# Cochran v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · June 27, 1934 · 126 Tex. Crim. 568

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3972502

## Case

- **Full name:** Brice Cochran v. the State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** June 27, 1934
- **Citations:** 126 Tex. Crim. 568; 73 S.W.2d 532; 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 782
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Morrow
- **Judges:** Lattimoke, Morrow
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3972502

## Opinion text

MORROW, Presiding Judge
(Concurring). — Concurring in the reversal of the judgment of conviction, the writer is not fully satisfied that Blanche Morgan was not an accomplice witness as a matter of law. Among the authorities which are re
*572
garded as bearing upon the subject is Luck v. State, 67 S. W. (2d) 302 .
The writer has no hesitancy in concurring in the reversal of the judgment of conviction for the fault in the charge stated in the foregoing opinion written by Judge Lattimore.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3972502. Public record. Not legal advice.
