# Phillippe Tanguy, 13500 Air Express, L.L.C. and 13500 Air Express, L.P., and PTRE Holdings. L.P. v. William G. West, as Chapter 7 Trustee of Richard Davis, Debtor, and Eva S. Engelhart, Receiver > Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · January 2, 2015 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4040155 ## Case - **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) - **Decided:** January 2, 2015 - **Precedential status:** Published - **Opinion:** Opinion - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4040155 ## Opinion text ACCEPTED 01-14-00455-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/2/2015 4:15:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK No. 01-14-00455-CV No. 01-14-00455-CV FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS ________________________________________________________ 1/2/2015 4:15:22 PM THE IN THE IN CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk COURT OF FIRST COURT FIRST APPEALS OF APPEALS TEXAS HOUSTON, TEXAS HOUSTON, _________________________________________________________ TANGUY, PHILIPPE TANGUY, PHILIPPE AIR EXPRESS, 13500 AIR 13500 EXPRESS, L.L.C & 13500 L.L.C & AIR EXPRESS, 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.P., Appellant, Appellant, v. WILLIAM G. WILLIAM G. WEST, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE AS CHAPTER WEST, AS TRUSTEE OF OF RICHARD DAVIS, RICHARD DEBTORS DAVIS, DEBTORS Appellee. Appellee. ________________________________________________________ APPELLEES’ BRIEF APPELLEES’ BRIEF ________________________________________________________ W. Wolfshohl Joshua W. Eva S. Engelhart Eva 24038592 Texas Bar No. 24038592 Bar No. State Bar 00796513 No. 00796513 jwo1fshoh1@porterhedges.com jwolfshohl@porterhedges.com May, Cron Ross, Banks, May, & Cavin P.C. Cron & Aaron J. Aaron Power J. Power 2 Riverway, Suite 700 24058058 Texas Bar. No. 24058058 77056-1919 Houston, Texas 77056-1919 apower@porterhedges.com eenge1hart@rossbanks.com eengelhart@rossbanks.com Porter Hedges LLP Hedges LLP 626-1200 (713) 626-1200 Main Street, 36 1000 Main 1000 36”‘ th Floor 623-6014 (fax) (713) 623-6014 77002 Houston, Texas 77002 226-6000 Telephone: (713) 226-6000 Telephone: 228-1331 Facsimile: (713) 228-1331 Facsimile: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE COURT APPOINTED COURT RECEIVER APPOINTED RECEIVER WILLIAM WEST WILLIAM G. WEST PRO SE PRO SE Of Contents Table Of Table Page Page SUPPLEMENTAL LIST SUPPLEMENTAL OF PARTIES......................................................................................... LIST OF PARTIES ....................................................................................... iiii .. STATEMENT OF STATEMENT THE CASE....................................................................................................... OF THE CASE ............................ .. . 11 . STATEMENT IN STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO ORAL OPPOSITION TO ARGUMENT ......................................................... ORAL ARGUMENT ....................................................... 2 .. STATEMENT OF STATEMENT FACTS ............................................................................................................. OF FACTS ........................................................................................................... 33 .. The Bankruptcy Court Judgment The Judgment and Appeals Thereof ......................................................3 .................................................... ..3 Judgment and Appointment of the Receiver .....................................3 Domestication of the Judgment ................................... ..3 The District Court Orders Appellees to Turnover and Authorizes the The Receiver to Sell the Driscoll Property .....................................................................4 ................................................................... ..4 The District Court Approves the Sale of the Driscoll Property...........................................5 The Property ......................................... ..5 SUMMARY OF SUMMARY ARGUMENT....................................................................................................... 6 OF ARGUMENT . APPELLEES’ ARGUMENT ........................................................................................................ 7 APPELLEES’ ARGUMENT.......................................................................................................... .. 1. 1. There is No Appellants’ Collateral Attack on No Legal Support for Appellants’ on the Judgment ........................................................................................ ..7 Validity of the Judgment..........................................................................................7 2. A Court May A May Require a Judgment Judgment Debtor to Turn Turn OverOver All Non- Non- Exempt Property to a Receiver. Exempt Receiver. .............................................................................10 ........................................................................... ..10 3. The Plain Language The Does Not Language of the Statute Does Not Require the Turnover Specifically Identify Property..................................................................12 Order to Specifically Property ................................................................ ..12 4. The Receiver Order, the Turnover Order and the Sale Order Were The Were Non—Exempt by Sufficient Evidence of Non-Exempt Property Which Supported by Which Not Subject to Sale by is Not by Ordinary Legal Process. .............................................. 14 Process. ................................................14 .. 5. The Receiver Order, the Turnover Order and the Sale Order Were The Were Supported by Non—Exempt Property Which by Sufficient Evidence of Non-Exempt Which is Not by Not Subject to Sale by Ordinary Legal Process. Process. ................................................14 .............................................. ..14 6. Do Not Appellants Do Have the Right to a Jury Trial on Not Have on the Order ..................... ..16 Appointment of a Receiver, the Turnover Order or the Sale Order.......................16 7. The Court Lacks Jurisdiction to Review The Review the Receiver’s Appointment as Master in Chancery......................................................................18 Appointment Chancery .................................................................... ..l8 PRAYER ..................................................................................................................................... 19 PRAYER....................................................................................................................................... .. l9 i SUPPLEMENTAL LIST SUPPLEMENTAL OF PARTIES LIST OF PARTIES Pursuant to the Rules 38.2(a)(1) and 38.1(a) 38.l(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Appellees file filed by file this supplement to the list of parties filed by Appellants, which Eva Engelhart, the court-appointed receiver, as an Appellee. which omitted Eva Appellee. Ms. was the movant Engelhart was movant in two two of the three orders in this appeal. Therefore, Therefore, she Appellee. is clearly an Appellee. Appellee: Appellee: Eva S. Engelhart Eva May, Cron Ross, Banks, May, & Cavin, P.C. Cron & 2 Riverway, Suite 700 77056-1919 Houston, Texas 77056-1919 Appellee: Attorney for Appellee: Appearing pro pro Se se as court-appointed receiver ii 4476732v1 4476732v1 TABLE OF TABLE OF AUTHORITIES AUTHORITIES Page(s) CASES CASES Bahar v. Lyon Fin. Bahar v. Fin. Servs., Servs., 330 S.W.3d App.—Austin 2010, pet. denied) ..................................18 S.W.3d 379 (Tex. App.—Austin ................................ ..18 Bergeron v. v. Sessions, 561 S.W.2d 551 561 S.W.2d App.—Dal1as 1977, 551 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas refd n.r.e.) ....................17 1977, writ ref’d .................. ..17 Block Black v. V. Shor, 443 S.W. 3d 170 443 App.—Corpus Christi 2013, no pet.) ...........................13 170 (Tex. App.—Corpus ......................... 13 .. Boger Boger v. Moore, Moore, Inc., 1/. S.W.2d 646, 649 196 S.W.2d 196 App.—Beaumont 1946, 649 (Tex. Civ. App.—Beaumont no writ) ...................17 1946, no ................. ..17 Congleton v. v. Shoemaker, No. 09-11-00453—CV, 2012 WL No. 09-11-00453-CV, WL 1249406 App.—Beaumont Apr. 1249406 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 12, 12, 2012, pet. pet. denied) (mem. op.) ....................................................................19 .................................................................. ..19 Cross v. v. Cross, 738 S.W.2d App.—Corpus Christi 1987, S.W.2d 86 (Tex. App.—Corpus dism’d w.o.j.).............16 1987, writ dism’d w.o.j.) ........... 16 .. Exec. Benefits Exec. Benefits Ins. 1/. Arkison (In re Bellingham Ins. Agency v. Bellingham Ins. Ins. Agency, Agency, Inc.), 134 2165 (2014).............................................................................7, 134 S. Ct. 2165 9,10 (2014) ........................................................................... ..7, 9, 10 Ferguson Ferguson v. v. Ferguson, 210 S.W.2d App.—Austin 1948, S.W.2d 268 (Tex. Civ. App.—Austin n.r.e.) .................. 17 1948, writ ref’d n.r.e.)....................17 .. v. Dorfif Gunther v. Dorff, 296 App.—Waco 1956, S.W.2d 638 (Tex. Civ. App.—Waco 296 S.W.2d dism’d) ......................... ..16 1956, writ dism’d)...........................16 Hennigan v. Hennigan, Hennigan v. SW 2d 666 SW App.—H0ust0n [14 2d 322 (Tex. App.—Houston th [14‘h writ dism’d) ............15 1984, Writ Distr.] 1984, .......... 15 .. Henry v. v. Masson, 333 App.—Houst0n [1st S.W.3d 825 (Tex. App.—Houston 333 S.W.3d Dist.] 2010, no pet.) .....................16 [1stDist.] ................... ..16 In re BP BP RE, RE, L.P., th 279 (5 735 F.3d 279 (5th 2013) ..................................................................... ..7, 8, 9 Cir. 2013).......................................................................7, iii iii 4476732v1 4476732v1 Moody Moody v. v. State, S.W.2d 158 538 S.W.2d App.—WacO 1976, 158 (Tex. Civ. App.—Waco ref'd n.r.e) ......................16 1976, writ ref’d .................... ..16 Moyer v. Moyer, Moyer v. Moyer, 183 S.W. 3d 48 (Tex. App. Austin, 2005, no pet.) .....................................13, 183 18 ................................... ..13, 18 v. Brown, v. Pillitteri 165 S.W.3d 715 (Tex. App. 2005) ...................................................................15 165 S.W.3d ................................................................. ..15 Sheikh v. v. Sheikh, 248 S.W.3d 381 248 S.W.3d 381 (Tex. App. Houston 1st 1st Dist. 2007) .......................................18 ..................................... ..18 Steenland v. Commerce Bank v. Texas Commerce Nat. Ass Bank Nat. Ass’n, ’n, 648 S.W.2d App.—Ty1er 1983, S.W.2d 387 (Tex. App.—Tyler refd n.r.e.) .............................17 1983, writ ref’d ........................... 17 .. Stem v. Stern v. Marshall, Marshall, 564 U.S.2(2011) U.S. 2 (2011)...........................................................................................7, ......................................................................................... ..7, 8 Suttles v. Vestin Realty Mortg. v. Vestin Mortg. I,I, Inc., Inc., 317 S.W.3d 412 317 S.W.3d 412 (Tex. App. Houston [1st App.—Houston no pet.) .....................15 Dist.] 2010, no [1stDist.] ................... ..15 v. McCarthy, Tanner v. 274 S.W.3d 274 S.W.3d 311 App.—Houston [1 311 (Tex. App.—Houston st [15tDist.] Dist.] 2008, no pet.) .... 10, 10, 13, 13, 14, 18 14, 18 SSTATUTES TATUTES TEX. T CIV. EX. C PRAC. IV. P & RREM. RAC. & CODE EM. C ANN. ODE ANN. § § 31.002(a) ................................ .............................. 10, 10, 11, 11, 14, 16 14, 16.. TEX. T CIV. EX. C PRAC. IV. P & RREM. RAC. & CODE EM. C ANN. ODE ANN. § 31.002(h) .................................... ..11, § 31.002(h)...................................... 11, 12, 13 12, 13 TEX. T CIV. EX. C PRAC. IV. P & RREM. RAC. & CODE EM. C ODE § § 31.002(b)(2) ................................................10, 12 .............................................. ..10, 12 TEX. T CIV. EX. C PRAC. IV. P & RREM. RAC. & CODE EM. C ODE § § 31.002(b)(3) ................................................10, 11 .............................................. ..10, 11 TEX. T CIV. EX. C PRAC. IV. P & RREM. RAC. & CODE EM. C ODE § § 31.0025 .............................................................15 ........................................................... ..15 OTHER O AUTHORITIES THER AUTHORITIES ofCiVi1 Rule of 171 ................................................................................ ..18 Civil Procedure 171..................................................................................18 iv 4476732v1 4476732v1 STATEMENT OF STATEMENT THE CASE OF THE CASE This appeal is the Appellants’ most recent dilatory tactic in a lengthy dispute More than four years ago, William non-payment of a promissory note. More regarding non-payment West (the “Trustee”) obtained a judgment G. West judgment of approximately $1.2 million against the Appellants in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. After a series of frivolous appeals by Texas. by Appellants, including a petition for certiorari denied by Supreme Court, the Trustee domesticated by the United States Supreme th the judgment 2701*‘ judgment in the 270 Texas. District Court of Harris County, Texas. Tanguy admitted in an affidavit of net worth that he has significant Philippe Tanguy significant non-exempt assets, including a rental property in Houston, non-exempt non-exempt non-exempt income income owned entities, and an airplane located in Georgia. After a from his wholly owned from which Tanguy’s hearing at which Tanguy’s affidavit was introduced into evidence, the District affidavit was Eva S. Engelhart (the “Receiver”) as receiver. Court ordered the appointment of Eva The Receiver subsequently obtained an order requiring Tanguy The Tanguy to turn over the rental property to her and an order authorizing her to sell the property. property. The Appellants appealed (i) The (i) the order appointing the Receiver, (ii) (ii) the order them to turn over the rental property to the Receiver, and (iii) requiring them (iii) the order authorizing the Receiver to sell the rental property. 