# Wichita Royalty Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Wichita Falls

> Court of Appeals of Texas · June 10, 1933 · 74 S.W.2d 661

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3980122

## Case

- **Full name:** WICHITA ROYALTY CO. Et Al. v. CITY NAT. BANK OF WICHITA FALLS
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** June 10, 1933
- **Citations:** 74 S.W.2d 661; 1933 Tex. App. LEXIS 1407
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum
- **Judges:** Conner, Dunkdin, Dunklin, Lattimore, Power
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3980122

## Opinion text

On Rehearing.
This cause is before the court on motion for rehearing. I have carefully reviewed the evidence. It is my judgment that competent evidence evincing fraud and collusion was not proven sufficient to form a basis for a jury issue. The evidence must be of sufficient force to register more than a suspicion or surmise.
It is my opinion further that, under the facts, appellants' cross-action was barred by limitation.
Without further restating the case or the law applicable thereto, I approve the reasoning and conclusion of Judge DUNKLIN in his original opinion, and concur in the conclusion reached by him that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3980122. Public record. Not legal advice.