# McPherson v. McPherson

> Washington Supreme Court · August 30, 1939 · 200 Wash. 365

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3997416

## Case

- **Full name:** Edith Elizabeth McPherson, Respondent, v. James Franklin McPherson, Appellant
- **Court:** Washington Supreme Court
- **Decided:** August 30, 1939
- **Citations:** 200 Wash. 365; 93 P.2d 428
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Blake
- **Judges:** Jeffers, Blake
- **Cited by:** 17 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3997416

## Opinion text

Blake, C. J.
(dissenting) — The statute, Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 988 [P. C. § 7507] (Laws of 1933, p. 432, § 1), makes the interlocutory order “final and conclusive upon the parties” in so far as it affects “the custody, management and division of property.” An interlocutory order is, in this respect, a final decree and was so held to be in
Masterson v. Ogden,
78 Wash. 644 , 139 Pac. 654 , Ann. Cas. 1914D, 885.
I dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3997416. Public record. Not legal advice.