# Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge Authority

> Washington Supreme Court · April 26, 1943 · 17 Wash. 2d 591

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4002316

## Case

- **Full name:** Elbert M. Chandler, Appellant, v. Washington Toll Bridge Authority Et Al., Respondents
- **Court:** Washington Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 26, 1943
- **Citations:** 17 Wash. 2d 591; 137 P.2d 97
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Millard
- **Judges:** Beals, Millard, Simpson, Robinson, Grady
- **Cited by:** 125 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4002316

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- finding no contract implied in law because it related to an expressed contract plaintiff was operating under when performing services to which he based unjust enrichment claim

## Opinion text

Millard, J.
(dissenting)—If, as admitted by the demurrer, appellant provided necessary data respecting construction of the bridge, which information was accepted and used by respondents, the demurrer should have been overruled, whereupon respondents could have answered and on the issues thus framed appellant would have been required to sustain the burden of proving his allegations; therefore, I dissent.
July 16, 1943. Petition for rehearing stricken.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4002316. Public record. Not legal advice.