# Meek v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · October 22, 1913 · 71 Tex. Crim. 433

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3960431

## Case

- **Full name:** James Meek v. the State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** October 22, 1913
- **Citations:** 71 Tex. Crim. 433; 160 S.W. 698; 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 480
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum
- **Judges:** Davidson, Prendergast
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3960431

## Opinion text

I do not believe the judgment and sentence against the principal were admissible in evidence in the case. I place *Page 439
this qualification as to my views so as not to agree to that question. The evidence was admitted without objection, but it occurs to me that the opinion indicates it was proper testimony. I do not so believe.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3960431. Public record. Not legal advice.