1 4476732v1 4476732v1 STATEMENT IN STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO ORAL OPPOSITION TO ARGUMENT ORAL ARGUMENT Appellees believe that the legal issues presented in this appeal have been authoritatively decided, and the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented parties’ briefs. in the parties’ briefs. was Accordingly, oral argument is not necessary and was by Appellants for the purpose of causing further delay. requested by delay. [Remainder of page left intentionally blank] blank] 2 4476732v1 4476732v1 STATEMENT OF STATEMENT OF FACTS FACTS The Bankruptcy Court Judgment The Bankruptcy and Appeals Judgment and Thereof Appeals Thereof On March On March 30, 2010, the Trustee obtained a judgment judgment against Appellees in amount of $1,183,090.80, plus post-judgment interest and attorney’s the amount attomey’s fees in the amount of $31,180.75 amount “ udgment”) (CR $31,180.75 (the “Judgment”) CR at pp. (CR at p. 5; see also CR 94-109). pp. 94-109). Judgment from the Bankruptcy Court to the United Appellees appealed the Judgment which affirmed the States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, which was frivolous, and awarded Bankruptcy Court’s Judgment, found that the appeal was awarded (CR the Trustee reasonable and necessary fees and costs for defending the appeal. (CR at pp. 69-93). of Appeals Appellees then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which (CR at pp. Judgment. (CR which also affirmed the Bankruptcy Court’s Judgment. pp. 59-68). by the Finally, Appellees had their petition for writ of certiorari denied by Supreme (CR at pp. 26-113). Supreme Court of the United States. (CR 26-113). of the Judgment Domestication of and Appointment Judgment and of the Receiver Appointment of On November On November 8, 2013, the Trustee domesticated the Judgment 2701“ Judgment in the 270 th (CR at pp. 5-11). District Court of Harris County, Texas (the “District Court”) (CR 5-11). On November On November 11, filed an Application for Turnover After 11, 2013, the Trustee filed “ Judgment Appointment of a Receiver and Master (the “Application Judgment and For Appointment pplication to (CR at pp. 12-14). Appoint a Receiver”) (CR 12-14). 3 4476732v1 4476732v1 On April 25, 2014, following an unsuccessful mediation, the District Court On (RR Apr. held an evidentiary hearing on the Application to Appoint a Receiver. (RR 2014). 25, 2014). At the hearing, counsel for the Trustee introduced two At two exhibits—Tanguy’s exhibits—Tanguy’s 2009 through sworn affidavit of net worth and his federal tax returns for the years 2009 2012. (RR CR at pp. 162-164). (RR April 25, 2014, at pp. 3:24-4:3; CR 162-164). Appellants no evidence at the hearing. introduced no hearing. on non-exempt assets listed on Counsel for the Trustee argued that any of three non-exempt Tanguy’s affidavit of net worth supported the appointment of a receiver—income Tanguy’s receiver—income from a rental property located at 1714 from 1714 Driscoll Street in Houston, Texas (the income of several hundred thousand dollars in the form Propemj’), income “Driscoll Property”), form of from Tanguy’s distributions from owned entities, and an airplane located in Tanguy’s wholly owned (RR April 25, 2014, at pp. Georgia. (RR pp. 5:1-6:17; pp. 8:1-25). 821-25). On April 25, 2014, the District Court signed and entered the Order Granting On which Turnover and Appointing Receiver and Master (the “Receiver Order”), which appointed Eva (CR at pp. 136-143). Eva S. Engelhart as the Receiver. (CR 136-143). and Authorizes the Receiver to The District Court Orders Appellees to Turnover, and The Sell, the Driscoll Property On May On May 23, 2014, the Receiver filed Emergency Motion filed an Emergency Compel Motion to Compel To Retain Real Estate Broker and to Sell Non-Exempt Real Property, To Turnover of Non-Exempt Non-Exempt Real Property (the “Motion Non-Exempt Compe ”). (CR “Motion to Compel”). (CR at pp. 147-150). pp. 147-150). 4 4476732v1 4476732v1 On May On May 30, 2014, the District Court held a hearing on the Motion Motion to (R May Compel. (RR May 30, 2014). The The Receiver appeared at the hearing pro pro Se se and counsel. (RR Appellees appeared through counsel. May 30, 2014, at p. (RR May The Trustee did p. 2). The Motion to Compel. Id. not appear at the hearing on the Motion Id. On May On May 30, 2014, the District Court entered its Order to Compel Compel Turnover Non-Exempt Real Property, to Retain Real Estate Broker and to Sell Non- of Non-Exempt Non- Exempt Real Estate (the “Turnover Exempt (CR at pp. 182-83). “Turnover Order”). (CR 182-83). The District Court Approves The Approves the Sale of of the Driscoll Property On July 9, 2014, the Receiver filed On Motion to Sell Real Property at 1714 filed her Motion 1714 App’x A. Driscoll St. See App’x On October 10, On Amended Order to 10, 2014, the District Court entered its Third Amended 1714 Driscoll St. (the “Sale Order”). See App’x Sell Property at 1714 App’x B. On October 30, 2014, Appellees timely filed On filed a notice of appeal of the Sale Order. See App’x The notice of appeal of the Sale Order was App’x C. The was docketed in this App’x D. on October 31, 2014. See App’x appeal on of additional items to be file a notice of designation of Appellants did not file December 29, included in the record for this appeal related to the Sale Order until December App’x E. 2014. See App’x E.11 1 ' Appellants’ designation of the record in connection with the Sale Order has not been completed by Appellants’ by the clerk’s office. Appellees have included the relevant documents Appendix to this brief. documents in the Appendix documents in the brief. All of the documents Appendix will be part of the supplemental Appendix supplemental record. record. 5 4476732v1 4476732v1 SUMMARY OF SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ARGUMENT The Trustee obtained the Judgment The Judgment four years ago and domesticated it in the Tanguy admitting that he has hundreds of District Court over a year ago. Despite Tanguy non-exempt assets and the Driscoll Property being under thousands of dollars in non-exempt five months, the Trustee has not recovered a single dollar from contract to sell for five the Appellants as a result of this frivolous appeal. Each of Appellants’ Each Appellants’ seven points on appeal lack any merit in the law or the undisputed facts in this case. case. Appellants’ made in slightly Appellants’ primary argument, made modified forms in points of appeal 2, 4, and 5, is that they should not be compelled non-exempt property to the Receiver and, instead, they have the to turn over all non-exempt how their non-exempt right to dictate how non-exempt assets are monetized. Appellants attempt to from laws designed to assist transmogrify the receiver and turnover statutes from judgment non-exempt assets from judgment creditors in collecting non-exempt from recalcitrant judgment judgment benefit and protection of debtors, like the Appellees, into statutes designed for the benefit judgment Appellants’ arguments ultimately fail because they require the debtors. Appellants’ judgment debtors. Court to ignore the plain language of the statutes and read additional elements into the statutes that do not exist. unavailing. Point of appeal Appellants’ remaining arguments are equally unavailing. No. 11 is foreclosed by Supreme Court decision; point of appeal no. 3 was by a recent Supreme was reversed by of appeal no. 6 is contrary to long- by statute nearly a decade ago; point of 6 4476732v1 4476732v1 standing Texas case law; and the Court does not have jurisdiction to consider point of appeal no. 7. ARGUMENT APPELLEES’ ARGUMENT APPELLEES’ 1. There No Legal Support There is No Support for Appellants’ Collateral Attack on the Attack on Judgment. Validity of the Judgment. Appellants’ on appeal first issue on Appellants’ first on the validity of the is a collateral attack on Judgment based on the Bankruptcy Court’s alleged lack of subject matter Judgment jurisdiction. Appellants misstate the procedural posture jurisdiction. of the rulings on this issue of below and, based on that incorrect description, below description, argue that there has been a change Judgment. See In re BP in applicable Fifth Circuit law that invalidates the Judgment. BP RE, RE, L.P., 735 F.3d th (5th 279 (5 Cir. 2013). Not only is the Fifth Circuit’s BP 2013). Not BP RE RE decision Supreme Court recently issued an inapplicable to this case, the United States Supreme opinion that validates bankruptcy court judgments, judgments, such as the one in this case, that were affirmed after de novo review by by federal district courts sitting as intermediate Exec. Benefits courts of appeal. See Exec. Ins. Agency v. Arkison (In re Bellingham Ins. Benefits Ins. 12. Ins. Agency, Agency, Inc.), 134 S. Ct. 2165 (2014). Inc.), 134 what is set forth in Appellants’ Contrary to what Appellants’ brief, they have never previously Judgment on the basis of lack of challenged the Judgment of subject matter jurisdiction or The Supreme Court. The constitutional authority of the Bankruptcy Court. Supreme Court issued its watershed decision regarding bankruptcy court jurisdiction and constitutional jurisdiction and v. Marshall, authority in Stern v. 564 U.S. 2 (2011), during the pendency of the Marshall, 564 7 4476732v1 4476732v1 Appellants’ Judgment to the federal district court. Appellants’ appeal of the Judgment court. The federal The brief the issue and ultimately ruled that Stern did district court asked the parties to brief not apply. (CR at pp. 69-93). Appellants then filed apply. (CR filed an appeal to the Fifth Circuit. The appeal raised the issue of whether, in light of Stern, The Stem, the Bankruptcy Court had Appellants’ counterclaims subject matter jurisdiction and authority to rule on Appellants’ against the estate. Couit estate. However, the appeal did not argue that the Bankruptcy Court lacked jurisdiction Judgment against the Appellants. jurisdiction and authority to enter the Judgment (CR Appellants. (CR at pp. 59-68). In their brief, brief, Appellants falsely allege that the Fifth Circuit concluded that waived or consented to the Bankruptcy Court’s subject matter Appellants waived jurisdiction The Fifth Circuit and authority as to the Trustee’s claim against them. The made such a finding could not have made finding because the only issue presented in that appeal was whether the Bankruptcy Court had was had subject matter jurisdiction jurisdiction and authority to on Appellants’ rule on Appellants’ counterclaims against the bankruptcy estate. estate.2 2 The goal of Appellants’ mischaracterization of the record below The make it below is to make appear as if this case is subject to the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in BP BP RE RE that a party cannot waive the constitutional requirements of authority under Article III. In reality, no court has ever ruled that Appellants waived or consented to subject 2 On the issue of whether the Bankruptcy Court had subject matter jurisdiction On Appellants’ counterclaims jurisdiction to rule on Appellants’ Fifih Circuit held, as did the federal district court, that Stern against the estate, the Fifth Stern did not apply. (CR at pp. 59-68). apply. (CR 8 4476732v1 4476732v1 BP RE matter jurisdiction or constitutional authority. Therefore, BP on RE has no bearing on this case. The Appellants are correct that there has been a significant The significant change in case law in the time since entry of the Judgment; they have just just cited this Court the wrong case. Rather than BP wrong BP RE, the newly issued opinion applicable to this case is Supreme Court’s ruling in Bellingham. the Supreme Bellingham. Supreme Court In that case, the Supreme declined to address the waiver and consent issue decided in BP BP RE. Bellingham, Supreme Court ruled that bankruptcy court 134 S. Ct. at 2174-75. Instead, the Supreme 134 affirmed by judgments in non-core matters must be affirmed by an Article III federal district judge after de novo review. Id. ale novo Id. Supreme Court held that there is no Critically, the Supreme no constitutional difference between a district court’s de novo between recommendation from nava review of a report and recommendation from a “final” bankruptcy court nova review of a “final” bankruptcy court and a district court’s de novo judgment on appeal: judgment on appeal: At At bottom, [Appellant] argues that it was entitled to have an Article it was III court review de novonova and enter judgment judgment on the fraudulent conveyance claims asserted by by the trustee. In effect, [Appellant] The received exactly that. The District nova review of Court conducted de novo summary judgment the summary judgment claims, concluding in a written opinion that there were no was no disputed issues of material fact and that the trustee was entitled to judgment judgment as a matter of law. In accordance with its statutory authority over matters related to the bankruptcy, see §§ l334(b), the District Court then separately entered judgment 1334(b), judgment in favor same review from of the trustee. [Appellant] thus received the same of from the District Court that it would have received if the Bankruptcy Court had it would treated the fraudulent conveyance claims as non-core proceedings 9 4476732v1 4476732v1 under §§ 157(c)(1). 157(c)(1). In short, even if [Appellant] is correct that the Court‘s entry of judgment Bankruptcy Court's was invalid, the District judgment was own valid Court's de novo review and entry of its own final judgment Valid final judgment cured any error. error. Bellingham, 134 S. Ct. at 2175. Bellingham, 134 Bellingham is directly applicable to this case. Even if Appellants were Even were and the Bankruptcy Court did not have constitutional authority to enter the correct and affirmation of the Judgment, the federal district court’s de novo review and affirmation Judgment cured any Article III deficiency. Judgment deficiency. Therefore, there is no legal support for Appellants’ collateral attack on the validity Appellants’ Judgment and this argument is Validity of the Judgment more than a red herring. nothing more 2. A Court A May Require Court May Judgment Debtor Require a Judgment Turn Over Debtor to Turn Non- Over All Non- Exempt Property to a Receiver. Exempt The Receiver was The & Remedies was appointed pursuant to Texas Civil Practices & Remedies Code Ann. §§ 31.002(b)(3) Code 3l.002(b)(3) (West 2008). In order for a court to grant relief under § § 3l.002(b), it 31.002(b), it must find that the requirements of §§ 31.002(a) must first find 3l.002(a) have been satisfied. v. McCarthy, satisfied. Tanner v. 274 S.W.3d McCarthy, 274 App.—Houston [1 S.W.3d 311, 322 (Tex. App.