legal sufficiency oftheevidence
of presented
the evidence presented

regarding
regarding theamount
the amountoffees
of which
fees which arereasonable
are reasonable and necessary. Ridge
and necessary. Ridge Oil C0.v.v.Guinn Invs.,
OilCo. Invs., Inc.
Inc.,,

148S.W.3d. 143
148 (Tex.2004)
143(Tex. (court-ordered
2004)(court-ordered ofattorneys’
award of feesisisreviewed
attorneys' fees under
reviewed under theabuse
the abuse o
off

discretion
discretion standard).
standard). The
The Drake Courtreinforces
Drake Court reinforces that
that R ule91a.7
Rule 91a.7 rrequires
equires an "award ofall
an of all costs and
costs and

SeeSecond
11 See Supplement
Second Supplement to Application
to Application for Payment ofAttorney’s
forPayment Feesand
of Attorney's Fees andExpenses,
Expenses, Expert
Witness Feesand
Witness Fees andExpenses,
Expenses, andCosts
and CostsofCourt
of onfile with
Court on the Court and
with theCourt and incorporated byreference
incorporated by reference
asififset
as setout fullyhherein.
outfully erein.

4849-6015-5168A

Silverado Appx. 0274
No. 1-15-586-CV 3623
reasonable
reasonable and attorneyfees
necessary attorney
and necessary tothechallenged
fees incurred with respectto causeoof
the challengedcause faction.”
action."2014
2014

Tex.
Tex. A pp.L
App. exis112572
Lexis 2572 aatt*6.
*6.T
The costsooffdefending
hecosts defendingthefederal
the federallawsuit were incurredwith
lawsuitwere withrespect
respect
demonstratedHowever,
to the challenged
to the causesofaction
challengedcauses as demonstratedabove.
of actionas solelyin
above. However,solely inan abundanceof
anabundance of
caution
caution andforthe
and for the benefit of theCourt,
of the Silverado
Court, Silverado identifies
identifiesthefollowing
the followingtotal amountof
totalamount of
$18,830.00 as the
$18,830.00 as amount solely
the amount solely rrelated
elated othefederal
tto mattershould
the federalmatter shouldtheCourt
the Courtfind
findthatdefense
that defenseof
of
thefederal
the federal lawsuit evenininthese
lawsuit -- even extreme
these extreme circumstances
circumstances —was
— notincurred
wasnot incurredwith
withrespect tothe
respectto the
0 challenged causes of
challenged causes of a ction.
action.

a D.
D. SUBSEQUENT MOTIONS&
& COSTS
tN
Silverado
Silverado isentitled
is entitledtto recoveritsreasonable
orecover its reasonableand attorneyfees
necessaryattorney
andnecessary feesand costsinthe
andcosts in the

event Plaintiffs
event Plaintiffs appeal
appeal and/or
and/or engage subsequent
engage in-subsequent motion
motionpractice
practicerelated othechallenged
relatedtto the challengedcauses
causes
ofaction 2014
of action aand
ndCourt’s
Court's findings.Drake,
Drake, 2014Tex.
Tex.A pp.LLexis
App. exis112572
2572 ((Tex.
Tex.App.
App. ——Fort
FortW orthNNov.
Worth ov.
20,
20, 2 014,no
2014, no pet.
h.). Plaintiffs
pet. h.). If Plaintiffs find it to fileaaMotion
necessary to
it necessary MotionttooReconsider
Reconsiderand/or
and/orRescind,
Rescind,
Silverado equests$2,500.00
Silverado rrequests asthereasonable
$2,500.00as the reasonableaand necessaryffees
nd necessary eesfor
for handling theresponsive
responsive
briefingandhearing relatedothe
briefing and hearing related tto same.See
thesame.
Exhibit"A," Affidavitof
See Exhibit"A," of JoshK.Davis.
Ifthe matterisis
K. Davis. If thematter
appealed, Silverado
appealed, Silverado requests
$10,000.00 for and necessaryfeesforhandling
requests $10,000.00 for its, reasonable andnecessary
the
fees for handling the
appellee’s inthecourtofappeals, $7,500.00 ifplaintiff files WritofError rPetition for
appellee's case
case in the court of appeals, $7,500.00 if plaintiff filesaa Writ of Erroroor Petition for
Review withtheSupreme Court ofTexas, and$7,500.00 iftheWritofErrororPetition
Review with the Supreme Court of Texas, and $7,500.00 if the Writ of Erroror
forReview
Petition for Review
requests
isGranted bytheSupreme ofTexas.See Inadditiontoitsfees,
is Granted by the Supreme Court of Texas. See id. In additionto
Silverado its
its fees, Silverado requests its
12572
costs.Drake,2014Tex.App.Lexis (Tex.App.-Fort Nov.20,2014,nopet.
costs. Drake, 2014 Tex. App. Lexis 12572 (Tex. App. — Fort Worth Nov. 20, 2014,no
h.).
pet. h.).
PRAYER
PRAYER
SilveradoSenior Living, Inc.d/b/aSilverado Senior Living SugarLandrequests theCourt
Silverado Senior Living, Inc. d/b/a Silverado Senior Living Sugar Land requests the Court
awardititscostsandreasonable andnecessary attorney feesincurred in anamountnotlessthan
award it its costs and reasonable and necessary attorney fees incurred inan amount not less than
$117,183.40.TEX.
R.CIV.P.91a.7;see 2014Tex.App.Lexis12572(Tex.App.-Fort
$117,183.40. TEX. R. Civ. P. 91a.7; see also, Drake, 2014 Tex. App. Lexis 12572 (Tex. App. —Fort

4849-6015-5168.1

Silverado Appx. 0275
No. 1-15-586-CV 3624
Worth
WorthN ov.220,
Nov. 0,2014).
2014). Silverado further
further requests its feesinthe
requests itsfees eventoof
in theevent faaMotion toReconsider
Motionto Reconsider

and/or
and/or R escindiin
Rescind the amountof$2,500.00,
nthe of $2,500.00,for
for handlingtheappel1ee’s caseinthe
the appellee's case courtoof
in thecourt fappeals
appeals
inthe amount of$
in the amount 10,000,and$7,500
of $10,000, and $7,500 ifplaintiff
if plaintiff filesaaWrit
Writoof
fError rPetition
Erroroor PetitionforReview
for Reviewwiththe
with the
Supreme
Supreme Court
Court ofTexas, and $7,500
of Texas, and $7,500 ifthe
if theWrit
WritofError Petitionfor
orPetition
of Erroror forR is Grantedby
isGranted
eview
Review bytheg
the
N
I- Supreme
Supreme Court
Court of
of Texas.

Respectfullysubmitted,
submitted,

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH,LLP
LEWIS LLP
/S/
/S/ JoshK.Davis

24031993
No.
0 K. Davis
JOSH
JOSHK.DAVIS
K. DAVIS
State Bar No. 24031993
CHRISTIAN
CHRISTIANR.JOHNSON
R. JOHNSON
StateBarNo.
StateBarNo.2 4062345
24062345
Weslayan
WeslayanTTower,
ower,SSuite
uite1400
1400
24Greenway Plaza
24 Greenway Plaza
Houston,Texas77046
Houston, Texas 77046
(713) 659-6767 Telephone
(713) 659-6767 Telephone
(713) 7 59-6830F acsimile
(713) 759-6830 Facsimile
ATTORNEYS FORDEFENDANTS,
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS,
SILVERADOS ENIORLIVING,INC.D/B/A
SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING, INC. D/B/A
SILVERADOSENIOR LIVING SUGAR LAND
SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING SUGAR LAND
CERTIFICATEOFSERVICE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Ihereby thata trueand
certify copyoftheforegoing wasserved
instrument uponall
counselIofrecord
hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrumentreceipt
via facsimile, handdelivery and!or mail,returnwas served upon all
requested
on
this lstDecember, 2014.,
counsel of record via e-file, facsimile, hand delivery and/or certified mail, return receipt requested on
this 1st December, 2014.

Philip Ross
PhilipHolbrook
1006 M. Ross Road
1006 Holbrook Road
SanAntonio,
Texas78218
San Antonio, Texas 78218
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Candice
LSchwager
Candice L Schwager
TheSchwager LawFirm
The Schwager
1417 Ramada Law Firm
Dr.
1417 Ramada
Houston,TexasDr.
77062
Houston, Texas 77062

4849-6015-5168.1

Silverado Appx. 0276
No. 1-15-586-CV 3625
Attorney
Attorney for
for Plaintiffs

SarahPatelPacheco
Sarah Patel Pacheco
Crain,Caton
Crain, Caton& &James,
James, PC
PC
1401 McKinney
1401McKinney Street
Street
1700 Center
1700 Five Houston Center
Houston, 77010
Houston, Texas 77010
Attorneys for CarolManley and
for Carol andDavid Peterson
David Peterson

JillW. Young
Jill W. Young
Maclntyre, McCulloch,
Maclntyre, McCulloch, &Young,
Stanfield & LLP
Young, LLP
2900Weslayan,
2900 Weslayan,Suite150
Suite 150
CJ
Houston,Texas
Houston, Texas77027
77027

0 W.RussJonesE
W. Russ Jones
JonesScherrer
Underwood, Jones Scherrer &Malouf,
& PLLC
Malouf, PLLC
5177Richmond
5177 Richmond Ave, Suite505
Ave, Suite 505
Houston,
Houston, Texas77056
Texas 77056/S/
JoshK.
/S/ Josh K.Davis
Davis
JosH
JOSH K. DAVIS

4849-6015-5168.1

Silverado Appx. 0277
No. 1-15-586-CV 3626
CAUSENO.427,208
CAUSE NO. 427,208

RUBYS.
RUBY S.PETERSON,
PETERSON, Individually, §§ IN PROBATE C
INPROBATE OURTNO.1
COURT NO. 1
MACKEY
MACKEY ("MACK")
("MACK") GLEN
GLENPETERSON
PETERSON §
PETERSON, NextFriend
PETERSON, Individually, Next Friend §§
Attorney—in
Attorney-in Fact forRUBY
Factfor RUBY §
PETERSON,
PETERSON,DONLESLIE
DON LESLIEPETERSON
PETERSON §§
Individually, Next Friend,
Next Friend, Attorney-in- §§
Attorney-in-
FactofRUBY
Fact of RUBYS.PETERSON,
S. PETERSON, LONNY
LONNY §§
PETERSON,
PETERSON, Individually
IndividuallyandNextFriend
and Next Friend §§
OfRUBY
Of RUBY S. S.Peterson
Peterson §
0 VS.
VS. § OF
OF

0 CAROLANNE
CAROL MANLEY,
ANNEMANLEY, §
DAVIDPETERSON,
DAVID PETERSON, SILVERADO
SILVERADO §
SENIORLIVING,
SENIOR LIVING,INC.
INC.d/b/aSILVERADO§
d/b/a SILVERADO§
SENIOR
SENIOR LIVING
LIVING — SUGAR
SUGAR LAND
LAND §§ HARRIS
HARRIS C OUNTY,
COUNTY, TEXAS
TEXAS

AFFIDAVIT
AFFIDAVIT OFJOSH
OF K.DAVIS
JOSH K. DAVIS

STATEOF
STATE OFTEXAS
TEXAS §§
COUNTY
COUNTY OFHARRIS
OF HARRIS

Beforem
Before theundersigned
me,e,the undersigned authority, this day, p
on thisday,
authority, on ersonally
personally appeared Josh
appeared Josh K.Davis
K. Davis aa

person whoispersonally
person who knownto
is personally known tome.
me.After administered
AfterIIadministered oathtotohim,
anoath
an him,upon hisoath,
uponhis hestated:
oath, he stated:

1. "My
1. nameisisJosh
"Myname Davis. IIam
K.Davis.
Josh K. amover theage
over the oftwenty-one
ageof (21)yyears
twenty-one (21) earsaand
ndhave never b
have never een
been
convicted of a felony. I am ofsound m ind,
c apableo fmaking t hisaffidavit,
andfully
convicted of a felony. I am of sound mind, capable of making this affidavit, and fully
competent
competent to testify
to thematters
testify ttoothe mattershereinstated,
herein stated,andIhave knowledge of
personal knowledge
and I have personal of every
every
herein.
made
statement
statement made herein.
2. II ama
2. am a licensed intheStateofTexas,
attorneyin
licensed attorney partner w
a partner
the State of Texas, a with the law firm of Lewis Brisbois
iththelawfirmofLewis Brisbois
Bisgaard
Bisgaard &Smith,
& L.L.P.,
Smith, L.L.P., andhave
and beenemployed
have been employed bySilverado Senior Living,
by Silverado Senior Living, Inc.
Inc. d /b/a
d/b/a
SilveradoSenior
Silverado SeniorLivingSugarLand(Silverado)
Living Sugar Land (Silverado) to to defend inthe
defenditit in theabove-entitled and
above-entitled and
numbered
numbered cause.
cause. This affidavit
Thisaffidavit isprepared
is insupport
prepared in support ofApplication
of Application forAttorneys’ Fees
for Attorneys' Fees
Pursuantto
Pursuant Rule9la
to Rule OrderEntered
91a Order EnteredOnOnNovember
November 10,I0,2014.
2014.
3. As
3. Asaapartner
partner for
for LEWIS BRISBOISBISGAARDBISGAARD && SMITH LLPLLP("LBBS") I amfamiliar
("LBBS")I am with its
familiarwith its
business
business practices.
practices. Asaapart
As ofitsusual
partof regular
andregular
its usual and business, LBBS
business, LBBS k eepsrregular
keeps egular records
records
oflegal
of work performed.
legal work am familiar
performed. II am familiar with
with therecords kept a
the records kept ndmaintained
and intheusual
maintained in the usual and
and
regular
regular c ourseof
course ofbusiness. have personal supervision,
business. II havepersonal supervision, custody,
custody, control
control a ndaccess
and to the
access to the
records ofthis
records of firmas
this firm they pertain
asthey the legal services
pertain ttoothelegal services rendered
rendered herein. I have examined
herein. Ihave examined the
the
records
records keptandmaintained
kept and maintained bythisfirmintheregular course o
by this firm in the regular course offitsbusiness
its business andsuch
and such
records
records reflect
reflect certain
certain ttransactions
ransactions intherendering
in the renderingoflegal
of legalsservices
ervicesinthe matter. IInnthe
in thematter. the
= EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT
4846-9716-7648.1
4846-9716-7648.1

