# Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Owens

> Court of Appeals of Texas · October 28, 1932 · 54 S.W.2d 848

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3973826

## Case

- **Full name:** TEXAS & N. O. R. CO. v. OWENS Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** October 28, 1932
- **Citations:** 54 S.W.2d 848
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum by O'Quinn
- **Judges:** Lawhon, O'Quinn
- **Cited by:** 21 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3973826

## Opinion text

O’QUINN, J.
I dissent from the reversal of this case. I think the judgment should be affirmed. The error upon which the reversal is based (the use of the word “casual” in the court’s charge) was harmless, and, in my opinion, was not calculated to, nor did it, in any manner influence tíie finding of the verdict by the jury.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3973826. Public record. Not legal advice.