# Williams v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · December 20, 1922 · 95 Tex. Crim. 354

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3960417

## Case

- **Full name:** Lum Williams v. the State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** December 20, 1922
- **Citations:** 95 Tex. Crim. 354; 254 S.W. 568; 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 729
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum
- **Judges:** Hawkins, Lattimore, Morrow
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3960417

## Opinion text

We declined to consider appellant's bill of exception number four because in our judgment the qualification appended thereto by the trial court indicated no error committed. The correctness of our opinion in that respect is challenged upon the motion for rehearing. Bill of exception number four is to the refusal of the trial judge to submit a special charge withdrawing from the jury's consideration certain testimony of appellant's wife elicited upon cross-examination. We have again examined the bill and the trial judge's qualification thereto. We remain of the opinion that the explanation of the trial judge, — which we must accept as true it having been accepted by appellant as a part of his bill, — made it unnecessary to give the special charge.
The motion for rehearing will therefore be overruled.
Overruled.
ON REHEARING. December 17, 1923.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3960417. Public record. Not legal advice.