Silverado Appx. 0278
No. 1-15-586-CV 3627
course of
normal course myduties
ofmy dutiesandresponsibilities
and responsibilitiesIreceive,
I receive,review
reviewand
and maintaininvoices
invoicessent
sent
to myclients
tomy clientswhich
whichiinclude
ncludesupportingdocumentation
documentationand/or
and/orrecords
recordsand am acustodian
andama custodianof
of
the
the s ame.
same. Furthermore,
Furthermore, itisin
it is inthe
then ormalcourseof
course
normal mydduties
ofmy uties
and
andrresponsibilities
esponsibilitiestotoreview
review
and
and maintain
maintain pre—bills
pre-bills which contemporaneoustime
recontemporaneous
which aare timerecords
recordsmaintained
maintainedintheregular
in the regular
course ofbusiness
course of business prior obeing
prior tto entttootheclient
being ssent the clientfor paymentand
forpayment amcustodian
andam custodian of thesame.
same.
tothisAffidavit
Attached to asExhibit
this Affidavitas Exhibit 11,,andincorporated
and incorporatedintoit
into itbyreference,
by reference,are trueand
aretrue and
correct copies
correct copies of invoices
of redacted' invoices with ndbilling
cost aand
with supporting cost billingrrecords
ecords(BatesNos.
Nos.SSSL
SL
000001-000076)
000001-000076)which wereincurred
whichwere incurredaand
nd submittedfor paymentrelated
forpayment totheabove
relatedto the above
referenced
referenced m n thedatenoted
atteroon
matter the date notedthereon
thereonas aswell asredacted
wellas redactedpre-bills
pre-bills((Bates
BatesNNos.
os.SSL
SSL
000077-000126)
000077-000126) which reflect attorney feesthathavebeenincurred
which reflect ndwillbe
fees that have been incurredaand will beinvoiced
invoicedinin
mid-December
mid-December perper guidelines.
guidelines.The
Theinvoices
invoiceswith
withsupporting
supportingrecords
recordsasaswell spre-bills
wellaas pre-billsare
are
made a courseooffregularly
made aassacourse conductedbusiness
regularlyconducted businessby personswith
bypersons withknowledge
knowledgeat or nearthe
atornear the
time
time ofmaking
of makingby orfrom
byor from informationtransmitted
transmittedby a personw
byaperson ithknowledge
with knowledgeofthe
of theevent
event
or information
or informationrecorded.
recorded. L BBSmaintains
LBBS maintainsand/or
and/orkkeeps
eepsaacopy
copyoftheinvoices
of the invoiceswith
with
supporting
supporting records
records aand
ndpre-bills
pre-billsiin
ntheregular courseofitsbusiness.,
the regularcourse of its business.
4. am very familiar
4. II amvery familiar w iththe
with natureofthis
the nature caseandtheworkwhich
of thiscase and the work whichhasbeenperformed
has been performedtoto
date.I knowledgeable
amknowledgeable
date. I am with
with thenumber
the number ofhours pentandthe
of hourssspent amountscharged
and theamounts chargedto
tomy
my
clientby
client by LewisBrisbois
Lewis BrisboisBBisgaard
isgaard&&Smith,
Smith,LL.L.P. amfamiliar
.L.P.II am familiarw ithwhatlawyers
with what lawyersof
of
similar
similar expert ability
ability iin the State ofTexas
ntheState of Texasaare recharging
chargingforsimilar servicesrendered
for similarservices renderedinin
connection with thedefense ofsimilar Ihave been
connection with the defense of similar matters. I have been continuouslylicensed
continuously licensedinthe
in the
StateofTexasince22001,
State of Texas ssince 001,andIhave otbeen
I havennot the subjectof
beenthesubject any disciplinaryproceedings
ofany proceedingsor
grievances. Myresumeiisand
grievances. My resume
attached
s attached ttoo thisAffidavit as Exhibit
this Affidavit as 2, is
Exhibit2, is incorporated
incorporatedby
or
by
reference if set out fully
as if setout
reference as fully hereinand
includes additional
and includes additionaldetail
detailregarding
regardingmymyknowledge,
knowledge,
education, background
education, background and
experience.
and experience.
5. Inconnection
5. In connection with
with my
defense ofthiscase,DDefendant
my defense of thiscase,
efendant has
has incurred,to todate,
date,aattorney
ttorney fees
fees
and costs inthe amount of$117,183.40 withregard t o defending against thechallenged
and costs in the amount of $117,183.40 with regard to defending against the challenged
causes ofaction whichwere
causes of action whichw ereddismissed
ismissed onNovember 10,2014and arerecoverable
on November 10, 2014 andare recoverablepursuant
pursuant
to Texas R uleof CivilP rocedure 9la.7. Thechallenged causes o factioncomprised
to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a.7. The challenged causes of action comprised
Plaintiffscomplete lawsuitagainst Defendantforthelifeofthelitigation untilPlaintiffs’
Plaintiffs complete lawsuit against Defendant for the life of the litigation until Plaintiffs'
FourthAmended Petitionwhichappearstto
ohaveadded claimforbreachof duty
Fourth Amended Petition whichappears have addedaa claim for breach of fiduciary duty
against Defendant. AsPlaintiffs failedononsuit thisnewallegation following the
against Defendant. As Plaintiffs failed tto nonsuit thisnew allegation following the hearing
on the9laMotion t o Dismiss, counsel recently inquired
whether or not an additional
on the 91a Motion to Dismiss, counsel recently inquired whether or not an additional 91a
9la
Motion to Dismiss relatedto th_iscauseofaction
Motion to Dismiss related to thiscause
wouldbe necessary.Exhibit
of action would benecessary.
3 tothis
Exhibit 3to this
Affidavit
is
is aatrue
true
and
and
correct
correctcopy
copy
ofemail
of email
correspondence
correspondence
totoopposing
opposing
counsel
counsel reflecting
the whichw asmade aand
ndkept intheregularcourseooffbusiness atthetimenotedon
the inquiry
bywhich was kept in the regularcourse business at the time notedon
the same aperson wmade
ithknowledge andisincorporated byreference if setoutfully
the same by a person with knowledge and is incorporated by referenceas
herein.InlightofPlaintiffs
failureto timelyrespond,anadditional as if set out fully
9la Motionto Dismiss
herein. In light ofFees
willberequired. Plaintiffs
relatedfailure to timelywillbesegregated
respond, an additional 91a Motion to Dismiss
will be required. Fees
to the same will
related to the same be segregated
shouldiitt prove necessary.
However, to thedate ofthisfee hasnotshould
incurred prove
any
necessary.
feesororcosts
However,
solely to thePlaintiffs’
related date of this feeallegation
application, Defendant
against has
Silverado not incurred
forbreach of any fees costs
duty
to
solely related to Plaintiffs' new
at
new allegation against Silverado for breach of fiduciary duty at

Unredacted
records
arebeingsimultaneously
submitted
totheCourtfor review
Unredacted records are being simultaneously submitted to the Court for in camera review
andinspection.
and inspection.

4846-9716-7648.1
4846-9716-7648A

Silverado Appx. 0279
No. 1-15-586-CV 3628
Paragraph 88oftheFourth
88 of the FourthA mended
Amended therefore, segregationoffees
Petition;therefore, of feesrelated tothis
relatedto this
cause o
cause offaction
action iis
snot
not necessary atthistime.
necessary at this time.
6.
6. Such
Such ffees
eesinclude,
include,but notlimited
renot
butaare to,the
limitedto, the investigationinto madebby
allegationsmade
intoallegations y plaintiff,
preparing pleadings
pleadings andmotions
and motionsiin
ndefense
defenseoof Defendant,discovery
fDefendant, discoveryincluding
includingddepositions,
epositions,
communication
communicationwithwithclient and all
clientand other counsel, hhearing
all othercounsel, earingattendance
attendanceaand
nd necessary
necessary
investigation
investigation work,
work,preparationof thismotion
preparationofthis motionaand
ndthe legalresearch
necessarylegal
thenecessary researchrequired
requiredfor
for
itscompletion. Theseactions
its completion. These actionsw reasonableand
erereasonable
were necessaryfortherepresentation
and necessary for the representationofof
Silverado. Pleasesee
Silverado. Please seetherecords
the records aattached
ttachedhhereto
eretoas
asExhibit andincorporated
Exhibit11and incorporatedbyreference
by reference
as if
as set outfully
if setout fullyherein foraadetailed
hereinfor detailedaaccounting
ccounting of the servicesperformed,
ofthe whoperformed
performed,who performed
them, atwhat
them, at whathhourly
ourly ate,w
rrate, hentthey
when werepperformed,
heywere erformed,and howmuch
andhow timethework
muchtime the workrequired
required
to complete.
to complete.
0
7. The
7. requestedfor
amountrequested
The amount forall andreasonable
costsand
allcosts reasonableand necessaryfees
andnecessary feesincurred
incurredwith
withrespect
respect
to thechallenged
to causesofaction
the challenged causes of action reflectsthenumber
the numberofhours pent(330.6
of hourssspent (330.6hhours
oursooffpartner
partner
0 time;
time; 3343.1
43.1 hours
hours ofassociate
of associate ttime
imeand23.6hours
and 23.6 hours oflawclerk
of law clerktime) tthe
time)aat amountcharged
theamount charged
by
by anan hour ateof$190
hour rrate hourffor
perhour
of $190per orpartners,
partners, $175per hourforassociates
perhour and$65
for associatesand perhour
$65per hour
forLaw
for Law Clerks.2 In my opinion,
In my all of thetime
opinion, allofthe spentand
timespent
incurred
expenses incurredwere
andexpenses
reasonable
were reasonable
and
and necessary.
necessary.
8. Plaintiffs
8. Plaintiffs chose
chosetto pursueaafederal
opursue lawsuit infurtherance ofthependingstatecourt
federal lawsuit in furtherance of the pendingstate courtm atter
forcing Defendant
forcing Defendantto
incur reasonable andnecessaryfees
to incur reasonable andnecessary
defending againstthe challenged
matter
fees defending against the challenged
causes of Plaintiffs attempt
causes of action.3 Plaintiffs attempt to
to recover
theirfederal fees aspart
recover their federal feesas
ofthe statecourt
part of thestate court
proceeding, butin an abundance ofcaution andfortheconvenience oftheCourt, Defendant
proceeding, but in an abundance of caution and for the convenience of the Court, Defendant
segregatesandidentifiesthatof the amounts identifiedaboveit
segregates and identifies that of the amounts
has incurred, date,
above it has incurred,toto date,
attorneyfeesinthe amount of withregardtodefending
of $18,830.00 with regardto
attorney fees in the amount
againstthefederal
defending against the federal
lawsuitfiledcontemporaneously withthis state courtpproceeding.
lawsuit filed contemporaneously with thisstatecourt
roceeding.it
9. lfPlaintiffs
9. If Plaintiffs
it necessaryto
find itnecessary
file MotiontoReconsider
to fileaa Motionto
and/orRescind, itis myopinion
Reconsider and/or Rescind, it ismy opinion
that $2,500.00 would bethereasonable and necessary
that $2,500.00 would be the reasonable and necessary
feesforhandling theresponsive
fees for handling the responsive
andhearing r elated
briefing and hearing related
o the
tto thesame.
lf thematter i sappealed, it is
same. If the matter is appealed, it ismy
opinionthat
my opinion that
$10,000.00 would bethe reasonable and necessary feesforhandlingtheappellee’s case in
$10,000.00 would be the reasonable and necessary fees for handling the appellee's
forReview case
within
the courtofappeals, $7,500.00 ifplaintiff WritofError rPetition
plaintiff filesaa Writ of Erroroor
the court of appeals, $7,500.00 if $7,500.00 Petition for Review with
theSupreme CourtofTexas,and iftheWrit o fError
the Supreme Court of Texas, and $7,500.00 if the Writ of Erroroor
Petition f orReview is
r Petition for Review is
Granted bytheSupreme CourtofTexas.
Granted by the Supreme Court of Texas.

2 Acontractual rateincrease went intoeffectonSeptember 1,2014forthisclient.Alower
A contractual
hourforrate increase went into effect on September 1, 2014 for of$65
rateor $175 p er
rate or $175 perpreviously
hour for partners,
$160per hour forassociates
$160 per hour fortheitemized
andthe
associates and
sameratethis client. A lower
perhour for
the same rate of $65 per hour for
lawclerks w as charged as on invoices.
law clerks was previously charged as reflected on the itemized invoices.
SeeSupplement to Application forPayment ofAttomey’s FeesandExpenses, Expert
3 See Supplement to Application for Payment of Attorney's Fees and Expenses, Expert
witness FeesandExpenses andCostsofCourt, on withtheCourtand byreference
witness Feesherein,
if setout and Expenses and Costs of
paragraph Court,
and on file with
Candice the Court
Schwager’s and incorporated
itemized invoices by reference
wherein she
as
as if set out herein,
at
at paragraph
one
one and
at
at Candice Schwager's itemized invoices wherein she
attempts the
to have estate ofRuby Peterson reimburse attorneys feesforthefederal lawsuit

4846-9716-76
attempts to
following have thewith
settlement estate of p
other Ruby Peterson reimburse attorneys fees for the federal lawsuit
arties.
following settlement with other parties. _

4845-9716-7648.1

Silverado Appx. 0280
No. 1-15-586-CV 3629
10.
10. Additionally,it it isanticipated
is anticipatedthatsuch requestwillrequire
that suchrequest will requireaamendment
mendment totoinclude
includeccosts
osts
related
related tto o theneed
the need for attend tthe
for counsel to attend hehearing
hearingrrelated this fee application,the
elatedtotothisfeeapplication, the
additional time
additional time required
required inpreparation,
in preparation,and argumentin
andargument supportofthis
insupport of thisapplication.
application.Further,
Further,
itit is that additional, feeswillbeincurred
anticipated that
is anticipated of Plaintiffs'anticipated
in receiptofPlaintiffs’
will be incurredinreceipt anticipated
Response and
Response the preparationof
and thepreparation ofaaReply
Replyaass necessary.
The above stated
11.Theabove
ll. are in
stated fees are in my opinionrreasonable
my opinion easonable and necessaryin
and inrelation tothe
relationto the
customary feescharged
customary fees charged ffor
orthe same or
the same similar sservices
or similar ervices in Harris County,Texas,
inHarris Texas, considering
the experience, reputation,
theexperience, of myself aand
and ability ofmyself
reputation, andability ndthe atLewis
attorneysat
theattorneys LewisBBrisbois
risboisBisgaard
Bisgaard
& Smith,L.L.P.whohaveworked
& Smith, L.L.P. who have worked on on this case, the
this case, controversyiinvolved,
the controversy nvolved,the thetime
time
limitationsiimposed,
limitations the results obtained,andthe
mposed,theresultsobtained, natureandlengthof
and thenature and length oftherelationship
the relationship
between Lewis Brisbois
between Lewis BrisboisB isgaard&
Bisgaard &Smith, .L.P.aand
Smith,LL.L.P. ndSilverado eniorLLiving,
SilveradoSSenior iving,Inc.d/b/a
Inc. d/b/a
0 Silverado S enior L iving Sugar L and."
Silverado Senior Living Sugar Land."
Oki
FURTHER
FURTHER AFFIANT
AFFIANT SSAYETH
AYETHNOT.
NOT.
0

··

OSH
OSHK.
K. 1AVIS,
AVIS,Affiant
Affiant

SWORN TO and SUBSCRIBEDbefore
SWORN TOandSUBSCRIBED meby
beforeme by .)0SY.) K bek\jcs , Affiant, on the 1st
dayofDecember,
day of December, 2014.
2014.

