# Eddie Don Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Division

> Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · August 5, 2015

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4071264

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
- **Decided:** August 5, 2015
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4071264

## Opinion text

LttuiU OF APPtflD

THCRfl distort oemta
August 5, 2015

APPfcOAMr

II.
0-3~L5*-ODJ43-CU

0-l-&N-J3"ODtL,0-Z_

THE STATE OF T£Kft5
APPttltE
/received \ erntii

JUN 2 2 2015
THIRDCOURTOFAPPEALS J APPEAL SfclEF
\ JEF E_y

tfuLE zs, groiikos fo&. uttCEP poom a pikAl coder, or pnoceeoiKfi wtrK appeal, ik coavtct
APPEAL KUWV&ETL 05-15-00 3^3-CVI, TltfAL CASE UUMlBeU D-l-fiK-LbOOtbOI StYU EDOEL DDtf
jbh\hi^oK \Li the state or na&, dcdeoeq that plaiktiff claim be Dcsf^Ais^eo with

PUui>oice ton. laol of sua^Ea AAArrt*. rruajsoicTCOfi SmttoAtos R*.rwosmatf, warn
RESPECT TO 6fcO^ NE6LCGEUCE fl£ftHO^tt*S l vewjJ flesftacsiflLt* Foil thl t^meaail brmTZOti
Of- THE OcPArXMET^r AMD BACH EWSflfUrtOtf CJM'0£Q. XT-3 jtffa3D:OTDM ItfCLUQErtfe lAtAtS ftv LHtfAU&H
VMMETIE PLArKTlFf APPELLANT X*> LOuFlKtD ,

ST. TECAS BOAO-0 OF PA&QOAS AUQ PARDEE. TftC PWXU.SEDM6 DF TtttS ^ECTCDUt Hi'5 AOcPrEO TO

Se ePFecTtv/E tulm mW lAxt* Retmsu Atfettoeo to BE EPPEenacSuttt 3o,m&i 11 Teic fceo
bill., AMEHiQEO TO BE EFFtOXtfE JLttifc ICcZ., IT TEt Rfi&H^WO. Se€\ (YPTttUett pAfcE

k. DEFEtoLNfiuf RrSSIE OWEKiS 1STUC PfcfcSTXjMG OFFEC£JL CtU(\\tt} AKO PdliCM &OftfcO OF TK£
STATE OF TtSAS TEXAS QEPAvLTcAeNX oF CSLDAXAA.L30S\tL£ PfctOOUS (\\\& PAecUC DtVISlDM, SHE

IS LECAtLH R£SPOf
T/te htsma toutiT Vim bkicArn to fiPPur Tcoas LauJ C*Aictritrm(> Pc/l^aI
JuajSDlcriD*/. Tews /Ja5 PLLdwea Fatl We tzEUdLSE OF PeplsoM SamOumm To
OUTEPL LL7ATT3 Of DUE P/U)EE$S UNDEfL FlffP/, E&HtHAM FtuflTEzurti AMM0M6PTTOF
WE uhlxTEb STnrzz h*3TxruTmi*.h)\iu>iAKt6* oe Ftca*/ aa/a Stak irmnn
tttf Omia/AMEE MffhtH Pail FA /hiPZDE fa P/lcaLe Caus* /amas^a^f Ncaaxa/c
nt loMEcrmP of Amest IT/dUtex Due fluxt&sLom &&*/*/of Z*f. Afm
to Afimr PunsuAA/r to An/ ftoMuiisrtomfe. DMitfArteCs) P>oam af/W^s
fMO Pa/iqLe Ltu/la/ PlAutnff-MMIaut Back To PtwcxP {aiIfa/g To fhUoai Pc**)aho
Ll^Latl/hc P/ldceojaes hbuMA fa Fedem/ Aa/A State IauJ-
THE PlAMTsff* APPELLANT Assaurs, Statl DfPi^is ez/jm AQmllAslo jjumua/jt^/
POPi AH CONDUCT Jot WElft OFflClAt CAPACLTf, PLAx(PTXP^APPlliA^r Tt> Ac AM^teD
km $ECUALE}, AHA tibtLfcQ WE EteCuTWE AurtowV MAUnft* Sutf/ QEMMP3S. On
m MQXEV oA SUCH AUTHolLLW PPPoiA/TW PD flUtUtZ THE fatomnL. Aa/A 3UAIL
Cause m Fucunc/E ro &e Ceih/e^e) td $ueA teaMMrtite Mao. appm^
THE State op rttAs E*tfaceME*tT bffrcm Can Mor fhsPure THCF/icr mr ttfef
Fail to ComM huta the Ml/timal PudceAusb set Foathjm Bctmw looPoseDeciA/iAmrJummiTt
THE DEPlWf&TMtbf M /l&tfS PMTLEC£$ bt TMMumtlfi SEtU&ED tfY MEEcWSilTUTlM AMD LmaK.
HEi: Ffl), fl&ai. Pool. Rul£.ilCb)(tKfAauAl Al\.t6ATxotf Tl-to ftt£ iUi^Aur Td Suejtcr Matte*.
SdhB OfcTtCfl. TW£ QuMtti Si-toutO 0e Uft>* fife DeFc/fA/toPS

15. UPoM hlkflMfmd MA belief, CAiffW fitSfctf rZ) &W5S UEaUECKCC Dtf&OAMFS hiwd
OF the PAEradL RLtxtetmtf* FaiI TDlt&Pea, tot To (Hiumti bfi Umml the (biorrros/
tefitoMM of lAWctH IT lA/rtS MMjfe. MA rtfAr The QEFEMHW", OW0UCT IMS WlLLFul,

It. flatter too Li) 4 zoouoSH kaas be OETUEMcwcb x«J(/£S CouA/rY QISTWT CdUAl.
(c). Ml statc AGaiW Musr Gt made A Pa/ltX of wc flcn&tJ,
(JO)* Pi CbUAr Mat fcMOL ADeeeaaaml?suowia/r mntacr PUeaaa ro whlmea.
tiU PlAnlTlff flt&UESr the Stvte ftom to PIuee oaJ tae t/Aicnmf da. appucauuM
Iff QubSTlDAJ

(el Mi ACimtJ bAwwr ua/a&l tp/es Sara* Mav Ac &u>u6#ru*/€VL rais Sxn*/
MAX UOT 6E USED Ton. DEEAt O/L STa/ ft HoHUtfA, JAP wtficM A Sasfirtsz**,
nn/ocaWAf, bd CAridJlaTwri of- A Littme 8v a Stape A Aw W»f

ffc*~. MToTDAfiT ACmrms OM CbAJSnrurc bEST/u/cnoA/JST &/Vaik£&l Puafi0 3etfi teAustxn***issuen &l TttL WttT BWoOIAKr PAOT DF HlS CASC IS Ok trtei DO^ErtmTCbfS.THt COURT
WVU.SF SEX mc ?BsOF b£\ Boftcfl PftntLMQAaafi A*0 T.kfcfc &&RG Anwm^rRAVrjaLS
PAMEL ^C^QeflS. tt\t (kWOllAAQir APPLTXb EK PACLTE. Fbfc AM ORGeTl TO Rttufttf
PLAtfttrPr~ APP&LMT eEtUfeM TD TOC^rO .1m PUttKOF-APTOlAUT \MEftX
nW^SPolLTEO PuttS&AttT TO T&, DCDCC T^AT WV5 ISSUeA, BUT THGf REFUSE TZ>
LdoL AT rUe fttSCDirOt/ MADE fti* trt£ 3U06MENT StX: ATTACHEO stated EtttlSlT
A. P. . Ha\1L [4cX0TU 1 A(A MbT l\S\ttKG FfcC t4lKDREQS DF ttoa«L5,
ReauM, X'w\ A^iaacic tt> t.d,U'1Q- aumiLVEHCL m m& mzMce. we
OLPMfMtMS FlEEb PPiCATb THt JdWOKlbff, Tb 1M(W IT ATTPCHEJ) SuPPNtmib
fl/Etolfe, TtfflT SbUEIiewl iMMtlLTr' BftfttEA PU\BSnfF-PPPELLMF CLAtm. THC
toatf bw m a&>ib& plawuTP MPflvm plmoimbs foil the PuaPc^c of
l&TAn&tJC> JURXSDKiriDKf
T«r2 COULTIK ff/2S CMe \ftte (IeQW£0 Tb EtfiMWL THE LMlOENCt
6tf UfHlCK PARTIES KEtXEA TO hLTOLMttfEl JOT ft FACT XSSticT EUSTEJD
1U:&M&ttfC> THE. ALUi&T} &&DSS KullGEMte bf TfrL QEPAAIM£NT3. FtomftfF-
ftPPEUMT PLfcTO GROSS WEl\Ul\CMCE Tb PLEADxaTG eSTttrtOSfteA SUSJEZT
AAAtTER CTadtSOTjcTtO^.

ftimitlPP-APl^LLAUr W6OL0 ^cM THt QOiKLVTMX TH£ aauMEMCra
MAOr THE BASS OF Ttifi $i£LT AAA THE flESuCPlUt JaTJU/UZS MO DAMAGES SET Car WE&C A
ninm aao ptibamrE hesuIt bF DcRmhm UL^dmeEr, Pailwc to facts tttaz if mc
mOLf} ESTAbimH THAT TrY£ CLAIMS CbME iMXKM AH PZPflZte mUU 6f DEfa/DAfifTS
%\PEIL£Hlt4 ItotAumH bEFbflE THt TOTAL COU&J fM JudJSDimm Tb PAOOLEE.

20. ftmrnft-AppeiiMr coaAPlautt He is fumed entiled to mmmm /za&sC
(A/rraour PiiAm cd«diow% psntm Qicdm bP the judhmew, sot.' amtnsQ
P. >teic fiwr toot M tt.s&fi. toes wor awrarM m ecPms Etmmtf speexal
COKQXTTOkl S,XSiR Ifb PRDVStBirED AS ftCCKOIIIOtf OF PAfcOLE. OK fAAKOAlbe/
SU?eRutSXDt4,TYtt5 E^CUmDU £uG£E«5ft Tttttie AtU Mb EttlUSEbtfS, IF TH£
EHGX5LATXWIC HAD WTOfoEB TO M&Kt&IT SPeOAL. CotfOlCLD* $z&P, EttEPF
Wte^ EtPtesst/ PtoitiOEto is cduco ttfwe etP(i€S5L^ l^ke. 3d, Even umw
A- UBttTf XKTfcTLEST EtlSTS rK TW£ €M3LY R€U.*St townST, RATHER., OuC
Me ftoC£6S RtoutCES sxwtfitf that me. PUVrKtlFf-ftPPaJLAKr^PteSoK
Be mm mtizti kottceim ADtfAtftaFtKE. pAtzoLe pakecs eoKsrattAn&tf of rnt
MATTETl A*0 THAT frE 6E GtTCtf AOPPORTUfttrV TD SUBNET AK* ^ra^FH* Tftar
HE FEEL^ BE RELEVANT TO THE PAfcOLE PANELS D&CT310N! OlRtXT eiAMjtfAratf
QwmibfL of Pact amo ak opportunity td respond td all the bad eiftoofce
•me Maa£ ftwfeL /ww M4UE (tedetirfi) Cjmcehmhg PiAMtiFf-MpenAP/r-
PimmFF-APPciLtwr om mi tolate sp&a#E CottDmDtf St&p &f
MWMAIZXW 3uPHU/HlDtf TAAf ftE&JUEO Hs( THE to/&c7)ffiW of 0ft JAJftA-Mtf
CL,lfiO«/i GUfiASC BttfUSt UAAIOUS STATUTES AfO Restate UPOtf DID Nor
APPL4 TD PLAWflfF-APPElLArtr.

