# United States v. Anthony Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 1, 2016

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4020442

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 1, 2016
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4020442

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6178

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:03-cr-00612-TSE-1)

Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 1, 2016

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Morris Rudolph Parker, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Anthony Brown appeals the district court’s February 3,

2016, order denying his motion for relief filed in his criminal

case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Brown, No. 1:03-cr-00612-TSE-1 (E.D.

Va. Feb. 3, 2016). We deny Brown’s motion for appointment of

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4020442. Public record. Not legal advice.