# Collins v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · June 21, 1922 · 92 Tex. Crim. 388

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3981569

## Case

- **Full name:** A. H. Collins v. the State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** June 21, 1922
- **Citations:** 92 Tex. Crim. 388; 244 S.W. 153; 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 486
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Morrow
- **Judges:** Lattimore, Morrow
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3981569

## Opinion text

on rehearing.
October 18, 1922.
MORROW, Presiding Judge
(dissenting). — Appellant insists that tested by the rules governing circumstantial evidence the facts do not identify the ten dollars which appellant received from E. A. Brown as a part of the money for which he failed to account, and it being conceded that his conviction rests upon the appropriation of the particular ten dollars mentioned, a reversal should result. In the opinion of the writer, this view should prevail. The other members of the court, however, maintain that the evidence is sufficient to establish this essential fact and that the motion should be overruled. It is so ordered.
Overruled.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3981569. Public record. Not legal advice.