# Prophet Ronald Dwayne Whitfield v. Clear Lake Nissan and Santander Consumer USA, Inc.

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · July 7, 2016

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4014355

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** July 7, 2016
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4014355

## Opinion text

Opinion issued July 7, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-16-00207-CV
———————————
PROPHET RONALD DWAYNE WHITFIELD, Appellant
V.
CLEAR LAKE NISSAN AND SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC.,
Appellees

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2015-22666

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Prophet Ronald Dwayne Whitfield, proceeding pro se, has neither

paid the required filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208,

51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West Supp. 2015), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2015); Order,
Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and

Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158

(Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has neither paid nor made arrangements to

pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being

notified by the Court’s Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss for Want of

Prosecution, issued on April 26, 2016, that this appeal was subject to dismissal for

failure to pay the required fees, appellant did not adequately respond. See id. 5,

37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss all

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4014355. Public record. Not legal advice.