# Bizzell v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · December 10, 1913 · 72 Tex. Crim. 442

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3969306

## Case

- **Full name:** Wiley Bizzell v. the State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** December 10, 1913
- **Citations:** 72 Tex. Crim. 442; 162 S.W. 861; 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 659
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent
- **Judges:** Davidson, Harper, Prendergast
- **Cited by:** 11 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3969306

## Opinion text

I do not care to dissent further than to say I am inclined to believe that this case is distinguishable from Miller's case, 47 Tex. Crim. 329 , by reason of the change in the law by Act of 1907, wherein it is required that all parties claiming exemption from jury service must file their affidavits with the clerk before convening of court, otherwise the court can not excuse them. *Page 449
ON REHEARING. January 14, 1914.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3969306. Public record. Not legal advice.