1•10.6 _ - a _
NotaryPublic,State exas
Notary Public, State of exas

• .
DENEISHA N.FISCHER
Notary Pulasc, Slate of Texas

2017
AUgal :r,

4846-9716-7648.1

Silverado Appx. 0281
No. 1-15-586-CV 3630
. SSLOOOOO1
SSL000001

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD&
& SMITHLLP
up
LAWYERS
LAWYERS
SUITE 1200
221
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
TELEPHONE
(213)
TELEPHONE (213) 250..1800
FEDERAL I.D, NO XX-XXXXXXX
'

tn
. '~

_ September
September30,
2014
30, 2014 •
CNASpecialty
CNA invoiceNo. 1391812
P.O.SpeiliClaims
P.O. Box l
Chicago. 60680-8317
Chicago, 'note 60680-8317
Invoice No, 1391812
`
Attn:
Attn:
- Claim
ClaimConsultant
0 Consuitant -
N
0 _ _—
OurFi|e
No.;50013-1476
Re; Silverado
Rel Peterson vvSilverado
Our File No..
Senior
Senior Living
50013-1476
129T
Court
CourtCase
129T -
Court Case No_. 2014-40980
Your
Your No.:
No.:
No.
_1111111.11111110
2014-40980

Current Feesthrough08/31/14
through 08/31/14 47,427.50
47,427.50
Current
Current Disbursementsthrough
through08/31/14
08/31/14 106.17
106.17
TotalCurrent
Current Charges 47,533.67

***Please
Pleasereturnthis yourpayment.
return this page withyour payment.*** -

*Life
*Life To
ToDate
DateF eesBilled: 47,427.50
*Life
Total
Billed:
Fees
ToDateDisb.
47,533.67
Billed: _
*Life To Date Disb.B
.
illed:
Billed:
*Lite to Date Total Billed:
47,427.50
106.17
106.17
47,533.67
_

WlLL
APPEAR
ALATER
ON WHICH BEEN
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED,
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0282
No. 1-15-586-CV 3631
SSLO0O0O2
SSL000002
BISGAARD
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD LLP
& SMITH up
LAWYERS
LAWYERS
· 221 NORTHSUITE 1200
1200
221NORTH FIGUEROA
FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 96012
LOS
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE (213) 250-1500
FEDERAL
NO
FEDERAL I.D. NO XX-XXXXXXX
_

September
September 30,2014
30, 2014 '
CNASpecial Claims
CNA No. 1391812
Invoice No. 1391812
P.O.B
P.O. Bo0
- 60680-8317
inois60680-8317
Chicago, inois _
_
Attn: 4.1111111111111111118
Attn:
ClaimConsultant
Claim Consultant

Re:Peterson
Re: Peterson Silverado
vvSilverado SeniorLiving
Senior Living
_
OurFileN0.:
Our File No.: 50013-1476
50013-1476
.
Court
Court 129T
129T
CourtCase
Court CaseNo.
No. 2014-40980
2014-40980
No.;
Your
Your No.:
.
Current Fees 08/31/14
through08/31/14
Fees through 47,427.50
47,427.50
. -
Current
Current Disbursements
Disbursements through
through 08/31/14
08/31/14 106.17
106.17
TotalCurrentCharges
Total Current Charges 47,533.67

*Life
'Life To DateFees
ToDate FeesBilled:
Billed: 47,427.50
47,427.50
T0Date
'Life To Date Dist). Billed:
Disb.Billed: 106.17
106.17
DateTotal
to Date
*Life to TotalBilled: 47,533.67
47,533.67

DISBURSEMENTS
MADE BEEN
HAVEYET REcEivE¤,
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED,
APPEARLATER
STATEMENT
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0283
No. 1-15-586-CV 3632
SSL000003
SSL000003

I3RISBOIS BISGAARD &
LEWISBRISBOIS
LEWIS SMITHLLp
& SMITH
LAWYERS
LAWYERS

221
1200
SUITE 1200
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
ANGELES,
LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90012
(213)
TELEPHONE (213) 250-1800
FEDERAL 1.0. NO ' XX-XXXXXXX

File
File 50013.1475 CNA
50013-1476 CNA _
Specialty Claims
Claims 9/30/14
9/30/14
rt Number
Number Peterson v S1verado
Silvered° Senior _
SeniorLiving
Living 1391812
1391812
JKID1 _-
t-t _ : Life-to-Date
Life-to-Date -
ri.
0
Period:
Life
Date
to Activity
Activity
Period: Life to Date

DevelomentAdministratn
CurrentB
Current ill
Bill Bllled
Billed

N
L110
L110
. Case
Ll . Case Assessment,DevelopmentAdministratn
FactInvestigation/Development:
Fact Investigation/Development: 30,766.00 30,766.00
30,766.00
N L120 Analysis/Strategy:
L120 Analysis/Strategy: 13,688.50
13,688.50 13,688.50
13,688.50
0 35.00 35.00_
L130 Experts/Consultants:
L130 35.00 35.00
N _
44,489.50 44,489.50
r• Subtbtal 44,489.50 44,489.50
_
. Pre-Trial and
Pleadings
L2 . Pre-Trial Pleadings and Motions
L210 Pleadings:
L210 _ 70.00
70.00 70.00
70.00
Written &Submiss.:
Motions 2,343.00 2,343.00
_L250Other
L250 Other Written Motions & Submiss.: 2,343.00 2,343.00
. Subtotal 2,413.00 2,413.00
2,413.00
Subtotal 2,413.00

L3. Discovery ·
. 35.00
— L330
L330 Depositions:
Depositions: 35.00 35.00
L360 OnSiteinspections
L360 On Site Inspections 35.00
35.00 35.00
35.00

· Subtotal
Subtotal 70.00
70.00 70.00
70.00

. Trial
L4 . Trial andTrial
Preparation and Trial
L450Trial
L450 Hearing
Trial & Hearing Attendance: 455.00
455.00 455.00
455.00 -
. Subtotal
Subtotal
_ 455.00
455.00 455.00
466.00

TotalFees
Total Fees 47,427.50
47,427.50 47,427.50
47,427.50
_
Disbursements
Disbursements
E101Copying
E101 Copying .77
.77 .77
.77
E112Court
Fees
E112 Court Fees 5.40
-100.00
5.40 5.40
5.40
E115Deposition
E115 Deposition Transcripts 100.00 100.00
100.00
Total Disbursements
Total Disbursements 106.17
106.17 106.17
106.17

TotalCurrentCharges
Total Current Charges 47,533.67
47,533.67 47,533.67
47,533.67
.

MADE ACCOUNT,
A
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH SILLS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED,
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0284
No. 1-15-586-CV 3633
SSLOOOOO4
SSL000004

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLT,
LAWYERS
LAWYERS
1200
SUITE 1200
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
(213)
.
TELEPHONE (213) 250-1600
_ _ 1.0.
FEDERAL W. NO 9S-3720022

·
tT
Frle
File 50013-1476
50013-1476 CNA
CNA SpecialtyClaims
Claims 9/30/14
9/30/14
Number
Number Peterson
PetersonvvSrverado
Silverado Senior Living 1391812 ,
1391812
I= JKD1
JKD1 · . Page
Page 11
Date
Date Atty Description of
of Services Rendered Hours
Hours Amount
Amount
7/18/14 JMS
7/18/14 JMS Fact
Fact lnvestigation/Development:
Investigation/Development: Research: Res
I
. Fact _ 1.2
1.2 192.00
192.00
7/1 JMS
7/18/14 JMS Factlnvestigation/Development:Review/Analyz
Investigation/Development: RevIew/Analyz

N 7/18/14 .EJ actlnvestl . 2.3
2.3 368.00
7/18/14 K
KEJ act Investiation/Development:
ation/Devalopment: Review/Analyz1101.4..11111MIIIIIINIO
/14
7/21/14 JKD act iInvestigatIon/Develo
act nvestigation/Develome
me view/Analyz .0
.8 140.00
140.00
iew/Analyz

7/21/14 JMS Fact lnvestigation/Development: _drafting .6 105.00
105.00
7/21/14 JMS Fact Investigation/Development; Draft/Revise: Continued drafting original answer,
application for
application for temporary restraining
restraining order
orderaand
ndtemporary
temporary injunctionsandorder
and orderoon
n
same.
same.
7/21/14JMS Fact
3.9
3.9 624.00
624.00
7/21/14 JMS Fact Investigation/Development: Communicate(With ` an edmultiple
ed multiple
correspondences with clients regarding

7/21/14JMS Factlnvestigetion/Development:Review/Analyz -. .. 1.0
1.0 160.00
160.00
7/21/14 JMS Fact Investigation/Development: Review/Analyz

7/21/14 JM-S _
Investigation/Development:
7/21/14 JMS Fact Investigation/Development:
.
Communicate(Other
Communicate(Other Outside
OutsideCCounsel):
ounsel): Telhone
Tel hone
1.6 256.00
1.6 256.00
callwith counselfor patient's P
call with counsel for co-defendants, patient's OArelatives.
POA relatives, regarding
.3.3 48.00
48.00
7/23/14JKD Investigation/Development: Client):
7/23/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Communicate(VVith Client): Telephoneconference
conference
Prepare for
telephone
conference
' telephone conferenceby
JMSIMO
Fact
by
Investigation/Development:
Communicate(\Nith
Client):
Telephone
conference .0
.8 140.00
140.00
7/23/14 JMS Fact Investigation/Development: CommunIcate(With Client): Telephone conference
with_ ardin
JMSact .4.4 64.00
64.00 -
Original
Answer
7/23/14 JMS Fact Investigation/Development: Draft/Revise: Drafted Defendants' Original Answer
andRequest forDisclosure
in responsetoto PlaintiffsOriginal
and Request for Disclosure inresponse 1.4- OriginalPetition. 224.00
JMSFact
lnvestigation/Development:
drafting
Defendants'
Response 1.4 Petition. 224.00
to Emergency
Application
for Order.
Restrainin
7/23/14 JMS Fact Investigation/Development: Draft/Revise: Began drafting Defendants' Response
JMSFact
to Plaintiffs' Emergency Application for Temporary Restraining Order.
7/23/14 JMS Fact Investigation/Development: Researc
1.9 304.00

7/24/14JKD _
FactInvestigation/Develo ' /Anal . 3.3
528.00
528.00
7/24/14 JKD Fact Investigationtevelo ·

JKDFact _ .Communicate(Other
lnvestigation/Development: 210.00
7/24/14 JKD Fact
Extemal):
Conduct
Investigation/Development:
lengthy
Communicate(Other External): Conduct lengthy
1.2 210.00
telephone withSarahPacheco, forfamily,
telephone conference with Sarah Pacheco, counsel for family, regarding...
|Attend
WillitAttend
hearing onMotion to
hearing on Motion to
.
Transferfor . and statement tothecourt. 3.6 630.00
Transfer for observation and unoffidal
7/24/14JMS Factlnvestigation/Development: position
AppearFor/Attend:statement to
Appearedthe court.
forandmonitored 3.6 630.00
7/24/14 JMS Fact Investigation/Development: Appear For/Attend: Appeared for and monitored

DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED,
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0285
No. 1-15-586-CV 3634
SSL000005
SSL000005
.
BRISBOIS
LEWIS B RISBOIS BISGAARD SMITH.
BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
· LAWYERS
LAWYERS
SUITE 1200 _
NORTH
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET

·
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 50017
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE (213) 250-1800
FEDERAL
NO
FEDERAL I.D. NO 959720522
_
.
File
File 50013-1476 _CNA Claims
CNA Specialty Claims 9/30/14
9/30/14
_
Number
Number Peterson vv Silvered° Senior
Peterson SeniorLiving
Living 1391_812
1391812
JKD1 Page
Page 2
2
Date
Date Atty of Rendered
Description of Services Rendered Hours Amount
Hours Amount
hearingon
hearing co~defendants‘
onco-defendants' motion
motion Iotransfer
to toguardianship
caseto
transfer case proceeding
guardianship proceeding in
in
probate court.
.
2.5 400.00
7/24/14 JMS FactlnvestigationlDevelopment:
JMSFact Rev'
Investigation/Development: Rev' .
as _ 2.6
2.6 415.00
416.00
0 7/25/14JKD
7/25/14 Factlnvesti
JKD Fact Invest atioNDevelo ment: ment:Review/Analyz
Review/Analyz
Prepare emails,
responsive pleadings,
Prepare responsive emalls, pleadings,
- co esponen an ue
col esp n e an u e 11 11agreements.Appear
agreements. forand
Appear for arid attend numerous
numerous telephone
telephone
conferences
conferences regarding andhandling
sameand
regarding same handling of
of reporting. ‘ 10.0
10.0 1,750.00
1,750.00
7/25/14JMS
7/25/14 FactInvestigation/Development:
JMS Fact Investigation/Development:Reviewlal
Review/ al
. _
2.6 416.00
7/25/14JMS
7/25/14 JMS Review/Analyz|
Factlnveslg o /Development:
` .3
.3 48.00
48.00
7/25/14 JMSFactFactinvestigation/Development:
7/25/14JMS proposed
Investigation/Development: Draft/Revise: Drafted proposed Rule
Rule 1111Agreement to
Agreement to
Plaintiffs andrem
7/25/14 Plaintiffs counsel
counsel regarding
regarding access
7/25/14 JMS Fact n ti ation/Development Researc
topro
accessto prope and remo lof loitive
of e loltive content.
content. 1,1
1.1

