# Sandoval v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · November 17, 1926 · 106 Tex. Crim. 468

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3976666

## Case

- **Full name:** F. Sandoval v. the State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** November 17, 1926
- **Citations:** 106 Tex. Crim. 468; 293 S.W. 168; 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 678
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Hawkins, Morrow
- **Cited by:** 12 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3976666

## Opinion text

The record before us shows an indictment charging appellant with transporting intoxicating liquor, and the verdict of a jury finding him guilty and assessing his punishment at one year in the penitentiary. If judgment was ever entered on the verdict, or if sentence was ever passed on appellant, the record fails to show it. Final judgment is a prerequisite to appeal. Washington v. State, 91 Tex.Crim. Rep., 240 S.W. 542 . See also notes under Art. 796, Vernon's Ann. C. C. P., Vol. 3 (1925). The record contains a motion for new trial but fails to show that it was ever acted on by the court or that notice of appeal was given. Art. 827, C. C. P. (1925); Griffin v. State, 174 S.W. 351 ; Parish v. State, 177 S.W. 93 ; Haynie v. State, 92 Tex.Crim. Rep.; 241 S.W. 478 .
The appeal must be dismissed.
Dismissed.
ON APPLICATION FOR CERTIORARI.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3976666. Public record. Not legal advice.