& RlkWB to /2£Z£#5E Mtttf M SPeE

ftfWttFF-APRElLfUK* UmtASALQEUfitotEDH: bF HUMAfit blAMm t£> ftELEASL
TMLH MSPECIAL CtMam XSSU60 MbiiDOL bF THE &0AM bF PAMPAS AMD PAfUm
(H AUSmt. Ttm OM THE H«DfiXbF DEEEMDEJL ZOOZ, AaP MWOtoWUm /lEEEASC
UPbTLT, UE&AL AttmP \UxtttCUT lUTLTLfEABtCS FPiEW) PfLL^AP ZtaFP, Blir MM* JM6tS
STILL tottotUE Tb &ELIIEUE THAT tUE C0ULLT3 SUOUEfS L€F POlSW bPfJElAL AAAkT TJ/E
folLE% to mvTEPL lUffAt WdStL OFFICIALS fllfl. JUDGES ILEEjP THEJEHTAPCDS bFf
PmM AtmH&TihnoK i&aA.L.$ava»9aw*MW bP
PA(LT3L.v£l e,C_ bz\iEA$mUfiV( P«D6ftwAVL.a IfcUAC.Setn&M 3LlU^?m^nx^rt

3.
JtAf AA/V CiUlLACttDA Wlffl PBPEtT lb P/USOflt CopIOITIIWB §HaLL FxTEVO M> fatTPfCA Tfad
HECESSAM TO COlUUtT THE UlbCAFIO^ bf THE FeOEAAL Pl6HP 6F A PtAWEff THC CduaI
SHALL MOT GfUHiT bfi PrPPnDUE AfiH PeTLSPECTWE PLeUeF UfifLEte THE Eou/iT FtHO^ THAT
SUCH RELIEF t% th\M OTLAWft* £l/TMO$ MO FuAJIfETL THAN Ulce&aaH To CdaflecT
THE VlbLATJbK bF THt FtOEAAl Hmf, PHID 13 THE LEAST JtteTWSWE AAcAAG MxMStoM
Tb CDAJLELT THE ilbhATTDK bF THE FeQEHAI tlM.
Uf

SueismcTioa flosea &t Go/auL
"ARbbk twoea Paxticmts

22. PLAJtfTtPF- fiPPOJJMT &«T23Tt*fc> ffitftS DEf^QIMitcTOP tZDAtrtALJu&tTCL, PftfiOLfc
DltfI&10ir,B0ftCOflOMnaSTMRiflS PAteE MO TEXAS BOARA bF PAOOatfS AMfl PAR0LE.5. 8OA(V0
Mrtnmtuttoos. boaho ft**, Hfl3 mmxta Post trial fcawni amo option that w FACT6 m WHicH THE iKFtftENa B
Based Mte«rfaJ«j.SEfe.QA^l«oUiXW^et(kn.Aiij.5ifcn attY6e*( Hfl4> W«5
UiitKftiT Pac^a Ettfiorni^ totoao ArtteAftiKG UM &wg.Ft*. * fa^&mvum*
See.*. 3>Vkao#£ ru»S\tfsAT(i-Yi.

ftOMmi^TWAmfer
^Mft^AE OP JWLSStXKtXlbtC
Vt. ALLe&ATiOAi CHALLEKfatMt Plea To Jaws&iorotf - trtE Tews F*aotE Status amo the
IcEUOOATID^ OF KAtMTT.FF-APPtLUWT OAKttAfff K,,200«T RELEASE. ACC0R0EX6 T«C STATE TAKCS
rtf At Position tAat Plea to Ju&is&cxitxi Is McassAftf. XT 13 Mon Paoocc RtwjCArxotf pfloaouOts

AN* ISSUE'S >P«OC££OIt(& THt bETOCTIDif 0>fAftAIl Le6isLatidi4 PKoVteBmfc I PlAiKTiFF-APpEUArtT From tutotRTAtiKk
CeR.rait( AcrwntESi t& tortTrnue ite EDuoaTlotf, pAanEiPATCK&Id LAAmGOLU&ftto
toimTttxH& barMCeouS THAr AAAU Vbu FaiUPseF, Ci) Wc OEFeuOAtiT's Acrco rNAWAm6 P/iObiQA FOEJE. tDAUIS COuMPt CoaaT
WDUEb HAD fmScLT NlATTEPi JUABOlcElOlL bUOL PlASNtlft APPlPtmrs CLAIM. PULWPlff APPecEANF
AQME Cd«UE&SEL tSEA Mdaje iMPtxirMThf, \fiktf A PuLe fiLblLJ FmIuae U State
P, CLaua WPbtP MuA fULif oV Be Laanted. MdTioip J5 Cdhuolteo fo/l0uU&. Monotv Fe>
SowidAfWy Iidemoit THE Count, UPa Fi«o&& AOaamtc Issue At To MaiuuaI FacPs Mar
Qtttf the mmtii MWoieas Dm a RuLe izkUi) CMqux Xb SubIect Matter JaasDrcriotf,
rurt: cduclt X* E^o*££Pje& To Bo&otoe FaeTuaI (tenures. t^TtFf-ftPfcu^r
(ZesPouo To DcFtKOAKr PU^oxugs .

30. Pa\S G>DC AKtfOTAT^ £eeTT2W ZO0K05&,
SeefcxKC fceiWTatf' Juo^weuT Tv\e Aeteo* Mm Re Goou^t Duly Lu ATqaiiis lWtV
terwa (Wr. ktfi&ofce DiO Nor^apPwLT DtTEa^EWAnoK TTUt ftcFbioPwr Ikb
EKGalsco tu DtJjW DC CsrtTAMACroa^ Coaoqof So CLeao. As To Suf>TActf ^eFauIt
-Juo&wveut kPeoaiAL ftuie Cwtil Pao^eouaE S3(bXTl.z&USX.AlftppU£AsrLTr/ OF
G>CK£GAL Rule. 2>\ UUO L(*K APpixcadLe.

31. UP&H l^PoamATiEW Ako BeleeF tue issue TS WHETHER TctAS DE?AriTmE*t OF
fttte AtPARTMEXT DF CtLTVVIWALTuSTlfX, PaRoIl fk*aiss
To Ttt(L OmV. oFTUlCcuot Ansa W ACoN Tb THe pLACWrLFF-APPELLA(aT"Mart.e(/e2"
Bur THC CLavt ReCuse To FiU A*o Icetuiut It To THE ?Acaf tkcAusc Wt tAx>TW DcO Mot
CowirU tott THc LdcaI Rales.

& UP^ iAz/DmarE)^ Aw fitliEF Rule 52. o/ TKe fkodUl fcJcs bF 6:ucL P,u^oua£
pRoifioob Wrrtt et^PtcT Ti> (^oiK6S oF Ucv> lM«enfca Based Dm DaaI oo Documevtail*/
^Lto'cMo:. f^> SaPPtrtlT. AMtAPOmr LP FlOcmI Count Is, l^tituo To As AOtQu*tc
bPPoA.Tum.Ff To PmtMT ADtfntsc Without Qaffaatt APdkidLe Dcfaft Judemovt.
teotmL Me 6WI Pnocamc ssG&.PcmiT* Pi Dc&u(t AtcLtf kAmff-APftU^ DlKeeT Tk Cw&s lumsour^ Cm to
3ku) ken THt Mum hi CPaaacpuuzld As P/umaajL , Ptu P/iobA&U Cause: Due THAT itm w APupal EmimaoAJ of AM CctiFarcn fhlaiMf
Pack m tAiSibvLAnoflP bh IMctAe/l THc FacFs Depeam/jped IMA/iPia/rf' fctvownopp. PLw/tfr¥
MPtLLfwF MjsThcGuUut AbffonlMEPi To &c HeaaFj Am To SI&j ,If Ac Cm', THE At OsD tier
HlbbATE WE CotiQlTWAfS lV If-HE DlO> THAT OrAtoAtsffWCCS It* MtTXL\ATWa/ SuEAtSt THnT
THE \lLbUnopP Dots Hop &&AAAUf RtOoiAfjOAP.

®> \t> ItiAAAAu'f Tk PLAtfPT^f-bPPdJjwf CoHhuueA OtTo/frou A*//l thputut F> Wt $n\rc
CdMilcTioUaL ImsuFuTjdaP PtAOtUE THt PtHAL DcospoaP. PiodmiIoaT Is &>t Aasld Ot/ ComaaloAP
if AtoTHa lVume Cba/Ws DtAsoNtA Mfp PaaoIc Is ZV// ACaiuktfw/PAf Aw AurPPonizzppc*
SejluleE OF SotTEHCE barsiOC THt fbHiTot/TiA/uP'' Do mot iumu offffm&> up/to Hotol
UAb bm CoAOECTih bf ACIluae . tHe faiunff- APtdLtoir Has Dtof IkLAstn /ho«t Fkisw Bam
Otf EUALUATtOti WAT He StitoH PtASfif/AbLE PflXMlSC bf AtMC AOLL TO PUTuiUJ To Sxitrt AH
Ptttithcri As Atestotsttoc, SilP-toLtm fbisc*/. SufutET To Ttk CbuniTtoets Af Uts tidaiec-fade.
HE m k 6/auMv tMPU>m m J* foe PoBe font fas PamiLp aa/o Fhm/A5 aha it fbm ate
EHDllflMG hmiHlAEHK OF HOAiAAL LIFE.

41 il25 hot Sor&sra: To.Attach Galatea jmAhltaaee Pb APolsc//** JustiAtaaLe QdjAtFce Jap
lAAuiTAimzuc Uxs couAiatiPAE Paeeodaa So LMt As Ac AblOtS tk TUt CCAQiriOA/5 OP (Pn PkLCASE,
TtiSH tflS UE&JE AnnaPAW>A OfLlbPC OF PfULAOM-

46* PlAntfitf HPPlLLahf CotiDcJMED To hfftTL Caxvdus LoK As To LtQaitu. CranoU eP
fiurttotupf Wat Out Paocc^s Is Fucllul a*m caus fid, Sucff PidccouajtL Pamoate As r/Pc
PAMKuLAfL iiTUATliW DtMAfiiK. FtPPU AUA fhLWLlMrtf AAWAPPMrs. AAlAaPCSWiTUftLX Lt/PtLEAAALC,
PAILOLL HAS DBTtLOVtA PlAb/RFF AfPtLLAUf TO HO/UAAL AM UScPuL LIFE UiCtUXTP PUE LA(aP.

«#. PiAluUf APPLtlAitf R0l*UkST7LATlVE fiELEA'iE ASAESF AT PAtoCt PWA f/UliMMX/Up
tolitf£S WE PEUOCATLO^ Ha\m(£> CtAfAitP PAIUEIPCLS HAVE RtMAlUED TLCLATtilEUF
iMMuFAbLL IfP JUAJSPOULkUCE . bl£E bF THtXL XS M/ftAE 6cuaWiAcUrAL ACTJDt/ SUfULH JrfJUAILS At/
IHL)L\ilOUAL, AHA TAL UfiSOti) AbLLMiSS OF THL ACJIOU OtAtA/AS bfii FACT Fx&Olti6S, EMIAO/CC UStA
TO PMUE. THE DbUait/AAENT^ CASE Md5F fSE O&ELOSCD TV TftC INDmOUAL 50 THAT fa UaS
AU bPPdETUMLVF Tb S'AOLO THAT IFIS UA/TdUE, WHILE WES XS FU/E Xti TKL CASE OF DtEuN\UJTAn){
bitbtt/EE, IT IS EVEN AAOlU DVtPCft.nwT WHE/le VKG. fcVliDEXCC Cowstsr OF tHL taTXA/fcxiV
OF IWfllUlQUALS VWUGSt MEMOflV Mtekf &L FAULrC ti. Wlk> lU F4CT, tAtCMT fi£ PadSU 0/1 Pt*SC*&
MATUSATEb A/ MALtCE, VENOK(t\ltUCS$> It6TOLEAAt UatflllHL$£tl9&-
55X.Ea..Kg.qymz..

iiS. fiLArMTlFF APPELLAMf tODtE bAH JbliUSOti toEUbtit THIS AcTLOM Xtt THE TEPAS CbUBT

SEtKt^ P/LIMARIL/ fO ALLEGE hLPttfVATlOt/ bF UPC, LIbULrfttL hdC COUflSCOF LAM OfL
SbWL UTttiSIQll THEUbF. PLAWTEFf APPELLAHF fiLSb ASSEAT JUOlElAL AUL6ACam
L//!/Afc7L STAFE*

10,
Jfc. UPbHTHFb/iMATXOfiP Aa/D P>eUeF SPitiM M'ACW Ph&tmtaM bfDEPcnAAHr'b PaiLu/le A
(AiU( kUTHbfLtLEh HitHF bit (j&Al l>tP/LE5afTAT2oe^u of We pla^f appoint ^ «,
MPOK bF SuuniNC THE AAMWSVMUE m*sc *«r Foal AO^ls^m
*A*B DA/ (LULLS WETll UOF AbOPWb XaT SUAHmNTiAL tOMOLTAHtt UtTft
PfloCcbUML fiEbUlTLLMmTS Fb/L AbENM llULE MAklAlG toptrAMEn £H THC
(\tlu\MtsmruiL p/wceoutll act

HB. UPut lAfFcvuviAnoAf ArtO BEXtEP 0) Pu(L3UAAtT tv FedolaI roles of Caux PnoCEDu/icr
S"S (h). AFrETL ARRfcST FMt \AlUtEjU FMLET) Tb PtaWtOE FbIL ArfV tfCAlLTTfe lAiLTtl OESPeCF
tD PTLtUAtE IUFEAEST THAT \PltUL fit LFFecFLD AV Wl OFFiElAL AcFIOaJ Cl) THE ftsfP OF
M EflUbH&uc* bcP(iL\lATU)N bF 5UcH lUTEfltSr TH/IOUGU PflDCEOUncS USEOtANb
tUL PtoMALLUmZt IF AHHi bf AOOlTEOHAL OIL SUDSTITUTE P/LDCeAUAAL lAfCQ/APUfti
Mb FtML^ rttEGDSHMMW** lAfTUEST IACLUDIHG THE FUHCfLOfit MWSItA AHD THE
Festal aaym MhaoI&tmih/l rumeHi that Addipioa/al opl Qu&smu/r P/LbCEouML
lEDdt(L£Mt!dF MULL) EMTAIL- PAULb Td COiAAUf titlF/i T/fL DUE P/MCttt CeAUJE.

ti.

