# Twohy v. Slate Creek Mining Co.

> Washington Supreme Court · October 25, 1948 · 31 Wash. 2d 668

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3994933

## Case

- **Full name:** Edmund v. Twohy, as Executor, Et Al., Respondents and Cross-Appellants, v. Slate Creek Mining Company, Appellant, Harry P. Kramer, Respondent
- **Court:** Washington Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 25, 1948
- **Citations:** 31 Wash. 2d 668; 198 P.2d 832; 1948 Wash. LEXIS 301
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Millard
- **Judges:** Schwellenbach, Millard, Hill
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3994933

## Opinion text

Millard, J.
(dissenting) — The jury found — that advisory verdict was accepted by the trial court — that Mr. Funkhouser’s story of the transactions was true and disbelieved the contrary version by Mr. Kramer. The trial court and jury were in a better position than this court to pass on the facts, and we should respect their determination of the question of fact presented. The judgment should be affirmed on mining company’s appeal and reversed on plaintiff’s cross-appeal.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3994933. Public record. Not legal advice.