# Odom v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · June 12, 1935 · 129 Tex. Crim. 227

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3964573

## Case

- **Full name:** L. F. Odom v. the State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** June 12, 1935
- **Citations:** 129 Tex. Crim. 227; 86 S.W.2d 225; 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 423
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum by Morrow
- **Judges:** Lattimore, Morrow
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3964573

## Opinion text

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
A review of the record in the light of the motion for rehearing leaves us of the opinion that the diligence to secure the absent testimony was not sufficient. Deeming the proper disposition of the case to have been made on the original hearing, the motion for rehearing is overruled.
Overruled.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3964573. Public record. Not legal advice.