# Denise Gail Dooley v. State > Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas ยท April 22, 2015 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4046131 ## Case - **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas - **Decided:** April 22, 2015 - **Precedential status:** Published - **Opinion:** Opinion - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4046131 ## Opinion text No. 05-1 4-00240-CR FILED IN IN The Sixth Court of APPeals 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS Texarkana, Texas 4/22/2015 3:42:39 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk DENISE GAIL DOOLEY, AppeTTant, \/ THE STATE OF TEXAS' Ag>peJ'lee. MOT]ON TO WITHDRAW PURSUANT TO AA/DERS V. CALTFORNTA,386 U-S.738 (196'7) TO THE HONORABLE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS: NOW COMES JEFF T. JACKSON, counsel for Appellant Denise Gai.l Dooley, and hereby moves to withdraw from representation of Appellant pursuant to Anders v' Cal-ifornia, 386 U.S. 738 (1961) ' In support' of this mot-ion, counsel shows as follows: I. Counsel has f hororrcrh I v 9frv! reviewed the record on appeal ' :nrl CIII\-ti/ fnr !v! fheSe urr\ reasons, is thoroughly familiar with the II. counsel- has, in the exercise of his professional judgment, determined that the instant case presentsi no nonfrivolous issues for appeal, and, in accordance with the Supreme CourL's decision in Anders v. Cal-ifornia, 386 U'S' 738 (L961), now so advise the court and requests permission to withdraw. Anders, id- at 144' III. In accordance with Anders, Counsel has, contemporaneously with this motion, filed a brief outlining all issues which might arguably support an appeal and exprlaining why t.hose issues are meritless . Anders, Id. IV. counsel has furnished the appellant with a copy of said bri-ef, and a copy of this motion, thus apprising appeallant of counsel's actions- V. Having determined that the instant appeal is wholly ri rrnl orrs - and fIITVVMD, qrIV h:rz'i IIqvIIIY ncr r:omnl vvrlrt/!Ivv i ecJ wi th tha l-rri v!!v of i no and notice reqr-iirements of Anders v. Cal-if ornia, counsel now requests thal: he be allowed t.o withdraw, pursuant to Anders. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, iI 'i s nrarzecl that the Cou:rt grant counsel' s request and all-ow counsel to withdraw from this case, pursuant to Anders v. CaLifornia, 386 U.S. 738 (1961) . pa