1.2
1.2
176.00

192.00
192.00
7/25/14JMS
7/25/14 FactInvestigation/Development:
JMS Fact lnvestigation/Development: Revised
Draft/Revise: Revised Original
Defendants' Original Answer
Answer in
in
_ lightofofPlalntiffs'
light Amended
Plaintiffs' Amended Pleading.
Pleading. .5
.5 -80.00
80.00
7/26/14 JMS Fact
7/26/14JMS FactInvestigation/Development:
Investigatlon/Development: Review/Analyze:
Review/Analyze: Reviewed
Reviewed andrevised
and Defendant's
revised Defendant's
Original
Original Answer
Answer to toinclude pleadto thejurisdiction
include plead the jurisdiction forlackofstanding.
for lack of standing. 1.2
1.2 192.00
192.00
7/27/14JKD
7/27/14 FactInvestigation/Development:
JKD Fact Investlgation/Development: Review/Anal
Review/Anal e
Multiple
telephone
conferences
conferences with
with facility personnel
facility personnel regardin
regardin
mil Prepare4 3.2
3.2 560.00
JKD
7/28/14 JKD Factlnvestigati0nIDeveIopment:
Fact Investigation/Development: Plan&Prepare
Plan For:Prepare for
& Prepare For: _ Hearing
forandattend
and attend Hearing
on injunction
onPlaintiffs Injunction meeting
hearing, meeting withwitnesses,
with witnesses,counsel
counsel daysconclusion.
upondays
upon conclusion. ‘
Preparation
Preparation forsecond
for secondday.day. . 12.6
12.6 2,205.00
2,205.00
JMSFactFactlnvesti
7/28/14 JMS ation/Develoent:Communicate(\Nith
Investigation/Development: Client):
Communicate(With Client): .
Conference
Conference callwith
call withclients
clients
.5
.5 80;0O
80.00
7/28/14JMS
7/28/14 JMS|. actInvestigation/Develo Communicaie(With
ment:Communicate(With Client):
Client): Conference
Confe'rence callw
call clients
ithclients
with

.3
.3 48.00
48.00
7/28/14JMS
7/28/14 FactInvestigation/Develo
JMS Fact investlgatIonfDevelo ent:Review/Analyz _
1.4 224.00
7/28/14JMS
7/28/14 actlnvestigation/Development:
JMS ad Investigation/Development: PlanPlan&Prepare
& Prepare For:Prepared
For: forand-attended
Preparerffor arid attended
hearingon
hearing Application
onPlaintiffs' Application forTemporary
for Restraining
Temporary Restraining Orderand
Order andTemporary
Temporary
lnjunctions
injunctions wherein
wherein partiesattempted
parties attempted to andcase
tosettle and setforhearing
caseset for hearing ttomorrow.
omorrow. 7.5
7.5 1,200.00
7/29/14JKD FactInvestigation/Development: Appear For/Attend:
7/29/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Appear For/Attend: Appear
Appear forandattend
for and attend Plaintiffs .
injunction
Injunction hearing,
hearing, meeting
clie¤| ponconclusion
meetinguupon ' counsel forforco-defendant.
conclusionw`hcounsel Telephone
co-defendant. Telephone
conference
conference with
with clien . 12.4
12.4 2,170.00
2,170.00 _
7/29/14JMS FactFactInvestigationIDevelopment:
7/29/14 InvestigatioNDevelopment: Appear Appear For/Attend:
For/Attend: Prepared
Prepared forandattended
for and attended
hearingoonn Plaintiffs' application
hearing application fortemporary
for restraining
temporary restraining orderand
order andrequest
request ffor
or
temporary
temporary injunctions. 8.5
8.5 1,360.00
7/29/14JMS
7/29/14 Factlnvestigation/Development;
JMS Fact Review/Analyz|
Investigation/Development: Review/AnalyzetraallaMMININ/
_

FORYOUR ACCOUNT, FOR
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR FORWHICH BILLS HAVE NOT
NOTYET
YETBEEN
BEENRECEIVED,
RECENED,
vini.L.
WILL A PPEAR
APPEAR O
ONNALATER STATEMENT
A LATER STATEMENT
_

Silverado Appx. 0286
No. 1-15-586-CV 3635
SSLO00006
SSL000006
_
LEWIS BRISBOIS
BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH i_Lp
LAWYERS
SUITE 1200
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
.
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
TELEPHONE (213) 250-1000
FEDERAL
NO
FEDERAL LD. NO 95.3720522
l
l
-
File
File 50013-1476
50013-1476 CNA
CNA Specialty Claims
. 9/30/14
9/30/14
Number
Number Peterson v Srverado
Silvered()S eniorLiving
Senior Living 1391812
1391812

Att Descri
JKD1
Date
JKD1
Date Atty tion
of Hours Amount
Description of Services Rendered
_
Hours
Page
Page 33
Amount

1111111111111PPmll.1"ml""."m'm".mu.,
0
7/30/14
Fact Meeting
_ lnvestigatlon/Development:
. Communlcate(Wlth
_
2.2
7/30/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Communicate(With Client): Meeting withal.
for forand Appear for and attend
2.2 352.00

. Plaintiffsln`unction our courtandcounsel
Injunction hearing, meetingour and counsel regarding

0 lnvestigation/Development:
Fact Appear for
hearing
and_ 14.2 2,485.00
7/30/14 JMS Fact Investigation/Development: Appear For/Attend: Prepared for and attended
Plaintiffs'Application
on Plalntlffs'
hearing on for Temporary RestrainingOrder
ApplicationforTemporary and requestfor
Orderandrequest for
14.2 2,485.00

Temporary
Temporary lnjunction.10.2
Injunction. 10.2 1,632.00
1,632.00
7/30/14JWB Factlnvestigation/Development: Draft/Revise: Draft r eportc oncernin
7/30/14 JWB Fact Investigation/ Development: Draft/Revise: Draft/Revise: Draft report concemin

. 3.6
3.6
576.00
576.00
7/30/14 LCCFact
7/30/14 LCC Investigation/Development: Research:
Factlnvestlgation/Development: Research: Research
.5.5 32.50
` 7/31/14
7/31/14
|.
JGB Factlnvestigation/Development: External):
JGB ilallallillare:111.11.11111111111.111.1.11111111.11111
FactInvestigation/Development: Review/Analyze:
7/31/14 JGB Fact Investigation/Development: Review/Analyze: Receive
Communications
1.111.
1111.1
Receive aand
ndreview
with
7/31/14 JGB Fact Investlgation/Development: Communicate(Other External): Communications with
.6
105.00
32.50

105.00
.

/14Fact
7/31 correspondence
correspondence
fro|
from
Conference
ment: Client
call review

7/31/14 JGB Fact Investigatton/Develo meet: Communicate(With Client : Conference call waren.
.11 17.50
17.50

JGB
7/31/14 JGB
investigation/Development:
· 1.0 175.00
Review/Anal Receiveandbeginanalyzing
gip ze: Receive and begin analyzing
act Investigation/Development: Review/Analyze:
7/31/14 JKD FactInvesti
Fact Inves
tion/Development:Communlcaie(With Client
on/Development: Communicate(With Clien
.3

1.0
52.50

175.00
7/31/14 JKD

` 3.2 580.00 3.2 560.00
8/01/14JGB
tel.from
ondence
and
corres
Factlnvestigation/Development: Review/Analyze:Receiveandanalyzemultiple
8/01/14 JGB Fact Investigation/Development: Review/Analyze: Receive and analyze multiple
correspondence and tel. calls from
=2.5
_ conference
Telephone 2.5 437.50
8/01/14 JKD Communicate(With
lnvestiation/Development: Client):
regardinQ|
8/01/14 JKD Fact Invest' ation/Development: Communicate(With Client): Telephone conference
'
. regarding
8/01/14
wit
8/01/14 JKD Fact `
JKD· Factlnvestigation/Development:
Investigation/Development:
Client):
Communlcate(Wlth Telephone
Client): Telephone conference
Communicate(With
.4 70.00
.

conference
8/O1/14 JKD
8/01/14 JKD wi b| ment:Plan&PrepareFor:Preparefortelephone
actInvestigation/Develo
act Investigation/Development: Plan & Prepare For: Prepare for telephone
conference w bt
.8

.4
140.00

70.00
8/01/14 JKD for eview/Analyze: R
.4 70.00

8/01/14 LCC Fact Inves
and
/14 Fact ment: Researched fort

ation/Develo•ment: Review/Ana Researched and revie
.5.5 87.50
87.50

DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT. FOR WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED,
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0287
No. 1-15-586-CV 3636
SSL000007
SSL000007
LEWISBRISBOIS
LEWIS BRISBOISBISGAARD &
& SMITH LLP
LAWYERS
SUITE
1200
LAWYERS
SUITE 1200
221
ANGELES, STREET
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
_
FEDERAL
TELEPHONE (213)250-1800
FEDERAL I.D. NO XX-XXXXXXX

Vi
.
File 50013-1476
50013-1476 CNASpecialty Claims
CNA 9/30/14
9130/14
Number
Number SiveradoSenior
Peterson vvSilverado Living
Senior Living 1391812
1391812
JJKD1 Page 4
Date
Date Atty ofServices
Rendered
Description of Services Rendered - Hours
Hours
_
Amount
Amount

JKD
8102/14 0mmunicate(With
JKD Analysis/Strategy:,ell Client
3.5 227.50
227.50

- and
. review 1.4
1.4 245.00
245.00 -
B/03/14
JKDAnalysis/Strategy:
Review/Analyze:
Receipt, emails
numerous
8/03/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Review/Analyze: Receipt, review and exchange numerous emails
0 with
Candice
Schwa
er,Kathleen
Beduze
and
with Candice Schwager, Kathleen Beduze and
ardin
ardin
. 1.5
1.5 262.50
262.50
8/04/14JGB
8/04/14 JGB FactFactinvestigation/Development:Communicate(Wlth
Investigation/Development: Communicate(With Client):
Client): extensive
Attend extensive

8/04/14JGB
conference call withillim.1111111.1411 re: 1.2
1.2 210.00
210.00
8/04/14 Factlnvestigation/Development:
JGB Fact Investigation/Development:Review/Analyze:Coninued
Review/Analyze: review
Continued oi- afl...*
review
- 1.8
1.8 315.00
315.00
8/04/14
JGBFact
lrivestigation/Development:
&Prepare
For:
Tel.
8/04/14 JGB Fact Investigation/Development: Plan & Prepare For: Tel. conferences with UMW ‘
4111111.111111.1111111111111116 re: IMINININIIIMINIMS. · _ .5
5 87.50
87.50
JGB Factlnvesti
8/04/14 ation/Development:
Review/Analyze:
Receive
and
8/04/14 JGB Fact Investi ation/Development Review/Analyze: Receive and analyzeill111111111.111111.
_ · .3 52.50
52.50
8/04/14JGB
8/04/14 Factinvestigation/Development:
JGB Fact Review/Analyze:
Investigation/Development: Review/Analyze: Workon.IRIWINIMIO
Work 1.9 332.50
332.50
8/04/14JKD Fact lnvestigation/Development:Communicate(Other External):Telephone conference
8/04/14 JKD Fact
with
Kathleen
Beduze
regardin.4
Investigation/Development:
with Kathleen Beduze regardin
Communicate(Other External): Telephone conference

8/04/14 4 70.00
70.00
JKD actlnvestigationlDevelopment:
Communicate(Other
Telephone
Extemal): conference
8/04/14 JKD act Investigation/Development: Communicate(Other External): Telephone conference
_
with din
_ 8/04/14JKD Factlnvestigation/Development:
Communicate(Other
External):
Exchange
multiple
8/04/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Communicate(Other External): Exchange multiple
.3 52.50
52.50
emails
with for
counsel POA-·regarding|
emails with counsel for POA regarding

8/O4/14 11111=111•1111111111111mmil
JKDFact lnvestigation/Development: .6
.8 105.00
105.00
Communicate(Other Exchange multiple
8104/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Communicate(Other External): Exchange multiple
emailswithPhilRoss,
emails KathleenBeduze
with Phil Ross, Kathleen GAL,
Beduze GAL, AALregardin
AAL regardin
. JKD
8/04/14 JKDFactFactInvestigation/Development:
.6 105.00
105.00
8/04/14 Investigation/Development: Communicate(\Nith
Communicate(With Client:Telephone
Client): Telephoneconference
with regarding

lnvestigation/Development:
52.50
52.50
8/04/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Research: Research

8/04/14JKD
4 70.00
70.00
8/04/14 JKD FactFactlnvestigationlDeveIopment:Review/Analyze:
Investigation/Development: Review/Analyze: andreview
Receipt and ofadditional
review of additional
emails fromCandice
emails from Candice S chwager
Schwager discussing
discussing request
request additional experts
foradditional
for experts tto
o examine
examine
RubyPeterson. .
Ruby Peterson. .4
.4 70.00
70.00
JKDFact
8/04/14 wit| Ccmmu
ment: 'cateithClient
:T
8/04/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Develo ment Commu 'cate ith Client : T ference
ference
wit

8/04/14
JKDFact
Investigation/Development:
Review/Analyze:
Recei
tendreview
ofadditional
8/04/14 JKD Fact Investlgation/Development Review/Analyze: Recei t and review of additional
.2
.2 35.00

8/04/14 Fact
IIMININ regarding
Investigation/Development; . 52.50
52.50
Review/Analyze:
Receipt
andreview
ofemails
from
8/04/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Review/Analyze: Receipt and review of emails from
Kathleen
Kathleen Beduze
Beduze a ndCandice
and Schwager
Candice Schwager regarding
regarding Motion
Motion toCompel
to andMotion
Compel and Motion for
Sanctions.
Sanctions. .2
.2 35.00
35.00
JKDFactFactlnvesti
8/04/14 JKD ation/Development:
In esti ation/Development Communicate(With
Communicate(With Client):
Client): Telephone
Telephone conference1
conference
r arding

•

MADEAPPEARSTATEMENT
LATER
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET SEEN RECEIVED,
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

.