HS. dcr
i&foNse &tw& that ntEi&ue Pueseuwa xs hat Zeeeyable. ue: Atracmo P.

ST>, Com Pmtamss, Mt\ m PLcEaiAma of Ft/t tmr 9nttA L\>A$rtmm»FAC fk&Ars
tOtiEE Don JDitototJ TO Humah QtElAMtuu/ flmn tiftu Ouieeo. AmmPUiusn THE MOST
MPbbXfitiF PmjP bf HC5 CASE rS W THE DmtP\CtfFATtt>f&, THE COWLT MST m$T Ph£ t/PE
ftttof bf buti m/ld% tti biwiworn. DeFm&l has m btTAaita a couacomit n
hAAtEE DoCbtAEUTfiTEbfLS MiAHAblE FO DEFUSE bL DtpMbAtit AFTHE SAME TIME, CAH INdid
lum XA THc Comsi te AosiAfES* Th ULmmtt Foe fofn/DAt/FS ftmsoto Plea to the
TUAJSOltml AHA THAT PlMUTltt AP/HUhsT CtfitMS Be AlSMUSUA (Huff P/UJuOUE PC(L
hci bf Sufltor tflMWLJiSAisasEFrott Uitto iPIaet Ft>t> PauLe it btfo&ai lon.RctcAsE
\MttU Ocfmt PTlml Wtu. luttotaatE \uirtt Mnu> To ItfoaL ttftrti'h Mttc Awo AOtOatPt
OtftteV

St. ioMEttfeUfc Tf4ftf AcW ftiSTi AH P&PW bf (LCfAlTf Taa/6i6EE THIN6S, AlToaL
bCtUdlAHECStAnA FLtXAmmUlAS, BuT M&0 &FATR bf MmD §UCt( A5 lifFainOUS fi*/d
bPlMbMC*) AH AETaafbtL ALLEEEO EVENT bA, /toUUMStovtE . AS DiSPW&aiSttca Fmaa
Its Le&aI UFeeI, tot/stOua/a^ oa h/FinPkcTAPic*/ a Fact is tof AtTb/i Couombtf
bf THIKGSi ASSUMED (Foil THlMom&/t) AS f/fiPPa/iH6 Eusmu£> (ufa&MAt/)
RIS6& dtmts Could Umbl QsAtomm fmL SuftAitts&i J^OolLa/c CffortaE Dm
WlfASC Commit Y6H PlA**W~AtPcUA*f AHA AUouLA Be Im CDMAAuuxAfanf ClaaH
mat Ito, Pot, Omti $o.

si~ £W 5foui/) Decide 0i/«m* Piea EaaIp At tHe Plcaomb Staec DFLmumtP
Vr PossIAU. Hole THt LtttsUFaidi Manaatz Is Uot &> GlmaIs, But 6* Stawtc base
bf (HWH %tftAM6H IfiAiAUA/lTV Foil hfc&bt&fTUsEdfTfft Dcftx/AMTi 6)tHt DtfMUMafT
Tt> totnh McrilaL &%Plea Fi JLa&OtdhAp Is AClfdl/a/EL %1(fc PUmiue [Miftxnl
btHUfat EuifltoilbH Wc haomCL fa QuiamaiuI JuaemlntIi) We Qti>AimE*/r% %&sP>«a
IV CmPiimE With Ttft frfa DP ttU P/LOtawE. AADple^e mGm^ml Jkm**r
UlbalC ULAhiff Mat Tfk JanjsOjCfctf MCoafaasT, (lElmf* bH BthaaaaA flu&autiA/
MbmH Would FIihiwate Mau AK0nJEFuSIK6 to
\Rtm EUEV&aaC. N\OHtTDrUKG DuiltX FuCiKJStt WD BA$I5 FOIL Afl AfcOfcST. AIXWOU6W
IT MA'/ ALE7LT THE AOMJJl/ISr/LArilfE OfFlU Tb THC NLtO tb TltC PflDPtfl UJLtUMmtes^
Such as those sm piPmwFF (\pPeumt j\id6meht,

PLAIWttrT (\PPFLLAHT SMUAM U»U0NADEE PtoDtiPl hVlSCA/ WbULD HAUL EXEPLCtSlO tV A §IMlLT/kL 31TUAT2DA\

15-.
bEfENDAHTS CbNOUET F/OL BObW THt EEEAL PiTAttMAD ESTADU5HEQ TV P/IOTEEP ADAMS! UfJAEASMAAlE
UlSV-bPHAAPI DEFENAMF5 COHAUtfIX SHTWnWALEi,WMTltfLY,BL IF-
PlAlHTlff APPeLUWT fl&ltTS, THC DbMG bf IHftAT A (LEAtoHAbLE TWA PliUALVF PtPASfiA WacO HOT
be UtSbEA TAt PA/LtttUL4A CWuiaSTAAIEES Oltttfl FaHlULE To Dc WUM £ueW ft PtftSDH lAicalD bo
L\H,OttE-TWt t\tT2EUtASrAKEXS.
TD E^TA^LtSrt 3U0iSQlL\UfcIvl tfLAntfflFFPi PftLLAAT EUPlAIU TfcAT BtEAuSE f\ CbUftT
fsiOF ACT WIHtOUT aETLRMrtfItl6 THAT IT HA6 SU&JtXMAATTEGLZTataSfcttTtDfi TO DdSD. rT
SHOUlb ttLAR EaHDEHIlX AS WtCtASAlW TO DcrCAMlHE THt ISSUE BEFOUL" P00C£EQrK6 *iiTH

THt. CaSL.

VIII.

tWf JiSIOfl

_WUtMx Hod AnO LAitto WAS rHuic
&H TTJALi bftTL DR. EM£*4t.

Plaintiff aPPellamt strcss the mporta/uce to the uxani is
ELicvrfcLt* Pod. (LtiEASt f(m PtusdH to totocbtut iMsaPuauist flele-ase rut Bueh Pjlleasenas
Dcmtn. See. Ttt, Govt tbbEmmtP st&,m,m PimmFF APPlUAAfA&Euc that due P/upess

R&fff 1HEU itoLATEA flttVkJSE THE TEiAS kM& OF PATLbOHS AUb PAAdLES DlD HbF PtLOMiDC
HIM HbTSLt bF SftOTAL COAlffiTTDJtf £&P foL QEEEASL Tb OJSCJLETUbHAAJi TAAP/AATOPUP
SaftamSuMf* Ik/ant HlAiPUlG, in Otmioti?«us piAmaFf APPuuaut has hcvul &ejea/
iwFbnMtA U witar fiE3Pftr Me Falls SKoer of OuAbfautL foa (LtlEfiSC. Puasuahf Zfi.
u^C.selwh iw unfirmawria \I. aabor^os: F2^.t7..?8lVlVilm^) PlAimffMMMT
(Xaw\ TAat but Pmcess foLr&tf OeEut&ib MkH Ik \Has (bunt A Paaole IleLeasc farm,
THAA ACtnltftCATC bf DtiCikML
m MicmttTwi was co&nasED iu fi&s mo/ the u&sunkLC Pcmm aioped the Pmai
tf mdkm df atomiL See; acq mMu&.uun sua* &oUr«c nam*
ACT pEODIflEO THAT IT DID HOT AfM TO IHMATES WHO HAD LESS TH/M TWELVE /*»*&
kEM/mtiAG Before asm aacaiE Fori a ocschaoge CunFiEAre. KA&nfr Appolaht
CWC/fiA TNAT HE MET THIS fiRtTEOJDrtE.M.1, P&4WGPF OPPEiLMTCoUmtD THAT tit VUAS
oekteO But Process ik Qountam isUiwu\mb ReFusim^ to wlah am samMc
•i^lHttlfi Peruke CD WIS UetuOM TO mcl-10. PEACMTIFF AP^LLAMT HlsiEZ ClvlEN
dPfdliUHirC TO flKFtn. ftAni6ATT^ ETLTOaiCC. ETtTLL AuTUoAW EXr^TS ro
feuai facts Mea*Ar6 OP fftcTS . WlEPTlMAL cMCUmTAUEES WAAAAPJT Si)e.U

At£ APPOttfTfAtAlf OF EDUUSlL,

59, BASeO AA THE FbAEEbtHE LiECr/WiE imstTbELCASi totiOirmP ItAPbSm tiPoU Uelejasc.
AS A PAEiDiilSrr^ TO (LLLEASC . HAostlFF APPElLAtsT TO A&tbE B*f THEEoUOitlOtJS bF
PAfioLE. PiAttfcFF APPdlAst QTAtEA FcDiMl EoA5TlFbTlbHAi WlbLarmU EUTlUHG i-kUA TO
DEELAAATDtUf iLMCto&iT UitTH flt&AAO Tb tHTS TlfAC iM/tlCATE Out P/LDCeSS CE>/JEEIlM^.

faO. fUE OfcFfcMGAMt £AtiS£0 lAItLLFULtotLKAAUCMOUS tK3UJL4's PLAlKTlFF APflEOMr
SOPFElUKG SEUEfLE iMjlUfcieS EAUSEO 8K DEPEMQAHPS &00fc5 MPAi TGa*££, OLTECUAEMAnDU

iMtfetttFJfL JUttXSOCXDD^ 6^ (Z£FEE£ME£ TD ftlAMHk eaCGEMCC* WLATORV' TAlTIES
DENIED THE ta/lETW TO OiTllOJ QEFEttDAttPS O&sTECTWb TO VEKUE. PLAwrtff APPtUAfir
MUST COfAPUWlTH feLDuiftLlAt>4T dF APPEAL Of \1uLE. AwQ OtAQLCHE^ WRAMtn for faliEF

tNHOiEFb&£ PlAGITEFFAPPElLAMT R£3Pf£rFiiUM PRA^S TM3 APPEAL &\WL JUOE^CHf
E\nAaTtl^ PlAaKlFF APPElLAi^

"• father rata Mou. CsOQ COAMp fUE tUt
ftLL Be.Ii^ THE fiLCLSSrD PosrTTOfT*

t£» G DLTlaoATDrX TUAt TT\E ACfe AKO O^AISSIb^fe OeSCttXRED H-fcOJEDt
VlXOLATtfc PLAINTIFF APPELLAMT RIGHTS UNOULTHC STATE LAtti, fofiSTirutlDtf
fVMfc LAVU5 OF THE UMITLO STATES.

fcS- A PRELIMcKAW/ MiQ PcfUAAWQir OlJUNCrifctf bOJDEOI>ib RXSSrt £>VAClO*s GLO/OEMUMJ
WAfinAMT AfiAttST PLAINTIFF APPeLLA^-

(ak» U.ELeA6E FRO^ SuBSTAMTVaI tOAofl In; THE IIudCaTIOM .

fcH* L^ouAiTrJEBALAiUEC VmlATtotf oF Le&Al Rtfiftrs, FofLtMtto* FAc law PodvltOES a
KErVlfcOY OR -TLl5nJCt, bti ALL rSSUES, TOtaiBIjEBK JULV,

fcA. Lr^u^raLftALMCC TtfE EXISTENCE bF A QllW OrtTttE PaRT 0 F TttE DEFEKOawT TO
?RbTtCT PlAtXtfrFT APPeLLamF FGjOaa TttC JOCUlM COMPLArMeOOf7 I(^ TUTS ^U(T.

