# Etheridge v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · February 10, 1915 · 76 Tex. Crim. 198

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3967872

## Case

- **Full name:** Lee Etheridge v. the State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** February 10, 1915
- **Citations:** 76 Tex. Crim. 198; 173 S.W. 1031; 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 333
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum
- **Judges:** Davidson, Harper, Prendergast
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3967872

## Opinion text

This opinion it in direct conflict with the cases of Etheridge v. State, Nos. 3364 and 3365, recently decided, in which Judge Harper concurred and Presiding Judge Prendergast dissented. Concurring in that case Judge Harper cites cases showing want of jurisdiction in County Court where no information had been filed. That the County Court was without jurisdiction is not debatable under the Constitution, statutes and decisions. I may write later and collate *Page 209
authorities, but it would be of no value if what has been written is to be ignored. We can not now tell what a day may bring forth.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3967872. Public record. Not legal advice.