PM,

Silverado Appx. 0288
No. 1-15-586-CV 3637
` 1200
SSL000008

LEWIS BRISBOISB ISGAARD& SMITHLLP
BISGAARD LLP
LAWYERS
LAWYERS
SUITE 1200
221
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET

·
LOSANGELES,

-
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
TELEPHONE (213) 250-1800
FEDERAL NO95-3720522
I I.D.NO
FEDERAL XX-XXXXXXX

N File
File 50013-1476
50013-1476 CNA SpecialtyClaims
CNA Claims 9/30/14
9/30/14
Number Silvered°Senior
PetersonvvSiverado SeniorLiving 1391812
JKD1
Number
JICD1 _Page Living
Page
1391812
55
Date A —
Date Atty Descri tionooffServices
Description Services Rendered Hours
Hours Amount
Amount
NNW 1.3
1.3 227.50
227.50
8/04/14 LCCFact
8/04/14 LCC Investigation/Development: Review/Analyze:
Investigation/Development:
Review/Analyze: Review
Review
b

.587.5
N 227.50

_
3.5 227.50
N 8/05/14 FactInvestigation/Develo
8/05/14 JGB Fact ment:
Investigation/Develo andrevi and review
ment: Review/Analyzle: Receive
` . - 3.5 612.50
612.50
8/05/14 JKD act
8/05/14JKD ith Client):Exchange
act Investigation/Development: Communicate With Exchange numerous
emails
email egarding .1111.1111111110111.
.5 87.50
8/05/14 FactInvestigation/Development:
8/05/14 JKD Fact Review/Analyze:
investigation/Development: Review/Analyze: Receipt andreview
and review

. .5
.5
87.50
87.50
8/05/14JKD Factlnvestigation/Development:
8)05/14 JKD Fact Review/Analyze: eoeitt and
investigation/Development: Review/Analyze: i
andrreview
allirli...111111111111111611 analyze .7.7 122,50
8/05/14 JKDFact Investigation/Development:
8/05/14 JKD Co
lnvestigation/Development: unicate(WithClient):
Co unicate(With Client): Telephone conference
with regarding
.56 105.00
105.00
8/05/14 JKDFact
8/05/14 JKD Factnvestigation/Develo ment:
nvestigatIon/Develo ment: Communicate(Other
Communicate(Other
External):Exchange
External): Exchangenumerous
numerous
emailsregardin~_
emails regardin 1.2
1.2
210.00
210.00
8/05/14 JKD actinvestigation! opment:lan repareFFor:
eve opmen : Ian repare
act Investigation/eve
or:Prepare
8/05/14 JKD Prepare ernaileulainellnille
AO .4
70.00
70.00
8/05/14JKD FactI nvestigation/Development:Review/Analyze:Receipt andreview of
act Investigation/Development: Review/Analyze: Receipt and review of wathig/1111
8/05/14 JKD

Illi
gorM1116
11.11111
411111.11".111111.1 1111111111111 11111.11 2.4
2.4
420.00
420,00
8/05/14 11010111.0
Fact Communicate(Other
8/05/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Communicate(Other External): Multiple.telephone
ofissuesrelatedto
conferenceswithcounselforPOAanddiscussions
conferences with counsel for POA and discussions of issues related to mi. .4.4 70.00
70.00
8/05/14 JKD Factlnvestlgation/Development: Review/Analyze:Receiptandreviewofmultiple
8/05/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development; Review/Analyze: Receipt and
makingthreatsbfactions and review of multiple
nonsensical
emailsfromCandiceSchwager
emails from Candice Schwager making threats bfissues.
actions and discussing nonsensical
claimsforrelief andassociated
claims for relief and associated case
andhearing
case and hearing issues. .6 105.00
8/05/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Develo e

1.2
1.2
210.00
210.00
8/05/14 FactInvestigation/Development: C0mmunicate(WithClient): Telephoneconference
8105/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Communicate(With Client): Telephone conference .
withim11011111 regardi
.3
52.50
52.50
8/05/14 FactInvestigation/Development: Review/Analyze:Beganreview o
8/05/14 LCC Fact Investigation/Development: Review/Analyze: Began review o

. 1.2
1.2
78.00
78.00
8/06/14 BP act Investigation/Development: ReviewlAna · .5 80.00
8/06/14 . 111111.11,
JGB Factlnvestigation/Development: Receive
Review/Analyze: and 5 80.00
8/06/14 JGB Fact Investigation/Development: Review/Analyze: Receive and analyzealle11111111

FORWHICH
ACCOUNT,
FORYOUR
MADE BILLS NOT
HAVE RECEIVED,
YETBEEN
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FORWILL LATER
YOUR ACCOUNT,AFOR STATEMENT
WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED,
. WILL APPEARON
ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0289
No. 1-15-586-CV 3638
. SSL000009

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITHLLP
LU'
&
LAWYERS
SUITE 1200
221 FIGUEROA
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOSA
LOS NGELES,
ANGELES, CALIFORNIA90012
90012
(213 ) 250-1800
TELEPHONE(213)
· FEDERALl.D.
FEDERAL NO
I.D. NO XX-XXXXXXX

File
File 50013-1476CNA
50013-1476 CNA Specialty Claims 9/30/14
9/30/14
Number PetersonvvSlveradoSenior
Silvered° Senior Living 1391812
1391812
JKD1Page
JKD1 Page 66
Date Att
Date Atty Descri tionof Services Rendered
Description Rendered Hours
Hours Amount
Amount

_ . Communicate(With
8/06/14JKD FactInvestigation/Development: Client); _ 1.5
1.5 252.50
262.50
8/06/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Communicate(With Client): Exchange emailswith
with -
0 regardin
.4 70.00
70.00
8/06114JKDFact
8/06/14 lnvestigation/Development:
Communicate(Wlth
JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Client):
Communicate(With emails
Client): Exchange emails with _
N regardin
regarding\ A1111111/1111M11111. _. _
.3 52.50
52.50
8/06/14JKD FactInvestigation/Development:
8/06/14 JKD Fact Plan&Prepare
Investigation/Development: Plan & Prepare For: _ preparation
For:Begin-
Begin preparationoo .

8/06/14 LCCFact ReviewIAnalyze:
7.2
7.2 1,260.00
8/06/14 LCC Fact InvestigatIonlDeveIopment:
Investigation/Development: Review/Analyze: Completed review
reviewof
of documents
regardin

8/07/14JKD actInvestigatlon/Development:
1.1
1.1 71.50
71.50
8/07/14 JKD act Investigation/Development: Review/Analyz

8/07/14 actlnvestigation/Development; Communicate(Other Extemal):Telephoneconference
2.8
2.8 490.00
8/07/14 JKD, act Investigation/Development: Communicate(Other External): Telephone
conference
with re arding
8/07/14JKD Communicate(With
Investigation/Development: Client):Exchange
.1.1 17.50
17.50
8/07/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Communicate(With Client): Exchange numerous
email
email
'
8/08/14JKD Factlnvestigation/Development:Communlcate(Other Receiptand 1.1 192.50
8/08/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Communicate(Other External): Receipt and review
.Carol Manley's ResponsetoMotion toCompelandfor
Carol Manley's Response to Motion to Compel and for Sanctions. .4.4 70.00
8/08/14 JKD FactInvestigation/Development: CommunIcate(With Client):
Telephoneconference 70.00
8/08/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development:
Beduzeregardin|Communicate(With Client): Telephone conference

8/08/14 aka Beduze regarding
Factlnvestiation/Development:
regardin
-
8/08/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Review/Analyz
e
-
.2
.2
35.00
35.00

regardin .8
8
140.00
8/08/14JKD FactInvestigation/Development:
Plan&PrepareFor:Pre a 140.00
8/08/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Plan & Prepare For: Pre
.
etIngell.110
. .66 105.00
105.00
8/08/14JKD Analysis/Strategy: Attendmeetin -
8/08/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Appear For/Attend: Attend m tin _
8/08/14 JKD WrittenMotions Plan&Pre are For:Preparefo5 1.3 227.50
8/08/14 JKD that Written Motions &Submiss.: Plan & Prepare For: Prepare fo

8/08/14 JKD Trial&Hearing Attendance: AppearFor/Attend: AppearforandattendHearing oon
n 5 87,50
8/08/14 JKD Trial & Hearing Attendance:
Motion to Compel Appear For/Attend:
andMotion for Appearpresented
for and attend Hearing
arguments tocourt in
Plaintiff's
support o Motion to
fpositions Compel and Motion
andcollaborated for Sanctions,
restrictions presented
forvisitation arguments to court in
andexamination. 2.6 455.00
support of positions and collaborated
on
on restrictions
8/08/14JMS Analysis/Strategy: Appear ForlAttend: Meeting withAfor visitation and examination. 2.6 455.00
8/08/14 JMS Analysis/Strategy: Appear For/Attend: Meeting with 111111.11.1.1111.....11.

MADE YOUR FORWHICH HAVENOTYETBEENRECEIVED,
APPEAR
WILL ON
A
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED,
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0290
No. 1-15-586-CV 3639
SSl.OO0O10
SSL000010
&

FEDERA
NO
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH ur
LAWYERS
SUITE 1200
NORTH
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS
LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90012 ·
TELEPHONE
250-1800
TELEPHONE (213) 250-1800
FEDERAL IM. NC) XX-XXXXXXX
_

. _
tr)
File
File 50013-1476
50013-1476 CNA Specialty Claims 9/30/14
9/30/14
Number verado SeniorLiving
Petersonvv Silverado Living 1391812
1391812
JKD1
JKD1 Page
Page 77
Date
Date Atty ofServices
Rendered
Description of Services Rendered Hours
Hours Amount
Amount ;
8/09/14 Analysis/S .5 _ 80.00
8/09/14 JKD nicat 80.00
JKD Analysis/ 1.- · .... nicat
0
_
2.3 402.50
402.50
8/10/14JKD Analysis/Strategy;Plan& For:Continue
Continue preparing
0 ira giniiiiiiimmilimmr.......im
8/10/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy:
hearin ln
Plan
anal
& Prepare For: preparing for
for continuation of Injunction

8/11/14JKD _ For/Attend:
8/11/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Appear For/Attend: forand
Appear for and attend Injunction Hearing
Hearing versus
3.2 560.00

client. Present defense,
client. defense, examine witnessesandanddefend
defendaccusations
accusationsofimproper
of impropercare
care
andconduct._
and conduct..Continue preparationsfor
Continuepreparations nextdday
fornext ayofHearing.
of Hearing. 13.6
13.6 2,380.00
2,380.00
PlanPrepare
8/11/14 JMS Analysis/Strategy: Plan For:
& Prepare For: Prepared
Prepared for and
and attended
attendedhearing
hearingon
on Plaintiffs .
motionfor restraining orderandtemporary 10.4 1,564.00
8/11/14 RGC motion for temporary restraining order and andrevise
8/11/14 RGC Analysis/Strategy: Review/AnalyzetReview and
temporary injunctions.
revise Motion
MotionforSanctions
for Sanctionson
on
10.4 1,664.00

Extrajudicial Statements and
andffollow
ollowup
up ,6.6 L 105.00
8/12/14JKD Analysis/Strategy: Appear For/Attend:Appear
8/12/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Appear For/Attend: Appear forand
for InjunctionHearing.
and attend injunctionHearing.
Examined andand presentedwitnessesinsupportof
presented witnesses in support ofclientdefenses,examined
client defenses, examined adverse .
witness andpresented
and presentedllegal
egalaargument
rgument tothecourt. reparelengthy
to the court.PPrepare lengthyppost
osthearing
hearingeemail
mail
t oSilverado
summary to Silverado management
summary managerhent personnel. - Draftedresearch 10.8 1,890.00
8/13/14 C-DS investigation/Development: 10.8 1,890.00
Draft/Revise: Peterson
8/13/14 CDS Fact Investigation/Development: Draft/Revise: Peterson - - Drafted research memo |V
8/13/14
CDS Ii/MINIMIIIIINS
8/13/14 CDS Factinvestigation/Develo ment: Research
1.7
1.7 110.50
110.50

8/13/14CDS OtherWrittenMotionsSubmiss.:
Submiss.: .Begandraftingmotionforsanctions 1.1
1.1 71.50
71.50
8/13/14 CDS Other Written Motions && Draft/Revise:
and forPetersonase. Draft/Revise: Began drafting motion for sanctions
and contempt for Petersonccase. .8.8 52.00
8/13/14 OtherWritten Motions &Submiss.: Review/Analz 52.00

8/13/14 KD
L
8/13/14 JKD Other Written Motions & Submiss.: Review/Ana
J : Review/An
l_ .. 1.3
L
227.50
227.50
8/13/14 JKD
8/13/14. Analysis/Strategy:
Commun-icate(With Exchange
Client): multiple .4
70.00
70.00
r ardin
smigai ' ‘
8/13/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Communicate(With Client): Exchange multiple
daimeogg iouro
emails wit1.111.111.1i

8/14/14 CDSOther Written Motions &Submiss.: Peterson motion forsanctions
8/14/14 CDS Other Written Motions & Submiss.: DraftiRevise: Peterson . Drafted motion for sanctions
8 140.00
and/orcontempt againstC andiceSchwager. .6
8/14/14JKD and/or contempt against Candice Schwager.
Review/Anal V 39.00
8/14114 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Review/Analzz

8/14/14
- Analysis/Strategy: ze: ' _
‘ correspondence
from
1.1
1.1
192.50
192,50
8/14/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy:
Russ Jones Review/Anal z : ' ' correspondence from
.1.1 17.50
JKDAnalysis/Strate
8/14/14 Russ Jones regarding
:Communlcaie(With
8/14/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy:
Client):
Telephone
conference
with
Communicate(With Client): Telephone conference with111101111111/0
17.50
regardin
regardin .1.1 17.50
8/14/14JKD Analysis/Strate
8/14/14 JKD Analysis/Strate
: Revi VV 17.50
52.50
8/14/14JKD Analysis/Strategy:_ Exchangeemailwithcounsel .3 52.50
8/14/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Draft/Revise: Exchange email with counsel regarding
8/14/14 Analysis/Strategy;
.2.2
Prepareemailcorrespondence
to 35.00
8/14/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Communicate(Wlth Client): Prepare email correspondence to
Silverado personnel
8/14/14JKD Analysis/Strategy: regarding II
Con1municate(OtherExternal):Exchange _ S
emails .2 35.00
8/14/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Communicate(Other External): Exchange emails withilIMINIM1110 .

