# Martha Barron v. Fernando Barron

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · August 2, 2016

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4021319

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** August 2, 2016
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4021319

## Opinion text

Opinion issued August 2, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-16-00175-CV
———————————
MARTHA BARRON, Appellant
V.
FERNANDO BARRON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 312th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 2012-27372

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Martha Barron has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for

purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE

ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West Supp. 2015); Fees Charged in

the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial
Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015).

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not

adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c)

(allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4021319. Public record. Not legal advice.