W• LrjotfTETL&ACAriCE lATJURV TO TtfE PlABlTTFf APPEOAmF RidaA OfcFeMQArtfs
pAtLUdt LlULPA&L££APETTFDLif SuftMrrTtO
1^ (&&**»' trsvfm

X\f.
V^AtteATK)rY.

2 EOQIE DbH SofkfSbH. tOlM-EO K&toAS 6EItCe> PlWSQiTUf ItiCAhltmEb at
3*h\e3 /?, b/mudH UHtr, Feeds cauA/n Texas, time (lead the Fout%Em/a co/tAPLAiMr
MID HEBIM HEAlfi THAT THE NsATFEPLS AUL6ED THEUl/iJ AAL' TtlUE, LULPT P\S THE MA/TEA.
f)LH6tn UPblf XHfbMATIDH Af/D AuttF, AHO As TO THoSG I BeUexPE THepa 10 BE TM.
t l/£fi#Y UHDt/L PttiACM of fiAJu^ Tf/AT THE Pb/lE&irH6 JS TfltiE AHA SpMAEeT,

ML A^Wm^P5E^3
tOOJL On/ cfetosW *S£*^

XVI
CEPTTPtparF hfStAAhrt

1 taCTffa T+Iat hnsuAUTlb TUCP VAUOlU AThUe AHA IbA/LECr bFTHE APPcaEBateF
MCALHUfiABtAD^tom M-to/pft
I '-••

MINUTES OF 1HE /y7 5 y / DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
. . U THE ?yjjn/.irtf TERM, A. 0. 19 ft?
r'jOiXA
... j.. . » . r i . .I. -———.— i. •' - , , , , „ i, / .
• i^Totfr .••>• cr,-.' • •. '. - 777 .•'•• rrr—: .
CRTODUl'JUSTICE PLANNING FUND FEE-ASSESSED S20.00
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICSH STANDARDS AND EDUCATION FUND 1.00
CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION FUNO...... iS.OO
TOTAL S3St23
v/^

JUDGMENT

FH-: STATE OF TEXAS

.'9JiI

Attorney for Stote Asst. Oist. Atty. —Jif?4j.,i ^Ai~Lo~. Plea Not Guilty

\ Count and/or
Paragraph

.™.niaJn IG.-nd£-

Plea to Enhancement.

t- y Findings an Enhancement

iI'Ia
a
U4
Punishment 66 .•flA.aiJ^U./^J f)foaJ:^yf rl CfiULrtr/rxs!)
a
a:
c
o
Sentence to begin '^2*.^ A. .dI'/99X
The Oefendont having been indicted in tjie above entitled and numbered cause for the felony
offense indicated above, and this cause being this day called for trial, the State appeared by
her Oistrict Attorney as named above, and the Oefendont named above, appeared in person and
either by counsel as named above or waived counsel as indicator above, and both parties announced
ready for trial. And the Defendant, in person and in writing, in open court, having waived his.
right of trial by Jury, had the indictment read to him, and in open court-pleaded not guilty.
And after hearing the evidence submitted and arguments of counsel, the Court found the Defendant
guilty of the offense indicated above, a felony, and assessed the punishment at confinement in S)
the Texas Department of Corrections for the period indicated above.

It is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the Oefendont is
guilty of the offense indicated above, a felqny, that the defendant committed said offense on the
date indicated above, that he be punished by confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections ..
for the period indicated above and that the State .of Texas do have and recover of the Defendant flf2^
all costs of the prosecution, for which execution"will issue.

Bi°

STATE'S
EXHIBIT

A
2.0,
Si9n^ Qnrf ,. *" ^ ^"tl— of thl.
"LSi?*9"- ond •nt-r-d ™ thl. th. doy 0f
»» A« 0.

(•>.
*A
Court
/£ °f H°rrla County, T-o,

--sasssarjass--..^. offense

°" "i. the 28ch day Qf n «» Courts v
received froni che ?J^ °f December, A.D. lg
kj fte l4ch Court of a„„ , 4 mandate of aff^
Appeals, Houston, Texas*ffirmance
°» ehia Che 3rd day of January,
kJ
,a A>D# ,
i»H5 mandate aH,=
alias capias issued.

^
-e ic remembered on che 4th I ®
CD
CD ence is Co begin on November 22, 1982.

•--.-:tti:-"7;-';:,..-":""r •'•- •~T-r~——— =ndth0 ^ ^ 3/c7-$
'"•ua1„Jai1vn-8ald-ii-'-9-;
"*1I9 in jail-
''i'r ^^^ mi

•«* 'icn* ••=WBS»a;»«y- -«» -o^;^-;,-- ^
- 'JO
^^—i—^^_ _'Q"L I3.0Q
^ B ^ " " "***"^0T /j

STATE'S
F.XHI8IT
/-/L>
And thereupon the sold Oef.«H«.«
STSSt-SSLS
'ollow, to wit" "it•VST"'-* ^V^t££S
Z.^ Pr,a«nc- of th. «ld oJfVSSJ Tl *T'r h-hod
™lna ln bor -*•«".
^r-f? toWhlreJcZ
My ^
odjudged to J. guilt, ^^"T °' «" C~* thoTSJ'oe^r*1^^" 00al~*h^
o—«.d at confin«.„t inH T ""I ^"^ above, a f.W^, T? 0bOVB» who *» been
oelivered bv the ShTrif* J 1 T* °*Part«nt of CorrectlonT^ ?? "h°" Pu"1«h-«t ho. been
th. stou of Text?;1^ othif^00"0^' t«°»' i-susj trth^oT^ induat~ *•»..*
D-fendant .hall * confTni ^ ^dS?Mi5°i^ °uthori«d to rV.S. Z^" °' Co«~tion. of
. The eaid Defendant « , . *"' °' ^""on,...

Ooy of
., . A. 0.

&
&
of Harris County, Tmxam
it

«-^^;&^^1^.
was

fa offense

O./O +U.3 -f- A->T»i* P,.,_... ,., "
and the Shnrtff ?/c7'
"• ••it-J:.ch to ths
*Mie in Jail Vn said ;"a"u;,;:. - -~j.c-.'i-axiv-a conduct

&
Parole in Texas
Parole & Mandatory Supervision Eligibility Chart
(Revised 01/30/2001)

Prior to All Offenses* 55' Calendar T 1/3,including any bonus &
101-01-66 blood
Maxima 4

amended 01-01-66 to allow goodtir,
Wll persons confined in TDC.1

01-01-66 All Offenses* 59" Time HboodTime = 1/4, including
3lood donations
thru u'nus
08-28-67 ,i inll
Maxiiju^n = m.

.08-29-67 All Offenses* 60a Calenb^i] tt'M +Good Time = 1/3, including
thru
ll anyibbmi & blood donations
'08-28-77 * TDCJ Data Services calculates digit ; y dates on all Maximum = 20 yrs.
offenses priorto 08-28-77 utilizing c !ine + good No Mandatory Supervision: inmate discharges
time =1/3, regardless ofthe law in effj 11the offense sentence when calendar time + good time • total
4curtrulings sentence.
was committed. This is apparently due
Sentence iseffectively reduced bythe amount of
during that time period.
goodtime earned.

|08-29-77 Capital Mujdferi6f|th Art 42.12Sec. 3f (08-29-77 thru 08-31-83)
thru Agg.Kidn^iiid69th Art. 42.12 Sec. 3g(09-01-83 thru 08-31-87)
08-31-87 Agg. Robbery V
Agg-RapHI Calendar Time = 1/3
Agg. Sexnal Abuse Miiiimum of 2 yrs.
(08-3|l-15: Agg. Rape and Agg. Sexual Abuse Maximum of 20 yrs.
corattfaedint Aggravated Sexual Assault)
OffenseL *ithA 'rmativeFinding of Deadly Weapon
All othe
CalenderTime + Good Time = 1/3, including
,'• '!' A, B, orC credits and bonus
• 11 • iii
Maximum of 20 yrs.

All offenses eligible for Mandatory Supervision.
3g Offenses: 70th Calendar Time • 1/4
09-41-87
Capital Murder Minimum of 2 yrs.
thrttiiji Maximum of 15 yrs.
08-31-83 Agg. Kidnapping
Agg. Sexual Assault
iiiiijljj Agg. Robbery
Offenses with Affirmative Findingof DeadlyWeapon
All other offenses CalendarTime + GoodTime • 1/4, including work
credits and bonus
Maximum of 15 yrs.
See MS Ineligible List #1 below for offenses
NOT eligible for Mandatory Supervision

,09-01-89 3gOffense: 7lst-72nd Calendar Time = 1/4
Capital Murder (Capital Felony) - Life Sentence Minimum of 2 yrs.
thru
1) Murders peace officer or fireman on official duty, Maximum of 15 yrs.
08-31-93
2) Murders while comraitting a kidnapping, burglary,
robbery, aggravated sexual assault, or arson,
3) Murders for remuneration, Calendar Time = 35 yrs.
4) Murders while escaping from a penal institution, effective 09-01-91.
5) Murders an employee of apenal institution,
6) Murders more than one person during the same
criminal transaction, or duringdifferent criminal
transactions but the murders are committed
SCFO REF 07.01
pursuant to the same scheme.

^H.
V. TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
3 The provisions of this Part V issued under Acts 1965,59th Leg., ch.
722, effective January 1,1966, as amended (Texas C.C.P., Article
42.12); and Texas Constitution Article IV, §11, unless otherwise noted.

Chapter 141. GENERAL PROVISIONS The provisions opthis §141.2 adopted to be effective July /, 1994.
19 TexReg 4750; amended to be effective June 30. 1998. 23
TexReg 6722.
The provisions of this Chapter 141 issued
under Chapter 508, Government Code §141.3. Policy Board Administration

(a) The policy board shall determine matters
Subchapter A. BOARD OF PARDONS that affect all board members.
AND PAROLES

(b) The policy board shall:
§141.1. Presiding Officer (Chair) and
Policy Board (1) adopt rules which govern the decision
making processes of the board;
(a) The presiding officer (chair) is
designated by the governor and serves in (2) establish work hours and caseloads for
that capacityat the pleasure of the governor. members ofthe board and assign additional
The chair acts as spokesperson for the board. duties, as necessary, to members of the
m policy board;
(b) Six members ofthe board shall serve as
the policy board of the Board of Pardons and (3) develop policies to ensure board
Paroles. The governor designates the policy members implement the updated parole
board. The term of a memberof the policy guidelines and assign precedential valueto
board is six years, to be served concurrently previous decisions of the board relating to
with the member's term on the board. The the granting of parole and the revocation of
chair of the board shall serve as presiding parole or mandatory supervision;
officer of the policy board.
(4) require members of the board to file
(c) Policy board members shall administer activity reports regarding release decisions
other matters as required by the chair. made by members of the board, workload,
The provisions of this§141.1 adopted to be effective July I, 1994.
hours worked, and implementation of parole
19 TexReg 4750; amended to be effective June 30. 1998. 23 guidelines;
TexReg 6722; amended to be effective September 26. 2002. 27
TexReg8963.
(5) report annually on all board activities
§141.2. Policy Board Quorum and parole release decisions to the governor
and the legislature.
The transaction of business before the policy The provisions ofthis §141.3 adopted to be effective July I. 1994.
board requires a quorum of the policy board 19 TexReg 47S0; amended to be effective June 30. 1998. 23
anddecisions require a majority of the TexReg 6722; amended to be effective June II. 2002. 27 TexReg
4990.
quorum. Fourmembers of the policy board
constitute a quorum.

