# Bank of California v. Clear Lake Lumber Co.

> Washington Supreme Court · February 10, 1928 · 146 Wash. 543

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3997704

## Case

- **Full name:** Bank of California, Respondent, v. Clear Lake Lumber Company Et Al., Appellants
- **Court:** Washington Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 10, 1928
- **Citations:** 146 Wash. 543; 264 P. 705; 1928 Wash. LEXIS 796
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Tolman
- **Judges:** French, Tolman
- **Cited by:** 15 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3997704

## Opinion text

Tolman, J.
(dissenting) — I concur, except as to that part which directs a judgment in favor of the Northern Pacific R. Co. The judgment of the trial court fully
*569
protected the Northern Pacific R. Co., in case it incurred expense in the retaking of the property, and in my opinion it is entitled to nothing more.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3997704. Public record. Not legal advice.