MADE
_ WILL
ON BILLS
LATER
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED.
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0291
No. 1-15-586-CV 3640
SSL000011 1
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

221 1200
NORTH
LAWYERS
SUITE 1200

ANGELES,
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET

-
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
TELEPHONE (213) 250-1E00
NO
FEDERAL LC, NO XX-XXXXXXX .
·
File 50013-1476
File
Number
CNAv SiveradoSeniorLiving
50013-1476 CNASpecialty Claims
Peterson v Silverado Senior Living
9/30/14
9130/14
1391812
1391812
JKD1
JKD1 . Page
Page 88
Date
Date Atty of Rendered
Description of Services Rendered Hours
Hours Amount
Amount
regarding °'
.4 70.00
70.00
8/14/14JKD
8/14/14 JKD na ysistStrategy:Communicate(With
naysislStrategy: Communicate(With Client):
Client): Telephoneconference withSarah
conferencewith Sarah
0 Pacheco and Russ Jones regarding
UM. Researc . .3 52.50
52.50
8/14/14JKD
8/14/14 JKD Anafysis/Strategy: Researc
_
_
Prepared correspondencetoplaintiff's
to plaintiffscounsel
counsel
ofvideo, Rule 11agreement and possiblevvisitation
entifying location of video, discussing Rule 11 agreementandpossible isitation
restrictions.
restrictions. .5.5 87.50
87.50
8/18/14 JGBAnalysis/Strategy:
8/18/14 JGB Analysis/Strateg :Review/Analyzeze
.4.4 70.00
70,00
8/18/14 _
8/18/14 JKD
JKD nalysis/Strate y: CommunicateOther
nalysis/Strategy: Exchange
Other External): emailswith
Exchange
_
emails with
regarding .2.2 35.00
8/18/14JKD : Review/Analyz
8/18/14 JKD Analysis/Strate Review/Analyz
_
_
. .2.2 35.00
35,00
_

personnel
Silverado
regardin
management
Investigation/Development: Review/Anal
8/19/14JKD FactInvestigatlon/Development:
8/19/14 JKD Fact Review/Analze
ze

JKD Analysis/Strategy: .7
122.50
122.50
8/19/14
8/19/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Communicate(With
Communicate(With Ciient):
Client): Exchange
Exchange numerousemails
numerous emailswwith
ith L
Silverado management personnel regardin

1.1
.8 140.00
8/19/14JMS naysis/Strategy: Silverado's FirstAmended Pleatothe
8/20/14
Jurisdiction,
Answer
8/19/14 JMS Analysis/Strategy:
Counterclaim.
and ra evise:
131Bit7Ftbvisetrafted
Fact ation/Develo
ment;
Silverado's First Amended Plea to the
Jurisdiction, Original Answer and Counterclaim. 1.1
1.1 176.00
8/20/14 JKD Fact Investi ation/Develo•ment: '

8/20/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Review/Analyze. _ . 1.2 210.00
1.2 210.00
8/20/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Review/Analyze.
/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Review/Anal 1.1 192.50
8/21 e numero ailswit
8/21/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Review/Anal e: Exchange num s e vn

8/21JMS
/14 _
Investigation/Develo
Fact Researc
ent: . 1.4 245.00
1.4 245.00
8/21)14 JMS Fact Investigation/Deve ant: Researc
8/22/14JKD Analysis/Strategy:
8/22/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Draft/Revise
. . .3 48.00

.6
105.00
105.00
8/22/14JKD Analysis/Strategy: Communicate Other Receiptand numerous emails
8/22/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy:
regarding Communicate Other External): Receipt and review numerous emails
Telephone
` regarding Telephone conference with ..88 140.00
140.00
8/22/14 sis/Strate :Draft/Revise:
Preparelengthy
statusreportand
8/22/14 JKD Ana Draft/Revise: Prepare lengthy status report and matter summaryee 1.1 192.50 .
8/22/14JKD Analysis/Strategy: 1.1 192.50
|Exchange Receipt
andreviewnumerous
ardin ' ' '
8/22/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Draft/Revise: Receipt and review numerous mails from
emails
vvlth`
from
ardin •
numerous
Exchange numerous emails with .9 157.50
8/22/14JMS Draft/Revise:
Revised
cllents' amendedplea thejurisdiction, .9 157.50
8/22/14 JMS Analysis/Strategy:
originalansweraDraft/Revise: Revised
ndcounterclaim clients'
toinclude first amended
additional plea
defenses to theimmunity
including jurisdiction,
original answer and counterclaim to include additional defenses including Immunity

NOTBEEN
ON
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED,
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT
·

Silverado Appx. 0292
No. 1-15-586-CV 3641
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

221
LAWYERS
1200
SURE 1200
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
SMITH -
SSLOOO012
SSL000012

LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90012
TELEPHONE(213)
(213)250-1800
_ 250-1800
i.¤.
FEDERAL I.D. NO XX-XXXXXXX

File
File 50013-1476
50013-1476 CNA
CNASpecialt
SpecialtyClaims
Claims 9/30/14
9/30/14
Number
Number Peterson
Petersonvv Silvered°Senior
Senior Living 1391812
1391812
JKD1
J1(131 - Page
Page 99
Date
Date Atty Description ofServices
of Services Rendered Hours
Hours Amount
Amount
pursuant to powerooff attorneyact.
to durablepower act. .3.3 48.00
8/22/14JMS Analysis/Strategy:
8/22/14 JMS Analysis/Strategy: Draft/Revise:
Draft/Revise: Peterson:
Peterson: Begandrafting
Began draftingaargument
rgument section
sectionoof
fmotion
motion
0 todismiss federalcomplaint to Fed. R. Civ.PP.
to dismiss Plaintiffs' federal complaint pursuanttoFed.R.Civ.
pursuant 12 b56. .
.12b 4.4
4.4 704.00
704.00
Review/Analyz
JKDAnalysis/Strategy: Review/Arialyz
8/23/14 JKD

0
JKDAnalysis/Strat
Analysis/Strat V
Receipt
1.4
1.4 245.00
B/25/14
8/25/14 JKD :
: Review/Anal ie:ze:
Receipt and review ofofnumerous
andreview numerousemails
emailsffrom
rom

8/25/14JKD
8/25/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: ra raft/Revise:
Receipt
Revise: Receipt andreview
and numerous
review numerous
V
emails
emailsfro
fro
.7 122.50
7 122.50

.6regarding _

8/25/14JKD
8/25/14 JKD leadlngs:
readings:Review/Analyze:
Review/Analyze: Exchangeemails
emailswwith
ith11111111111.01regarding.11111111104
1.1 192.50
1.1 192.50
.4.4 70.00
70.00-
8/25/14JKD
8/25/14 JKD nalysis/Strategy:
Communicate(With
nalysls/Strategy: Client):
CommunIcate(With Telephone
Client): Telephone conference with
anerlikregarding
.88 140.00
140.00
8/25/14JKD Plan
8/25/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Plan Prepare
& Prepare For:Telephone
For: Telephoneconferencewith
conferencewithIMMO
regarding|
.01.1111111.../1 regarding 1.11111111111111111111....11111M.=.11 .4.4 70.00
70.00
8/25/14JKD Depositlons:
8/25/14 JKD Depositions: Review/Analyze:
Review/Analyze: Receipt
Receipt andreview
and ofcorrespondence
review of fromSarah
correspondencefrom Sarah
Pachecoregardin
Pacheco regardin 4
.2
35.00
35.00
8/25/14 Experts/Consultants:Review/Analyze: Correspondence from Young, Guardian Ad
8/25/14 JKD Experts/Consultants: Review/Analyze: Correspondence from Jill Young, Guardian Ad
Litem, regardi .2.2
8/25/14JMS Other MotionsSubmiss.: Draft/Revise:
Draft/Revise:Peterson: drafting and 35.00
8/25/14 JMS Other Written
Written Motions &&Submiss.: Peterson: Continuedagainst
revisingSilverado's
revising Silverado's
Second Motion forSanctions and/orforContemptdrafting and
Second Motion for Sanctions and/or for Contempt against
opposing c ounsel
opposing counsel
Candice S chwager regarding violationofCourt's p rotective
Candice Schwager regarding violation of Courts pprotective
order. 2.8 448.00
8/25/14JMS Written Motions &Submiss.: Draftedroposed oorder.
rders on
8/25/14 JMS Other Written Motions & Submiss,: Draft/Revise: Peterson: Drafted proposed orderson
2.8 448.00
motionsfor
motions for sanctions and
and contempt
including potential additional
contempt Including potential additionalgag
orderand/or
gag order and/or
detailedprotective
order.
detailed protective order.
2.4 384.00
14 JKD FactInvestigation/Development: Review/Analyze:Receiptand ofemailfrom 2.4 384.00
_ 8/26/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development:
Candice Review/Analyze:W
Schwagerregardingresponse Receipt
ilson and review
Prepareof emailinfrom
Candice Schwager response
toDiane
to Diane Wilson article. Prepare email in
response a ddressing andhandling moving f orward. - .3.3
response addressing postings and handling
14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Receipt moving forward.
andreview ofmultiple emails 52.50
8/26/14 JKD Analysis/strategy: Review/Analyze: Receipt and review of multiple emails from

87.50
8/28/14JKD
8/26/14 JKD Analysis/Strat
Communicate(With
Client): Telephone conferencewith
th Client): Telephone conference with
.5 87.50
regardin .2 35.00
regardin wit .2 35.00
: Review/Analyze:
8/26/14JKD Analysis/Strate Telephone
conference
8/26/14 JKD Analysis/Strate Review/Analyze: Telephone conference wit
arding
Plan&PrepareFor:Planandpreparefortelephone conference and .9 157.50
— 8/28/14
8/26/14 JKD Analysts/Strategy:
of Plan &strategy
PrepareaFor. Plan and
ndtalking prepare for telephone conference and .5
points.
discussion of identified
14 JKD Analysis/Strategy; strategy andReceipt
Review/Analyze: talkingandreview
points. ofemailfromBethAbbott .5 87,50'
8/26/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Review/Analyze: Receipt and review of email from Beth Abbott

HAVE
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET SEEN RECEIVED,
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0293
No. 1-15-586-CV 3642
SSL00O013
SSL000013
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
LAWYERS
SUFTE 1200 · _
221
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
tos
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
TELEPHONE 213) 250-1000
¤
FEDERAL I.D. NO XX-XXXXXXX

· _ 9/30/14
File
File 50013-1476
50013-1476 CNA SpecialtyClaims
CNA Claims 9/30/14
Number PetersonvvS1veradoSenior _
Silverado Senior Living 1391812
1391812
.11(D1 Page 10
Date
Date Atty ofServices
Description of Services Rendered Hours
Hours Amount
Amount
- .5 87.50
Other
JMSOther
8/26/14 JMS Motions
Written Motions &
8;Submiss.: Draft/Revise:
Draft/Revise: and revisingm
Continued drafting andrevising otion
motion
for sanctions aagainst
· forsanctions gainstopposing
opposingccounsel Schwagerlor
ounselCandiceSchwager for extrajudicial statements
including social media end blog posts regarding proceedingand
media andblog and lawyers. 4.4
4.4 704.00
704.00
8/27/14JKD Motions
8/27/14 JKD Other Written Motions & &Submiss.:
Submiss.: Communicate(Other
Communicate(Other Counsel):
Outside Counsel): Telephone
Telephone
conference with R uss J onesregarding|
conference with Russ Jones regarding
.
11.01.1111.1..
.2.2 35.00
8/27/14JKD
8/27/14 JKD Fact In OutsideC
/Development: Communicate(OtherOutside
Factlnvestigation/Development; ounsel:TeIehone
Counsel): Telephone
conference
conferencewith_
with-
_ 111.1.1.11.11Communicate(Other .1.1 17.50
17.50
8/27/14 JKDAnalysis/Strategy:
8/27/14 JKD Outside
Communicate(Other ounsel:Telehone
OutsideCCounsel conference
: el hone conferencewith
with
Kathleen B
Kathleen eduzerregarding
Beduze egarding
NUM Researc|
.2.2 35.00
8/27/14 Other
8/27/14 JKD Other Written
Written Motions
Motions &Submiss.:
& Submiss.: Resear

- 4
70.00
70.00
8/27/14 JKD Factlnvestigation/Development:
8/27/14 JKD Fact
Review/Analyz
Investigation/Development Review/Analyz
.4.4 70.00
70.00
8/27/14JKD Analysis/Strategy:Review/Analyz.
8/27/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Review/Analyz

. 1.5
1.6
280.00
280.00
8/27/14 KD Analysis/Strategy: Review/Anal
8/27/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Review/Anal

.88 140.00
140.00
B/27/14 JKD Motions _
&Submiss.:Review/Analyze: Receipt andreview ofemailfrom
8/27/14 JKD Other Written Motions & Submiss.: Review/Analyze: Receipt and review of email from
Russ Jones
Russ Jones regardin .2.2 35.00
Motion 35.00
8/27/14 JKD Ot er ritten Motions Continue
8/27/14 JKD Ot er ntten Motions & Submiss.:. Draft/Revise: Continue drafting Defendant's Motion
factualandlegal
forSanction andMotion forContempt byincorporationofadditional
for Sanction and Motion for Contempt by incorporation
arguments. Continuedrafting Defendant's Motionfor of additional
basedfactualeand
uponthical legal

duties.
_1.3
arguments. Continue drafting Defendant's Motion for Sanctions based upon ethical
1.3
227.50
227.50 .
8/27/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Draft/Revis .8 140.00
_ _ .8 140.00 _·
8/27/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Revlew/Analy 17.50
Motions &Submiss.: . NoticeofHearing .1 17.50
8/27/14JMS Other
Other dtten Motions & Submiss.: Draft/Revise:
on
Peterson: Drafted Notice of Hearing on
8/27/14 JMS MotionforContempt and/orSanctions againstCandice er. .1
Motion for Contempt and/or Sanctions against Candice Schwager. 16.00
8/27/14JMS FactInvesti i velome t: v' /Anali..
8/27/14 JMS Fact Investi v' /Anal
elo me t

