# Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.

> Washington Supreme Court · December 7, 1936 · 188 Wash. 396

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3994515

## Case

- **Full name:** C. A. Blanchard Et Al., Respondents, v. Golden Age Brewing Company Et Al., Defendants, Harry Dail, Appellant
- **Court:** Washington Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 7, 1936
- **Citations:** 188 Wash. 396; 63 P.2d 397; 1936 Wash. LEXIS 683
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Millabd
- **Judges:** Millabd, Steinert, Tolman, Blake, Beals
- **Cited by:** 113 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3994515

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- reversing a trial court order imposing surgery to treat malignant cancer of the larynx when the IP expressed a preference for radiation treatment
- rejecting legislative attempt to abolish or abridge the power of the superior court to issue injunctions

## Opinion text

Millabd, C. J.
(dissenting) — In
Casco Co. v. Thurston County,
163 Wash. 666 , 2 P. (2d) 677 , was presented the question whether it was an encroachment upon the constitutional powers of the courts for the legislature to provide that injunctions shall not be issued except in certain cases to restrain the collection of any tax. We there held — what we there said can not lessen the force of that holding — that the procedure sought to be established did not constitute an unlawful encroachment upon the powers and functions of the judiciary as determined by the constitution. Clearly, the rule there announced is applicable in the-ease at bar, where the same question in principle confronts us. Until that case is overruled, I am bound thereby. There is no reason why the rule of
stare decisis
should not obtain in the case at bar as in any other case. It follows that I can not do otherwise than dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3994515. Public record. Not legal advice.
