# Xiangxiang Tang v. Klaus Wiegand > Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · July 20, 2015 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4063650 ## Case - **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) - **Decided:** July 20, 2015 - **Precedential status:** Published - **Opinion:** Opinion - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4063650 ## Opinion text FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/20/2015 1:31:08 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk EXHIBIT A r"· '"' •. z44z2 tu;;;z;:. * z *'""' .-.- '··•: , Sent: Monday, July 6, 2015 9:31:20 AM Subject: Re: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Thanks; my mistake about it being offered. John Venzke From: "Mindy Hall" To: "jvenzke@comcast.net" Sent: Monday, July 6, 2015 9:25:59 AM Subject: RE: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Mr. Venzke, I will have to check on this.  I was out of the office last week, Tuesday through Friday. In my previous e-mail to you, I explained there were no exhibits included in the appellate record because none were included in Mr. Wauson’s Designation of Reporter’s Record.  I did inform you though that Exhibit 77 was never admitted.  I did not say that it was not offered.  Again, I will have to check the record and I will get back to you. Mindy Hall From: jvenzke@comcast.net [mailto:jvenzke@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 8:02 AM To: Hall, Mindy Cc: John W. Wauson; Sharon Dianiska Subject: Re: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Mindy As a follow up to my formal request, enclosed is the Exhibit List filed by Plaintiff's which reflect Exhibit 77 was "Wauson Probus Attorney's Fee Statements (redacted)." What I am looking for is this form, or whatever you used to keep track of the trial exhibits, which indicates Offered and Admitted as it relates to Exhibit 77. Thanks. John Venzke From: jvenzke@comcast.net To: "Mindy Hall" Cc: "John W. Wauson" , "Sharon Dianiska" Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 10:50:18 AM Subject: Re: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Request for Supplemental Reporter's Record Pursuant to Rule 34.6(d) Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure From: "Mindy Hall" To: "jvenzke@comcast.net" Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 9:58:06 AM Subject: RE: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Mr. Venzke, There were no exhibits that went up with the appeal because they were not included in Mr. Wauson’s Designation of Reporter’s Record for the appeal.  I also note that Exhibit 77 was not admitted at the trial. Mindy From: jvenzke@comcast.net [mailto:jvenzke@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 1:12 PM To: Hall, Mindy Subject: Re: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Mindy I noticed that Exhibit 77 (copies of Wauson's attorneys' fees) was not in the the testimony you prepared and filed. I looked at the District Court's website and they are not listed in that record. Do you have this Exhibit as part of the testimony ? If so, and I want to add for the appeal, what do you need from me to do so ? I know I need to file Motion with Court of Appeals, but what do you need from me to include it ? Thanks. John P. Venzke The Venzke Law Firm. 713-522-1190 713-816-6908 cell jvenzke@comcast.net From: jvenzke@comcast.net To: "Mindy Hall" Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 10:35:21 AM Subject: Re: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 No problem; do it all the time. Did not want you to miss a deadline. From: "Mindy Hall" To: "jvenzke@comcast.net" Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 10:15:13 AM Subject: RE: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Yes.  Sorry about that. From: jvenzke@comcast.net [mailto:jvenzke@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 10:13 AM To: Hall, Mindy Subject: Re: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Do you mean 6 24 ? From: "Mindy Hall" To: "jvenzke@comcast.net" Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 9:31:23 AM Subject: RE: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 No, I filed an extension.  My record is due 5/24. Thanks! From: jvenzke@comcast.net [mailto:jvenzke@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 9:27 AM To: Hall, Mindy Subject: Re: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Mindy I noticed the Court of Appeals says it recievd the reporter's record. But all they have are two hearings typed up by Stephanie Webb. Have you filed the other part of the record ? Thanks. John Venzke From: "Mindy Hall" To: "jvenzke@comcast.net" Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 1:47:27 PM Subject: RE: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 No problem.  Thanks for letting me know.  Have a nice afternoon. Mindy From: jvenzke@comcast.net [mailto:jvenzke@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 1:46 PM To: Hall, Mindy Subject: Re: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Mindy After all your work my clients decided not to have any thing added to the record. They re broke. Thanks again. John Venzke From: "Mindy Hall" To: "jvenzke@comcast.net" Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 5:04:50 PM Subject: RE: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 The cost for the appellate record you requested which includes the testimony of Andy Tang and Yvonne Tran is $3,000. The cost for the two bills of exceptions, if you choose to include them, is $344. Please let me know how you wish to proceed. Thanks, Mindy Hall From: jvenzke@comcast.net [mailto:jvenzke@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 4:07 PM To: Hall, Mindy Subject: Re: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Good point; if we do it, and I do not think client's can pay so probably moot, but it would include our two bill of exceptions and, with Tang and Tran, that is it. Thanks. From: "Mindy Hall" To: "jvenzke@comcast.net" Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 2:08:16 PM Subject: RE: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Wes has ordered the testimony of Klaus Weigand and his own testimony on attorney’s fees, pretrial motions, bench conferences, charge conference, and the hearings from 10/31/14 and 11/14/14. I’m just confirming that you don’t need Voir Dire, anything concerning Defendant’s two bills of exceptions, opening statements, closing arguments, any of the jury questions, the reading of the verdict, et cetera. From: jvenzke@comcast.net [mailto:jvenzke@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 1:06 PM To: Hall, Mindy Subject: Re: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Hasn't Wes ordered the rest ? From: "Mindy Hall" To: "jvenzke@comcast.net" Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:54:28 PM Subject: RE: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 I want to clarify that you’re only asking me for the cost for the testimony of Ms. Tran and Mrs. Tang? From: jvenzke@comcast.net [mailto:jvenzke@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 8:37 AM To: Hall, Mindy Subject: Re: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Any luck on a figure ? Thanks. John Venzke From: "Mindy Hall" To: "jvenzke@comcast.net" Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 5:21:55 PM Subject: RE: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Mr. Venzke, I will work on a cost and let you know. Thanks, Mindy Hall From: jvenzke@comcast.net [mailto:jvenzke@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 9:34 AM To: Hall, Mindy Subject: Tang v. Tran; No. 13-DCV-211293 Mindy As you may recall, I represeted Yvonne Tran and Klaus Wiegland in this case. I see that Wes Wauson has requested a partial statement of facts. Can you give me an estimate of how much the remainder would cost ? That would be the testimony of Mrs. Tang and Ms. Tran. Thanks. John Venzke --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4063650. Public record. Not legal advice.