# Texas Association of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine v. Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners And Patricia Gilbert, Executive Director in Her Official Capacity > Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · October 29, 2015 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4074565 ## Case - **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) - **Decided:** October 29, 2015 - **Precedential status:** Published - **Opinion:** Opinion - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4074565 ## Opinion text ACCEPTED 03-15-00262-CV 7603947 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/29/2015 3:28:53 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK No. 3-15-00262-CV FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS In the Court of Appeals 10/29/2015 3:28:53 PM Third District of Texas — Austin JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF ACUPUNCTURE AND ORIENTAL MEDICINE, Appellant, v. TEXAS BOARD OF CHIROPRACTICE EXAMINERS AND YVETTE YARBROUGH, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Appellees. On Appeal from 201st District Court, Travis County, Texas Cause No. D-1-GN-14-000355 ACUPUNCTURE ASSOCIATION’S RESPONSE TO THE CHIROPRACTIC BOARD’S MOTION TO STRIKE Craig T. Enoch Melissa A. Lorber Shelby O’Brien ENOCH KEVER PLLC 600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2800 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 615-1200 / (512) 615-1198 fax Attorneys for Appellant 1 Appellant Texas Association of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine (“Acupuncture Association”) files this response to Appellees Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners and Yvette Yarbrough, in her Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Chiropractic Board’s (“Chiropractic Board”) motion to strike. The Acupuncture Association requests for the Court to deny the motion. The Chiropractic Board asks the Court to strike a laundry list of footnotes in the Acupuncture Association’s brief: specifically, footnotes 29, 32-36, and 38-39. These footnotes simply reference websites that are readily available to the public on the internet. But the Chiropractic Board claims that because the cited websites are not in the clerk’s or reporter’s records, the Acupuncture Association may not cite them in its brief. Links to these websites were included in the Acupuncture Association’s brief for the Court’s reference, if the Court wishes to consult them. The question before this Court is one of law, not one of fact that is dependent on evidence. The Acupuncture Association is not attempting to put new evidence into the record by 1 attaching copies of documents to its appendix. Referencing internet websites in 1 See Burke v. Ins. Auto Auctions Corp., 169 S.W.3d 771, 775 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005, pet. denied) (“an appellate court cannot consider documents or hearings that are cited in the brief and attached as appendices if they are not formally included in the record on appeal”) (emphasis added); In re Estate of Bendtsen, 230 S.W.3d 823, 830 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007, pet. denied) (a court should not consider evidence attached to a brief that is not included in the appellate record—such as new affidavits). 2 appellate briefs—even if hard copies of the linked documents were not put into evidence in the trial court—is a common practice, one that the Office of the 2 Attorney General routinely follows. Further, a court may take judicial notice of a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it “can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.” TEX. R. EVID. 201(b). A court may take judicial notice at any state in a proceeding. Id. 201(d); see also Pub. Util. Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm’n of Tex., 878 S.W.2d 598, 600 (Tex. 1994). Here, it cannot reasonably be questioned that these internet websites say what they say. Indeed, the Chiropractic Board does not even attempt to question these websites’ accuracy. The cited websites are mostly those of accrediting bodies that are expressly referenced in Acupuncture Board and Chiropractic Board rules. Thus, the Court may take judicial notice of these websites. 2 See Glenn Hegar, in his Official capacity as Texas Comptroller, and Ken Paxton, in his Official Capacity as Texas Attorney General v. Texas Small Tobacco Coalition, Petitioner’s Brief on the Merits, at 8, 10, 12, 18-19, 24-25, 59, available at: http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=bc596889-bf61-4627- 9d27-aabddbfb9bb9&coa=cossup&DT=BRIEFS&MediaID=19589422-da99-407a-81c1- 61f33732e971. 3 PRAYER Appellant Texas Association of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine respectfully prays that this Court deny the Chiropractic Board’s motion to strike. The Acupuncture Association further requests any other relief to which it may be entitled. Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Craig T. Enoch Craig T. Enoch Texas Bar No. 00000026 cenoch@enochkever.com Melissa A. Lorber Texas Bar No. 24032969 mlorber@enochkever.com Shelby O'Brien Texas Bar No. 24037203 sobrien@enochkever.com ENOCH KEVER PLLC 600 Congress Avenue Suite 2800 Austin, Texas 78701 512.615.1200 Telephone 512.615.1198 Fax Attorneys for Texas Association of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, on October 29, 2015, the Acupuncture Association’s Response to the Chiropractic Board’s Motion to Strike was served via electronic service on the following: Joe H. Thrash Assistant Attorney General Administrative Law Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711 Joe.Thrash@texasattorneygeneral.gov /s/ Craig T. Enoch Craig T. Enoch 5 --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4074565. Public record. Not legal advice.