Review/Analyz
ron/Development: 96.00
8/27/14 FactInvestiga
8/27/14 JMS Fact Investiga
-_ of 1.3 208.00
fromJill 1.3 208.00
8/28/14JKD trategy:Review/Analyze:
Receiptandreview
8/28/14 JKD regardin9|
Young trategy: Review/Analyze: Receipt and review of correspondence from Jill .1 17.50
Young regarding
8/28/14JKD Analysis/Strategy: Client): Telephone M with
conference .1 17.50
8/28/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Communicate(With Client): Telephone conference with elleMaimmi _

APPEAR
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED,
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0294
No. 1-15-586-CV 3643
SSL000014
SSL000014
&
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH up -
LAWYERS
. 1200
SUITE 1200 , ·
221
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
0 TELEPHONE (213)250-1500
NO -
FEDERAL I.D. NO 954725522

File
File 50013-1476
50013-1476 CNA
CNA SpecialtyClaims
Claims 9/30/14
9/30114
Number PetersonvvSiverado _
Silverado SeniorLiving 1391812
Date
Att Descrl
of
Services
tion Rendered Hours
Amount
Number Living 1391812
JKD1
JKD1 Page
Page 11
11
.
Date Atty Description of Services Rendered Hours Amount
'regarding .2.2 35.00
35.00 s
8/28/14JKD Analysis/Strategy:
8/28/14 JKD Analysls/Strate Review/Anal
0
. 1.11.1 192.50
192.50
8/28/14 JMS Analysis/Strategy:
8/28/14JMS Analysis/Strategy: Draft/Revise:
DrafVRevise: Continued draftingmotion to dismiss plaintiffsclaims
motiontodismiss claims
0 pursuant to Fed. R. C_ Iv.P.12(b)(6)
pursuant toFed.R.Civ. andinthe motionfor
and in the alternativemotion
_
N
Fact
JKDinvestigation/Development:
8/29/14 JKD Communlcate(Other
·
Outside
Counsel):
statement.
statement.
P. 12(b)(6) formore
more definite

Fact Investigation/Development: Communicate(Other Outside Counsel): Telephone
conferencewith Jill Youngrregardin
withJillYoung egardin
2,9
2.9 464.00

·
JKDSInspections
8/29/14
re iteDraft/Revise:
8/29/14 JKD Prepare
_ email
correspondencet_ _ _
Site Inspections Draft/Revise: Prepare email correspondence t
.2.2 35.00
35.00

JKD
8/29/14 offrom
Analysis/Strategy:
email
Review/Analyze:
Receipt
and
review
8/29/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Review/Analyze: Receipt and review of email from Candice
Schwagerthreatenin
Schwager threatenin to grievance, ,prepared
to file grievance nse emailto
res nse
preparedres email toallcounsel
all counsel
.2.2 35.00
35.00
,
regarding · .4 70.00
70.00
8/29/14 JKD Review/Anal

8/29/14
.5 87.50
8/29/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Review/Anal e

Review/An_
8/29/14 JKD AnalysisiStrategy: Review/An
e ·
5 87.50

Analysis/Strategy:
Counsel):
Other Tele
Communicate
Outside 70.00
hoconference
8/29/14JKD
Sarah
Pacheco
Other WrittenMotions
.2 35.00
8/29/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Communicate Other Outside Counsel): tele ho conference with
Sarah Pacheco regarding
&Submiss.:Draft/Revise:Receiptandreview ofemail
.4

.2
70.00

35.00

of
multiple
review from
emails
Analysis/Strategy:
Review/Analyze:
Receipt
and
8/29/14 JKD Other Written Motions & Su miss.: Draft/Revise: Receipt and review of email
correspondence from regarding
_ correspondence from Russ.Jones regarding
8/30/14 JKD Analysis/Strategy: Review/Analyze: Receipt and review of multiple emails from
.1.1 . 17.50
17.50

regardIng".
.11111111.1111111111111=1111
.4
70.00
70.00

8/08/14
E112-Filing/Recording
Date
Fee
07/28/2014
Date:
Date
Commercial
Wells
Fargo
TX.Gov Card
feeServices
for Trans
DescritionofDisbursement
C0nv.Fee,
Filing
answer.
· 5.40
Description of Disbursement
8/08/14 E112-Filing/Recording Fee Wells Fargo Commercial Card Services Trans
Units
Units
Rate
Rate
Amount
Amount

8/31/14Date: 07/28/2014 Stile TX,Gov Conv.Fee, Filing fee for answer. 11.00 .O7_ 5.40
.77
8/31/14 Duplication
8/27/14 DonG.PylantFeeforCopyofTranscript 11.00 .07 .77
100.00
8/27/14 E115-Transcript Don G. Pylant Fee for Copy of Transcript 100.00

Reca
of
Services Effective
Hours Fees
Pete . Associate
Brian BrianD
Codi
.5 Rate
Pete · 80.00
Reca. of Services
.Kraus Associate
Clerk
Hours
4.2.5
Effective
Rate
160.00
65.00
Fees
80.00
273.00

StephensAssociate
Jacob
M. 91.4
Joshua
160.00
Codi D. Kraus

14,624.00
JohnG.Browning
John G.K.Davis
Browning
Joshua K. Davis
JacobW.
John M.BStephens
usch
John W. Busch
Law Clerk
Partner
Partner
Partner
Partner
Associate
Associate
Associate
4.2
15.6
15.6
161.5
161.5
3.6
91.4
3.6
65.00
175.00_
175.00
175.00
175.00
160.00
180.00
160.00
_ 273.00
2,730.00
28,262.50
28,262.50
576.00i
14,624.00
576.00
_

LATER
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FoR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED,
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0295
No. 1-15-586-CV 3644
SSL000015
B B
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH tar LLP
LAWyERS
SUITE 1200
221
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
.
LOS CALIFORNIA90012
LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90012

_ (213)
TELEPHONE (213) 250.1800
FEDERAL 1.0. NO XX-XXXXXXX

File
File 50013-1476 CNA
50013-1476 Claims
CNA Specialty Claims 9/30/14
9/30/14
Number
Number veradoSenior
Petersonvv Sflverado _
Senior Living 1391812
1391812
JKD1
JKD1 Page
Page 12
12
RecapofServices
Reca of Services Hours
Hours Rate Fees
Fees
- E.
Kristie E. Johnson Partner .8.8 175.00
175.00 140.00
, Lauren C.
C. Corbett Law
Law Clerk 9.8
9.8 65.00
65.00 637.00
637.00
O
0,,J
Ryan
Ryan G G..Cole
Cole Partner
Partner
Total 288.0
.6.8
288.0
175.00
175.00 105.00
105.00
47,427.50 j
n

0
· ' .

- Total
TotalFFees
ees • 47,427.50
47,427.60
Total
TotalD isbursements
Disbursements 106.17
106.17

Current
Total CurrentCharges
Total Charges 47,533.67
47,533.67
_

FORYOUR NOTYETBEEN
WILL
APPEAR
ON
ALATER
STATEMENT
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET SEEN RECEIVED,
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0296
No. 1-15-586-CV 3645
SSL000016

2-
,moDoe4, eFiling 2 - Filing Details zplw -7 014 Page 1 or 2

Peler56Y1 afx
ProDoceFiling 2 in
logged in es prIscIthmartneselevrIsbrisbois.com
Horne I Submit filing Sir h mit .Service I tey Ellin:H:1 Resew cod

CI 042s in All /lines Pr
jo.Ler
_ige

N
Food Dent f, rifle
Time:
Date:
Mo,dnV. nos 20, 10,9
44 44444n:20.50 AM 44 4......4
hr StSSOSCg11RG)PJII
4 envier Intormation
4 -4 4
Envelope Number: 1057484
Case Category: Givodinnalsp
Court Assignment Hanis County Clerif • Probate
Cede Tn.: am for Temp 0dardlimiltp ol a Imam (rim. SOT)_
La LI•e Number: 917,208 Case Title:
44 _- -·
Ed:Amount ‘ Payment.Information -

0 or
ProDos, Inc. or other provider fee
Account Mame: 1E05
Payment Method: C.reneCrall
N orila,li/oSarairo fee 13.00
Credit Card Type: VISA
0.25% Sores :SS $0.25
Card Number: %XXX %201X %XXX ChM
Cent! F.
Torn. Chun SalVICE fees - S7.00
4Card Expiration Date; 05/2017
Termer:lion Amount 15.4 4 ·
State nPlilng System ProcessingFees:
Fees: Transection Status: Ariproet0
r,orververre r re TransactionID:
ID: 3240299
Transoction Order It. 00195748a.0
Total Envelope Feast 05.40

-4 4 4.4j

·
Personal Information , . -
f Ner: Pito:Si Martinez Nati Davis
'
l-
Emelt Jn·
1osh.Dens(01emsoreitrostom
_
Attorney of Record: loon leave Sort
Status:
Fir mor
or Organisation: I cent 13nsbors BiS0eard R Sind., LIP St^nto Wens. No
ear Number: 210E1993 Jlu YOUrig
Posh: Ial.YouegSesvnla wlee
•Sistus: Se*
Service OveldJ: On
Served Onle/Time:
AM
1/1/0001 12:00:00 rug —
W. lanes
Email: •- wcones0171112aol.ccan
· - Status: Sent _
Service Coned: Yet
St-reed DelciTilne: 7121112014 2:211:04 PM
- Kathleen trade..
- neastannithecrasseaton.com
-
Suitor, SEAL
ServIce Opened: Yes
Soned Date/Time: 7/213/2014 2:22158 PM
Sorel; Pacheco
PaCheco-elliegleasielaran.cem
4 Sion, ' Sent
Service domed: lees
Served Date/Ime: 7/7.17/2014 2:27:55 PM
Candice Schwager
Erna,. eatuSice.gelclens.tiocom
slaws: Sent
Service ilihnect Yes
Enistel cv/vvhnv, 1/150001 /2110:00 AM
Michael Hirsch
. Elm!: inlersclitt.eplawsern
Sorts • sent
· Senate Opened: Yes
Serml 044e/Nne: 7/22/2014 2:27:22 PM

Mms://www.proclocefile.com/ViewFiling.aspx?param=1957484 8/1/2014 4

4
82739 Fargo Doc 1of2
Vendor: 1779789
82739 Wells4071822
Fargo Commercial Card Services 8/08/14
Doc ID: 000191Y5-1 Amount:
Page 5.40
1 of 2
Voucher: 1779789 Dist: 4071822 Date: 8/08/14 Amount: 5.40

Silverado Appx. 0297
No. 1-15-586-CV 3646
SSLOOOO1
71
SSL00001 7

trroDoelb eFiling22-- Filing Details Page22 of 2

CV
N
Answer

Finny Fees .
Filing Information
Total Ring Fees: stant) Current Statue: s'accepted
AM
Accepted Pete/Tires: I178/2014 51:21:25 AM `
Filing Deecripdonik.prrer
Reference Number: Mittman r073.91

Document(s)
. OtaumentlNormetlon

lead Document: -
-
-y^17-59.5;N - Answer RFD NT (Does not contain tannins. dam]

cLi] Transmitted • ndTFRSON • Answer Rri).odf [Doe. not contain sensitise data]
- ·

This
This sat mai all vvnlrnll Cutivrdin 552053-2014 Timrnsdn Smilers.All
All inii•LS

N

95 8/1/2014
littps://www.prodocefile.com./ViewFiling.aspx?param= 1957484 8/1/2014

82739 Fargo Card DocID:00Ol91Y5-2 Page 2 of2
Vendor:
Voucher: 1779789
82739 Wells4071822
Fargo Commercial Card Services Doc ID: 000191Y5-2 Amount:
Voucher: 1779789 Dist: 4071822
Date:8/08/14
Date: 8/08/14
Page
Amount:
2 of 2
5.40
5.40

Silverado Appx. 0298
No. 1-15-586-CV 3647
- _
inn° :
qS1••••

1,t.613/31,11 Lir ..211111,4 I

Cr.)
_ Cost ce
Cost Advance Ticket
Check
Check rt!guest
0 if HOU-100309

1. Check
·
Chock —Date ASAP
2. Type of——
Date Near:lad: ASAP
al
“ Expense:

**Finance
**Finance Committee approvalre|uired
required
0 Filing Fee 5 0 Court Reporter Fed
_ CR
O Fee
Witness Fee 77 0 Mediation tArbltratio Fee* AM
AM
0 /
Prof. Consulting / Serylce Fee SS 2 COD
COD Transcription II voice Needed)." GG
0 0 Expert Witness Fee" JJ 0 ReproductionI1 Copi R

0
· 0
O
Jury
Jury Fees
Deposition
JF
H
JF 0 Reproduction// MedicalRecords
Records RR
RR
‘·
N .. - ’
Any over $500.00
Any client-related requests over $500.00 requireL| neAshiey’s
L.ne Ashley's approval. Alleducational
educational _ ·
expenses/seminarsrequireKarlLourelro’s pprov|I.I.
require Karl Loureiro'saapprov -

3.
3,
4.
5.
6.
6.
7.
No.:5001
4. and Amount:
File
Client and File Name:
Client and Matter No.:
5. Amount:
Payee /Vendor:
Payee/ Vendor:
SlIve ado andRuby
5001
$$10'I.00
Don
Ruby Petersonv.

Pylant,C
Don . Pylant,
Prob|teCourt
_
.S.R.
C.S.R.
ilverado
Y. Silverado
_
7. Mailing Address: Prob•te CourtN 0. 1
No.
201 aroline
201 c aroline Street
oor F
i-lous
6th F oar
on,
Haus on, Texas 77002
77002
8. Payee'sTelephoneNo.:
Payee's Telephone No.: (713) 388-6692
9.
9.
Payee's
Payee's Tax I.D.
I.D. N o.:
No.:
10.
Explanationfor billing
Explanation for billing purposes:
Fee of
Fee f tr copy of transcript -
Attorney:
Attorney: K.
Josh K. Davis
Ex|
Secretary:
Judy EEx 4628
Judy Jose

Auth.by! // DDlete 9/1
41/i
f

Floor:
Houston
Auth. by/
Signature -
i
Returnto;
Return to:
Davis
Nancy Davis
Floor: Houston

Rememberto haveAttorney nd all ·
Remember to have Attorney Sign nd Attach all Supporting Backup

. ·

1782497
Voucher:
Vendor:
Vendor:
Voucher:
Dist:
4079809
83287 DonG.
83287 Don G. Pylant
1782497 Dist: 4079809
DociD:
Doc ID: 000190U1-1
100466
Date: 8/27/14
Page100.00
Amount:
1of2
Amount:
1 of 2
100.00
Check#: 100466

Silverado Appx. 0299
No. 1-15-586-CV 3648
- ssL1000

e-
0
.