tr.
terms and conditions of release (See grantee from payment of all or a portion of a
Contract of Release). fine or canceling a forfeiture of a bond.
(32) Parole officer—A person duly (41) Reprieve-A temporary release from
appointed by the director of the TDCJ- the terms of an imposed sentence.
Parole Division and assigned the duty of
supervising administrative releasees. (42) Restoration of rights ofcitizenship-A
pardon limited to the restoration of the right
(33) Parole panel-A three member decision to vote, which in turn restores any other civil
making body authorized to act in rights conditioned upon the right to vote.
administrative release matters.
(43) Revocation-The cancellation of parole,
(34) Parolee—A person released from mandatory supervision, or of a conditional
prison on parole (see definition of parole set act of executive clemency which subjects
forth in this section). A parolee is also an the administrative releasee or grantee of the
administrative releasee (see definition of act of executive clemency to immediate
"administrative releasee" set forth in this incarceration or, in the instance of reprieve
section). of a fine, to immediate payment of the fine.
(35) Party-Each person or agency named (44) RMS-Mandatory supervision vote to
or admitted as a party. release to mandatory supervision when
TDCJ determines that the prisoner has
3 (36) Policy Board-Six members of the reached a mandatory supervision date.
board appointed by the governor as an
additional duty ofoffice, who vote on policy (45) Serve-All (SA)-A decision by the
matters affecting the entire board. board or board panel to deny parole and to
not release the inmate until serve-all date.
(37) Preliminary hearing-Hearing at which
is determined whether probable cause exists (46) Serve-All Date-The projected release
to support an allegation of a parole violation, date or minimum expiration date as
pending a revocation hearing. determined by the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice.
(38) Pre-parole transfer-The transfer of an
eligible prisoner, as defined in Texas Civil (47) Statutory references-See the definition
Statutes, Article 6166-4, to a community of "constitutional and statutory references"
residential facility, as defined in Texas Civil set forth in this section.
Statutes, Article 6616-4.
(48) Trial officials-The present sheriff,
(39) Release plan-Proposed community prosecuting attorney, and judge in the
and place of residence and proposed county and court of offense, conviction and
employment or proposed provision for release.
maintenance and care of the releasee.
(49) Victim-A person who is a victim of
(40) Remission of fine or forfeiture-An act sexual assault, kidnapping, aggravated
) ofclemency by the governor releasing the robbery, or felony harassment or who has
suffered bodily injury or death as a result of

EL
TEX,. DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUS JE
PAROLE DIVISION
SISP / EM INSTRUCTION SHEET

Offender's Name: JOHNSON, EDDIE D TDCJ/SID #: 364033 / 01607144
TDCJ Unit: HUNTSVILLE Institutional Parole Officer: II )s CC /L
Transmitter#: A09190 Date/Time Attached: 01/16/2004/ j (J, J>^>/t
Monitor Type: SISP
As part ofyour special condition SISP (Super-Intensive Supervision Program) /"T" (Electronic Monitoring), the following
rules apply:

I. IF YOU ARE BEING RELEASED TO A PRIVATE RESIDENCE:
1. Report to your private residential plan directly, immediately and without delay.
2. Amonitoring device has been installed in your residence and atransmitter strapped at the ankle. These
monitoring devices will monitor your activity and report violations to your Parole officer.
3. DO NOT tamper in any way with the transmitter strapped at the ankle or the monitor in your residence.
4. DO NOT unplug orrelocate the monitor that has been placed in your residence.
5. DO NOT place anything ontopofthe monitor.
6. DO NOT pick up the telephone until after the second ring.
7. DO NOT use the telephone:
a. When the green indicator light is on orblinking (wait 10 min. after it stops).
b. Ifthere is a beeping noise coming from the monitor.
8. DO NOT leave thetelephone inan "offhook" position when notin use.
9. Ifyou are on the telephone and anoise (dull click or beep) is heard over the line, you must hang up for 10
minutes.
10. DO NOT leave theresidence for any reason prior tohaving your initial appointment with your Parole OfBcer.

/ D. IF YOU ARE BEING RELEASED TO ACOMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL FACILITY:
1. Travel to and report directly, immediately and without delay to the designated facility. The facility and your
Parole Officer have been notified of yourrelease time and will be monitoring yourarrival time.
2. This monitoring device will monitor your activity and report violations to your Parole Officer.
3. DO NOT tamper inany way with the transmitter strapped atthe ankle.
4. DO NOT leave the facility for any reason prior tohaving your initial appointment with your Parole Officer.
Ifiilly understand that violations will be reported to my parole officer and may result in an issuance ofawarrant and/or
revocation of my release.

01/16/2004
Date

01/16/2004
Date

Distribution: Original - District Office File
Copy- provided to offender
Copy - Provided to BPPthe Austin

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2
TDCJ-PD

tsde nf ©Bxas
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Pardons and Parole Division
Certificate of Handatory Supervision

Date of issuance! 12/11/2003

Name TDCJ # SID #
JOHNSON,EDDIE DON 00364033 01607144

Legal county of residence Approved county of release
HARRIS HARRIS

Location: Unit KN, TDCJ-ID

Cause#: 3755S7 375536

The Toxas Departasnt of Crlalnal Justice Institutional Division CTDCJ-ID) of the State of Texas has dotarained that said offender is ollolblo
for Handatory Supervision under the provisions of Chapter 50ft. Texas 6ov't. Code. THEREFORE, the Toxas Board of Pardons end Paroles CBoard)
hereby orders that said offender be released undor Mandatory Supervision and shall laaedlately roport to the office indicated below for
supervision)

REID C0MH. CORR. FACILITY Report immediately & directly to your halfway house CHWHD.
10950 BEAUMONT HWY 90 If verifiable transportation delays or other emergency
HOUSTON, TX 77078 occurs, contact the HWH immediately. Failure to do so will
C713J675-4426 cancel further gate money and result in the issuance of
arrest warrant.

and shall be peraltted to be at liberty in the legal eustady of tho State of Texas but subject to tho orders of tho Board and the Toxas
Departaent of Crlalnal Justice Parole Division, and under the rules and conditions of Handatory Supervision heroin. The period of Handatory
Supervision shall be for a period equivalent to the aaxlaua tore for which the offender was sentenced loss calendar tiae actually served on
the sentonce. The tlao to bo served under Handatory Supervision is also calculated as calendar tlao. Tho certificate) shall becoae effoctlvo
when eligibility regulreaents for Handatory Supervision under Chapter SOS, Texas Cov't. Code have baon aot or when Handatory Supervision is
ordered by the Board of Pardons and Parolos.

STATUTORILY MANDATED CONDITIONS

Unless otherwise provided, I shall reside in the county in which I resided at tho tiae;I coaaitted the offense for which I was sentenced to
tho Institutional Division or tho county of the offonse for which I was sentenced to the Institutional Division if I was not o resident of the
State of Texes.

I shall demonstrate an oducational skill level that is equal to or grootor then tho average skill level of students who have coapleted the
sixth grade in a public school in the State of Toxas.
I shall subalt to testing for alcohol or controlled substances.
I shall not coaaunlcate directly or indirectly with the vlctlaj go to or near tho residence, place of eaployaent. or business of the vlctiej
or go to or near a school, day-cere facility, or siailar facility where a dependent child of the victia is in attendance.
I shall not intentionally or knowingly coaaunlcate dlroctly or indirectly with, nor intentionally or knowingly go near a residence, school,
placo of eaployaent, or business-of the offense for which .I was sentenced to the Institutional Division.
I shall relaburso the State of Texas for the costs of any Post-Secondary Educational Prograas in which I participated in TDCJ.
Upon written InitrucHnn frni mv «up»rvi«lng nfHr.r,

I shall participate in a drug or alcohol eontinuua of care treataent progrea.
I shall register as a sex offender under Chapter 62, Code of Crlalnal Procedure.
I shall not go in. on or within o distance specified by a parole panel of prealsas where children coaaonly gather, nor shall I supervise or
participate in any Progrea that includes as participants or recipients, persons who are 17 years of age or younger, end I shall attend
psychological counseling as specified by ay supervising officer.
I shall perfera not less than 300 hours of coaaunlty service at a service project designated by a parolo panel.

SPECIAL CONDITIONS

SISP - I shall coaply with Super Intensive Supervision Progrea conditions.

"Jll— te.

ISSUED BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES AT AUSTIN. TEXAS OH THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER. 2003.-=^^^/ 7J~'*/rd ith
2. Time of Offense: ^g)0>^i
Major: Mi'ior:

5. Place of Incident:
-^^ 6. Incident:
4.TDCJ# 37^7pT^T
I 7. Code

6-ft*
8. Description of Incident (If more spaces are needed.'continue on back) on the date anc^timelisted
above in (place)

Resident Name: Qh^tpj^ £^dc£ TDCJ# _J%> Uo3"^
>&£&£,
/UCktert.

13. Resident Notification*
^L£^22^Z_.;_„
I have received a copy of the charge(s) alleged against m??
*<> t n
JWLZ.
Date and Time Notified Resldatff Signature
A
Notifying Official/ Title:
''"^-L^feex. _..-
You have the right to appear before a hearing off'.osr 24 hours or more after rersbt of H? notice Yc
have the right to have an oppcrfcjrfty to be heard, cal! witness and submit a wr-e~ sVtenVW ~Bv
signing here you give up the right to 24 hour notice and authorize the Hsarina 0*fic*r to ornceec wit
the hearing. w

c^
A COPY OF THIS DISCIPLINARY REPORT
14. Accused Statement and Attitude:

,«?•. w *A

w \^-j
:-^."'Investigation Section ' ~
Investigation Comments and Conclusions: -*.vv:\'.i . '

,i - , - "

^•i^?N

16. Iwish to waive my right to aDisciplinary Hearing: Yes / No

••Resident's Sig'nature"" : "•• ' V"v"1 .'~ v''u-'»'~ 7$Sfe1!'(L ap1 ' •-- '
-V
17. Resident's Plea: Guilty:
Not Guilty: * >• i . ', *• '

^-Hearin^^ .;.
_ Not Guilty:
Saric{ion{s) Imposed:-, * o.v

»

) . TT r

i
ncoi-i
JateJL T

Resident Signature:
-^ -/o £qW Date:
f £-.?•(?nd
1/ 1. Date of Offense:.j£/^g/^
Parole Officer: ».j ith *
2. Time of Offense: _2. ^ "6bJed' COntlnue on back> on ^ date aTiduSelitid
ResidentNamer^J^^^..^^^L___ TDCJ. 1^/fr 3^
****** •&? ^ fojSjfyZZ J&jfarr^ .*
•/ - .♦ */ —
w. ' £x
'deem

10. Witness Nairt,:L _TIZZZZ~ ^^fc- O^r^/^ _Z^v^r>
11. Signature of reportir^Cmployee/ Date/Tim7- vifej?^ --/T/7 -. 1
12. Name and title of reporting o^hypr7f^^ zL-ge*?*
13. Resldert Notification: ^ ^^ ji^^^j^^^^
:ihave
hsve receiver;
receiver: a
a ccpy
rv.nv of
r»f r.,3
n..- cha^O;) dl^;d
o»~...-,.. /..* . . . . against me

^3-^/ ^
Date and Time Notified ~ ' -~&'•fife' /^ -^
,'w^N- ,..
Kesden: Signature
Notifying Official/ Title: #/'•;/&,, ,<>>? -' -s
You have the right to appear before a hearinn r.frr-or o *•
have the right to have an opportSto b*™l£S™Jl£•? "^ ater r6C9,»3t of thls noti»- Y
signing here you give up bright to'24 houSaliJaXS?^^
the hearing.
V^ '^^ By
dnu csUcn0i ue tne Hearing Officer to proceed wit

w.. . t?2SI,?.FJ",S Di3CIPLiNARY REPORT " l ^ » *^ ?*• t •••^ >«# r«%
4' Ac«55«55Swi5aSdSai^

1S- ,nvestigitio7Tsiclio7;
Investigation Cedents and Conclusions:

16' ,W,'Shfowaive^righttoaDiScip,i
Resident's Signature

17. Resident's Plea: Guilty;

18- Hearing Office, Committee Decision: Guiity / M
Sanction(s) lmp0sed: '~ Not Gu%:

Hearing Date/ Tim
Comn^e^Mel^7H earing Officei
H-
VA •> *s-A VA x U •*A •*-A A. vU A •>-A ^VVVA * ^ ^
**A R^JU-£SI'Fj'Hi JC!49£t3 ~ CHEHt£ft, •JA£QU£i„£N£ PO-HOUSTON V'?Q VII
*** ' 5 YS N I 3 3 A '3 K •• f £ F 0 R 11 Pn NT V-
ilfb^G!- IT.! 26D-^bn UAH:: 0B*ft/04 !]«{•.: 03»0*P* P^OMTY? ?V9
fO: ;Oi?9t3 - CH:£Ml£K, JACSUeLTNi:
SR«]?I&lfilC1 PfcRDU Of'FJCfR

2410 HAfllLTCN
L"3r FWiQf
I-KJUS10N, TtXAf* 770040000

ySNT&IX - WftRRAHO"SSLsANCKJOECt.-5IGJ*3
WARRANT..l£:SUANCt.JD[-:CIS3 0NS
PQ WARRANTS SECTION?
AUSTIN

TEXAS BEPARTHF.N1 Of t-RIHINAL JUSLTfJ.
pa-sou- BivrsroN-yiOLATiDM rfpqrt

5££U0«N 1: CKNUf.l INFORMS! jON

N^M^i JdHH-'aiJN^EO^tJi QON iilCJ H'SHSE?.', "364033

•"j i.O/T;!";'i: 0*40/144 f*tfT; :jC3.?f.-:H-> t»SN? 434 -92 -P090 StXi N RAQI: 3LACK
HF "! B'-!"• ; YF C'C'iOR' Sfc&'J*-! HA'R :!"P.r 0-• "!•';' ^"'!'