—Houston st [151 (“The relief allowed by Dist] 2008, no pet.) (“The Dist.] by section 31.002(b), may be 3l.002(b), therefore, may when the conditions in section 31.002(a) granted only when 3l.002(a) exist.”). exist”). Section 31.002(a) find that the judgment requires the court to find owns some judgment debtor owns non-exempt property some non-exempt “cannot readily be attached or levied on by that “cannot TEX. by ordinary legal process.” T CIV. EX. C IV. 10 10 4476732v1 4476732v1 PRAC. P & RREM. RAC. & CODE EM. C ANN. ODE ANN. § § 31.002(a). Once that threshold showing has been 3l.002(a). Once made under §§ 31.002(a), the court is free to grant relief under §§ 31.002(b). made 31.002(b). Under Under Section 31.002(b)(1), may require the judgment 3l.002(b)(l), a court may judgment debtor to “nonexempt property that is in the debtor’s possession or is subject to the turnover “nonexempt debtor's control.” Id. 3l.002(b)(l). Notably absent from the plain language of Id. at §§ 31.002(b)(1). non-exempt property cannot be 3l.002(b)(l) is any requirement that the non-exempt Section 31.002(b)(1) readily attached or levied on by The only requirement is by ordinary legal process. The non-exempt and in the debtor’s possession or subject to the that the property be non-exempt control. Similarly, Section 31.002(b)(3) debtor’s control. “appoint a 3l.002(b)(3) allows a court to “appoint nonexempt property, receiver with the authority to take possession of the nonexempt property, sell it, it, pay the proceeds to the judgment and pay judgment creditor to the extent required to satisfy the judgment.” judgment.” Id. 31.002(b)(3). Id. at §§ 31.002(b)(3). from Section Again, conspicuously absent from non-exempt property cannot be readily 3l.002(b)(3) is any requirement that the non-exempt 31.002(b)(3) on by attached or levied on by ordinary legal process. Appellants’ argument asks this process. Appellants’ Court to ignore the plain language of these statutes and engraft the ordinary legal 3l.002(a) onto Sections 31.002(b)(1) process language found in Section 31.002(a) 3l.002(b)(l) and (3). The plain language of Sections 31.002(a) The 3l.002(a) and (b) establish that a court must find that there is some find non-exempt property that cannot be readily attached or some non-exempt by ordinary legal process and, once that showing has been made, it levied on by may it may 11 11 4476732v1 4476732v1 order the judgment non-exempt property to a receiver. judgment debtor to turn over all non-exempt 3 receiver.3 This by Section 31.002(h) conclusion is bolstered by which does not require a court to 3l.002(h) which turnover. See T specifically identify the property that is subject to turnover. TEX. CIV. EX. C PRAC. IV. P & RAC. & REM. R CODE EM. C ANN. ODE ANN. § Appellants’ interpretation of Section 31.002(a) 3l.002(h). Appellants’ § 31.002(h). 3l.002(a) and make the statute internally inconsistent. would contradict (h) and make (b) would inconsistent. Not Not only do 3 l.002(h) in their argument here, their next point of the Appellants ignore Section 31.002(h) 4 statute.4 appeal argues for a ruling that is exactly the opposite of the statute. 3. The Plain Language The Language of the Statute Does Does Not Not Require Turnover Require the Turnover Order to Specifically Order Specifically Identify Property. The Receiver Order provides the Receiver with “the The power and authority to “the power take possession of all non-exempt (CR at pp. 136-37). non-exempt property” of the Appellants. (CR 136-37). was required to specifically Appellants complain that the Receiver Order was specifically identify property that is subject to turn over. This argument is directly contrary to the plain language of the statute. As discussed above, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies As Code Section Remedies Code “appoint a receiver with the authority to take 3l.002(b)(2) permits a court to “appoint 31.002(b)(2) 3 The Appellants argument that there was The was no no or insufficient evidence of non-exempt property that cannot be of any non-exempt on by readily attached or levied on by ordinary legal process is addressed in point of appeal nos. nos. 4 and 5. 4 made transparent at the end of their argument on Appellants‘ true motivation in this case is made Appellants’ on point of appeal no. 2. Appellants’ ultimate goal is to have the Driscoll Property sold at a constable’s Appellants’ constable’s sale rather than for a fair market value. value. The District Court recognized that such a sale would The would result in no no recovery to the Trustee. Trustee. (RR May 30, (RR May 2014, at p. 12:10-13:4) (“My general response [to the Appellants’ complaint at having to pay 12:10-13:4) (“My pay broker and trustee’s fees] fees] is, my experience is, my experience with that is, is, at a constable’s sale it’s amount of its only going to go for the amount ofthe the liens. liens. . . Because . . why would why would anybody do anything else? . . . Generally speaking, . . . speaking, you much don’t generate very much you know, constable sales don’t my experience.”). in excess of the lien, it’s been my Why would experience"). Why would the Trustee, or any anyjudgment judgment creditor for that matter, would minimize, rather than maximize, select a path that would on the Judgment? maximize, its recovery on Judgment’? In particular, particular, the Trustee is Chapter 7 trustee in bankruptcy with a fiduciary a chapter maximize the distribution to creditors of the estate. fiduciary duty to maximize estate. 12 12 4476732v1 4476732v1 nonexempt property, sell it, possession of the nonexempt pay the proceeds to the judgment it, and pay judgment creditor to the extent required to satisfy the judgment.” TEX. judgment.” T CIV. EX. C PRAC. IV. P & RREM. RAC. & EM. CODE C ODE § § 31.002(b)(2). may enter or 3l.002(b)(2). Further, Section 31.002(h) states that a “court may enforce an order under this section that requires the turnover of nonexempt nonexempt property without identifying in the order the specific propertv subject specific property subiect to turnover.” Subsection (h) of Section 31.002 became May 17, became effective on May 2005. See 17, 2005. TEx. T CIV. EX. C PRAC. IV. P & RREM. RAC. & CODE EM. C ANN. ODE ANN. § May 17, § 31.002(h) (West 2008) (effective May 17, 2005). Appellants cite only one case in support of their argument that a turnover must specifically order must property. See Mayer specifically identify property. v. Mayer, Moyer v. Moyer, 183 3d 48 183 S.W. 3d (Tex. App.—Austin pet.). Mayer no pet.). App.—Austin 2005, no was decided on Moyer was August 17, on August 17, 2005, just months after the effective date of Section 31.002(h), but failed to address the three months new Subsection (h). However, itit is clear that Mayer new Moyer has been been superseded by by statute. On several occasions since the enactment of Section 31.002(h), On 3l.002(h), courts of meaning and held that a turnover order does not affirmed its plain meaning appeals have affirmed specifically identify property. need to specifically property. See, e.g., Black v. See, e.g., v. Shor, SW. 3d 170, Shar, 443 S.W. 170, App.—Corpus Christi 2013, no pet.); Tanner v. 175 (Tex. App.—Corpus 175 274 S.W. 3d v. McCarthy, 274 311, 320-21 App.—Houston [1 320-21 (Tex. App.—Houston st [lst Dist.] 2008, no pet.). pet.). Therefore, the 13 13 4476732v1 4476732v1 Receiver Order is consistent with Section 31.002(h) 3 l .002(h) in that it it requires Appellants to non-exempt property to the Receiver. turn over all non-exempt 4. The Receiver Order, the Turnover The Order and Turnover Order and the Sale Order Were Order Were Supported by Supported by Sufficient Evidence of Non-Exempt Sufficient Evidence Which is Non-Exempt Property Which Not Subject to Sale by Not Ordinary Legal Process. by Ordinary Process. 5. The Receiver Order, the Turnover The Order and Turnover Order and the Sale Order Were Order Were Supported by Supported by Sufficient Sufficient Evidence Evidence of Non-Exempt Non-Exempt Property Which Which is Not Subject to Sale by Not Ordinary Legal Process. by Ordinary Process. fifth points of appeal, Appellants argue that there is no In their fourth and fifth evidence or, in the alternative, owned any non- alternative, insufficient evidence that they owned exempt property that cannot be readily attached or levied on by exempt by ordinary legal low threshold for a process. This Court has previously established an extremely low process. judgment showing under Section 31.002(a): judgment creditor’s showing 3 1 .002(a): Section 31.002 does not specify, or restrict, the mannermanner in which which may be received in order for a trial court to determine evidence may whether 3l.002(a) exist, nor does it require whether the conditions of section 31.002(a) that such evidence be in any particular form, that it it be at any particular level of specificity, or that it quantum it reach any particular quantum may grant aid under section 31.002. before the court may 31.002. However, a trial must nonetheless determine that the request for aid pending court must before the court falls within the scope of section 31.002 before it it enters an order granting relief under that section. making this section. In making determination, determination, the trial court must must have some some evidence before it it that establishes that the necessary conditions for the application of 31.002 exist. exist. S.W.3d at 322. Thus, all three District Court orders must Tanner, 274 S.W.3d must be affirmed non-exempt property that cannot readily be if there is any of evidence of any non-exempt on by attached or levied on by ordinary legal process. process. 14 14 4476732v1 4476732v1 At the hearing on the Application to Appoint Receiver, At Receiver, counsel for the Trustee introduced two exhibits—Tanguy’s sworn affidavit two exhibits—Tanguy’s of net worth and his affidavit of (RR April 25, 2014, at pp. 2009 through 2012. (RR federal tax returns for the years 2009 CR at pp. 162-164). 3:24-4:3; CR 3:24-4:3; 162-164). Appellants introduced no evidence at the hearing. hearing. non-exempt assets listed on of three non-exempt Counsel for the Trustee argued that any of Tanguy’s affidavit of net worth supported the appointment of Tanguy’s of a receiver: receiver: (1) rental income from the Driscoll Property, (2) income of several hundred thousand dollars income owned entities, and (3) an Tanguy’s wholly owned in the form of distributions from Tanguy’s (RR April 25, 2014, at pp. 5:1-6:17; airplane located in Georgia. (RR 521-6217; pp. pp. 8:1-25). 821-25). on filed an eleventh hour pleading the night before the hearing on Appellants filed the Application to Appoint Receiver which was no which alleged that there was no equity in the (RR April 25, 2014, at p.3:6-13 Driscoll Property. (RR p.3:6-13 and p. 5:6-12). That turned out p. 5:6-12). to be false and there is substantial equity in the Driscoll Property that will be realized upon income from upon the Receiver’s sale. However, the rental income from the Driscoll non-exempt property that cannot readily be by the Appellants is non-exempt Property disclosed by by ordinary legal process. See, attached or levied on by See, e.g., e. g., Suttles v. Vestin Realty v. Vestin Mortg. SW3d Mortg. I,I, Inc., 317 S.W.3d 412 App.—Houston [1 412 (Tex. App.—Houston st [151 Dist.] Dist.] 2010, no pet.). pet.). Tanguy’s income derived from Tanguy’s from his various wholly-owned non- wholly-owned entities is non- exempt property that cannot readily be attached or levied on by exempt by ordinary legal process. See Hennigan process. SW 2d v. Hennigan, 666 SW Hennigan v. 2d 322 App.—Houston [14 322 (Tex. App.—Houston th [14”‘ 15 15 4476732v1 4476732v1 1984, writ Distr.] 1984, TEXAS dism’d); T Writ dism’d); C1v. EXAS C PRAC. IV. P AND R RAC. AND REM. CODE EM. CODE § § 31.0025. (RR 31.0025. (RR 2014 at p. 5:21-23 April 24, 2014 5:2l-23 and p. 9:15-18). no doubt that the airplane located in Georgia is non- Finally, there can be no exempt property that cannot readily be attached or levied on by exempt by ordinary legal process because it Texas. See Pillitteri it is not located in Texas. Pillilteri v. S.W.3d 715, 165 S.W.3d v. Brown, 165 App.—Dallas 2005, no. pet.) (“The 722 (Tex. App.—Dallas (“The ordinary legal process by which by which A writ must be addressed to a sheriff upon is a writ. A property is attached or levied upon or constable in the State of Texas, and directs the official to attach and hold the defendant’s property as shall be found within his county.”). The District Court was The was presented with evidence regarding these three assets them satisfies and any one of them satisfies the requirements of Section 31.002(a). 3 1 .002(a). 6. Do Not Appellants Do Have the Right to a:1 Jury Trial on Not Have Appointment on the Appointment of a Receiver, the Turnover Order or the Sale Order. Turnover Order Order. It is a well-established principal that a judgment judgment debtor does not have the right to a jury receiver. See, e.g., jury trial on the appointment of a receiver. e. g., Cross v. Crass, 738 v. Cross, S.W.2d App.—Corpus Christi 1987, S.W.2d 86, 89 (Tex. App.—Corpus dism’d w.o.j.) (“The 1987, writ dism’d (“The main suit and lies within appointment of a receiver is an ancillary proceeding to the main Accordingly, appellants are not entitled to a the sound discretion of the trial court. Accordingly, jury jury trial on the trial court’s discretionary authority to appoint a receiver.”) v. Dorfl (internal citations omitted); Gunther v. 296 S.W.2d Dorff, 296 S.W.2d 638, 639 (Tex. Civ. Civ. App.—Waco 1956, App.—Waco (“The appointment of a receiver is a matter 1956, writ dism’d) (“The 16 16 4476732v1 4476732v1 of the judge of the court to Whom resting largely and primarily in the discretion of whom the application is addressed. Defendant is not entitled to a jury jury trial [in] such instance.”). instance.”). it has been held that the right to trial by “Traditionally, it by jury jury does not extend v. Mosson, to receivership proceedings.” Henry v. Masson, 333 S.W.3d App.— S.W.3d 825, 848 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Houston [lst Dist.] pet); see also Moody Dist.] 2010, no pet.); Moody v. S.W.2d 158, v. State, 538 S.W.2d 158, 161 (Tex. Civ. 161 App.—Waco 1976, Civ. App.—Waco refd n.r.e). 1976, writ ref’d n.r.e). “[A] court of competent jurisdiction may appoint a receiver,” and as a result, a hearing on receivership may receivership proceedings is “inherently incapable of being determined by jury.” Boger by a jury.” Boger v. v. Moore, Inc., 196 S.W.2d 646, 649 196 S.W.2d App.—Beaumont 1946, 649 (Tex. Civ. App.—Beaumont no writ). 1946, no writ). The reasoning behind this rule is that because “receivership property is in custody The management and control is that of the court; jury intervention would of the law, its management would management of the receivership from impermissibly transfer control and management from the court to the jury.” Bergeron v. Sessions, 561 Bergeron v. S.W.2d 551, 554 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas 561 S.W.2d App.—Dallas 1977, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (citing Ferguson 1977, v. Ferguson, 210 Ferguson v. S.W.2d 268, 269 210 S.W.2d 269 (Tex. App.—Austin 1948, Civ. App.—Austin Civ. 1948, writ ref‘ d n.r.e.)). Thus, after the appointment of the Writ ref’d Receiver, Appellants did not have the right to a jury trial in connection with the 5 Order.5 Receiver’s motions leading to the Turnover Order and Sale Order. 5 of their argument that they were entitled to a jury Appellants cite only one case in support of jury trial, Steenland v. v. Texas Commerce Bank Commerce Bank Nat. Not. Ass Ass’n, S.W.2d 387, 391 ‘n, 648 S.W.2d 391 (Tex. App.—Tyler 1983, (Tex. App.—Tyler rerd n.r.e.). 1983, writ ref’d The issue in Steenland n.r.e.). The was whether the appellant had the right to a jury was jury trial on non-exempt portion of his homestead, on the valuation of the non-exempt homestead. In the present case, Appellants admitted in the TanguyTanguy Affidavit that the Driscoll Tanguy’s Driscoll Property is not Tanguy’s 17 17 4476732v1 4476732v1 PTRE had the right to a jury trial on Finally, Appellants argue that PTRE on its plea in intervention. The intervention. PTRE’s plea in intervention. The District Court has not ruled on PTRE’s intervention. PTRE is not yet a party to the proceeding below Therefore, PTRE below and cannot be an appellant in this case. Accordingly, this argument should be disregarded because PTRE has no standing to make PTRE make such argument in this appeal. 