# Grandview Inland Fruit Co. v. Hartford Fire Insurance

> Washington Supreme Court · March 29, 1937 · 189 Wash. 590

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3994002

## Case

- **Full name:** Grandview Inland Fruit Company, Appellant, v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Respondent
- **Court:** Washington Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 29, 1937
- **Citations:** 189 Wash. 590; 66 P.2d 827; 109 A.L.R. 1472; 1937 Wash. LEXIS 532
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Tolman
- **Judges:** Millard, Tolman
- **Cited by:** 10 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3994002

## Opinion text

Tolman, J.
(dissenting) — In my judgment, this case cannot be distinguished from the case of
Markham Shingle Co. v. Royal Ins. Co.,
106 Wash. 309 , 179 Pac. 799 ; and since I am unwilling to overrule that case, I am disposed to affirm the judgment in this case.
Main, J., concurs with Tolman, J.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3994002. Public record. Not legal advice.