# Bingham v. Johnson

> Court of Appeals of Texas · April 26, 1928 · 7 S.W.2d 665

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3955600

## Case

- **Full name:** Bingham v. Johnson.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** April 26, 1928
- **Citations:** 7 S.W.2d 665; 1928 Tex. App. LEXIS 583
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent
- **Judges:** Graves, Pheasants, Pleasants
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3955600

## Opinion text

I dissent, believing the evidence was sufficient to sustain, not only the $500 recovery for lost profits in the operation of the gin, but also the $1,500 of damage to the plant, without taking into consideration the articles or appliances which were shown not to have been damaged.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3955600. Public record. Not legal advice.