7. The Court The Court Lacks Review the Receiver’s Appointment Lacks Jurisdiction to Review Appointment as Master in Chancery. Master final argument is that the District Court abused its discretion by Appellants’ final by granting master in chancery powers to the Receiver. This Court does not have jurisdiction to consider this argument. which is generally considered “[U]nlike a post-judgment turnover order, which appealable—a post-judgment order appointing a master in chancery is not final and appealable—a final final and appealable.” Sheikh v. final v. Sheikh, 248 S.W.3d App.— S.W.3d 381, 393 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Houston Dist.] 2007, no pet.). There is no appellate jurisdiction over an order [lst Dist.] when that order is embedded appointing a master in chancery even when embedded within a turnover-and-receivership order. turnover-and-receivership Id. (citing Mayer order. Id. Moyer v. Mayer, Moyer, 183 S.W.3d 48, 51 183 S.W.3d 12. 51 App.—Austin 2005, no pet.)). (Tex. App.—Austin “The Mayer “The Moyer court reasoned that a post- judgment final and appealable because Rule of judgment master-in-chancery order is not final Civil Procedure 171, which authorizes the order’s entry, requires further action by 171, which by homestead non-exempt rental property. homestead and is non-exempt property. Therefore, Steenland is not applicable because there is no dispute non-exempt. over whether the Driscoll Property is non-exempt. 18 18 4476732v1 4476732v1 the court; a master-in-chancery order is, final in the sense that it is, therefore, not final it can tumover-and- Id. Instead, the master in chancery portion of a turnover-and- be appealed.” Id. mandamus. Id. receiver order is only subject to review through mandamus. Id. at 394; see also Bahar v. Lyon Fin. Bahar v. Fin. Servs., 330 S.W.3d App.—Austin 2010, pet. S.W.3d 379, 388 (Tex. App.—Austin denied) (citing Mayer S.W.3d at 324 (same). Moyer and Sheikh); Tanner, 274 S.W.3d Appellants cite only one unpublished decision in support of their argument that the District Court could not grant master in chancery powers to the Receiver. Congletan v. See Congleton 09-1 l-00453-CV, 2012 Shoemaker, No. 09-11-00453-CV, v. Shoemaker, WL 1249406 2012 WL 1249406 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Apr. 12, App.—Beaumont 12, 2012, pet. denied) (mem. op.). op.). However, the first had vacated the master in footnote in that decision indicates that the trial court had chancery portion of the receivership order prior to the appeal and, therefore, the appellate court did not discuss any master in chancery issues. Id. Id. at n.1. n.l. Accordingly, this Court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the master in made by chancery arguments made Appellants.6 by Appellants. 6 PRAYER PRAYER affirm the District Court’s Receiver Order, In conclusion, this Court should affirm Turnover Order, and Sale Order and grant such other relief as is just. just. 65 Under the heading of its seventh point on appeal, Appellants Under two final, Appellants slip in two arguments regarding the final, frivolous arguments “bias" and her fees. First, any appeal of the Receiver’s fees is premature. Receiver’s alleged “bias” premature. She has not been awarded non-exempt property due to this awarded any fees because she has not been permitted to sell any non-exempt appeal. Second, as this appeal. was the movant stated above, the Receiver is an appellee in this case because she was movant in two two of three orders from which from which the Appellants appealed. 19 19 4476732v1 4476732v1 Date: January 2, 2015. Respectfully submitted, PORTER P HEDGES ORTER H LLP EDGES LLP By: /s/ Aaron /S/ Power Aaron J. Power Joshua W.W. Wolfshohl State Bar No. 24038592 No. 24038592 jwo1fShoh1@porterhedgeS.com jwolfshohl@porterhedges.com Aaron J. Aaron Power J. Power Bar No. State Bar 24058058 No. 24058058 apower@porterhedges.com 1000 Main 1000 36”th Floor Main Street, 36 77002 Houston, Texas 77002 226-6000 (713) 226-6000 228-1331 (fax) (713) 228-1331 ATTORNEYS FoR ATTORNEYS F OR APPELLEE APPELLEE WILLIAM WILLIAM G. WEST, CHAPTER WEST, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE T RUSTEE and and By: Eva S. Engelhart /s/ Eva /S/ Eva S. Engelhart Eva Bar No. State Bar 00796513 No. 00796513 May, Cron Ross, Banks, May, & Cavin, P.C. Cron & 2 Riverway, Suite 700 77056-1919 Houston, Texas 77056-1919 626-1200 (713) 626-1200 623-6014 (fax) (713) 623-6014 Court Appointed Court Appointed Receiver 20 4476732v1 4476732v1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to Rules 6.363 and 9.5(b), (d), of the Texas Rules of Appellate (d), and (e) of 2nd day of January 2015, a true and correct on this 2nd Procedure, this is to certify that on was served on the following counsel of record by copy of the foregoing was by U.S. U.S. first by electronic delivery as follows: class mail and by Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. 5222 Spruce Street 77401 Bellaire, Texas 77401 jizen@comcast.net Tcmguy, 13500 Attorney for Appellant Philippe Tanguy, Attorneyfar 13500 Air express, L.L.C., express, 13500 Air Express, L.L.C., 13500 Express, L.P. and L.P. and Intervenor, PTRE Intervenor, PTRE Holdings, Holdings, L.P. L.P. Power Aaron J. Power /s/ Aaron Power Aaron J. Power Aaron 21 4476732v1 4476732v1 CERTIFICATE OF CERTIFICATE COMPLIANCE OF COMPLIANCE type-Volume limitation of Texas Rule of This brief complies with the type-volume Appellate Procedure 9.4(i)(2)(C) 9.4(i)(2)(C) because this brief contains 4,722 words, exempted by excluding the parts of the brief exempted of Appellate Procedure by Texas Rule of 9.4(i)(1). 9.4(i)(1). This brief complies with the typeface requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(e) and the type style requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(e) because this brief brief has been prepared in a proportionally Word in 14-point spaced typeface using Microsoft Word Times New 14-point Times Roman font or New Roman larger. /s/ Aaron Power Aaron J. Power Aaron J. Power Aaron J. Power 22 4476732v1 4476732v1 APPENDIX TAB APPENDIX A TAB A Motion to Sell Real Property at 1714 Motion 1714 Driscoll Street 8333-001/ESE NO. 2013-67779 WILLIAM G WEST, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF AS CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE OF RICHARD DAVIS, Plaintiff VS. (0)¢0'3¢01¢03¢0Jf0!(-0)(0‘!er1y inspected selected by Buyer and licensed by TREC or otherwise permltte by law to makeby inspectors Seller at Sellers expense shall inspections. keep the utilities on during the time immediately cause existing militias to be turned on and this contract is in effect. shall B. SELLERS DISCLOSURE NOTlCE PURSUANT TO 55.008, (Check one box only) TEXAS PROPERTY CODE (Notice): (‘lg Buyer has received the Notice. (2 Buyer has not received the Notice. Within days after the effective date of this contract, Seller shall deliver the Notice to Buyer. li Buyer does not receive the Buyer may terminate this contract at Notice. any time prior to the closing and the earnest money D SELLERS whichever The (3) occurs, and the earnest money Seller not required DISCLOSURE first is be refunded Buyer. to furnish the notice under will Texas Progeny Code. the to C. OF LEAD-BASED PAlNT AND LEAD- ASEO PAINT HAZARDS required by Federal law for a residential dwelling constructed prior to 1978. is D. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPERTY CONDlTlON: ‘As Is‘ means the present with any and condition of the Property detects and without warranty except for the all warranties in this contract. Buyer‘: agreernem warranties oi title and the to accept the Property As is under 7D(1) or (2) does not preclude Buyer from inspecting Paragraph the Property under Paragraph 7A. lrom negotiating repairs or treatments in a subsequent amendment, or from temtinating this contract during the Option Period. it any. (Check one box only) E (1) Buyer accepts the Property As Is. D (2) Buyer accepts the Properly As is provided Seller. the lollowing specific repairs and treatments: at Seller's expense, shall complete the (Do not insert general phrases. such as ‘subject to inspections‘ that do not identify specific repairs and treatments.) E. LENDER FtEQUlRED REPAIRS AND TREATMENTS: Unless otherwise agreed in writing, neither party is obligated to pay lor lender required repairs, which includes treatment for destroying insects. ll the panies do not agree to ‘wood treatments, this contract wil terminate and the earnest pay tor the lender required repairs or the cost oi lender required repairs and treatments money will be refunded to Buyer. it exceeds 5% of the Sales Price, Buyer may terminate this contract and the earnest money will be F. COMPLETION OF FlEPAlRS_ shall complete all agreed repairs and trea' ents refunded to Buyer. AND TREATMENTS: U les otherwise agre d In writing: /’ prio to the Closing Do a; and (lit a ._ _ _ tr) Seller / ., ~ . permits’ must bejobtained, required it repairs a j, , treatments be _ who are V _lJ/ licensed to provide such I pairs or he_ ments or. ii no thus! performed by perso license is required y law, are comrgyercially ehgaged in the trade of electibn. any /tiansferable Marranties r‘ vicling och repairs (or’ treatmentsf \.At Buyer's ved by l ler with re ect to treat‘ nts will’ Ele transler,'ed the repairs and ’ \‘to Buyer at Buyers ex nse. S ler fails to complete any ll‘ agrde repai and treatments (prior to the Closing te’ Buyer rn 1? , ;_ /~C,‘(0L'~\ Paragraph or extend ye Closing D te u to 5 ays exercise’ remedies under " necess tor Seller to complete the i ( . repcirs and treatments. ~ 03.‘ EN IRONMENTAL MATTERS: ‘ ‘ 41,1, Buyer is advised that the presence of wetlands, toxic 41 _ -I including asbestos and wastes or substances. environmental hazards. or the presence at a / l threatened or endangered species 1 habllat may aflect Buyer‘s intended use / /TREC ol the , /R T 1601 initialed for identification by Buyer two, and Seller «Z34 L NO. _20-12 M Produced wan zlpFomIO by zipLogix 18070 Rnnn Mile Road. '7“ .«J‘‘\ D5 Fmer. uldvignn 46026 S1 \ Docusign Envelope ID: EBCAEGEE-SBAE-4B27~883A-838C757B1037 Contract Concerning 1714 Driscoll St. Houston. TX 77019 (Address ol Property) Page 5 ol 9 4-28-2014 Property. If Buyer is concerned about these matters, an addendum promulgated by TREC required by the parties should be used. or . FiESlDENTlAL _ not exceeding $ It the cost of the residential residemial service contract for the Buyer should review any Purchase ot a residential service scope of coverage, exclusions a rid limitations. The . purchased from various companies contract is optional. Similar authorized to do business in Texas. coverage may be 8. BROKERS’ FEES: All obligations of the separate written agreements. parties for payment of brokers‘ lees are contained in 9. CLOSING: A. Theclosing ofthe salewillbe on orbetore Jul 31 days after objections made under P is later (Closing raph 6D have been a Date). If either party fails to close the sale defaulting party may exercise the remedies contained in Paragraph 8 . cosing: 15. (1)Seller shall execute and deliver to Buyer and showing no a additional exceptions to turnish lax statements or certificates showing no delinque (2) Buyer shall pay the Sales Price in good lunds acceptable (3) Sellerand Buyer shall execute and deliver atfidavits, releases. loan documents any notices, statements, certificates, closing of the sale and the issuance and other documents reasonably of the Title Policy. required for the (4) There will be no liens, assessments, or security interests against the not be satisfied out ol the sales Property which will assumed by Buyer and assumed loans proceeds unless securing the payment will not be in default. ot any loans (5) it the Property is subject to a residential defined under §92.102. Property lease. Seller shall transfer security Code), it any. to Buyer. In such an event. deposits (as deliver to the tenant a signed Buyer shall statement acknowledging that the security deposit and is responsible for Buyer has received the the return of the security deposit. the exact dollar amount of the security deposit. and specitying 10. POSSESSION: A. Buyer's Possession: Seiler shall deliver to Buyer possession oi the required condition, Prope in its present or ordinary wear and tear excepted: according to a temporary residential E] upon casing and funding lease fonn promulgated by TFIEC or lease required by the parties Any other written ClD’~3ll1g which is not possession by Buyer pn'or to closing or euthonzed by a written lease will establish by Seller alter relationship between the parties a tenancy Consult your insurance agent prior to at suiterance ownership and possession because clian e at terminated. The absence of a written insurance coverage may be limited or lease or appropriate insurance expose the parties to economic loss. coverage may 8. Leases: (1)Atter the Effective Date. Seller me not execute any lease (including but not mineral leases) or convey any interest in limited to the Property without Buyer's written (2) It the Property is subject to any lease consent. to which Seller is a Seller Buyer copies ol the lease(s) and any move—ln party. shall deliver to condition torm signed by the tenant within 7 days alter the Eflective Date of the contract. 11. SPECIAL PROVISIONS: (Insert only factual statements and business the sale. TREC rules prohibit licensees details applicable to from adding which a contract addendum. lease or other form has been use.) This contract is sub‘ court-., Harris county Texas. 12. SETTLEMEN_T AND OTHER EXPENSES: A. The tollowing expenses must be gold at or prior to closing: . V (1) Expenses payable by Seller ( eller‘s Expenses): (a) Releases ol existing liens. ‘including prepayment penalties and recording lees; /; ¢/releese of Seller's loan liability; tax statements or certificates; _ _ iii «I/' 1 '- ' nd other exP enses payable by Seller under this F reparation oi deed; (D) Seller shall also pay an amoum not to exceed contract. ' $ N __ to be applied in the TAR 1601 initialed lor identification by Buyer Pmduond with 1EoFormO by zloLonl'x 18070 Fmoen Mile Flow. and TREC NO. 20-12 Fruw. Mlchloui 48026 .m:«.1hLm*z»_m 1714 oriwoiisi Docusign Envelope ID: EBCAE6EE-98AE—4B27-883A-8380757B1037 1714 Dxiscoll St. Contract Concerning Houggon TX 7'l0;g , Page 6 of 9 428-2014 (Address of Property) following Buyers Brpenses which order: VA, Texas Veterans Land Board or other Buyer is prohibited from paying by FHA, other Buyer's Bcpenses as allowed governmental loan programs, and then to by the tender. (2) Expenses payable by Buyer (Buyer's Expenses): Appraisal lees; loan application adiusted origination charges; credit reports; fees; on the notes from date of cfisbursement preparation of loan documents; interest to one month prior to dates of first payments; recording lees; copies of easements and month endorsements required by lender; loan—related restrictions; loan title policy wig inspection fees; photos: amortization schedules; one—hali of escrow fee; all prepaid items, including required premiums for flood_ and hazard Insurance, reserve deposits tor Insurance, ad valorem taxes special govemmental assessments: final compliance and inspection; underwriting fee; wire transfer inspection; courier lee; repair fee; expenses Incident to any toen; Mortgage insurance Premium (PMI). VA Loan Funding Private Prem um (MIP) as required by the lender; and other Fee, or FHA Mortgage Insurance this contract. expenses payable by Buyer under 8. If any expense exceeds an amount expressly stated in this contract for such expense be paid by a party, that party may terminate this contract to unless the other party agrees to pay such excess. Buyer may not pay charges and less Texas Veterans Land Board or other governmental loan program expressly prohibited by FHA, VA, regulations. 