# Bowen v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · November 2, 1910 · 60 Tex. Crim. 595

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3958191

## Case

- **Full name:** John Bowen v. the State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** November 2, 1910
- **Citations:** 60 Tex. Crim. 595; 133 S.W. 256; 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 571
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by McCORD
- **Judges:** McCORD, Ramsey
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3958191

## Opinion text

McCORD, Judge
(dissenting). — I do not agree with the majority of the court that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. I believe that the conduct of the defendant, his association with Pro-best and Marvin, the coming together of these three parties shortly after the robbery, the lavish display of money by defendant, all to my mind show identification of defendant as one of the guilty parties. I am convinced the evidence is sufficient and therefore enter my dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3958191. Public record. Not legal advice.