13,2014
August 13,

Davis
Josh Davis
2014
_
,
DonG
Don G..P
Pyl

Houston, T
7
|692
yl|t,t,C.S.R.
Official Cou Reporter

201
Co
(713)36:•692
1
Probate Co rt Nu. 1
201 Caroline S• 6° C.
77002
77002

~
_
-
_

AtLew
Attorney At Law
Lewis
Lewis Brisbois
Brisbois Bisgaard & _ LLP
&Smith,
Smith, LLP _
_ 1400
Suite1400
24 Greenway Plaza, Suite
0 Houston, Texas 77046.2410 _
(713)654-6767
Telephone: (713) 659-6767
0
Attention: Judy
Judy Jose . -
Re:
TRIAL COURT
COURT C USE
C USE NO.427,208
NO. 427,208
THE
IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF OF *I
* I THE PROBATE COU T COU
'T
RUBY
RUBY PETERSON, ONE
OF
PETERSON,

INCAPACITATED ADULT
* NUMBER ONE OF :

HARRIS COUNTY,TE AS
TEXAS
_
ofthe video
Transcription/Reporter's Record of the Objection and ruling of videopre entation at the
heldon
Temporary Injunction hearing held 12,2014,
August12,
onAugust theabove-entitled andd numbered
2014, in the
cans?, expedited, at your
your request _

Due& Owing:
Due $100.00
$100.00 -

you,
Thank you,

DonG.
Don G. Pylartt

.
· .
·
·

.
.

Voucher;
Vendor:
Vendor:
Voucher:1782497Dist:
83287 DonG.
4079809
83287 Don G. Pylant
1782497 Dist: 4079809 Date:
8/27/14
DocID:
Doc
Amount:
100466 _ 100.00
Date: 8/27/14
Check#:
2 of 2
ID: 000190U1-2

100466
Page
Amount:
2 of 2
100.00

Silverado Appx. 0300
No. 1-15-586-CV 3649
SSL000020
SSL000020

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH nr
&
LAWYERS
SUITE 1200 _
STREET
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS _ ND
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012

FEDERAL
TELEPHONE (213) 250-1800
FEDERAL I.D. NO XX-XXXXXXX

.

CNA
Claims
CNA Specialty Claims
Chicago,
Illinois
60680-8317
P.O. BANN.
Chicago, Illinois 60680-8317
139432
invoice
No.
October15,
15,22014
014
invoice No. 1394324
-
Attn: .111111111.1111.
Claim
Claim Consultant
` -

V •
tiV
Re: Petersonvv Silverado SeniorLiving
Re: Peterson Senior Living
Our F
Our ileN
File o.:
No.: 50013-1476t
50013-1476 _

Court 129T
129T
Court Case
No.
Court Case No. 2014-40980
2014-40980
Your
Your No.:
No.:

CurrentFees 4
Current Fees through 09/30/14 26,802.00
26,802.00
• through
Disbursements
Current Disbursements through 09/30/14 86.84
TotalCurrentCharges
Total Current Charges
26,888.84
26,888.84

***
*** Pleasereturnthis pagewith
return thispage withyour
your payment.***

*Life To Date
*Life To Fees B
Date Fees illed: 72,332.40 ·
'Life To
To Date
Date Disb.
Billed:
Disb. Billed:
Billed:
72,332.40
193.01
193.01
_
*Life to Date Total Billed:
*Life toDate Billed: 72,525.41
72,525.41

FOR
YOUR FOR YET BEEN
WILL STATEMENT
LATER
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH SILLS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED,
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0301
No. 1-15-586-CV 3650
SSLOOOO21
SSL000021
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
up
LAWYERS
SUITE 1200
221
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOSANGELES,
LOS
(213)
250-1
BOO
ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA 90012

FEDERAL
I.D.
NO
90012
TELEPHONE (213) 250-1000
FEDERAL I.D. NO 95.3720522

N
CNASpecialty
CNA Specialty Claims
Claims 15,22014
October 15, 014
P.O.
P.O. BoxlIMP
Chicago,illinois
InvoiceNo.
Invoice No. 1394324
1394324
Chicago, 60680-8317
Illinois 60680-8317
Attn: 1111.111.111.1110 _
Claim
Consultant
Claim Consultant

N
N
a -
N
Re:Peterson
Peterson-
Our
File
Re:
No.: 50013-1476
Our File No.:
SeniorLiving
v Silverado Senior
50013-1476
Court 129T
129T
Court
Case
No.
Court Case No. 2014-40980
2014-40980 _
Your No.:
Your No.:

Current
Current Feesthrough
Fees O9/30/14
through 09/30/14 26,802.00
26,802.00
Disbursementsthrough
Current Disbursements through09/30/14
09/30/14 86.84
86.84
TotalCurrentCharges
Total Current Charges
26,888.84
26,888.84

ToDate
*Life To FeesBilled:
Date Fees Billed: 72,332.40
72,332.40
ToDate
*Life To Date Disb. Billed:
Disb, Billed: 193.01
193.01
*Life
*Life toDate TotalBilled:
to Date Total Billed: 72,525.41t
72,525.41

DISBURSEMENTS
DISBURSEMENTS MADE
MADE FORYOUR
FOR
APPEAR
ON
ALATER
ACCOUNT,
YOUR ACCOUNT, FORWHICH
FOR BILLSHAVE
WHICH BILLS HAVE
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT
NOT YET BEEN
NOTYET BEENRECEIVED,
RECEIVED,
.

Silverado Appx. 0302
No. 1-15-586-CV 3651
SSL0000221
SSL000022

·
221
LAWYERS
BISGAARD SMITH
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITHLLP
Lcr
LAWYERS
1200
SUITE 1200
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
Los
ANGELES,90012
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
.

TELEPHONE
(213)
250-1
TELEPHONE (213) 250-1800
l.D.
FEDERAL N0NO 95.3720522
FEDERAL I.D.

50013-1476 CNA Claims 10/15/14
File
Number
50013-1476
Peterson
PetersonvvSverado
Senior
CNA Specialty Claims __
Silvered° Senior Living
1394324
10/15/14
1394324
JKD1
Life-to·Date
Activity
Activity
Bill
Current Bill
Life-to-Date
Billed .
Life
toDate
Perlod: Life to Date
0 Case
.L1.. Case Assessment,Development,Administratn A
32,052.39
L110 Factlnvestigation/Development: 2,517.00
2,517.00 32652.39
L110 Fact Investigation/Development: 4,174.50 17,315.47
L120 Analysis/Strategy: 4,174.50 17,315.47
L120 Experts/Consultants;
L130 Analysis/Strategy: 475.00 508.61
N L130 Experts/Consultants:
L15OBudgeting: 475.00
456.00 508.61
456.00
N L150 Settlement/Non—Binding
L160 Budgeting: ADR: 456.00
57.00 456.00
57.00
L160 Settlement/Non-Binding ADR: 57.00 57.00
· Subtotal
-7,679.50
7,679,50
50,389.47
50,389.47
·
Pre-TrialPleadings andMotions
L2.. Pre-Trial Pleadings and Motions
L210 ·• 7,455.00 7,522.21
L240
L210 Pleadings: Motions: 7,455.00 _1,585.50
7,522.21
L240 Dispositive
L250Oh Motions ubmiss.:
t erW Motions: 159600
,1,585.50
. 3845 .27
1,585.50
, 3,845.27
1,596.00
L250 Other Written Motions & Submiss.:
Subtotal 10,636.50 12,952.98
Subtotal 10,636.50 12,962.98

La.. Discovery
L320 Document 152.00 152.00
L330
L320 Document Production: 76.00
152.00 109.61
152.00
L340 Discovery;
L330 Expert
Depositions: 5,108.00
76.00 5,108.00
109.61
L35O Expert Discovery:
L340 Discovery Motions: 3,150.00
5,108.00 3,150.00
5,108.00
L360
L350 OnSiteInspections
Discovery Motions: .00
3,150.00 33.61
3,150.00
.

.Trial
SubtotalA 8,486.00
Trial
and
L350 On Site Inspections .00 33.61
Subtotal 8,486.00 8,553.22

L450 Trial
L4 . Trial Hearing and Trial
Preparation .00 436.73
L450 Trial & Hearing Attendance: Subtotal .00
.00 436.73
436.73
Subtotal .00 436.73 A
Fees
Total 26,802.00 72,332.40
Total Fees 26,802.00 A 72,332.40
Disbursements
E101Copying
Disbursements 79.38 80.15
E112
E101 C ourt
Fees
Copying 7.46
79.38 80.15
E115Deposition
E112 Court Fees .00
7.46 100.00
12.86
A 193.01
E115 Deposition Transcripts 86.84
.00 100.00
Total Disbursements 86.84 193.01

CurrentCharges 26,888.84 72,525.41
Total Current Charges . 26,888.84 72,526.41

MADE
ASTATEMEN
wu.L
LATER
ACCOUNT, RECENED,
BEEN
YET
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECENED,
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0303
No. 1-15-586-CV 3652
Sa000023

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD&
& SMITH
SMITH LLP

ANGELES,
LoS
-

CALIFORNIA
90012
221
LAWYERS
LAWYERS
1200
SUITE 1200
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET

TELEPHONE
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012

FEDERAL
No.
TELEPHONE (213) 250-1800
FEDERAL I.D. NO 954720522

.
File
Number
50013-1476
50013-1476 CNA
CNA SpecialtyClaims
Peterson
vS1 Senior
verado Living
Claims
Peterson v Silvered° Senior Living
10/15/14
10/15/14 -
1394324
JI(D1 Page 1
Date Att
Date Atty Descri tionof
Description of Services Rendered Hours
Hours . Amount
Amount
8/25/14 CDS Pleadings: Draft/Revise: Peterson - Drafted

8125114CDS
8/25/14 Pleadings: Research:Peterson
Peterson-Drafted _ 2.7 175.50
0 CDS Pleadings:

8/26/14 CDS
.8 52.00
52.00
CDS
0 __ . 1.9
1.9 123.50
123.50
tJ 9/02/14 JKD Fact Inves

9/02/14 JKD Review/Analyze: and review of .2 55.00
numerousemails
of numerousemailsfrom
.2 38.00
9/02/14 JKD Experts/Consultants: Review/Analyze:
RussJones,SarahPacheco
Receipt and
andPhilRoss
review
regarding| from -
9/02/14
9/02/14 JKD
Russ Jones, Sarah Pacheco and Phil Ross regarding111111111..11111111.....,
111111111.10101r
Fact
JKD Fact
rePare
Investigation/Development:Review/Analyz__
Review/Analyzeb,
.4.4 76.00

.5.6 114.00
9/03/14 JKD
9/03/14 _Other
JKD Other Written
Written oionsumiss.: Review/Analyze: Exchan eeemails
emails with
114.00

9/03/14JKD regarding
E erts/Co _ .53 57.00
57.00
9/03/14 JKD Experts/Co · evlewAnalyz

_ .33 57.00
57.00
9/03/14 JKD E erts/Consuitants: Review/Anal

JKDer &Submiss.:R| .4 76.00
erW ritten
Motions &Submiss.:
R - ‘|/Anal
/Analz|
.4 76.00
9/03/14 JKD
9/04/14 CDS '
Written
eadin|s: Research:Research.|
z _ . .1 19.00
19.00
9/04/14 CDS • eadin s' Research: Research
9/04/14 CDS
.6
.6
39.00
39.00
9/04/14 CDS eadings: Research: Researced
ed

9/04/14 Other Written Motions&Submiss.: Draft/Revise:
Pre|are 1.4
91.00
91.00
9/04/14 JKD Other Written Motions & Submiss.: Draft/Revise: Pre are
9/04/14 A nal
JKD sis/Strate| |‘ .2 38.00
9/04/14 JKD Anal sis/Strate :|ra| a - |·· .
.2 38.00

9/04/14 JKD A sis/Strate
nal . -
Review/Anal .4 76.00
9/04/14 JKD Anal sis/Strate Review/Analz|
.4 76.00

9/04/14JKD Fact . _ ·
z=
ommunicate(With Client):
Telephoneconference
.2
.2
38.00
38.00
9/04/14 JKD Fact Investigation/Developm • ommunicate(With Client): Telephone conference
withill.11111.1.18regarding .2 38.00 ;
9/04/14JKD Factlnvestigation/Development; _ emailswit .2 38.00
regardin|
9/04(14 JKD Fact Investigation/Development: Review/Analyze: Exchange emails wit
ANIMISM .22 55.00
9/04/14JKD 11111011.14
Document Production: Redactedand - 38.00
_ 9/04/14 JKD Document Production: Draft/Revise: Redacted and prepared40//setimMIN//10
· Outside 114.00
9/04/14
JKD 111111111111. 1 Communicate(Other Counsel): Telephoneconferencewith .5
JKD Analysis/Strategy: Communicate(Other Outside Counsel): Telephone conference with
.6
.2
114.00
38.00

MADE
BILLS
RECEI
HAVE
YET
BEEN
WM.
9/04/14JKD An regardin
sis/Strategy:
Research:Receiptandrevie ili .2 38.00
9/04/14 JKD Ana vsis/Strategy: Research: Receipt and revie

_ WILL ALATER
ON STATEMENT
DISBURSEMENTS MADE FOR YOUR ACCOUNT, FOR WHICH BILLS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED,
WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT

Silverado Appx. 0304
No. 1-15-586-CV 3653
SSLOOOO24`
SSL000024

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH Lis
LAWYERS
SUITE 1200
NORTH
221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET
CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012
TELEPHONE (213) 250-1800
NO
FEDERAL I.D. NO 954120522

File
File 50013-1476
50013-1476 CNA
CNA SpecialtyClaims
Claims 10/15/14
10/15/14
Number _ Peterson
PetersonvvSlverado
Silvered° SeniorLiving
Living 1394324
1394324
JKD1Page
JKD1 . Page 22
Date
Date Atty Description ofServices
of Services Rendered
Rendered Hours
Flours Amount
Amount

9/04/14JKD
IMMis
OtherWritten Motions
.4.4 76.00
76,00
9/04/14 JKD Other Written Motions &&Submiss.:
S

[Text truncated at 120,000 characters. The full text is on the page linked above.]

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4074800. Public record. Not legal advice.