•'•••• hj i ^ ;• . {-V; c >"

*'."." .-."• J- -,i •> •. !"•

r c. TO Om--:"(/ .- . 1 /! .J., *.

i '• r »-T!>* "i >J#*N 4 f.• /i XT f: i'- c- '! h! »":J ' > '; r.'... I • '.

•:. DHY: K]
v _•

actr viyy mnito?.im-nuie.: tjatf
•iOH? r.URrf.^f{IJth(Si){ J(A7F.(S;:
rsstr r c r ion- P.V.U-: (s) s qa n-:•
}'RC:/F£0£;?;Atf AITFNjfAHit-RliLh {$} : *!»A'JF^
C:.V PI.AC£tf£NT*RUUiCS:»; T}Ar£;'
LOCK! :
s..M, PfcOfcRAH Pt.AC:F.rtF.NT-RULJ^(3):* IiAItt?)}
!R;.\Ami!; 2ATF: SUPERVISION -REQUEST £?? COWX*ITt*jN;•; '; 1 j^ fit rUU.'j
••i.k r .->.:> !:." ."C«; r.> r:-.;i,-. ci.-.t.-..-,-; .- .-,.-..•> .-*».^:.; .-. r r -.

•'ic- ;.•;*.,>y*»#J
"i v"; ] ;• |•• i•• f. i; v-r •:•:»r r._ •» .-•:.j.
Ki r.:^\;.>.r.i : r ..->:

5b,
W\?H\M- $1«PERV3S10#~AWA1T MSPOSITTON OF OHMNftl r-^»->pf-.~

O.iHTLHlMZ SUPSfiOlSSON-REQUEST gpp D?NCiriQN• ^rtVvc;ir{*J Af'l^il^1

IS3UC SUJ1MON.S
X If?:-M;i: UA&KAK7 UA8£AN7#i OF 05 2004 01607144
CO .OF: SI COIC-: CO OF;
30 KOI IB&ilf [-/ARRANT, CONiTR. WITH UNIT PUPV AMI? 7AKF. AIT£RNA1E
INTERVENTION AS BEEHEI1 APPROPRIATE
COW'iINiK L'ARRAfcY IN FFFFCl;
VMLA7TCN RElWf R£rUfi!*E», FGLUWIJW INFLATION REQUIRED:
CrOHfiFNTS: PRU PUJA ISHE.1: C*N MC-3C/TC1C AT J4?9

VR DAFF/riH?-! Fj/S 13QPM

IK?f,l$IO,N RENICRFB BY; f;ARi.A RAKJRF? BATE.! Oi 7.00

MSTZZ&STlWi FAROLE OFFICER J. OHFNTFP.
Of-KlCt: HOFSiON / MSIRjCI PARfH.t. Of MX?.
OFFICER'S USER IB'. ..;C!;9F;.3

UNjI SUPERVISOR: J.HFNCHACA

OFFICE:
PAROL* SUPFRi-:Tf»DP'F. UJMTR KR:

Au'fli fi'.^AI Of'-•;>:.•/- :»j.V

•I ;=. •

•*.••
• :• •'•" J3 ; a .-. i •.. -1 •-..•:•.;
THE STATE OF TEXAS
WARRANT
Directing Retaking
ADMINISTRATIVELY RELEASED PRISONER*
(Non-Executive"Clemency)
Before Revocation or Rescission ofPresumptive/Tentative Parole Date

TO ANY SHERIFF, ANY PEACE OFFICER, ANY OFFICER OR OTHER PERSON AUTHORIZED BY LAW
TO SERVE CRIMINAL PROCESS OR TO ANY PERSON IN CHARGE OF ANY JAIL, PENITENTIARY OR
OTHER PLACE OF DETENTION:
DOB: TDCJ#: 00364033

GREETING:

WHEREAS, JOHNSON. FT)DIE DON . SID#: 01607144,
was convicted ofafelonyoffense in the State of Texas and ^assenrencedTc.the Texas Department of Criminal)
^JusticerP^CPiyisj^^
AND WHEREAS, said convicted felon was granted aparole or administrative release and remains in the custody
of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Parole Division amenable to the orders of the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice, Parole Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles;
AND WHEREAS, reliable information has reached the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Parole Division that
the administrative releasee has violated the terms, rules, and/or conditions of administrative release, has lapsed or
is about to lapse into criminal ways or company, or was ineligible for release and is hereby declared afugitive
from justice;
NOW THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority vested in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Parole
Division by Texas Government Code Ann. §508.251, it is hereby ordered that said adrninistratrve releasee, be
arrested detained and housed until such time as he may be placed in the custody ofan agent ofthe Texas
Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, or until further order of the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice, Parole Division or the Board of Pardons and Paroles, and for so doing, this shall be your sufficient
warrant.

NOT SUBJECT TO BAIL TEXAS DEPARTMENT* CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Parole Division

By:
P. O. Box 13401, Capitol Station
Austin, Texas 78711
Area Code (512) 406-5317
Warrant No. 08-05-2004-01607144
J.CHENIER/DPO/HOUSTON 7
/DPO/
File
Date of Issuance: 08-05-2004

*The term "administrative release" includes parole and mandatory supervision, preparole transfer, work program and premature release.
BPP-FS-50 (R 1/98)

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 14
IS.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ** PAROLE DIVISION
ADJUSTMENT STATEMENT
Name
SECTION n
A- Employment
jth of employment:
Length . . rJf(\M\
^ jfW^AJ
2. If unemployed, how long unemployed:
Reason: .
B. Fies
1. Supervision fees: Current ( ), Deferred ( ), Arrears ( )
Explanations: &M/M $9 Jll^i\ Pit \XL/XlllU
2. Restitution fees: Current ( ), Arrears ( )
Explanations: ^A^tX^
section m
A. Home/Marital
Adjustment: ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Marginal ( ) Unsatisfactory
Explain:
SCtirMtl: .
Adjustment ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Marginal ( ) Unsatisfactory
Explain: -
SECTION IV is*/u>n
A. Arrest (s) iince release - Date (s), Charge (s), Disposition (s), and Board action for each ^Vlbnlk ,
B. Other reported violation (s) - ROV date (s), rule (s) alleged, and Board action for each JlfUHUC?
SECTION V
A. Does the individual meet thecriteria for EM and/or ISF - CA Yes
faffihi ,
( ) No. Indicate which \>^* ^
B. Proposed plan if offender is continued on supervision: . Wcriftod ftO Not Verified
Residence . — K' y
i^l^nS; ( )V«iM (Y)NotVerified
Date
ucx/.-aon in/os
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTi^i
PAROLE DIVISION

RIGHTS OF OFFENDER IN THE REVOCATION PROCESS

To: Johnson, Eddie Don ' No: 364033

It is allegedthat you have violated one or more ofthe rules / conditions ofyour release. Your rights in the revocation
processare listed below.

1. You have the right to be personally served with written notice ofthe rules and conditions you are accused of
violating. That means you have the right to have someone give you written information ofwhat conditions ofrelease
you are accused ofbreaking.

2. You have the right to have a preliminary hearing if you have not been convicted of a new offense. This hearing will
be held at or near the place ofthe alleged parole or mandatory supervision violation. The purpose ofthe preliminary
hearing is to determine whether mere is probable cause or reasonable grounds to believe you violated a condition of
release. *

3. You have the right to have a revocation hearing ifyou are alleged to have committed technical violations or you are
found guilty in a criminal case. However ifyou received a felony conviction with a term of incarceration in a penal
institution, you will be allowed only a limited hearing in order to explain why you should not be revoked. You must
request this mitigation hearing.

4. You have the right to a disclosure of evidence against you. That means you can see everything before the hearmg.

5. You have the right to a state appointed attorney under certain circumstances to be determined by a hearing officer. If
you qualify for that right, an attorney will be appointed to represent you. If you do not qualify for that right, you may
hire an attorney to represent you.

6. You have the right to be heard in person by telling a hearing officer what happened and to present evidence,
affidavits, letters and documents in support ofyour position.

7. You have the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses by asking questions at the hearing unless the
hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing you to do so.

8. You are entitled to be heard on the violations by someone designated by the panel.

9. Ifyour parole or mandatory supervision is revoked as a result of a hearing, you will receive a written report by the
hearmg officer which sets forth the evidence relied upon in support ofa finding that you violated one or more
conditions ofyour parole or mandatory supervision.

10. Ifrevoked as a result of a hearing, you may have the right to request that the Board of Pardons and Paroles reopen the
revocation hearing within forty-five (45) days from the date ofthe Board's decision.

As indicated by my signature below, I affirm that I have been advised of my rights in the revocation process.

Releasee V fy/)L J{L UJL^~ Date 9/0/Of
Witness r-\^^}iyj^ny^^LJ\^y Date

PSV-48 09/03
40/
C. WAIVER OF HEARINGS

1 Ido not want aPRELIMINARY hearing. Iunderstand that the parole officer has no authority to make promises as to
what will happen ifIdo not have ahearing. Ialso understand that only the Parole Board can decide what punishment
should be given. Ihave not been coerced into signing this waiver, nor have any promises been made to me in
exchange forsigning the waiver.
DATE
OFFENDER

DATE
WITNESS

2 Ido not want aREVOCATION hearing. Iunderstand that the parole officer has no authority to make promises as to
what will happen ifIdo not have ahearing. Ialso understand that only the Parole Board can decide what
punishment should be given. 1have not been coerced into signing this waiver, nor have any promises been made to
me in exchange forsigning the waiver.
DATE.
OFFENDER

DATE
WITNESS

D. HEARING REQUEST/SCHEDULE
1. I hereby request that a Preliminary hearing be held.
DATE.
OFFENDER

DATE
WITNESS

Preliminary Hearing Location Date and Time of Hearing

2. Ihereby request that a Relocation hearing be held.

OFFENDER
hate 010/p/
WITNESS

Revocation Hearing Location Date and Time of Hearing

E. SUMMONS
No. .
To:

You are hereby ordered and summoned to appear at apreliminary/revocation hearing at the time, dater and-location indicated
above to answer the allegations in Section B, Page 2. Your rights during the hearing process are outlined in Section A, Page 1.
Failure to appear as instructed may result in the issuance ofawarrant for your arrest.

Date
Regional Director, Parole Division

day of.
, 20 by personally delivering a copy ofsame to
EXECUTED this
the named addressee.

Parole Officer
Offender/Johnson, Eddie Don /TDC# 364033
DIST.: Central/
Sup. OfffJ. Chenier/030723005/Houston VII Attorney/
Agt. Offf Hearing Off/

Hi
RELEASEE'S NAME: ^^^^Kn^/^." &3L^Lt'gJ ""4lX33 HEARING DATE :C& jj PSJjYf
NAME ADDRESS
ADVERSE/FRIEgrrKY
WITNESS '

( )
Relationship:
~'^ 11—-—^
ZC: -T701& PH# Tj^75j±BU
>
Relationship:

ZC: ~77
la^rvindA) ( )

Relationship:

zc= HO 7% phs -il3)6>7S,;'MF24>
^EffanidSuJllBy, ( )

Relationship:

/~770r?B> rB*7&j6&''4f24>
( )

Relationship:

zc: 77^5? 8 phs itz&sriWZi,
( ) ( )

Relationship:

ZC: PH#

( ) ( )

Relationship

ZC: PH#
kv
ih* j&^
DIST: CENTRAL HEARING SECTION OFFENDER/SAME AS ABOVE
HEARING OFF/ C.D.OFORDILE/HOUSTON I ATTORNEY / N/A
SUPV OFF/J.CHENIER/HOUSTON 7
AGTOFF/

HS-135 (Revised 09-25-03) EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3 Page 1 of2
*f3.
INSTRUCTIONS TO PAROLE OFFICER:

1) The OFFENDER, and the Parole Officer acting as awitness, are to sign this form in the spaces provided below. If
the OFFENDER refuses to sign the form, place the words "refused to sign" in the OFFENDER'S signature space.
2) The OFFENDER is to be given acopy ofthis form, as well as the attached Hearing Report.
3) Parole Supervision/Selection Officers must return a signed copy ofthis form to the Central Office.
OFFENDER'S MOTION TO REOPEN HEARING

According to Board ofPardons and Paroles Rule # 146.11, an OFFENDER'S Motion to Reopen aHearing must be
made sixty (60) days from the date the Board panel voted to revoke the OFFENDER'S supervision. Such request
should be made only:

1) forany substantial errorin the revocation process; or

2) upon newly discovered information.