13.PRORATl0NS: Taxes lor the current year, interest, maintenance and rents will be prorated through the Closing Date. The lees. assessments, dues taking into consideration any change in tax proration may be calculated exemptions that will affect the current year's taxes. if taxes for the current year vary from the amount prorated at closing, the parties shall adjust the prorelions when tax statements for the current year are available. if taxes paid at or prior to closing, Buyer shall pay taxes for are not thelcunent year. ,- 14. CASUALTY LOSS: it -._any part of the'\,Property’ ' is damaged or destroyed ~ casua_lty'\atter the effective date at this, by tire/or other contract. Seller shall restore tl-is Property to previous condition as soon as reasonablyxpossible, but its in ,any event by the Closing "Setter tails‘-_to do so due. to factors Date. ll bey‘o_nd,/Seller's control. Buyer may ‘(a) contract and the earnestrnoney will be _.*refunded to perfonnance up to 15 days ‘and the Closing tpate will be e nded c|:3D%:Er.5:Fs1%:‘r;;E"Home: Eva Enge1'ba:t.,Couzt: Appointed Buyer Dale Seller Date Receive: other Broker 05“? Usfinfl B"°k9' Date Patricia Dajani Joanna Roemnr The tom: or this Iddandirrn has been approved by the Texas Real Brat: Comrniulon tor use only with approved or promtloalod sirnlhrty toms oi contracts. Such noorovd reintax to this aantraoi torm only. TREC terms are intended for use only No representation is mad: as to the legal vdldity or adequacy at any provishn in any spediic trlnuotione.by is not real estate . imtacfions Texas Real Estate Commission. EC. Box 12188, Austin. TX 7E7! I-ZIBB, 512-9353000 (rttt;1Mww.ueoIoxu.9ov)Ilihbli tor oompcx It (TAR-1906) 10-10-11 TREC NO- ON- Huzz‘ cum. 3', A.rui'n5o!Jcui:uu3n1tbusu-.1'x77tm fltwu:2‘ll.4¥.l9W F uiuanot Ibpnnelncfcir Kfifimdm &,fl,|.fl,fl - i7i4Dat-mils l Prpduod WWI Icfvrrwb/xtploix INTOFKIIMH flood. Fnur. Docusign Envelope ID: EBCAEGEE-98AE-4827-883A-838C757B1037 Qt '6 TEXAS Assocumou OF REALTORS® SELLER‘S DISCLOSURE NOTICE O‘I’uumo(S|tiunolREl|.TO%,I\:.flll Notice lo a buyer on or bclore the effective date of a contract. This form complies with and exceed the minimum disclosures required contains additional disclosums which by the Code. CONCERNING THE PROPERTY AT 1714 Driscoll St. Houston, -xx 77019 DATE SIGNED BY SELLER AND IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR ANY MAY WISH TO OBTAIN. IT lS NOT A WARRANTY or ANY KIND BY INSPECTIONS OR WARRANTIES THE BUYER AGENT. SELLER. SELLERS AGENTS, on ANY omen Seller Cl is D is not occupying the Property.” unoccupied U (by Seller), how long since Seller has occupied the or ‘Rrtever occupied the Property ,,:J’,.i P rope ny? Section 1. The Property has the below: (Mark Yes (Y), No (N), or Unknown ltet-ns’r'narl‘wnltP[Ii1=wtIM7UWbm|0¢Ro|d.Fruw.MchlgunlB&I an umsmt l7llDr'uull51 ugmu.ni_m-n Docusign Envelope ID: EBCAE6EE~98AE-4B27-B83A»838C757B1037 Concerninalhe Property at 1714 Dziscoll St. rx 77019 -Houston. water supply provided by: Clcity \ Was the Property built CI well DM D00-op nknown gamer; before 1978? Dyes [3 no unknown (It yes. complete. sign. and attach TAR-1906 conoeming lead-based R°°' TYP9 5 palm hazards). A991 (approximate) Are you (Seller) aware at any of the items listed In this Section 1 that are not in working condition, need at repair? Dyes that have defects. or are Elna It yes, describe (attach additional sheets if necessary): ____________ Section 2 Are you (Seller) aware of any detects or malfunctions In any aware and Na (N) it you are not aware.) of the tollowing?: (Mark Yes (Y) if you are Item Y N ltem Y Basement Item Floors Y Ceilings Sidewalks Foundation / Slab(s) Doors Walls I Fences interior Walls DFWEWBYS Windows U WW9 Fixtures Other Structural Components Electrical Systems Plumbing Systems ixterior Walls Roof It the answer to any of the items in Section 2 is yes, explain (attach additio sheets l If necessary): Section 3. Are you (Seller) aware 0! any of the following conditions: you are not aware.) (Mark Yes (Y) if you are aware and No (N) it Condition mum Condition Asbestos Co Fo nents sed rees: oak t S abitat on Fault nes Radon ' or exit: aste D t W l ubsurtace Structure or its nlermitlent or e anks aim or Lead- nr Encroachments onto the Pr Urea~lorma|de Insulation ements on Located in 100- in on F‘ Present Rat ns. Active termites or other it as attach TAR-1414 destro insects t tructures Previous treatment lor or onto the Loca or r District P ermite or of ne ain T ‘ (TAR-1406) 01~Dt-14 2/ ;l—-’ ' lnltlaled by: Promised with zIpFwrv-8 by zpugtx 15070 Buyer: .____ and Seller:__/__~__,____ Page 2 ot 5 Flltetn Mlle Head. Fmcr. Michigan 4BD2e 17|4 Dam]; 3; Docusign Envelope ID: EBCAEGEE-98AE—4B27-883A-83SC757B1037 Concerning the Property at 1714 Dsiscoll St. Houston, rx 77019 It the answer to any of the items in Section 3 is yes, explain (attach additional sheets if necessary): ‘A single blockabie main drain may cause a suction entrapment hazard for an individual. section (Seller) aware of any item, 4, Are you which has not been previously disclosed in equipment, or system in or on the Property that is In need of repair, this notice? Clyes qua if necessary): yes, explain (attach additional sheets it Section 5. Are you (Seller) aware of any of the following (Mark Yes (Y) you are aware. Mark No ii not aware.) it (N) if you are D [[1 Room additions. structural modifications, or other alterations or repairs made in compliance with building codes without necessary permits or not i in effect at the time. D Homeowners‘ associations or maintenance fees or assessments. yes, complete the following: Cf Name of association: if Manager's name: Fees or assessments are: $___;__ Phone: I I: per and are: ljmandatory El voluntary Any unpaid fees or assessment for Property? Dyes ($ the Ifthe Property is in more than one ) [1 no association, provide information about the attach information to this notice. other associations below or [3 Any common area (facilities such as pools. tennis courts. walkways, or other) co-owned in with others. if yes, complete the following: undivided interest Any optional user lees for common facilities charged? [3 yes Ci no if yes. describe: :1 Any notices of violations of deed restrictions or governmental orcfinances affecting the condition or Property. use ol the E] Any lawsuits or other legal proceedings directly or indirectly affecting the Property. to: divorce, foreclosure, heirship, (Includes, but is not limited bankruptcy. and taxes.) 0 Any death on the Property except for those deaths caused by: natural causes. suicide, or accident unrelated the condition of the Property. to Ci Any condition on the Property which materially affects the health or "--iE;'i-—.i;‘i___,__CI_D.—l;i~——B-——-Ei————A— safety of an individual. Cl Any repairs or treatments, other than routine maintenance, made to the Property to remediate hazards such as asbestos. radon, lead-based paint, environmental urea-formaldehyde, or mold. if yes, attach any certificates or other documentation identifying the extent of the remediation (for example, certificate of mold remediation or other remecfiation). Cl Any rainwater harvesting system located on the property that is larger than 500 gallons and that uses a public water supply as an auxiliary water source 1:: The Property is located in a propane gas system service area owned by a propane W retailer. distribution system / / (TAR-1406) 01-01-14 Initiated by: Buyer: fizz and Seller: " , Page 3 of 5 mwgmmm V imo sum Mlle ma, Freur. war-loan 48026 , Produced with zipFal'I'I|O byzivtovix rm Driscoil st DocuSign Envelope ID: EBCAESEE-98AE-4B27-883A-83BC757B1037 Conceming the Property at 1714 Dz-tscoll St. Houston, rx 77919 It the answer to any of the items in Section 5 is yes. explain (attach additional sheets It necessary): ___._________ Section 6. Seller [1 has [3 has not attached a survey ot the Property. section Within the last 4 years, have you 7. (Seller) received any written regularly provide inspectionsand who are either licensed as inspectors or inspection reports trom persons who inspections? yes D no 0 yes. attach copies and complete the following: I.‘ othenrrise permitted bylaw to perform in Date T Name of r ~ Note: A buyer should not rely on the above—cited reports as a rellectlcn of the current condition Property, A buyer should obtain inspections from inspectors chosen by the buyer. of the Section 3. Check any tax exemption(s) which you (Seller) currently claim for the Property: Homestead Ci Cl Wrldlite Management [j Senior Citizen D Disabled [3 Agricultural [1 Disabled Veteran Cl Other: §\Unknown Section 8. Have (Seller) ever a claim damage tsu tiled for to the Property with any insurance provider? Dyes no Section 10. Have you (Setter) ever received proceeds for a claim for damage to the Property insurance claim or a settlement or amrard in a legal (for example, an proceeding) and not used the proceeds to make the which the claim was made? yes qno D If yes. explain: repairs for Section 11. Does the property have working smoke detector E unknown accordance with the smoke detector installed in requirements of Chapter 765 of the Health and Safety Code?‘ El noCl yes. it no or unknown, explain. (Attach additional sheets it necessary): ‘Chapter 766 ol the Health and Safety Code requires one-family or two-family dwelfings to have working smoke detectors Installed in accordance with the requirements of the building code in effect in the area in which the dwelling is located, including pertonnance, location, and power source requirements. It you do not know the building code requirements in ellecl In your area, you may check unknown above or contact your local building official for more inlorrnation. A buyer may require a seller to install smoke detectors lor the hearing impaired at the buyers family who will reside in the dwelling is if: (1 ) the buyer or a member hearing-Impaired; (2) the buyer gives the seller written evidence of the hearing impairment from a licensed physician: and (3) within 10 days alter the effective date. the buyer makes a written request lor the seller to install smoke detectors lor the hearing-impaired and specifies the locations for installation. The parties may agree who will bear the cast of installing the smoke detectors and which brand of smoke detectors to install D5 / 5 '\-v//i’/ (TAR-1406) 01-01-14 initiated by: Buyenfid’ . and Seller: 5 Page 4 ol 5 Produced with zipForrIIObyzhl.ogix teoro Fmeen vine Road, Fraser. vacunm-M8026 mm£p.i.mi.x.a2n 1714 Dnsool] St Docusign Envelope ID: EBCAE6EE-SBAE-4B27-883A-83BC757B1037 Concerning the Property at 1'I14.Dzisco11 St. Houston . am: 77019 Seller acknowledges that the statements in this notice are true to the broker(s), has instructed onjnfluenced Seller best of Seller's beliel that no person, including the to provide inaccurate information or to //Q» information. / " 2/.716»,//\—/' Signature at Seller /I/L DEE Signature orserter ¢0>¢0N0-HJHOD¢0l¢0>¢0! HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS PHILIPPE TANGUY, 13,500 AIR EXPRESS, LLC, AND 13,500 AIR EXPRESS, LP, Defendants 270"‘ JUDICIAL DISTRICT THIRD AMENDED ORDER TO SELL PROPERTY AT 1714 DRISCOLL ST.‘ Plaintiffs Motion To Sell Real Property at 1714 Driscoll St. having been presented, and it appearing to the Court that this motion in all respects should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: I. The Received is authorized to sell the property at 1714 Driscoll St. per the contract _ 3Ew9l*_=d1°_‘h°_')4P£‘°P_£“dE?'°F9°§E’9“3‘£ _A ‘L ,_, Any =.-- rances, filed/asserted again 3. Philippe Tanguy is to instruct Nationstar and CitiBank mortgages to provide current payoffs to the Receiver and her title company and cooperate fully with the Receiver and her title company. That a Receiver’s Deed for the property at 1714 Driscoll a valid legal deed by W; 4. St., is which good title is to be transferred at closing; SIGNED this the I 0 day of APPENDIX B APPROVED: ROSS, BANKS, MAY, CRON & CAVIN, P.C. BY: Eva s. Engelhan #oo?9ss1’3 2 Riven»/ay', Suite 700 Houston, TX 77056-1918 713/626-1200 (PHONE) 713/623-6014 (FAX) - 1/912014 3:00:59 PM chm mm ' Daniel - District Clerk °" 9"”, ,9.' ggm;fi.aua.4ez1.ea3A-eaacroraroav ::vn:?oc°'Nng171171e By: names, SASI-IAGAYE s gl:.'!..e..P' PnoMuLeA1Eo av ‘me TEXAS near. esrrrre ooumssrou rrr-rec) ONE TO FOUR FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONTRACT m - 1° I ‘ (RESALE) NOTICE: Nel For Use For Condominium Treneeclions 1- PARTIES: The names to this contract (sel1erland_ czelx canton iionoe Seller agrees Io sell end convey (away), to Buyer and Buyer ogrees Io buy irom seller below the Property defined 2. PROPERTY: The land. improvements and oooeeeeriee are collectively reierrod to as the 'Fropeny'. A.LAND: Lot 10 Block Addiion. Oily oi P o Texas. known as “Ella! Oourily oi _y_g§_$,L , (eddrasarzlp code). or as described on oiieohed exhlbii. B. IMPHOVEMENTS: The house. garage and oil other iinuree and improvements above-described reel properly. including onoohed lo the wlihorri iimlielion. ihe Iuiimlng and bulii—ln llama. II any: oil oouipmeni ‘permonenily inelalied and appliances, volorroee. screens. welI~io-wail oupellno. mlrrore. ehuilero, evrnlnge, ceiling ions. arlic lone. mail and brackeio ior ieievielons and boxes. leievleion eniennee, mounts epeeium. hearing and eir-conditioning uniie. doieolion equipment. wiring. plumiairru oeeuriiy end lire and iiphiinp llxluree. chendeiiere. vroier idieherr equipment. garage door eohoner eyeiem. oprrnere. cleaning equlpmlnl, cooldng oquipmnnl. end all oiher ohrubbery. iondeoeplrip. ouidoor properly owned by Seller and ellached ruinrcvanv. lo lire shove deouibed c. ACCESSORIES: The ioiiowinp dosabed related eooesooriee. ii any: window eiove. fireplace screens. cunaine and air conditioning units. rods. binds. vrindovr shades. droperies and mailbox keys. above ground pool, rode. door koyo. ewimrning pool equlpmonl and { orliiiciei nrepioco ioev. end melnlenence eeoeosorloe, conirole lot: (I) porego doors. (II) entry puree. end improvemenie and accessories. (iii) other D. BIOLUSIONS: The ioilowing improvements and accessories be removed prior io delivery ei possession: will he rolnlned by seller and must 1 3Ai.ES PRICE: ,, ‘ ‘ ~ ~~ " 3. sum oi oi! financing deocrioed below (exchrdlrig eny loan lundinp ioeormongepeIneunInoepromium).. . C. Sa.lesFrlce(SuI1IoiAendB)............... 