# R.D. Tips, Inc. v. Virginia Jett > Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) ยท May 11, 2015 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4065978 ## Case - **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) - **Decided:** May 11, 2015 - **Precedential status:** Published - **Opinion:** Opinion - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4065978 ## Opinion text ACCEPTED 03-13-00336-CV 5225335 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/11/2015 10:21:48 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK CASE NO. 03-13-00336-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS THIRD COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT AUSTIN, TEXAS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/11/2015 10:21:48 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk R.D. TIPS, INC., Appellant v. VIRGINIA JETT, Appellee Appeal from the 419th District Court, Travis County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GN-11-003799 Hon. Rhonda Hurley, Judge Presiding APPELLANT'S RESPONSE TO APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE THE MANDATE Jonathan D. Pauerstein State Bar No. 15637500 ROSENTHAL P AUERSTEIN SANDOLOSKI AGATHER LLP 755 E. Mulberry, Suite 200 San Antonio, Texas 78212 Telephone: (210) 225-5000 Facsimile: (210) 354-4034 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT, R.D. TIPS, INC. 1 477601.1 80592.00013 To The Honorable Third Court of Appeals: Appellant, R.D. Tips, Inc., in opposition to Appellee's Motion To Expedite The Mandate, states the following: 1. Appellant has superseded the judgment below as permitted by law. Accordingly, while this case is on appeal, Appellee has received the protection afforded by law and Appellant is entitled to pursue the appellate process to its conclusion. Nonetheless, Appellee seeks to expedite the issuance of the mandate based on conclusory allegations that she needs funds due to unspecified financial hardship. 2. Appellant has until June 12th to file a petition for review in the Supreme Court of Texas, which it is entitled to file under Texas law. 3. The mandate can only be expedited upon a showing of good cause. Tex. R. App. P. 18.1(c). 1 Appellee, failing to carry this burden, points to nothing that is not true of many plaintiffs who hold money judgments that are on appeal. While she has been unable to execute upon the superseded judgment, that is always so when a defendant appeals an adverse money judgment and posts a supersedeas bond to secure the plaintiff during the appellate process. And, while Appellee says Appellee's motion is unverified and not supported by affidavit, which alone warrants its denial. Cf Andrews v. Twin Montana, Inc., 547 S.W.2d 54, 56 (Tex. Civ. App.-Fort Worth 1977, no writ) ("the motion of appellant for extension of time for filing his brief is not verified and ... there is no affidavit presented in support of it. Under these circumstances appellant has not proved anything by his motion; he has merely made some unsupported allegations."). 2 477601.1 80592.00013 she needs the money awarded in the judgment, that too is likely to be so in similar situations. 4. Were Appellee's conclusory claims sufficient to show good cause for expediting the mandate and denying Appellant the right to supersede the judgment until the appellate process is exhausted, then good cause for the same relief would exist in most cases in which defendants appeal from money judgments. The good cause standard demands more, but Appellee has not provided it. 5. Appellee has not alleged, let alone proven, facts demonstrating that there IS good cause for expediting the issuance of the mandate and thereby abrogating Appellant's right to pursue all appellate avenues for review of the superseded judgment. Appellee thus has not sustained her burden to establish good cause. For the foregoing reasons, Appellee's motion should be denied. Respectfully submitted, J o athan D. Pauerstein State Bar No. 15637500 ROSENTHAL PAUERSTEIN SANDOLOSKI A GATHER LLP 755 E. Mulberry, Suite 200 San Antonio, Texas 78212 Telephone: (21 0) 225-5000 Facsimile: (21 0) 354-4034 jpauerstein@rpsalaw .com 3 477601.1 80592.00013 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT, R.D. TIPS, INC. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE The undersigned counsel certifies that this document contains 63 8 words (counting all parts of the document). The body text is in 14 point font, and the footnote text is in 12 point font. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Appellant's Response To Motion To Expedite The Mandate was served via United States Mail on this 11th day of May, 2015, upon the following counsel of record: Eric J. Taube Taube Summers Harrison Taylor Meinzer Brown LLP 100 Congress Avenue, 18th Floor Austin, Texas 78701 4 477601.1 80592.00013 --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4065978. Public record. Not legal advice.