Address your Motion to Reopen to: BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES,
BOARD ADMINISTRATOR, P.O. BOX 13401,CAPITOL STATION
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711.

(NOTE: Ifthe Hearing that was held was apreliminary hearing, the OFFENDER'S signature below is simply an
acknowledgment that the Preliminary Hearing Report has been received by the OFFENDER.)
By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt ofthe report concerning the Hearing held in my case.

OFFENDER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT

OFFENDER'S SIGNATURE DATE

witness 5XTfT

HS-135 (revised 07-01-04) Page 2of2

H4'
• -s
Charles Bacarisse
Harris County District Clerk

March 2, 2005

EDDIE DON JOHNSON
#364033 SOUTH TEXAS SANCTIONS FACILITY
1511 PRESTON AVE.
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, please find enclosed
copies of the documents indicated below concerning the Post Conviction Writ filed in
cause number 375537-B in the 185th District Court.

I I State's Original Answer Filed

• Affidavit

• Court Order Dated

I | Respondent's Proposed OrderDesignating Issues and OrderFor Filing Affidavit.

£
By

EX PARTE § IN THE 185TH DISTRTCTCOUrT ^'V
§ OF
EDDIE DON JOHNSON,
Applicant § HARRIS COUNTY, T E X A S
RFRPnNnFNTR PROPOSFD FINDINGS OF FACT.
nnMHI UfilONft OF I AW, AND ORDER

The Court has considered the application for writ of habeas corpus, the Respondents

answer, and official court records in the above-captioned cause. The Court finds that there are no

controverted, previously unresolved facts material to the legality of the Applicant's confinement
which require an evidentiary hearing and recommends that the relief requested be denied, or in

the alternative dismissed, because:

1. Applicant presents vague and ambiguous claims, which fail to allege sufficient facts to
establish an alleged harm or a ground for relief. Ex parte Maldonado, 688 S.W.2d 114,

116 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985);

2. Applicant merely offers conclusory allegations, which even if sworn to, are not enough to
warrant habeas relief. Ex parte Empey, 757 S.W.2d 771, 775 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967);

3. Alternatively, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals requires "[a]ll persons seeking time
credit relief in an application filed pursuant to Art. 11.07, § 3, filed in the district clerk's

office on or after January 1, 2000, must show that a written decision has been obtained,

or that he is within 180 days of release according to current department records, or must

allege that he sought resolution of his credit complaint more than 180 days before the
application was filed." Ex parte Stokes, 15 S.W.3d 532, 533 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000),

citing Tex. Gov't Code. Ann. § 501.0081 (Vernon Supp. 2003); and

4fc.
4. Alternatively, Applicant failed to establish that he either obtained a written decision from

the TDCJ time credit review board, is within 180 days of release, or sought relief from

the TDCJ time credit review board 180 days before filing the application. Therefore, the

Applicant has not met the statutory predicates for raising a time credit complaint.
Stokes, 15 S.W.3d at 533, citing TEX. GOV'T CODE. ANN. § 501.0081 (Vernon Supp.

2003).

THE CLERK IS ORDERED to prepare a transcript and transmit same to the Court of
Criminal Appeals as provided by Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2003).
The transcript shall include certified copies of the following documents:

1. the application for writ of habeas corpus;

2. the Respondent's answer;

3. the Court's order; and

4. the indictment, judgment and sentence, and docket sheets in cause number
375537 (unless they have been sent to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
pursuant to a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus order).
THE CLERK is further ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the Applicant.

By the following signature, the Court adopts the Respondent's Proposed Findings of Fact,

Conclusions of Law, and Order.

SIGNED this 5 day of fQojp^oJr\ 2005.

JUDGE PRESfQING

M7-
****************************** ******'*******************************************
*** —
** REQUESTOR: RDI3563 - DICKERSON, ROI LETECI SOUTH TEXAS'.ISP ***
********************************************************* ******************^^

** SYSM IN BASKET PRINT ***

1ESSAGE ID: 850126ETT DATE: 03/01/05 TIME: 02:35pm PRIORITY: 000

'O: RDI3563 - DICKERSON, ROI LETECIA
SR DISTRICT PAROLE OFFICER
SOUTH TEXAS ISF
1511 PRESTON AVE
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002

'ROM: WRNTDEC - wARRANT__ISSUANCE_DECISIONS
WARRANT_ISSUANCE_DECISIONS
PD WARRANTS SECTION
AUSTIN

IUBJECT: VR - JOHNSON

** Sent by Alternate User "CL06999M for ,,WRNTDECn ***

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
PAROLE DIVISION-VIOLATION REPORT

SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION
SPECIALIZED CASE SISP SUPERVISION LEVEL SI-4 REPORT DATE: 03-01-2005
NAME: JOHNSON, EDDIE DON TDCJ NUMBER: 364033
CURRENT ADDRESS SOUTH TEXAS I.S.F. CITY: HOUSTON STATE: TEXAS
SID/DPS: 01607144 FBI: 00503315H SSN: SEX: M RACE: BLACK
HEIGHT: 6' 02 WEIGHT 213 EYE COLOR: BROWN HAIR COLOR: BLACK
SKIN COMPLEXION: DARK DOB: - STATE OF BIRTH: TEXAS
SCARS/MARKS/TATTOOS: NONE

INSTANT OFFENSE: MURDER W/DEADLY WEAPON 2 COUNTS
SENTENCE: 60 YEARS COUNTY OF CONVICTION: HARRIS
RELEASE DATE: 01-16-2004 DISCHARGE DATE: 11-12-2042
COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: HARRIS
LAST SCHEDULED CONTACT:
02-28-2 005 - PREPARING FOR RELEASE FROM I.S.F.
LAST FACE TO FACE CONTACT WITH OFFENDER (DATE/TYPE):
02-28-05 I.S.F.

SECTION II: INVESTIGATIVE CONTACTS
1. ATTEMPTED HOME CONTACT DATE: N/A RESULTS: N/A
2. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT DATE: 08-05-04 RESULTS: CLEAR

OF CRJMWAL JUSTICE

By:
r. U. Box 13401, Capitol Station
Austin, Texas 78711
^rea Code (512) 406-5317
Warrant No. 03-01-2005-01607144
R.DICKERSON/DPO/CENTRAL
/DPO/CENTRAL
File
Date of Issuance: 03-01-2005

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 26
53 -
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
PAROLE DIVISION

RIGHTS OF OFFENDER IN THE REVOCATION PROCESS

A. To: JOHNSON, EDDIE DON No: 364033

It is alleged that you have violatedone or moreof the rules / conditions of your release. Your rights in the revocation process
are listed below.

1. You have the right to be personally served with written noticeof the rules and conditions you are accusedof violating.
That means you have the right to have someone give you written information of what conditions of release you are
accused of breaking.

2. You have the right to have a preliminary hearing if you have not been convicted of a new offense. This hearing will
be held at or near the place of the alleged parole or mandatory supervision violation. The purpose of the preliminary
hearing is to determine whether there is probable cause or reasonable grounds to believe you violated a condition of
release.

3. You have the right to have a revocation hearing if you are alleged to have committed technical violations or you are
found guilty in a criminal case. However if you receive a felony conviction with a term of incarceration in a penal
institution, you will be allowed only a limited hearing in order to explain why you should not be revoked. You must
request this mitigation hearing.

4. You have the right to a disclosure of evidence against you. That means you can see everything before the hearing. •

5. You have the right to a state appointed attorney under certain circumstances to be determined by a hearmg officer. If
you qualify for that right, an attorney will be appointed to representyou. If you do not qualify for that right, you may
hire an attorney to represent you.

6. You have the right to be heard in person by telling a hearingofficer what happened and to present evidence, affidavits,
letters and documents in support of your position.

7. You have the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses by asking questions at the hearing unless the
hearing officerspecifically finds good causefor not allowing you to do so.

8. You are entitled to be heard on the violations by someone designated by the panel.

9. If yourparoleor mandatory supervision is revokedas a resultof a hearing, you will receive a written report by the
hearing officerwhichsets forth the evidence relied upon in support of a finding that you violated one or more
conditionsof your parole or mandatorysupervision.

10. If revoked as a result of a hearing, you may have the right to request that the Board of Pardons and Paroles reopen the
revocation hearingwithin sixty (60) days from the date of the Board's decision.

As indicated by my signature below, I affirm that I have been advised of my rights in the revocation process.

-ho s^inn d5fc?-/0S
V14®D Date 03 /ca./o5

PSV-48 (REV 9/03) EXHIBIT A, PAGE 22 ,3hq page i 0f3
J4,
C. WAIVER OF HEARINGS

1. I do not want a PRELIMINARY hearing. I understand that the parole officer has no authority to make promises as to
what will happen ifI do not have a hearing. I also understand that only the Parole Board can decide what punishment
should begiven. I have not been coerced into signing this waiver, nor have any promises been made tome in exchange
for signing the waiver.

Releasee Date

Witness . : Date

2. I do not want a REVOCATION hearing. I understand that the parole officer has noauthority tomake promises as to what
will happen ifI do not have ahearing. I also understand that only the Parole Board can decide what punishment should be
given. I have not been coerced into signing this waiver, nor have any promises been made tome inexchange for signing
the waiver.

Releasee \ Date

Witness Date
D. HEARING REQUEST/SCHEDULE
1. I herebyrequest mat a Preliminary hearingbe held.

Releasee. ._ Date

Witness Date

Preliminary Hearing Location DateandTime of Hearing
2. I herebyrequest that a Revocationhearingbe held

Releasee ~fo &QS) Date 03/09-/^
Date Q3[/CXL JOS'
'57/ PpWfhTOj
03
Date and Time ofHearing
}k>ji
p& fas

E. SUMMONS

To: No
You arehereby ordered andsummoned to appear at a preliminary/revocation hearing at the time, dateandlocation indicated
above to answer theallegations in Section B, Page 2. Your rights during thehearing process areoutlined in Section A, Page 1.
Failure to appear as instructed mayresult in theissuance of a warrant for yourarrest.

Date Regional Director, ParoleDivision

EXECUTED this day of _, 20 bypersonally delivering a copy ofsame to the named
addressee.

Parole Officer
DIST: CENTRAL HEARING SECTION RELEASEE/JOHNSON. EDDIE D. # 364033
HEARING OFF/ ^ ATTORNEY/
SUPV OFF/ROl L. DICKERSON / 03-12-23736 / GALVESTON DPO
PSV-48 (REV 9/03) ^ Page 3of3

ST.
South Texas Intermediate Sanction Facility
1511 Preston Ave, Houston Texas77002

Memo
To: Offender :AJJI/U,U. frldli Pom,: fl/l/ |0
From: Visitation Officer

Subject: Denied yisi

Date:

^sssasa^diFim^w^^'

Check one:

Not on approved visitation list.