4. FINANCING (Nol ior use will: reverse morlyoge financing): The porllon oi Selee payable in cosh will he paid as ioilowe: (check Prbe not D A. THIRD PARTY FINANCING: One or eppilcable boxes below) s (1) eza________ Properly Approval: Ihe more loxdudina any third pony morigage loans loan lundfne ice or monoaee insurance premium). in line roioi ornouni oi ii Properiy does rial eelisiy lire lenders’ undorwriiing the |oan(e) (including. bul noi llmlied requiremanie lor lo appraisal. Ineurebiiily end lender Buyer may ierrnlnole ihio eenireci by giving notice required repairs). lo aoiiur prior In closing and ihe money will be reiunded lo Buyer. eemooi (2) Oredil Approval: (check one ear: only) D (a) This contract lo eubieoi io Buyer being Third Party financing Addendum ior approved ior Ihe ilnancing described in me arieehed Q or VA iinencinp. Gredli Approval re) 1111: eonireei le noi subject to Buyer being approved ior Ilnancinu and does noi involve FHA D B. ASSUMPTION: The aeeumpilen Ihe unpaid oi balance oi one or more promissory nom prlneipei described the eiulcired TREC Loan Aeeumpliorr D vendors FINANCING: A promissory nole lrom Euyor seller S uLa_____j_ secured In Addendum. C. SELLER TREG and deed oi Iruei Ilene. mud oorrielning ihe sole! Financing Addendum. Ii an owner mm and condition described lo oi oi . In Ihe eliodrod by poiioy title insurance is iurnlerrad. Buyer ehnil iurnioh seller wirh o rnorigageo policy oi ilgiwysmunee. 0 I TAR 1601 auyor_,'i__ Iniileied ler ldoniliioeiion :‘1l.:|‘n.fl-utIvAnl'llfllCIdeIlelIh$o.‘ll1lI|I by "‘ end senarf fr mac NO. 2012 momma: ummn non‘ ru me an nuns-hriaiputlrretoph roman-alil-Arastlremilalpr-ail Imernan nuaaauu wlnlwwr maIMmn'-Iiu 31-03 ‘on 5331, ..-7 I ,4’ mm M ,)w «mama wuemunuumnsw-mama Mn! 54 unmunuom -M POM"! tam W1. Am: so Suolna };lM(IMl and ' ‘p"."u‘3'aao :au"2.‘“mn.3 In‘;‘y...'3°..‘?..“}‘n°&”Z‘q“° “°$'.i'.§‘.i' .."° K "‘ “‘°“‘ °‘ §7é”nl?i‘.7.m’3'9.3 mu nggélfidaua tsuohoflfihggflgpa 3.; OOMPIIHSI-II ‘NEW’! 5' 3o Ufllltflflfl 3 NB :3 BID 9 U "“""“ ”°"‘° '“ """°‘ [mm go map am an buns om menu as amp :5 ulna wauadxo Mncum awn: pm'wu3I?a'i'm7\a°z:n’n'1vnum°ww’?It‘§’:n’h'7n1'::u7o-dean .$“"”‘-an uwlwmnmmnawwmmwmanfiucmomnwmn mam ta) ewulxagggluugundxziiagzan u an M oggswgaxluhm 9 “gap on mad 2 : uun mm on mm: a snug Mfla:l'MBfiW?:'I}J‘:n°":|l'.:"¥l‘ttAal:Bu|‘|?lI;‘:°d Mdtaau mu tauwnlvu I we lundma mu nlnaowsn-n1mws:auas‘:omnxoa mm:333:1. sumo Wlklflfiflmlfl so WWPIIN nu- 9 mi Q”-qwgnMa5=_aue9(' fll:|°"‘°9 In ammo” Manna pun mnllflwd mmnflaz 3 cpm sq luau; oqmn.(auommuauousnpuawmmooqm¢|uquuuKsuIxoA’na' nbal E no net PMNIIF 1°“ 3" PWWRWO \l°Il4W!i DID II-lltlnlflllflflc 915 ‘lmwwpgtlrauvs 0| WP MDRUWOWI ‘#35499 9| JMNFNM ‘ONO ‘ll M IJIIUI9 mu EM “MOP 10] WM 901 WE M11995‘ #3“! MP9) IKBD E 10 MOP II 0% 11!! DOPIIBWI NI MM WM oacmumonaunmaaxa puIn:auu{unuooumn';3qdu;fla1a.gInuMoIauua03 991%!” 3°" 195“! Aokla on sweumnoa unudaaxa ma mmm pun wwuununo out I up oz Kuidmoo am. am sozpmunl 33.5; anmmnua ‘fifgm aims‘: ‘swears ummwmsoumlfiutwu l.|¢lflalB‘IIII0|fl't|1ll1I|I-I00) WMMMWWNDI goenumnMn aonmwnnntunanaa am In nauuoua ' fiwalmlgna (o ‘aw : -:3‘-':'i3'u"cu 0! mm mm pommun um on0: (I) 'nue|smwd a1‘:::a“:‘:p':n?:'w‘: 'aa:mum"oen«md-any u: an uow$?w'3?sg"n'$°'.=‘1-‘fa-_we Man! mm ‘mm ‘Mom ‘minim an uosdmo pmuud ‘fig:|unmu.Io|lauuudoaxopa! on la: arms mu. (a) pnpu I pawfldacqhmnnwu|ImqmKqmmwadoqmmomndaoumwl‘ol;;u”?a:u%2é (9) -we -ozuaumonn pill filmU1 its 1nuI=o:°:£II°dnIaota}mvA again pawl a(In?n"7u'£3:aVh"33$wm% 3” fmwfll . , '4 ’''—i' ~ - ‘:~.:. ueuosummmg~ oauumu; - '4‘.-V." wmuruuo M In =onoa nu ‘v filed-avuuaunocuautzra ~ ~~ %n'\\vAano31a"-'|"'1n '9 ,. .. Kznmww . umtso IMO lama us am » uonmaxo uodn zguonugugau - . :6 warez»: amend as '3! TI°99'lZ¢ VTLI mmueouooumuao Aootumzaswvcao-Lear-nvns-anavaaa =0! OWN "i8"°°° . ~~ uowslananvaop-nr. sncasoaa-sane-4321-aaaMnac1s1a1nu1 &IIImdOoIIectnlng I714 B25860!-1 I8. 9 ml-£l|M;5y'dB I allot sollarofilvgmlga o ‘M Elma“, E +uI$L§uoN¢gnm:g:ummurmmuww.wmaw«wa§oumob1mam am wmwa: rm aw: am ITIABSTMGTOBTrILEP0l.IcY:BvoluuraIMusBuyorlnhxvoatInhsltuIoIllIlo finfinfiymfiéowwwmmmwdawm goleoduolu ~..':"v.:*...==~.:',“.,..~..:‘ZZ'..."=*'*-'7.’§ Ibnollnltfinllnxlaonauyorc "’ ""°"‘§" ~ I.9'EI‘um“5'u""’ '" ‘Lw”p.§'§5m“°m3.?."a"3.'1.‘?.Ii:I§e'I5;"I-°'¥.E’r.'€ “'''IS' a priyzny uvmn aaaaolauonaga). Sullav no as o ~~ ~ aapufigx. ~ ~~0. ~ amulet an what In News eoplu cl CW ~~ my mall . nllon oI bdlvl“°'“ lo. matzlclluna. owner: nasal »....;:I:’.”’...é”.2‘3'i. .fa'% on. P onycwroquul. I maua Suubiaut lo MmId¢lctym:I.embanlI'I'p' Flficu p€.'e‘y""£':5;'n'§% mmRY TAX nlswwcrs: ‘I'll: ' 0 II I‘ I ‘£'§‘££‘§‘éI«'3n'£}§ —(°%) STA Pm wmurrwwm the _ II In Wm- - ,. chaplcr 49. Texas Walar cwasorflwu ago. 3} sells! to deliver swim. m.=~m~'=;m:.Im.m- n -° TIDE WATERS: . (4) II the PI abuts the Inlluaneod waters 01 I119 Tunas Nalum I Resources lids! lndmlad In the M "Illa!" U ‘ls gfnmllrns gmfiagan ""m'” r&;.ud'$lfl“u:::ug:n . I\'r?I’a'£'5' . .. .. :: ~ -. aahntoa and MA11'Efis:BuyubaMaodflwhm§flaunooo1wwuda.m:dauhmncn. unwound or endannaradwanes a nvlru ngbnnm humus. 0r mmpnunou spades, «mm al I __ ~ ~ B lnicndod use of Inc 1 lnIIlalod1orldanIl!lootEoubyBuyor fiflnmfltbkwwflunfln mnnmnuumnramluwunu No 20-12 "uh-an ooaaslotuznvazcpouauzncneeesoane-4&7-aoaA.eaac7s1a1oa1 111.4 pagan st-.. . PIWIOIO 4-28-2014 “aim than tnauem. an addendum pmmulgaed by THEO at ya I-LI-IESIDENTIAL SERVIGE OONIMGTS: mw Wild ":‘%u"5:'«'5‘?:3'°'“°"“'°."5.°° '2.- doalnn'!or 1"}-"wad °°'"'°:;v'.n..5;=;.*§...“:, mm:-w comma! In: In: mm bopnaialmumdmm o B uyetshwrotewowfiuz cowngn may no 2 Bf do wanna .‘:'...'v.:.°:L‘:°.:P.".:.'...7.$:'.'.'..»......‘°"”.‘.'%‘;. Inform. :2 ohllgallmu of the parties fa payment oi brokers‘ me are contained In GI A.ThododnuolIhna!awflbaonoIha!an 4-» ,2 ummr 32 58% E _party may oxordu me In execute and deliver I and allow: no ueonhlnadlnmagrapbi eueupflwnn lo :1 thgu pl at! P" 1,, /KL~o-A’ We 3... ._ 2:: fa Lou/6* iv no In "38".:.."'."”"".... mlaauosonmaho INV- :5 mhooccrow «diva my wnm 123 nolleoa. amemanls. vouonab!y_ mqumd fnrthe P wlfich win any loam W0. gage» 3h5|llnU:|:,f|9Ym‘8C uyat. M. . ‘‘'’°.'.“‘..!.;''.; uanmen! (Mad that mu m_;':..., ....:::, =..w..::.,. .. N dinning: Iomdeuyuzagoungnlon cl: In 01 $0fl$Nflfl‘!B8Hlfl‘|lH 1801! arfipflw I; "£1,308! U %F’” MVP0ssos:lcng..B:i1%ar1ocloshI9,‘n1by"SellIrane1' I vnfllen lnturlneo nun: prtor to :0! ‘nu a sum bcgauen‘ Itynguurranoo cover: 3 who M (urrnlnalad. gpoaathoplrllulo oennumlolon of a trnlnn lam 0|’ appraprlug lnalgraneo 0|’ 3 . nu: coverage may °-*~ w mnmmmmhflym. anylaauh Swab m::?.~:.a."*:.,.=:'.:=:':° °°:::.... as: °~°="~..s.z..~.:-,°.m.°.::';v........'~'. mm tudud sun W movain . shalldollvarto ‘ no 1 enplan::ml:nEflmu(n‘)m:n;i”:uy 1.8PEcIAL PROVISIONS condition the «man: (lna «'.:.:'=~..*,:::=.-;. ~.a::...%.~*. 6 hutfn I dawn applicable to r..:"s.,'s.:.;~::.;°°.'".:“;‘..#’"~”~'~"::£~”n2."a:;-,:'. '~ on.) glut: caucus: so nhjaoe court. lnszia county rescue. he the um.v.f"'o":“:"'§ao 2”-You. puma u 2ETILEMENYAND OTHER ENSEB ‘flwfoilowlng exponent mums ~~ (I) Expenses puyahtabysoflot gtarprlulododnnz slim’: mun): - "Mm" m‘ man my ~ML "°'w?.‘:';”.» °é.u%.‘*“'?..’?.... 9:‘; ”‘I.“.%uur'?‘:‘:..""'a..£'.'..‘?;Tf:"‘.':' eenluculm propulsion ' 6 «nor as alluundal dud; Msnlldlahdl ulupayan Iltllllllllnlrl ls nilla. "rAn1aoI l:fllhlad1or!daml!toa1IanbyBuyot.___..__ Indsallar nmnaulntuvuunobuuaw Iwnnmalltmumm mam awumur. acme:-sans-m1~am-oammtm amuaucaneondm 171.4 8:13 W11 ac. following older: Buyers VA. Texas Valonim oihetauyml la E=a:~:.~.W.g*.,°:z."m.m"°*°a%: ualtuwadzthalonm WV? (BWI Expansn): Appratuldfoagmloan to ..m “"3... 0*! gvwés: mat mpam, pmpmllan applbulcn fur ' D lam-Island hazard lgawanu. I naww fee: 1!! II . Indus! Ihb cl. mum auu.y°§'a$'a‘nao axcuda an Imolml “III party "may Iannlnm at W: mud ""“"' "' Olpfllil "'3m£'§."”a‘t‘.§’ a'§’e'm‘"°" uni!on “N9 up nnamae5°§'y' 9.3 5°51 v». NE“ mu ~~ II In s E 5% Rior owadodnq.B1-W9’ Pivhxu 16.51‘ 0 TV : I ntyaar. mJ.o§.:::' Egfnudma ‘ta 8 In no dug‘ cw.-u~~ 1911:;-so udno lo lsclmwm 8 at’: can 535: 0 anew {none , ’to1§.r2ayI>!Qd en's ~~ .- damn ‘ " .u:1d:'r°flflfz lls million Min ' n the 3? 8 own %§§§ »—— at un lseoruhet.‘ i amgnph _dra ndapomlnyal at V/an 1s.nérAu1.1': u a mmumo we come: van: to . gohnnttmfiifiwilvayabu by lb) and mealva the cams! glam be provided mbgthh aggulga W391:“ lhh eonuul. y8elM.hw ~ dnoasotlerheooeunpladfl-wfimpam ' section 1. The Property one we :\avorouawmuwPnpony Immum 7%» ~~ below: (um Yea on. No utllnimown Tmnatladoasmiuuwmnuaaomnobo Tllaunbedufl MlHIIl¢ll|l.%I)IHflllfilVOy. AR-140 0|-01-I4 hm fiyouplqa-uunnodnlnll\I-I.Ilnu tnnlal 895!‘ _,j, and Sailor I. m‘ D mg” ammun: escnassz~saAa4au1-can-a=ac761I1II=7 111.4 D:-local). ac. comamhamalfmpqnyu ‘ was the Pmporlyhulil balm 1978? Clyu DM wnIaraupp|yprovldodhy:aol1y Dwell Boo-op Una own cIother:_____________. (I've-. eampzoto. Rooi‘I'ypo:_ sun. and man ‘rm-1m g load-based perm humus). Aar._ an (approxbnua) lalhmmavcflayranloowdngonmoPrupaw(nIun:Inumdeuvem:gphcodwuaflsthusMr:a1eoormo1emMm)? an: Dwsltnown mumpm Anywfiwujuumoluwduwmmflstuhfldasédmimumnumwambmcwxdflommmhawddatmorm ayes cg. uyea.daacuuo(a:an=na¢u1uonuametannaeeua:y):___;_______ anclbn 2. Arayvu (senor) owuu at my nwua and no (N) I! you on not aware.) debate or mufluuofiom In my 0! the Ionowlnaiz (Mark Yea (Y) you an El‘ ~ Y ~~ llmaamwarlonnyonhollams 8adJon2|syaI.oxp!dn(ullodI shaouIlnoousuy):__________ suntan 8. No you (antler) aware cl any ol mo you am not aware.) lollowlnn eondlllomu (Mark You (V) II you no man ml No (R) I! (TAR-1466) 01-O1-14 lnlllalad by: Ind Pllfllllilllbkflfiwlvl-Int Iidlomua-IflnIIaIM|wr.|IlthnlIna 89llDIz__1.._._.__. Plat 2 oi 5 maflnam nuuuun mama awnhoo u:aocAaae:~aaAe4az1-sash-035675731097 . 1714 32110011. 68. coneomlng tho Proalny a1 "=9 Illho annwotloanyotmoltomntusooflonafsyos. 9XPlIln(atta:lIodd1lIona!ohoaIollneoeoca¢y): 'Aslnabhbdmhhmdnmhnwuuuam1hnnnoopmomhawd¢oranmdIvldw. ocean I» Avnyunusan owuoolan Ium.oqu1p:mmLor dloolosyodln our: nation? um lolnyoamnploin naanoponyoutmnnudmnpau l’|Ocfl$ly): Eliyyet no (andldzflluwdnui ‘ sucllons.) An you (Sailor) swan ol any oi mo tollowlny (Mark You not won. (V) If you no swore. link No (N) P! you on 0 Roomudtllo wdmalmomflcauotnwmrmouorofl lnuampihneomwfibultolngcodoahefloemthemo. W ovropolnmadovlnluouinoeauuypumillomol cl Ho:nowuI:'rs' ormalntonanco loaaotauoumonra. llyas. comphtolhofotlowlngz umwnh I03 euwmmme Pm“: F 8____ _ pII'_______ Arsywuodolauwuaaswmmraunefioponn and In: Dmamal W Clvohauuy I1 Dyna (S _._. Pnponyls Inmoro llmano uuocmbn.pmvtdoln!onnoIIon the ) no _____ oflaohtnlomullomotlusmiloo. ohouuho omotauodulom bdowo: D My common uoa(!ncl|1\1eo such It pooh. tennis courts. woflovnyo. or other) wilh omen. Ii yu. complain mo toltowing: _ _ _N3yoLuond_nqwLqooloLmmmmunflaodIuwd1Byao—DnrHnwdwubm.T_';;_'2;:. ’ co-owned In unomdod Imam! 4A ‘ ‘ zwmflmdvhhflomddeedmwwwuwgwmvnmmwwnmwufluflngunwwwanwuoolfln ropany. Mybwsu’uwdMrlagalmouod:1gsdhoowuhdImwulommmoFmpony.0ncaflnhululnlflmlao lo:dIvotcn.forodoouro.haluhlp.banl1n:ptcy.andlv:oo.) ' DDDUD Anydoomontnofio ray on onmptggmyoxoen Hcnhosoduthu nous ad by‘.naturd cumsuufclflo. on oddm e um Iuodto Any oondlllon on ma Properly which molulnfly Ifleoulho Mam: or solely at an Individual Am‘ Nodm 0! tnolmnnlo mam other than routine maintenance. mode ouch no ubearooz radon. load-baud to pow. wwiomuoldohydo. ma Propony Io tomodlalo onvhonmml or mow. ouch onyoortlflcotas ' flyoo. or ofhardoannanlatlon ldanlllytngthe eoulflcnto ol mold tomodlollm ov om! romodlallen). mom onus ronwdhflon (lo: omnpln. mbmmr mirlwowhawooll lo located on aurngoya mm“? the mp onlhlllslovg y or In an 500 9altonnnnolhu auto D fiwhoporwkhuladluooropaneuoooymmsetvleoureaownedbyapmpanndsulbufionsyown rv / / (TAR-140e)0!-01-14 r-u-u-macaw-u-an lnltlalod by: uId8nl1or.:_._:_ Pogoaofl Ioovofioznnulnucaavlra-v.IIlNwIII=1I mumnmm Imounau ogmstgn Envdspo ID: ucaases-one-aazv-mA.oaw'1m1m1 1114 02193911 81:. consuming the Pmputy at ' Iuhoansworlomyawxsltmnsln8owonSIayus.exp!ah(auadnndwuIushaeblrceossuy): —_—.—:.:.j Reunion 6. Sollnr D has Uhu not albehod a survey at nu Property. Bawon 'I.pNV:l'gv: the Laue: 4 neatvedwupny wrtuatI|l’r!:"sp:ma!on tepom ragulmy naps on: y-$n:!,mhan outy:'tlIh(segon or suede: name: tau: panono who Inspections? Dyes Duo Ityountudu eeplaomdecmplawlhafollcwt-va: a aopenulfled yuwhperlenn ~ Now.-A buyarahouldnotrw an the above-drednponaau mlloctlonollha curruntcondlilon aim Properly/.Abuyershouldob!eln tnspoabnsfmmtnspsatnrs chounbytbabuyar. soeglun 8. ohm: any tax umpuomubwgmragflm ourmnfly comm (or the Property: Cl Wlkmle Management ['3 Aaflouilunl [3 Disabled Vsuamn D Other: qunknum Bedlons. Haw pmvldm Dyna u no (Sella) ever um a claim {or damn: lo the Pmpany with any insurance Run yau.(s¢IIa1) war noelvad pnunda for I claim for damage to tho P}-cpany Baalon 10. lnumnu oinlmonuulnmeal on rd_5|"1e1tln_r9uaedlnu) (lot example, an amtnntuudlha prwaodnlnnlaltothonpnlmfor ‘ which uwunurwufifadirn yis‘ - no YES IXNBIII3 Section 11. Does llwpmpuly hnva working unoha dam roqulmmunto ucnapunaa ol the Huallh and Ealely Oodurmk unlw.-Mn accordance with the uncle: «teeter Installed In Mrlaamddfilonalshootl I1 nonusavy): Elna Oyoa. flnow unknown. upldn. 'cmpmmonno Mullnandsatevcoduequmu one-bmwarnvovlannnydwollnna amoudatadonimtaltadlnaaaardanco wlthlhueqldinmmualulabulldlrwcodamolleallnlhocnnh wnIdrIIaadm!lr1gla!a:a!od.lndLvdlIupa:!amImca. Ioullan. mdpmvanoancnoquhvmounllynudonor knowlhobulmryoodonqukurlenhhofiadhyvwuaqyoumayohadrmbwwnabowwcauedww halbltfiahgchfiehllurmanlnlamabbn Ab we sulfur to Install ah do tonne II 0: but ~......»=%,:*~«»»,...v,=-L....-~,.,,.,,--. mwuwm 8 .' E Bf mobmobteaas mm»G; , lcdrqyfllaa tpewu mapatvannqywruwnonfllbauuncosiclt-uMmrg' dalualomandwhldebrandolunaloadoladolalolnshl (ran-uoe) o1-on-:4 lnlflaludby: M48011 a:-.___.___' Panel at 5 Pvctndihifallfibllblofl l0BN|IbIrI|flulu¢.Rm.Ifll§IIIfl& jflfimg flllfliliaflfi ~~~~ DnflJ§i'lI EIIMODI I3: EBGAEBEE-BBAE-4321-BRA-633075731037 ~ 1711- 3:13:91). It. Ooucamlng the Pmpom as solloroelmovdodgaummumamuomwmlnmulnfloeammnwmoboddsdlorsbonu Ihatnopuown. lndudlmfln brown). has lnswctad gqnnuoneed Salaam pmvldo Innocents lnfonmlion ov to matulal Intonnnllan. ADDITIONAL NO'I1¢ES TO BUY: (I) ThomruboplnrnanlofPuhnosulotymalnlalnandmbeaotlniihopuhllomlyoearoll.unooosldodcumnrnol nghtovodouoffmdemmboamdlnmvmndpooduueufoaaamhmooamboao :01‘ lnlannullon npumnom. aoncomlng pill ulmlnal ’ actlvny In oemln mm or visa nolgkoomoooo. comm mo Inna! polio; (2) IlfltewopenylsloealodlnacoaotaluuollnamoeawudolmoenmlnImooasuJWn1nIwIyorvIlWM.0oolu:oI1ho mnnnlshudohordorlnglho Gurl ofMa:loo.I.hoproponymoybao1Mee1to(ha Prozocllon Act (chnplav 81 or G3. Nnlmnl Open Boaohukaonho Dunn Raaoumoo coda. rospaoirvoly) and a hndmont dune prolocflon pm-nil may be mqulmd tor ropalu or eonovuoum ooaflilmta or lmpnmmonh. comm the local aovouuuoni with udlnmou sulhorlly ovoreonnmollon adjacent to pubflo bundle: for mu lnlonnwon. (5) 11 oflon on square Iootana. maasmomemo. 0! houndallut. you Ire basing your lndooandonny moasumd to verily any npanod Infaunanon. you would haw lhoso Roms (4) Tho following providers currently provide service In the property: Bowls: phone Ii: swan _ Waist: _cahls: Tram: .fi;_———— 2 —*“pmrne’f ’ ’ ” plum s: [moon 9: " ’ "K .