# United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Clifton

> Court of Appeals of Texas · February 10, 1923 · 250 S.W. 1056

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3977465

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO. v. CLIFTON Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** February 10, 1923
- **Citations:** 250 S.W. 1056
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum by Buck
- **Judges:** Buck, Conner
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3977465

## Opinion text

On Motion for Rehearing.
BUCK, J.
Our attention is called to an error in the original opinion of the majority. In Pilgrim v. Dukes, 24 Tex. 384 , the extension of time seems to have been given after judgment and not before, as stated. The inaccuracy makes no difference in the conclusion reached by the majority.' With a full consciousness of the able dissenting opinion by Chief Justice CONNER, and also the able brief and motion for rehearing filed by appellant, the majority are still of the opinion that their conclusions reached on original hearing are correct.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.
CONNER, C. J., dissenting as before.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3977465. Public record. Not legal advice.