—Inappropriate Identification (ID or Driver License did not match information on list)
Inappropriate attire

__Inappropriate conduct

tyted on relationship

otherlffin:•*"&*. HJ> (klJ Lirfj IAMit ^l/Ml/l

#

St.
m__\y_ ^iginal j Supplemental

CLIENT: fc|#k 1W &)Ju*?frr FIA/TDCJ#: 3bH033 SJJ).#: 06} 07IHH
ATTORNEY INFORMATION:

(filR^lS. FLRSTNAME MIDDLE LASTNAME "~~~T" SUFFIX
TEXAS BAR NO. TX\ c PHONE #: '
CITY STATE ZIP

I HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT, AND
FURTHERMORE, I HEREBY AGREE TO IMMEDIATELY SUPPLEMENT THIS AFFIDAVIT IFANYOFTHE
STATEMENTS MADE HEREIN ARE AFFECTED BY A CHANGE IN FEE AGREEMENT, OR ARRANGEMENT, OR
FACTUAL CONDITIONS. V)
PRINTED OR TYPED NAME U DAY OF /4&72.C>4D.c.3rX,n, RP*31Ud53 oPPENPEE JoUfEtod, Enmg OoM td MAttPftmRy
S&m*iexRG. CfttEKPftR Txnte aeemep puis (\cc.oibo"nMM T.Dt:r-Xfc>.r4o.^o33 oPFEHpeE Jtmt^rijEJ^XE ppm via^ huETo Be

(taftrrftsB Was issued ffl RfiP TUereBI fAy&Es ftEPR^flrepU op XhADXMtouftL^ ftifettre. BS ft Pocto/
gErgQftcTTA[£Ly ftPPLXED TD THE frUJUfcftSfc.
OFFfcdPEfc :TOtttiSONft EDDIE hOM *&HD
tepjrtPTM By r,n.c^s,n aapmnBzL Zfi,/?^ fir that ixmc the televant pttat/jtb Pjduweo

A PUSOU/H, MA*/ UPTT BE ULZASZD TD toAkHUTOM SUPzMXSZOl/ XF TH£ PArsCA/ePL X
9MHJ1M& A ^TE^fPE Fo/L OJL tiAS P/£E£LE>USU/ bEEfiJ //t/2£T6D Of fnUKDEZ M.6Z PeJ/AL t^oTiE.
TFT THE. TXME O&tHQEL CjOMfilZTTeO THE hPPtPJSE TUB UA$> WCPLOBO PlrAFfrnSTL)/,
AT THAT TTME A CotJUTETZO// foil Tfl£ PPF&JSZ £et/DE&E£> T//£ P/EZSOP/&E tt/eEZGJZBLE PoPl
te/PAS6 OPP MAA/P1ATD/H/ ^UPEJLOXStQp/.
T//& PteVOPAttafiJ JMUDLE A ti£\Ll PJZLMIklAL PfidyVTIOA/ APTEfl T/tC P)Ff£NDEX
Have: teiiuzp z/fe, Va?^ zi dak .
OPFto/nzBS PlifiXf&t-t-N Fofi toMDAwiLij SyPF£\tLSZ)A/ ££L£/is/r xs nP7BL*>injfin FM the:
$TATtJT£ XAJ FZCfttn- AFT THE TZM£ OP /i%<> CU/ULetJT 0Ff£AP6E. T/P/TT STATUTE Pltif/jZ/l£<> THAT
THf f™/i>T.c°rmus Re FiJuMr/bsTtA oa/ the Pumez/t lxst p>p xa/beiatr/jt opposes AePbee
M27 Front (Revised 9-1-2001) YOUR SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED ON BACK OF THIS FORM (OVER)

GST18 2005
TT fl£klf)£P- THE Pimmr O.OA/(JZCTXE)/J B/XPXFLE FoPL frAM/MM WOLfcSOpl*

\AllW AM X HEftL- 7 te/Pffrl-ti T?» ME. TT l4K\/_ TC ^is A r?_ASoN .

OCT 18 2005

Action Requested to resolve your Complaint.
£_____ Up/OGA. \ietLTBF> 3HT ______ X f (&) 2.
MftT 1(ST LE6TSLATURfc CUfXPTEV, lftT WB XS5S- IVQicLfc _T . SeC_Q** S.^t

hm ftaavsc Sec 8 CO i^d Sec ^5 ftw> ££r xg.
I
Offender Signature: S&J6EIL: f/fxup_> JjMviUl
^
OCT 18 2005 Date: / nJUvJ^V; Jv_Hfc>:r;ci Clerk

NOV 2 8 2006 NO. 37553 -C
EX PARTE Harm dcfciill. Texas
^AQ/JI| § In the 185th District Court
__^ 1 Deputy §
EDDIE DON JOHNSON l§ of
§
§ Harris County, Texas
AFFIDAVIT Of g \ jxfjw t>icki?i i
STATE OF TEXAS ) Ynf KFf T
COUNTY OF TRAVIS )

BEFORE ME, the undesigned, aNotary Public in and for the State ofTexas, on this day
personal appeared Sandy Pickeil, who, after being duly sworn, deposes as follows-
My name is Sandy Picke,,. Iam over eighteen years of age, of sound mind; capable of
mak.ng thls affidavit; and personal.y acquainted with the facts herein stated. Iam employed as
" ^ ^^ "* Rele- Proce^ ^tion ofthe Texas Department ofCriminal
Justice - Parole Division ("Parole Division").
Ialso am the deputy custodian ofrecords for the Parole Division. Attached hereto and
mcorporated by reference, as Exhibit Aare twenty-six pages of the Parole Division Wd
(Record )about Eddie Don Johnson ("Johnson"), TDCJ #364033, which are kept by the Parole
D,v,s,on in the regu.ar course ofits business, and it was the regular course ofbusiness ofthe Parole
condm oropinion, recorded to make the Records or to transmit information thereofto be induded
, the Record; and the Record was made at or near the time or reasonably soon thereafter. ^
attached Record is an exact duplicate ofthe original.

l>Z.i
Johnson, Eddie Don TDCJ# 364033
Page 2

Offenses
Murder W/DW (2cts.)
County
Harris
Cause Numbers 375536
375537
Sentence
Two- 60-years
Date of Sentence
8-15-1983
Date of Offense
10-29-1982
Sentence Begin Date
11-21-1982
TDCJ Receive Date
9-28-1983
Mandatory Supervision Release Date 10-24-2017
Maximum Expiration Date
6-10-2043
Total Flat Time Served
24-yrs 6-mos 17-days
ys
5-yrs 9-mos 22-davs
ys
1-mo 30-days [
Offender Johnson committed the offenses ofMurder With De*Hlv w~„
Harris County, Texas, in cause numbers 375536 __Ttrmirt * P*°D °F ab°Ut I0"29-1982, in
(60) years in the Texas Departmento7cS^Jus icfInlnt ?^as ^tenced to serve two- sixty
Court ofHarris County on7-15-1983^^^
Johnson was released from TDCJ custody on mandatory supervision -ill* ™_ •„
expiration date of 11-12-2042. On 3-1-2005 a Pre R™^ w ^i6"2004' W1~ *maximum
Parole Division. Johnson was JstedT^^^ 1^7" iSSUed * the
revoked on__25-2005. Offender Johnson was returned £ TrTci rIT' T? Omandatory s»Pe™sion
readmission offender Johnson was charged for . S If J^ 2T*Z
an unsatisfactory term of mandate™
°D 4"8'2005' At -* Point of
and 19-dayS as out ofcustody for
forfeiture of prior earned Soodtime^ the

error in his current time c£E*£ ^ S that thsre "« -
this response that he should contact ^SoSlE^

uj.
EDDIE DON JOHNSON, IDCJ #364033

ch

supervised release).
/ mcd, dense: „not, please state the reasons (or /ah
osonsjoi Johnson not receivu
'ing

^««: Records maintained by the TDCl p . rv •
'"^ory supervision on January• 16.-004.
>004 TO WORK UArE:
DATE: 01 21 2004
01 ^ 20(

=REFRESH
=
MAIN MENU

•^u-t-r
.n • V.I !•
•3

US'.
SHARON KELLER COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS LOU.SE PEARSON
PRESIDING JUDGE n prk
RO. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION 5,2 463 K5,
LAWRENCE E. MEYERS AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711
TOM PRICE EDWARD J. MARTY
PAULWOMACK GENERAL COUNSEL
CHERYL JOHNSON 512-463-1597
MIKE KEASLER
BARBARA P. HERVEY
CHARLES R. HOLCOMB

CATHY COCHRAN
JUDGES

June 21,2006

Eouie Dun Joiinson
Lynaugh Unit - TDC #364033
1098S. Hwy. 2037
Fort Stockton, TX 79735

RE: 375537-B
WR-31,972-04

Your letter has been received. Please be advised:

• To obtain Copies of items requested, contact the State Law Library, Inmate Copy Service, at PO
Box 12367, Austin Texas 78711-23267. Please be sure to include your full name and any
aliases, TDCJ number, date of conviction, county of conviction, appeal number and complete
mailing address.

D Your records will not be returned to you because once records are received in the Court they
become the permanent records of this Court

_ Neither the Judges nor the staff of the Court can give legal advice. We recommend you
contact Inmate Legal Services at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional
Division.

u Your writ ot haoeas corpus has not Deen received in ;nis court. Please contact the district court
for the status of your case.

• The Court of Criminal Appeals does not provide forms. Habeas forms may be obtained from the
unit iaw library or contact the District Clerk of the county of your conviction.

_ Your change of address has been received and noted in our system.

Sincerely,

i^^lLx^
Louise Pearson
Clerk

SUPREME COURT BUILDING, 20 1 WEST 14TH STREET, ROOM 106, AUSTIN, TEXAS 7870 t
Website www.cca.courts.state.tx.us l>kr
iat* (fLaunsel for (®iienber&
,Apifaisum ofQlexas department of(Jrimmal justice

P.O. Box 4005
Huntsville. TX 77342-4005

August 30, 2006

Eddie D. Johnson
TDCJ# 364033
James Lynaugh (LH/73)

Dear Mr. Johnson:

The TDCJ-ID computer reflects that you have been eligible for parole release since 03-01-05.
Whether or not you are granted parole isup to the sole discretion of the Board of Pardons and
Paroles. As of today's date, you have amandatory supervision release date of 03-23-2018.
If you are not granted parole, you will not be released until you have reached your mandatory
supervision release date. Remember however, that this date (03-23-2018) is aprojected date,
reached when the good time added to your flat time equals the length ofthe sentence (60-years).
Any loss of good time ora status change willaffect this date.
Sincerely,

CtaUuL Lte-»Jii*>—
Barbara Clendennen
Legal Assistant, Appellate Section

./be
c: File

Austin. Texas 7S711 » (512) 4n6-5452 « \vw\v.tdvj.st;-jic.t\.us;b|>p/
•4

UNSWORN DECLARATION

I, EuutE M JftUte-d , TDCJ NUMBER *3tWo:tt

Beingpresently incarcerated in the mwvefl A> UtUmGtl Unit ofthe Texas

Department ofCriminal Justice, in Pecos , County, Texas
Declare under penalty ofperjury that Iam the applicant in the above and foregoing
Motion. I have read said motion and the factual allegations ofthe same are true and
Correct.

Executed on this Ife day of J\\rtC , 20 ts*.

JAjLl &ML (JJLo*^ *ZlnHO^

EDOEE bo*a JbftisM *1uom . Movant, ProSe
Velva L. Price
District Clerk, Travis County
Travis County Courthouse Complex
P.O. Box 679003
Austin, Texas 78767

DATE: May 21, 2015

EDDIE DON JOHNSON
TDCJ ID: 00364033
JAMES A. LYNAUGH UNIT
1098 S. HIGHWAY 2037
FORT STOCKTON, TX 79735

ORDER (DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE)

D-l-GN-13-001602

EDDIE DON JOHNSON
VS.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PAROLE DIVISION

You are hereby notified that the above order has been signed and
entered MAY 13, 2015 in the 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of Travis
County Texas in the above numbered and entitled cause.

Velva L. Price,
District Clerk

L60 - 000047880 D-l-GN-13-001602 BH
MAY 13
At *:_Ml PmAIS
CAUSE NO. D-l-GN-13-001602
^MTPfiglTBiffflBrBlit
EDDIE DON JOHNSON § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
Plaintiff,

v.

§ TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF
CRIMINAL JUSTICE- §
PAROLE DIVISION
Defendant § 200* JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Order

On this day, this Court considered Defendant's Amended Plea to the Jurisdiction and any
response thereto.

It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This order operates as afinal judgment.

Signed this dayof. C- \?> .,2015.

^/l^zU ^U
PRESIDING JUDGE
r
APPEALS llm&LJL 03 -iS*-M> 3«/3 CV
TOTAL Ecu/tfCASE riuPlBdl JH-ft/- /3-to/tfiL

foorc „tf joMison/
T.D.Lr.TOf*iiiUCii

T'MlSTOtiETbH, fEl/W

**
fa/l* JtFFtfttf 0. MLE C_ftfc,
* toUdf OF APPfftLS

r/ttftfl btSlWTDFTEWS

Ausn* Utitttltf PLEASE FtMD ft CAP* of PtAmaFF^PPOlAMr APPEALS 6016F
itt rrtc aaovre fafeaaCto cause ntAr CiAm Be DisfAt&^eo with Pttejurnti; i=o_laoc of
JuaiSDiccrDtf. eKtmt- in. thi_ actc&m du iv* da4 df WW _hs» Pleas* file ftu_ _u.»ifc
tt> rttt ATTEMuovi &p tut cooiw of arpewa mu> OE>mr. if therc ant &H* ouesnws
fteoatm* tfcQui&T.iCArtBe GHKttea fttiue fctuwi (vodress.

EO02Etoi/dl)W13
JAMts. a, b/H/AUM UtlEF
MB S. HwH 2£>IT
Ptor37DC£JM* TEEfa
WSS--97W-
Lffi+lllgl
•
IM^'lW^^'llhhm^'Wih^
j.iwn wnvwn'tf £?\wr

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4071264. Public record. Not legal advice.