__ _ > _ Nlluml aw phone B: phone I: Phone company: phone 9: Propano: phone I: (6) Tllic scum Dlsololute Nolloo was oornploted by Seller as ol the data algnod. The as we and correct andlaavo no mason Io bollovo to be lain or lnaooulatn. broken have ruled on Ihls notice AN INBPEOTQH QF v_oua CHOICE INSPECT THEII PROPERTY. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO HAVE The undmlanad Buyer uhgulovvjadgea receipt oi Illa tovogolng nofioc. out-n ' 6/20/2014 , a1o Elnnauia 3| Buyer Prlmnd Name: Dow Prlmvd Name: (TAR-1406) 01-01-14 . Pogo Sol 5 um-vvmorauouv Iblnh umonnuuuunuo.nmv.Iwvu¢nII uunlnhnm numsunn ~ Doaflhtl ammo no: aunzczauszs-ma-sacs-aasvrracsaes Q __ """' PHOMULGATED BY THE TEXAS REAL AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT CONCERNING THE PROPERTY AT TATE COMMBSION (THEE) 12-05-2011 1714 Ddnaoll St. §g_u_|£:‘n Address and CW) ' (Street ~ Sella! and Buyer amend the contract as futlows: (check each applicable box) D (1) The sales Prtoo In Paragraph 3 ol the contract In: A. cashp¢rt1onotSalasPr-mopayablehyfluyeratcloslng ......... 3. sum ottlnanctngdowlbedln thecontract.. ........... .. O. satesPrtee(sumotAa.ndB)... .... ...... .......... D (2) In edattlon to MY MP2!!! and treatments otherwise required by the wntract. seller. at sullen expense. shall complete the (allowing repair: and traatmnts: D (3) ThedatoInPanqraph9dttrecomrat:ischm1uodto__________._:. El Thaamauntln Parugraph12A(t)(h)olthoeonttas!lachancadto$j.j_.j D (4) . (6) flteeostoflardamqulrodrapalmuunanmont.asttonizodonmaanaatadflsnwlllhopdd astolIowa:5_______:_:_, bysallens D (G) BuyurhaspatdselIeranoddItfonalOpt5onFaeot$ byfiuyar. tornnextonslonotttte unrastrtcted right to terminate the contract on orbotore .1'hiudditlonnlOptionFeoEIwntD wmnotbouadltadtofltosalasfitca. __j_____________ . El Buyer walvestho unraatrtctcd rtght to terminate the corrtrut tor whlchthe OpllonFeow|s paid. 0 (7) (8) The data for Buyer to gm written notice to Setter that Buyer cannot obtain credit Approval as caHon!IlI'Ilh£Tl1lrdPany Hnanol:IaCondIllcnAddandumloICred!tApprcval|ad1Anned lo_.::_j__._____ D . (9) other Modifications: (Insert or_\ty tin!_a;ta_ta1onts_:rId b§nags_detal_Is tun sat9.L Z EX$UTED I30 68] 0' , . (BROKEN: FILL IN THE BIT! OF HNIL A%EPTAN°E-) '-" Ileana. Inc. Salter / ‘=9 3|-WW SOHO! hum. find’: “"”.."“° '°"":.“' mun ........t.....:’.:".‘.'.'.‘..“.’!‘:'.§.".“.;':.t“..m,'” '“‘°'“"..m...'?..' ‘R“.2".’...'i°"‘°""‘ .3‘) ....m.°"“' "’.;':""°'....¢u...."" vamudonu. TIMI Roll Ellnla I . Box 12138. Alrflh. ‘TX 73711-2138. 512-OSBQMO tar (Mtp#tnu.vna.Ia:n.uov)TflEONc 30-7 TIdutuImInplanITHEONo.3I-9. (TAR-1503) 12-05-9011 P3931511 laIl:rVIl|l$IAw.530P¢u0IkBl\»d.lhutua.1'X17W1 Pha:1l!J¢9£IS9 ru: 1tusv.utr1 misaoqtut nltosuscou. mm:-can wramouyuatqu tmnnnmmannu. rumwaunaaoan ggggmm . ." - Doeuslaa Envnlupn ID: PHOMULBATED EYTMETHA8 REAL ESTATE COMMISSION (THECI 12415-um AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT CONCERNING THE PROPERTY AT ~~ 1'l14'D:1nca1l. it. QQILWII ' (8!mt| Addams and Elly) seller and Buyer amand tha comma an (nllnwn: (chads each applicable box) D (1) The sales Price In Paragraph 3 cl the warrant ls: A. cashpanlonolsalesPrlunpnyablabyBuycratcloslng..... ..s B. sumolflmnungdascrlbadlntheennlract... ..s c. snlasP:£oa(surnolAanda]............ . D (2) In addition to any repairs and Iraalmaruo otherwise. S -thélcznlract. Sailor. al sellers oxpanu. Ihaltccmplelo the (allowing repairs and lreahnenls: n Thadahln Pamaraphsoltha wntmctischanaedto D (3) ~ ‘mo amount In Paragraph I2A(1)(b) at In: D (4) (5) caramel I: changed to 8 The mm o! lander required rcpalra and Iroatnxant, as flomlzud on ______j.____:, . as mom: 8 anachzdgsi. wlfl ha mid Iha D (8) V W” . for an nxtansbn of the unmlrlcted right to Immlnnla (ha contract on or TM; uddlilonalopllonfio D MID wlllmlbocredllodlolmsdaa Ptlca. Won D . . Buyer walvu Iha unmmclad nah! lo tannfnuu (ha centred lot D (7) which (8) The dale lor Buynr to gm wrman nolluo Io Butler that player annual the Option Fee was paid. ubluln credit Approval ll (arm in the Third Party Financing condition Addendum (nr Gradh Approval ls changed .____.j..____ ..____- (5) If Modifications: (Inaa'n my (actual atuernanu and business details appflcaua£lhi£n1¢.)__ acacuranna of IIATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE.) “WW , . (BROKER: FILL IN THE _ UR 5E'mn:5arn%9= H-W Eallvrmifuh-=h._¢.wr€ Rape!-at-d E3-‘NW fiEi5TSu:u¢£.vut III &'°'&‘..a. """ approved %m rebut .'.'.’u“J.° :'.;‘.'§’!..'.'iy’."n‘a":¢‘s"e..... .;':‘f.";i‘..‘.'a'.‘a"a‘..'3";'."'-a'$‘«"x'a'y":’..’fl°‘? “' """"“' ‘.1"u§' 3"""“""wm-m=s...'“"' '¥.'3.5"s'a‘§’¥‘ "‘""a...."' ..u.."':- 'w£"u'a'u'."' mu...""°'"‘ (f%\!.VI§.| )7flECNO.39*7.nII1€fllIlbfll&'Ifi$&.SB-C. "r"s:’§‘a'v"':"sfzu"ss'i"‘i'u'é“3'b"a""souo"' 12452011 (TAR-1908] URI Gimcv ad» Page i alt ¥...m‘3imoo '”“‘*r'.’.’:”u".'.1‘m:o.“‘”’““““‘».'I.‘.’J'£.‘.'... Hlanldmfixhfnaflwfiplwh nuoumllsl lIWOfiIDOIIIflaI|Id.FnIlr.IEfil§call&| $313,315.33 TAB CC APPENDIX TAB APPENDIX Appellees Notice of Appeal N0. 2013-67779 WILLIAM G. WEST, AS CHAPTER 7 § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRUSTEE OF RICHARD DAVIS, DEBTOR§ Plaintiff, vs, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS PHILIPPE TANGUY, 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.L.C., AND 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.P.. @l'0)|’0l|’0l(0l|’0ll0l§¢I(0lI71|'0lWlYJ1 Defendants . V. PTRE HOLDINGS, L.P. I ntervenor 270TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOTICE 9; APPEAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Defendants, PHILIPPE TANGUY, 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.L.C., AND 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.P., and Intervenor, PTRE Holdings, L.P., hereby appeal the Order Granting Sale of Property signed October 10, 2014 which this Court entered on the 10th day of October, 2014 at the request of the Plaintiff, William G. West, Trustee, to the First or Fourteenth Court of Appeals at Houston, Texas. There are already two related pending appeals in the First Court of Appeals in Case No. 01-14- 00455-CV. Defendants and Intervenor state the following: 1. The Trial Court is the 270th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas. 2. The Judge of the Trial Court is the Honorable Brent Gamble. 3. The Order being appealed was signed on the 10th day of October, 2014 . 4. Defendants, PHILIPPE TANGUY, 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.L.C., 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.P., and Intervenor, PTRE Holdings, L.P., 1 APPENDIX C desire to appeal. 5. Appellants believe that the appeal is taken to the Court of Appeals for the First Supreme Judicial District of Texas at Houston, Texas. 6. Defendants, PHILIPPE TANGUY, 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.L.C., 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.P., and Intervenor, PTRE Holdings, L.P., are the parties taking the appeal and filing the notice. Respectfully submitted, s/Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. Attorney for Defendant and Judgment Debtor TBC # 10443500 5222 Spruce Street Bellaire, Texas 77401 (713) 668-8815 (713) 663-9402 FAX jizen@comcast.net s/Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. Attorney for Intervenor, PTRE Holdings, L.P. TBC # 10443500 5222 Spruce Street Bellaire, Texas 77401 (713) 668-8815 (713) 663-9402 FAX jizen@comcast.net CERTIFICATE QE SERVICE I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was sent to Eva Engelhart, Receiver, 2 Riverway #700, Houston, TX 77056-1918 (713-623-6014 FAX) and Joshua W. Wolf- shohl, Porter and Hedges, 1000 Main Street, 36th Floor, Houston, TX 77002 by facsimile transmission (713) 226-6231 Fax and/or U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, on this the 30th day of October, 2014. s/Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. NO. 2013-67779 WILLIAM G. WEST, AS CHAPTER 7 § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF‘ TRUSTEE OF RICHARD DAVIS, DEBTOR§ § Plaintiff, § § VS. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS § PHILIPPE TANGUY, 13500 AIR § EXPRESS, L.L.C., AND 13500 § AIR EXPRESS, L.P. , § § Defendants. § § V. § § PTRE HOLDINGS, L.P. § § Intervenor § 27OTI-I JUDICIAL DISTRICT PHILIPPE TANGUY, 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.L.C., 13500 AIR EXPRE§§, L,P. ‘S AND INTERVENOR, PTRE HOLDINGS, I._-.:P.'_S,__ REQUEST FOR FINDIEGS O_F PAGE AND CO§CLUSIO§§ {E LAW TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: DEMAND IS HEREBY MADE pursuant to Rule 296 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure that this Court prepare and file Find- ings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in support of its previous Judgment or order in this case signed October 10, 2014 and filed by the District Clerk on October 10, 2014. Demand is being made for the preparation and filing of such Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law within twenty days of the signing of the Judgment as required by said Rule. A copy of this demand is being provided to all parties and/or counsel of record. Respectfully submitted. S/Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. Attorney for Defendant and Judgment Debtor TBC # 10443500 5222 Spruce Street Bellaire, Texas 77401 (713) 668-8815 (713) 668-9402 FAX jizen@comcast.net s/Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. Attorney for Intervenor, PTRE Holdings, L.P. TBC # 10443500 5222 Spruce Street Bellaire, Texas 77401 (713) 666-8815 (713) 668-9402 FAX jizen@comcast.net CE IF CA E E SERVICE I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was sent to Eva Bngelhart, Receiver, 2 Riverway #700, Houston, TX 77056-1918 (713-623-6014 FAX) and Joshua W. Wolf- shohl, Porter and fiedges, 1000 Main Street, 36th Floor, Houston, TX 77002 by facslmile transmission (713) 226-6231 Fax and/or U.S. Mall, postage prepaid, on October 30, 2014. S/Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. musveszaur/m7o Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. APPENDIX TAB APPENDIX D TAB D Notice of Appeal of the Sale Order Cause #: Cause #: 2013-67779 # Court # 270TH 270TH Judgment Date: Judgment 10/10/2014 Date: 10/10/2014 Volume: Volume: Page: Page: Image #: Image 62791808 #: 62791808 Due Date: Due 11/9/2014 Date: 11/9/2014 Attorney Attorney Bar No: No: 10443500 10443500 F” F“ IN FILED IN 1ST ST 1st COURT OF APPEALS Assigned to Assigned 1 Court of Appeals 1St|C-l8H§¥()Ol\|l:,/'l'E?(:EéLS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/31/2014 2:16:39 PM 10/31/2014 PM Date Findings Findings of Facts/Mtn _ _ Facts/Mtn of Modify/Mtn New Trial Modify/Mtn New _ Trial filed? _ _ 10/30/2014 1Q/|§Q}é}g;flERAPR|NE CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk Request for Transcript Filed? Request Filed? N/A N/A D D Appeal previously filed? Notice of Appeal Y filed? Y OA OA Number of Days: Number Days: 10 10 File File Ordered: Imaged Ordered: Imaged Notes: Notes: Prev Case No: Prev Appellate Case 01-14-00455-cv (3 No: 01-14-00455-CV RD (3RD APPEAL) APPEAL) BC Notice of Appeal BC Appeal filed filed BG Notice of Appeal filed BG filed — Government – Government C C Judgment Appealing Final Judgment D -- Accelerated Appeal D Appeal OA No OA Record Request filed No Clerk’s Record filed O – Clerk’s Record O — Record Request filed of Appeal) filed (w/Notice of APPENDIX D 10/30/2014 5:03:45 PM Chris Daniel — Clerk Harris County Districi Envelope No. 3018791 By: Patricia S1 Romain-Tippins Filed: 10/30/2014 5:03:45 PM NO. 2013-67779 WILLIAM G. WEST, AS CHAPTER 7 § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRUSTEE OF RICHARD DAVIS, DEBTOR§ Plaintiff, § § vs. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS § PHILIPPE TANGUY, 13500 AIR § EXPRESS, L.L.C., AND 13500 § AIR EXPRESS, L.P., § Defendants. § § V. § § PTRE HOLDINGS, L.P. § Intervenor § 27OTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOTICE QE APPEAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Defendants, PHILIPPE TANGUY, 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.L.C., AND 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.P., and Intervenor, PTRE Holdings, L.P., hereby appeal the Order Granting Sale of Property signed October 10, 2014 which this Court entered on the 10th day of October, 2014 at the request of the Plaintiff, William G. West, Trustee, to the First or Fourteenth Court of Appeals at Houston, Texas. There are already two related pending appeals in the First Court of Appeals in Case No. 01-14- O045S—CV. Defendants and Intervenor state the following: 1. The Trial Court is the 270th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas. 2. The Judge of the Trial Court is the Honorable Brent Gamble. 3. The Order being appealed was signed on the 10th day of October, 2014. 4. Defendants, PHILIPPE TANGUY, 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.L.C., 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.P., and Intervenor, PTRE Holdings, L.P., desire to appeal. 5. Appellants believe that the appeal is taken to the Court of Appeals for the First Supreme Judicial District of Texas at Houston, Texas. 6. Defendants, PHILIPPE TANGUY, 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.L.C., 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.P., and Intervenor, PTRE Holdings, L.P., are the parties taking the appeal and filing the notice. Respectfully submitted, s/Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. Attorney for Defendant and Judgment Debtor TBC # 10443500 5222 Spruce Street Bellaire, Texas 77401 (713) 668-8815 (713) 668-9402 FAX jizen@comcast.net s/Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. Attorney for Intervenor, PTRE Holdings, L.P. TBC # 10443500 5222 Spruce Street Bellaire, Texas 77401 (713) 668-8815 (713) 668-9402 FAX jizen@comcast.net CERTIFICATE QE SERVICE I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was sent to Eva Engelhart, Receiver, 2 Riverway #700, Houston, TX 77056-1918 (7l3—623—6014 FAX) and Joshua W. Wolf- shohl, Porter and Hedges, 1000 Main Street, 36th Floor, Houston, TX 77002 by facsimile transmission (713) 226—6231 Fax and/or U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, on this the 30th day of October, 2014. s/Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. JUFC7 (NSK#) JUFC7 (NSK#) JUSTICE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT JUSTICE INFORMATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OCT 31, OCT 2014(C1) 31, 2014(C1) INT6510 INT6510 CIVIL CASE CIVIL INTAKE cAsE INTAKE OPT: INT OPT: _____ -— INT GENERAL PARTY GENERAL PARTY INQUIRY INQUIRY PAGE: PAGE: 11 -- 2 cAsE NUM: CASE NUM: 201367779__ PJN> __ 201367779__ PJN> TRANS NUM: __ TRANS CURRENT COURT: NUM: _________ CURRENT COURT: 270 PUB? _ 270 PUB? _ CASE TYPE: CASE ENFORCE FOREIGN TYPE: ENFORCE FOREIGN JUDGMENT JUDGMENT CASE STATUS: CASE DISPOSED (FINAL) STATUS: DISPOSED (FINAL) WEST, WILLIAM STYLE: WEST, STYLE: WILLIAM GG (CHAPTER TRUSTE VS (CHAPTER 7 TRUSTE PHILIPPE TANGUY, PHILIPPE VS TANGUY, ============================================================================= tttt INACTIVE **** INAcTIvE PARTIES **** PARTIES **** PJN PER/CONN COC PJN PER/CONN BAR COC BAR PERSON NAME PERSON NAME PTY PTY ASSOC. ATTY ASSOC. ATTY NUM NUM NUMBER NUMBER STAT STAT __ 00007-0001 IVD 00007-0001 IVD WEST, WILLIAM WEST, WILLIAM __ 00006-0001 00006-0001 IVP IVP 10443500 10443500 PTRE PTRE HOLDINGS HOLDINGS L PP L IZEN, JOE ALF IZEN, JOE ALF __ 00004-0002 XPL 00004-0002 XPL 10443500 13,500 AIR 10443500 13,500 EXPRESS LP AIR EXPRESS LP JOE ALF IZEN, JOE IZEN, ALF __ 00003-0002 00003-0002 XPL XPL 10443500 10443500 13,500 13,500 AIR AIR EXPRESS EXPRESS LLC LLC IZEN, IZEN, JOE JOE ALF ALF __ 00002-0002 XPL 00002-0002 XPL 10443500 10443500 TANGUY, PHILIPPE TANGUY, PHILIPPE JOE ALF IZEN, JOE IZEN, ALF __ 00001-0002 XDF 00001-0002 XDF WEST, WILLIAM WEST, WILLIAM GG (CHAPTER TRU (CHAPTER 7 TRU __ 00005-0001 RCV 00796513 00005-0001 RCV 00796513 ENGELHART, EVA SHAFIR ENGELHART, EVA SHAFIR __ 00004-0001 DEF 00004-0001 DEF 10443500 13,500 AIR 10443500 13,500 EXPRESS LP AIR EXPRESS LP JOE ALF IZEN, JOE IZEN, ALF __ 00003-0001 00003-0001 DEF DEF 10443500 10443500 13,500 13,500 AIR AIR EXPRESS EXPRESS LLC LLC IZEN, IZEN, JOE JOE ALF ALF __ 00002-0001 DEF 00002-0001 DEF 10443500 10443500 TANGUY, PHILIPPE TANGUY, PHILIPPE JOE ALF IZEN, JOE IZEN, ALF _ 00001-0001 PLT 00001-0001 WEST, WILLIAM 24058058 WEST, PLT 24058058 WILLIAM GG (CHAPTER TRU (CHAPTER 77 TRU POWER, AARON POWER, AARON ==> (11) ==> FOUND CONNECTION(S) FOUND (11) CONNECTION(S) 1=AcTIvE 1=ACTIVE 2=ATY. INQ. 2=ATY. INQ. 3=ACT.ENTRY 3=ACT.ENTRY 4=ISS. SERV. 4=ISS. SERV. 5=DOC. INQ. 5=DOC. INQ. 6=CASE INQ. 6=CASE INQ. 7=BACKWARD 7=BACKWARD B=FORWARD 8=FORWARD 9=PTY. ADDR. 9=PTY. ADDR. 10=REFRESH 10=REFRESH 11=HELP 11=HELP TAB EE APPENDIX TAB APPENDIX Appellants Notice of Designation of Additional Items ALFRED IZENA JOE ALFRED IZEN JR. JR. JOE IZEN & IZEN & ASSOCIATES, ASSOCIATES, P.C. LAW P.C. ATTORNEYS AT ATTORNEYS AT LAW SPRUCE STREET 5222 SPRUCE 5222 STREET -— BELLAIRE, TEXAS 77401 BELLAIRE, TEXAS 77401 668-8815 Telephone (713) 668-8815 Telephone / (713) 668-9402 Fax 668-9402 Fax December 29, December 29, 2014 2014 Chris Daniel Chris Daniel Harris County Harris District Clerk County District Clerk P. P. O. O. Box 44651 Box 6 51 Houston, Houston, Texas 77210 Texas 77210 RE: RE: No. 2013-67779; No. William G. 2013-67779; William Q; as as Chapter Trustee 9; Chapter 17 Trustee Richard of Richard Davis, Debtors, 1; Davis, Debtors, Philippe Tanguv, v. Philippe Tanquv, E; Al, Et Al, Designation Designation of of Additional Items Additional Items to to Be Included in Be Included Record on in Record on Appeal; Request Appeal; Request Reporter's Record Court Reporter's for Court for Record Dear Sir: Dear Sir: Attached is Attached is a copy of a copy the District of the Clerk's Docket District Clerk's Docket Sheet Sheet in in above—styled and the above-styled the numbered cause. and numbered cause. The circled are items circled The items the are the items Appellant designates items Appellant designates as items to as items included in be included to be in the Clerk's the Clerk's Record on Record on Appeal. Request is Appeal. Request made that hereby made is hereby Official Court the Official that the Court Reporter of Reporter 270th Judicial the 270th of the Judicial District District Court Court that took the that took notes the notes Motion to the Motion at the at Sell Real to Sell Real Property hearing on Property hearing October 10, on October 2014, 10, 2014, prepare aa Court prepare Reporter's record Court Reporter's record of hearing for such hearing of such purposes of for purposes of appeal. We appeal. request an We request estimate and an estimate will forward and will requested forward aa requested deposit. deposit. Sincerely, Sincerely, Joe Alfr Joe Alfred Jr. Izen, Jf\ Izen,* JAI:kC JAI:kc cc: cc: Eva Engelhart Eva Engelhart Joshual Wolfshol Joshual Wolfshol TANHEHCBV . DOR/TK1o7'| TANWEHC3Y.D0R/TK471 1 APPENDIX E Office of Harris County District Clerk - Chris Daniel Page 1 of 5 HCDistrictclerk.com WEST, WILLIAM G (CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE OF THE l2/26/2014 ESTATE 0 vs. TANGUY, PHILIPPE Cause: 201367779 CDI: 7 Court: 270 DOCUMENTS Number Document P05‘ D3” P35 Jdgm ~~~ 6361-3?W5\_ Certificate of Conference _g __ ER SIGNED GRANTING ENTRY OF TEMPORARY ORDERS __, _ ._,,__._______»__M_ W '2/“/20” I2/I6/20l4 ; 633668] I Proposed Order to Tumover Log Books‘Provide Access to Non-Exempt Airplane and to 12/03/2014 3 . Retain Gordon Cragg to Appraise the Airplane 4 ‘\ / Notice of Past Due Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Pursuant to Rule 297 Texas ‘ éylffié ll/24/2014 3 b‘4 «rs __ Rules of Civil Procedure (x V: 54:: O ‘” 63238l37 Proposed Order to Tumover Log Books and Provide Access to Non-Exempt Airplane and I ll l9/20l4 2 °’ ' ~ to Retain Gordon Cragg to Appraise the Airplane 63l53004 Defendants and Judgment Debtors. Philipe Tanguy,l3500 air Express. L.L.C.. and l3500 I I/l3/2014 ~~ Air Express. L.P.'S Response and Objection to the Reeeiver's Motion to Compel Tum Over Order of Non-Exempt Airplane and to Retain Gordon Cragg to Appraise and Sell the A ~~ ~~~~ ~ A ~ 63153005 Exhibit ll/I 3l20l4 6 ~~63153906 ~ ~~ Proposed Order I/I3/20 ~~~ _____ I ‘63l53007 Defendants and Judgment Debtors, Philippe Tanguy, l3500 Air Express. L.L.C., and ll/l3/2014 ~~ l3500 Air Express, L.P.'S Motion for Continuance ofTrial on Receiver's Motion to Compel Turn Over Order of Airplane and Claim for Turn Over Purported Distributions ~ ~~ ($2,085.? ~~~ 63I53008 Exhibit A llll3/2014 2 ~~~ ~ 63l53009 Exhibit B ll/l3/2014 2 Proposed Order I I/I3/20|4 2 ~ Affidavitof Defendant, Philippe Tanguy, ln Opposition to Receiver's Motions for ll/I3/20l4 9 Charging Order Against Debtor. Philippe Tanguy's Partnership and Membership Interests ~ and Motion to Compel Turn Over of Non-Exempt Airplane and to Retain Gordon Cragg to Appr 63169159 EXHIBITA ~~~ ~~ ~~~ -> ll/I3/ZOI4 l ~~ »> 63l69l60 EXHIBIT B II/I3/ZOI4 ~~ A> 63l69l6l EXHIBITC _________ ~ ll/l3/20l4 ~~ 63l203l9 Defendant-In-Intervention William G. Wests, Chapter 7 Trustee of Richard Davis Original ll/l0l20l4 Answer ~~~ 62996972 Defendants, Philippe Tanguy, 13500 Air express. L.L.C.. [3500 Air Express, and LPS l0/30/20l4 lntervenor. Ptre Holdings. L.P.S. Request for Findings of Fact and Conclusioons of Law ~~~ 62999297 notice of appeal I0/30/Z0l4 2 62856928 Second Amended Notice of Hearing l0/2ll20|4 2 62735373 Amended Notice of Hearing 10/ I3/ZOI4 2 62708047 Defendant and Plaintiff-in-lntervention‘s PTRE Holdings, L.P.‘S Ob_]ECll0n to Reeeiv—eT'sg“ I0/l0/20l4 5 ~ Request for Emergency Consideration and (Proposed) Third Amended Order to Sell Real Property at l7l4 Driscoll Street ~62708048 ~~~ ~ Proposed N" 0/ l 0/20] 4 %\ l I ORDER SGND GRANTING SALE or PROPERTY ~~ _.4—-— no/1'5/2_o‘14-) I9 ~~ Proposed Third Amended Order to sell property at l7l4 Driscoll St. I0/08/20I4 2 ~~ Exhibit C l0l08/20l4 I7 ~~ Supplemental Aflidavit to Motion to Sell Real Property of I714 Driscoll St. I0/08/2014 2 http://www.hcdist:rictclerk.com/edocs/public/CaseDetailsPrinting.aspx?Get=RPCzHNmB... 12/26/2014 ~~~62674331 _ ~ Office of Harris County District Clerk Exhibit A B - Chris Daniel __,, . _ , _ , _ ,_ ,,,__ ‘_ _, , . ... . —»-- ‘°’°3’2°"‘ '°’°3’Z°” Page 2 of 5 -~-~~--‘-7-s 9 3 62674332 Exhibit ~~ ~ 62674333 Exhibit C '0/W20“ '7 D '°’°3’2°'4 2 62674334 Exhibit 62674857~ Receiver's Motion to Compel Tumover ofNon-Exempt Airplane and to Retain Gordon 10/08/2014 4 Cragg to Appraise and sell the Airplane 62674858 Exhibit A '0/03/2°14 9 6267-4359 Affidavit 10/03/20"‘ 2 ~ 62674860 Exhibit B I0/08/2014 3 ~~62674861 Exhibit C I0/08/2014 I 62674862 PROPOSED ORDER TO COMPEL TURNOVER OF NON-EXEMPT AIRPLANE AND 10/08/2014 2 TO RETAIN GORDONCRAGG T0 APPRAISE AND SELL THE AIRPLANE 62674863 Notice or Hearing IOI08/20|4 2 62677691 Receiver's Motion for Charging Order against Debtor, Philipe Tnnguy's Partnership and 10/08/2014 Membership Interests 62677693 Exhibit A 10/08/2014 9 62677694 Affidavit 10/08/2014 2 62677696 Exhibit B 10/08/2014 3 ~ 62677697 Affidav it 10/08/2014 2 62677699 Exhibit C I0/08/2014 3 Exhibit D ~ 62677700 10/08/2014 3 l 62677701 Exhibit E ______,__ 10/08/2014 5 ; Order against Debtor, Phillippe Tanguy's Partnership and Membership 10/08/2014 3 Interests 62677705 Notice of Hearing 10/08/2014 2 ~~~ ~~~ ~ 62612274 Amended Notice of Hearing — 10/03/2014 2 ~~ ~ 2888 Request for Emergency consideration/hearing on the Motion T6 real Property at 1714 ~10/02/20 I 4 Driscoll St. ~~ ~~ 62597587 coun ofappeals for the first district oftexas at houslon order 5)” will H W H T ~~10/02/2014 6 ~~~~ 62597656 Exhibit A_I0-02-l4 no/02/2014 9 ~62597925 Exhibit B_I0~02-14 I0/02/20|4 3 ~62597974 caring I0/02/20|4 2 62597986 LettTanguy West HC Notice ofNonavaiIibity ofCoun 10/02/2014 1 625982 I 3 Exhibit C_10-02-I4 10/02/2014 14 625982 19 Exhibit D_l0-02-I4 I0/02/20|4 2 62598236 Proposed Amended Order to Sell Property at 1714 driscoll st. 10/02/2014 17 6 I 708522 Defendants’ Notice of Filing 07/24/2014 I 6 I 708523 Appellants, Philippe Tanguy. 13500 Air Express. L.L.C., and 13500 Air Express. L.P.'S 07/24/201 4 20 Emergency Motion for Temporary Order Staying Turnover and Receivership Proceeding Pursuant to T.R.A.P Rule 29.3 6 I 708525 Affidavit of Appellant. Philippe Tanguy. In Support of Appellants‘ Emergency Motion for 07/24/2014 6 Temporary Relief Pursuant to T.R.A.P Rule 29.3 61710028 Exhibit A 07/24/2014 14 61710030 Exhibit B 07/24/2014 3 61710031 Exhibit C 07/24/2014 22 61714077 Amdavil 07/24/2014 2 http://www.hcdistrictcIerk.com/edocs/public/CaseDetaiIsPrinting.aspx?Get=RPCzHNmB... 12/26/2014 ~~~ Chris Daniel Page 3 0f 5 Offtce of Harris County District Clerk - \ ‘ e177‘4os5 —"‘ 61714036 61714093 ~ INTERVENOR. HOLDINGS, L.P.'S. RESPONSE AND OBJECTION T0 1>'r1u-: RECEIVER. EVA ENGELHARTIS, MOTION TO SELL REAL PROPERTY AT DRISCOLL STREET AND PROPOSED ORDER ANDIOR AMENDED ORDER INTERVENOR. PTRE HOLDINGS. L.P.'S. RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO _ 1714 07/24/201 4 07/24/2014 07/24/2014 1 4 RECEIVER. EVA ENGELHARTIS. MOTION TO SELL REAL PROPERTY AT 1714 DRISCOLL STREET AND PROPOSED ORDER AND/OR AMENDED ORDER 61714094 Proposed Order 07/24/2014 1 61609174 NOTICE OF PAST DUE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 07/16/2014 2 PURSUANT TO RULE 297 TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 61553449 Proposed amended Order to sell property at 1714 driscoll st. 07/ I I/20I4 2 ~> 61553450 Exhibit C 07/ I I/2014 I4 61509888 Motion to Sell Real Property at 1714 Driscoll St. 07/09/2014 3 61509889 Exhibit A 07/09/2014 9 61509890 Exhibit B 07/09/20” 3 61509891 Exhibit C 07/09/2014 14 61509892 Exhibit D 07/09/2014 2 61509893 Proposed Order 07/09/2014 2 61509894 Notice of Hearing 07/09/2014 2 61758864 Court of Appeals First District (postcard) 07/07/2014 I 61611895 Court ofAppeals First District (postcard) 07/01/2014 I 61273901 DEFENDANTS, PHILIPPE TANGUY. 13,500 AIR EXPRESS L.L.C. AND I3,500 AIR 06/19/2014 I EXPRESS L.P.'S, REPLY TO RECEIVER'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO LEASE PROPERTY AT 1712 AND 1714 DRISCOLL STREET. HOUSTON. TEXAS FOR A TERM LONGER THAN MONTH-TO-MONTH 61273914 Defendants Philippe Tanguy, 13500 Air Express L.L.C And I3,500 Air Express L.PS 06/19/2014 5 Reply To Reciever Response To Defendants Motion To Lease Property At 1712 And 1714 Driscoll Street. Houston Texas For A Tenn Longers Then Month-To- Month 61449265 Court ofAppeals First District (general infonnation) 06/ 19/2014 4 61244676 Receiver's Response to Defendant's Motion to Lease Receivership Property for Longer 06/18/2014 4 than Month-to-Month Tenancy and Motion to Compel Turnover ofDocumenls and Property Pursuant to Court Order Dated May 30. 2014 61244682 Proposed Order to Compel Turnover 06/18/2014 2 61256949 DEFENDANTS. PHILIPPE TANGUY, 13500 AIR EXPRESS, L.L.C.. AND 13500 AIR 06/18/2014 2 EXPRESS, L.P. ‘S, REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 61261600 Tanguy West HC Notice oIAppeaI 06/18/2014 2 61168270 Filing Letter 06/12/2014 1 61168574 Defendant, Phillippe Tanguy's Motion for Coun Approval to Lease Receivership Property 06/11/2014 4 for Term Longer Than Month-to-Month Tenancy 61168575 Exhibit A 06/11/2014 1 61168576 Exhibit B 06/11/2014 3 61168577 Proposed Order 06/11/2014 1 61168578 Notice of Oral Hearing 06/ 1/2014 I 1 61228236 Court of Appeals First District (general information) 06/06/2014 5 61065884 Trial Coordinator Document 06/02/2014 8 60995173 DEFENDANTS, PHILIPPE TANGUY. 13500 AIR EXPRESS. L.L.C., AND 13500 AIR 05/30/2014 6 EXPRESS, L.P.'S OBJECTION TO RECEIVER'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO COMPEL TURNOVER OF NON-EXEMPT PROPERTY. TO RETAIN REAL ESTATE BROKER. AND TO SELL NON-EXEMPT PROPERTY http://www.hcdistrictclerk.com/edocs/public/CaseDetaiIsPrinting.aspx?Get=RPCzHNmB... 12/26/2014 Office of Harris County District Clerk - Chris Daniel Page 4 of 5 60995 I 74 EXHIBIT A 05/30/20l4 5 609951 75 PROPOSED ORDER 05/30/20|4 I 6I0|2360 ORDER SIGN ED COM PELLING PRODUCTION 05/30l20l4 2 Request Writ of Execution 05/27/2014 I 6 I 028332 Notice of Appeal 05/23/2014 2 60927975 Emergency Motion to Compel Turnover of Non-Exempt Real Properly. to Retain Real 05/23/20| 4 as 6093694 I Estate Broker and to Sell Non-Exempt Real Property 60936942 Exhibit A 05/23/20| 4 60936943 Affidavit 05/23/20| 4 NwN~o 60936944 Exhibit B 05/23/20 I4 60936945 Aflidavit 05/23/20| 4 60936946 Exhibit C 05/23/20 I4 I 60936947 Proposed Order 05/23/20 I4 60936948 Notice of Hearing 05/23/201 4 NNN 60708547 Bond of Receiver 05/07/20l 4 60708549 Oath of Receiver 05/07/20 I 4 I 606 I 8695 ORDER SETTING BOND SIGNED 04/25/20 4 I 8 ORDER SIGNED APPOINTING RECEIVER 04/25/20] 4 ORDER SIGNED GRANTING MOTION FOR TURNOVER 04/25/20I 4 605673 I 2 PETITION IN INTERVENTION OF PTRE HOLDINGS. LP. 04/24/2014 6 60487236 DEFENDANTS AND JUDGMENT DEBTORS, PHILIPPE TANGUY. I3500 AIR 04/2l/20I4 4 EXPRESS, L.L.C.. AND I3500 AIR EXPRESS. L.P.'S. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE TRIAL ON PLAINTIFF’ S APPLICATION FOR TURN OVER ORDER AND APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER AND MASTER 60487237 Proposed Order 04/2|/20l4 I 6048723l DEFENDANTS AND (PURPORTED) JUDGMENT DEBTOR, PHILIPPE TANGUY's, 04/|8I20I4 2 NOTICE OF DESIGNATION OF EXEMPT AND NON-EXEMPT ASSETS 60509764 DEFENDANTS AND JUDGMENT DEBTORS. PHILIPPE TANGUY, I3500 AIR 04/I7/2014 5 EXPRESS, L.L.C., AND I3500 AIR EXPRESS, L.P.S, FIRST AMENDED ANSWER AND ORIGINAL COUNTER-CLAIM 60245479 ORDER SIGNED SETTING HEARING 03/27/20 I 4 I 6008 I956 proposed order 03/20/20 14 I 60387480 MOTION TO RESET HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR TURNOVER AFTER 03/20/20 4 I 3 JUDGMENT AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF A RECEIVER AND MASTER 60387483 Proposed Order to show cause why appication for tumover aflerjudgment and for 03/20/20l4 I appointment of a receiver and master should not be granted 58734703 Defendants and Judgment Debtors Philippe Tanguy. I3500 Air Express, LLC and I3500 I2/I3/20I3 I Air Express. L.P.s Jury Demand 58734706 Defendant's and Judgment Debtors Jury Demand I2/I3/2013 I 587347I I Defendants and Judgment debtors Philippe Tanguy, I3500 Air Express LLC and I3500 Air I2/I3/2013 3 Express, LP's Motion for Refenal to Mediation 58734712 Proposed Order I2/I3/20l3 I [Text truncated at 120,000 characters. The full text is on the page linked above.] --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4040155. Public record. Not legal advice.